Dendritic Cell Differentiation Regulate GM-CSF or Flt3 Ligand ...

7 downloads 27 Views 696KB Size Report
Allophycocyanin-anti-c-kit/CD117 (2B8), PE-anti-CD135/Flt3 (A2F. 10.1), and FITC-anti-Sca-1 (D7) were obtained from BD Biosciences. PE- anti-CD127/IL-7Rα ...
The Journal of Immunology

Estradiol Acts Directly on Bone Marrow Myeloid Progenitors to Differentially Regulate GM-CSF or Flt3 Ligand-Mediated Dendritic Cell Differentiation1 Esther Carreras,* Sean Turner,* Vladislava Paharkova-Vatchkova,2† Allen Mao,† Christopher Dascher,‡ and Susan Kovats3* Estrogen receptor (ER) ligands modulate hemopoiesis and immunity in the normal state, during autoimmunity, and after infection or trauma. Dendritic cells (DC) are critical for initiation of innate and adaptive immune responses. We demonstrate, using cytokine-driven culture models of DC differentiation, that 17-␤-estradiol exerts opposing effects on differentiation mediated by GM-CSF and Flt3 ligand, the two cytokines that regulate DC differentiation in vivo. We also show that estradiol acts on the same highly purified Flt3ⴙ myeloid progenitors (MP) to differentially regulate the DC differentiation in each model. In GM-CSFsupplemented cultures initiated from MP, physiological amounts of estradiol promoted differentiation of Langerhans-like DC. Conversely, in Flt3 ligand-supplemented cultures initiated from the same MP, estradiol inhibited cell survival in a dose-dependent manner, thereby decreasing the yield of plasmacytoid and conventional myeloid and lymphoid DC. Experiments with bone marrow cells from ER-deficient mice and the ER antagonist ICI182,780 showed that estradiol acted primarily via ER␣ to regulate DC differentiation. Thus, depending on the cytokine environment, pathways of ER signaling and cytokine receptor signaling can differentially interact in the same Flt3ⴙ MP to regulate DC development. Because the Flt3 ligand-mediated differentiation pathway is important during homeostasis, and GM-CSF-mediated pathways are increased by inflammation, our data suggest that endogenous or pharmacological ER ligands may differentially affect DC development during homeostasis and disease, with consequent effects on DC-mediated immunity. The Journal of Immunology, 2008, 180: 727–738.

A

ntigen-specific T cell responses depend on the function of dendritic cells (DC)4 (1). DC initiate innate immune responses via their ability to sense invariant pathogen molecules and secrete inflammatory cytokines. After activation and Ag exposure, DC display high levels of MHC-bound Ags and costimulatory molecules and produce cytokines, leading to the activation and differentiation of naive T cells during adaptive immunity. DC also have a role in immunological tolerance to self-Ags and have been implicated in initiation of autoreactive T cell responses in murine autoimmune disease models and in humans (2–

*Arthritis and Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104; †Division of Immunology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010; and ‡Center for Immunobiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029 Received for publication August 23, 2007. Accepted for publication October 31, 2007. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 1 This work was supported by a grant from the Health Research Program of the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology. 2 Current address: Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. 3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Susan Kovats, Arthritis and Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 NE 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73104. E-mail address: [email protected] 4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; ER, estrogen receptor; SERM, selective ER modulator; E2, 17-␤-estradiol; BM, bone marrow; LC, Langerhans cell; FL, flt3 ligand; MP, myeloid progenitor; CMP, common MP; LP, lymphoid progenitor; CLP, common LP; int, intermediate; SA, streptavidin; FSC, forward scatter; SSC, side scatter; MHCII, MHC class II; QRT PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; GMP, granulocyte/monocyte progenitor; PDC, plasmacytoid DC; MDC, myeloid DC; LDC, lymphoid DC; ELP, early lymphoid progenitor.

Copyright © 2008 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. 0022-1767/08/$2.00 www.jimmunol.org

4). Dysregulated cytokine networks involving DC play a role in autoimmunity, particularly in diseases that preferentially affect women such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (4). Thus, it is of clinical interest to identify and understand how sex-based differences, including sex hormones, influence the development and function of DC. Estrogens are regulators of growth, differentiation, survival, or function in many cell types and act by binding two forms of estrogen receptor (ER), ␣ or ␤ (5, 6). In addition to endogenous estrogens, ER ligands include pharmacological agents such as the selective ER modulators (SERM) tamoxifen and raloxifene used for prevention or treatment of breast cancer and osteoporosis (7), phytoestrogens such as the soy isoflavones (8), and environmental endocrine disruptors such as the industrial chemical bisphenol A used in manufacture of plastics (9). Ligand-bound nuclear ER dimers function as transcription factors (10). Ligation of one or both ER may lead to disparate patterns of gene expression in different cell types, depending on ligand form and concentration, the relative cellular expression of the two ER, the relative levels of transcription coactivators or corepressors, and the nature of ERdependent promoter regulatory sequences (11, 12). SERM have cell type-specific agonist or antagonist effects, depending on these parameters. ER also mediate rapid signaling events in cooperation with growth factor or cytokine receptors (13). Via these ER-mediated mechanisms, estrogens act to modulate the development or severity of human diseases affecting many organ systems, including the immune system (14). Sex biases in incidence of autoimmune disease, recovery from sepsis and trauma, and immunity to pathogens have been observed in humans and rodent models (reviewed in Ref. 15). Progenitors and mature cells of the immune system express ER and androgen receptors (16), suggesting that sex hormones can directly modulate

728 the development or function of immune cells, although the mechanisms by which this might occur are not completely understood. Studies of immune responses in the normal state, during autoimmunity and after infection or trauma, indicate that ER ligands modulate innate and adaptive immunity and hemopoiesis (9, 17–23). Hemopoietic progenitor numbers, lymphopoiesis, and plasmacytoid DC differentiation were modulated by variation in estrogen levels in pregnant, ovariectomized or 17-␤-estradiol (E2) treated mice (20, 24 –26). Multiple reports show that normal or manipulated systemic estrogen variation alters APC numbers or function in vivo or in vitro (reviewed in Ref. 27). Our previous work has shown that E2 acts via ER␣ on murine bone marrow (BM) cells to promote the GM-CSF-mediated development of functional myeloid DC with characteristics of Langerhans cells (LC) (28, 29). The SERM tamoxifen and raloxifene inhibit this DC differentiation (30). Multiple DC subsets in vivo have been distinguished on the basis of location, surface markers, function and migratory capacity, and whether they are present in steady-state conditions or develop as a consequence of inflammation or infection (31, 32). The cytokines Flt3 ligand (FL) and GM-CSF mediate DC differentiation in vitro and in vivo (33–38). FL-mediated differentiation of the DC subsets in lymphoid organs appears to predominate during homeostasis. In contrast, GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation is likely to be most important in vivo as GM-CSF levels rise during inflammation resulting from infection, injury, or autoimmunity (39). Notably, elevated GM-CSF levels have been associated with the inflammation and DC dysregulation in SLE (4, 40). In vivo, all splenic DC subsets and epidermal LC can arise from the flt3⫹ fractions of the common myeloid progenitor (CMP; Lin⫺c-kit⫹Sca-1⫺CD34⫹Fc␥RlowIL-7R␣⫺) and the common lymphoid progenitor (CLP; Lin⫺c-kit⫹Sca-1lowIL-7R␣⫹) (41– 44). A Lin⫺c-kit⫹CD11b⫺CX3CR1⫹ clonogenic progenitor specific for macrophages, DC, and monocytes (45) and CD31⫹Ly6C⫹ undifferentiated myeloid blasts (46) also yield myeloid DC in response to GM-CSF. Culture models in which DC differentiation is driven by FL or GM-CSF lead to the development of DC subsets similar to those found in lymphoid organs and skin. BM cells cultured with FL generate DC that are functionally and phenotypically equivalent to splenic conventional myeloid (CD11c⫹B220⫺ CD11b⫹), lymphoid (CD11c⫹B220⫺CD11blow/⫺), and plasmacytoid (CD11c⫹B220⫹) DC (47). In contrast, BM cells cultured with GM-CSF yield myeloid (CD11c⫹CD11b⫹) DC including a subset with characteristic features of LC (CD11c⫹CD11bint Ly6C⫺) (29, 48). Because the relative importance of the GM-CSF- and FL-mediated DC differentiation pathways may vary in vivo during homeostasis and inflammation, we studied the impact of ER signaling on these two developmental pathways. To determine a direct effect of ER ligands on DC differentiation from defined hemopoietic progenitors, we isolated MP from murine BM and incubated them with agonist or antagonist ER ligands in the cytokine-driven culture models that support DC differentiation. Physiological amounts of estradiol acted directly on highly purified flt3⫹ MP to promote GM-CSF-mediated differentiation of myeloid DC, which we previously showed have features of LC (29). In contrast, estradiol significantly inhibited FL-mediated DC differentiation from flt3⫹ MP by decreasing numbers of viable cells and differentiated DC. Experiments with the ER antagonist ICI182,780 and BM cells from ER-deficient mice showed that estradiol mediates its effects primarily via ER␣ in these models. Our data show that depending on the cytokine environment, pathways of ER signaling and cytokine receptor signaling can differentially interact in the same flt3⫹ MP to regulate DC development. Thus, by modulating DC differ-

ESTRADIOL REGULATES DC DIFFERENTIATION entiation in vivo, endogenous estrogens or systemic SERM exposure are likely to regulate DC-mediated immune responses during infection, tumor immunity, or autoimmunity.

Materials and Methods Mice Female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute Animal Production Program and were used at 8 –12 wk of age. Mice expressing enhanced GFP at the locus of the CX3CR1 gene (CX3CR1gfp/gfp) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory, and female CX3CR1gfp/⫹ mice generated by breeding with C57BL/6 mice. Homozygous ER␣- or ER␤-deficient (B6.129-Esr1tm1KskN10 or B6.129-Esr2tm1KskN9) female mice were purchased from Taconic Farms. Mice were housed in the pathogen-free barrier facility of the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (OMRF) Laboratory Animal Resource Center. The OMRF Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved the studies.

Cell culture reagents Regular medium was RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS (Omega Scientific), 2 mM glutamine, 100 U penicillin/0.1 mg streptomycin/ml, 10 mM HEPES buffer, 50 ␮M 2-ME, and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. Hormone-deficient medium was RPMI 1640 lacking phenol red, with 10% charcoal-dextrantreated FCS (Omega Scientific) and the other additives listed for regular medium. Charcoal-dextran stripping of FCS extracts steroid hormones and reduces their levels below the detection limits of a standard radioimmunoassay (49). Phenol red was omitted because it has weak estrogenic activity at the concentration that is present in RPMI 1640 medium (50). E2 in ethanol or water soluble (cyclodextrin encapsulated) E2 (Sigma-Aldrich) was diluted into the hormone-deficient medium cultures at varying concentrations. ICI182,780 (Tocris Bioscience) in DMSO was diluted into regular medium cultures to 100 nM. Addition of ethanol or DMSO alone was always included as a vehicle control and did not change DC differentiation or surface marker expression compared with untreated cultures.

Cell sorting Allophycocyanin-anti-c-kit/CD117 (2B8), PE-anti-CD135/Flt3 (A2F 10.1), and FITC-anti-Sca-1 (D7) were obtained from BD Biosciences. PEanti-CD127/IL-7R␣ (A7R34) and PE-Cy5-anti-Sca-1 (D7) were obtained from eBioscience. BM cells were isolated from the spines of four to eight female C57BL/6 mice, washed with PBS containing 2% charcoal-dextrantreated FCS. FcRs were blocked with anti-CD16/32 mAb (2.4G2). Cells bound by biotinylated mAb directed at lineage markers (CD3␧, CD11b, CD45R/B220, Ly-6G/Ly-6C(Gr-1), TER-119) were removed with streptavidin (SA)-conjugated immunomagnetic beads (BD Biosciences). The Lin⫺c-kit⫹flt3⫹ population, MP (Lin⫺c-kithighSca-1⫺IL-7R␣⫺), MP-flt3⫹ (Lin⫺c-kithighSca-1⫺flt3⫹), MP-CX3CRI⫹ (Lin⫺c-kit⫹sca-1⫺IL-7R␣⫺ CX3CR1⫹/gfp), and LSK (Lin⫺c-kithighSca-1⫹IL7R␣⫺) were isolated by again incubating the enriched Lin⫺ cells with anti-CD16/32 and the mixture of biotin-conjugated mAb to lineage markers along with mAb to the desired progenitor markers; biotin-labeled mAbs were detected with SAFITC or SA-allophycocyanin-Cy7. Cells were sorted on a FACSARIA machine (BD Biosciences). In most experiments, postsort analyses indicated ⬎90% purity.

DC cultures When cultures were started from isolated hemopoietic progenitors, to deplete ER-bound E2 acquired in vivo, cells were incubated 1 day without E2 and cytokines in deficient medium before addition of GM-CSF. GM-CSFdriven DC differentiation cultures were set up using total BM cells, including red cells (5 ⫻ 105 cell/ml) as described (28, 51). Conditioned medium (3.3% v/v) from J558L cells transfected with the murine GM-CSF gene was used as a source of GM-CSF (52). MP, MP-CX3CR1⫹, MP-flt3⫹ were plated at ⬃10,000, 6,000, and 1,000 cell/ml, respectively. Cells were harvested on day 7 and analyzed by flow cytometry for DC surface markers. In the FL-driven culture model, DC were generated from total BM or isolated MP in cultures supplemented with FL-IgGFc (400 ng/ml) (47). rFlt3L-IgGFc fusion protein was prepared as described (53). In initial experiments, similar results were obtained with rFL (PeproTech). Total BM cells after red cell blood lysis were cultured at 1–3 ⫻ 106/ml in medium containing FL-Ig at 400 ng/ml. MP and MP-flt3⫹ cells were cultured at ⬃1.8 ⫻ 105 and ⬃1.8 ⫻ 104 cells/ml, respectively. Cultures were harvested on days 7–9, counted, and analyzed by flow cytometry. DC were activated by incubation for 16 h with CpG-A oligodeoxynucleotides (10 ␮g/ml) or bacterial LPS (0.1 ␮g/ml). DC also were generated from LSK (⬃2000 cells/ml), MP (⬃4000 cells/ml), and MP-flt3⫹ (⬃1000 cells/ml) in

The Journal of Immunology cultures supplemented with both GM-CSF (3.3% J558-conditioned medium v/v) and FL-Ig (400 ng/ml) for 7 days.

Flow cytometric analysis of DC Cells harvested from cytokine-driven DC differentiation cultures were washed and preincubated with anti-CD16/32, and labeled with optimally titered mAbs in FACS buffer (PBS, 5% newborn calf serum, 0.1% sodium azide). Fluorochrome- or biotin-labeled mAbs specific for CD11c (HL3), CD11b (M1/70), B220 (RA3-6B2), CD24 (M1/69), Ly6C (AL-21) were obtained from BD Biosciences. PE-labeled mAbs specific for CD40 (1C10), CD86 (GL1), and MHC class II (MHCII; M5/114.15.2) were obtained from eBioscience. Anti-PDCA-1 (JF05-1C.4.1) was obtained from Miltenyi Biotech. PE- or FITC-conjugated SA was used to detect the biotinylated mAb. Samples were run on a FACSCalibur or LSRII instrument and analyzed with FlowJo software.

Real-time PCR analysis Total RNA was purified using TRIzol (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and a RNeasy spin column (Qiagen) and treated with RNase-free DNase (Promega). Samples were converted to cDNA with an anchored oligo dT22 primer and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies). cDNAs and primers were mixed with RT2Real-Time SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Superarray Bioscience); PCR was performed using an ABI7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). PCR conditions were 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C with 40 cycles. Esr1 (ER␣) and Esr2 (ER␤) primers were purchased from Qiagen (sequence is proprietary) and ␤-actin primers were: forward primer GGCCCAGAGCAAGAGAGGTA, reverse primer GGTTGGCCTTAGGGTTCAGG (54).

Statistical analyses Prism version 4.0 (GraphPad) or Excel (Microsoft) software was used for statistical analyses. Results are expressed as the mean ⫾ SD or mean ⫾ SEM. The significance of the differences between two means was calculated by an unpaired Student t test with either equal or unequal variances. Differences were considered significant if p ⬍ 0.05.

Results Estradiol decreases FL-mediated DC differentiation In vivo and in culture models, DC differentiation is mediated by either FL or GM-CSF. Previously, we showed that E2 promotes GM-CSF-mediated myeloid DC and LC differentiation in cultures initiated from total BM cells; E2 preferentially increased the numbers of functional CD11bintLy6C⫺langerin⫹ DC, although numbers of CD11bhighLy6C⫹ DC also were increased (28, 29). To determine whether E2 also regulates DC differentiation mediated by FL, we used the FL-driven culture model, which leads to plasmacytoid (PDC; CD11c⫹B220⫹), and “conventional” myeloid (MDC; CD11c⫹B220⫺CD11b⫹) and lymphoid (LDC; CD11c⫹ B220⫺CD11blow/⫺) DC subsets that are phenotypically and functionally similar to the major splenic DC subsets (47, 55). Total BM cells (after red cell lysis) were cultured with vehicle (EtOH) or E2 (1 nM) in “hormone-deficient” medium in which the basal concentration of ER ligands is very low due to use of steroid-depleted FCS and RPMI 1640 lacking the weak ER agonist phenol red (50, 56). We determined the extent of differentiation of each DC subset after 8 days in the absence or presence of E2 based on hemocytometer cell counts and the cellular expression of the surface markers CD11c, CD11b, and B220; in some experiments, expression of MHCII, PDCA-1, and CD24 also was determined. The DC that differentiated in these cultures could be divided into PDC, MDC, and LDC as shown in a representative experiment (Fig. 1A). In some experiments, PDC also were identified as PDCA-1⫹, MDC also were identified as CD24lowPDCA-1⫺, and LDC also were identified as CD24highPDCA-1⫺ (data not shown). Most notably, addition of E2 significantly reduced the number of viable cells as assessed by the hemocytometer count and on forward scatter (FSC) vs side scatter (SSC) plots (Fig. 1, A and B). Within this viable cell gate, the three DC subsets were present in both cultures, although the relative percentage of DC was greater in the cultures

729 containing E2 (63 vs 49% in this example), and within the conventional DC fraction, the relative percentage of CD11b⫹ MDC was greater in the presence of E2 (Fig. 1A). However, the numbers of each DC subset were reduced, with the most profound effect on PDC and LDC (Fig. 1B). The CD11c⫹ DC present in FL-driven cultures displayed low levels of surface CD40 and CD86 that are characteristic of immature/resting DC, while MDC displayed higher levels of MHCII than PDC or LDC (Fig. 1C and data not shown). DC differentiated without or with E2 were functionally competent because each increased surface CD40, CD86, and MHCII in response to the activating TLR ligands unmethylated CpG-A oligodeoxynucleotides and bacterial LPS (Fig. 1C and data not shown). A greater percentage of the conventional DC that differentiated in the presence of E2 achieved the highest level of CD40, CD86, and MHCII, while PDC expression of MHCII, CD40, and CD86 after activation did not differ significantly in the presence or absence of E2. In sum, these data show that in FLdriven differentiation cultures, E2 profoundly decreases viability of cells, leading to decreased numbers of functional DC and altering the ratio of the two conventional DC subsets. Estradiol differentially modulates FL- and GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation at the same threshold concentration The ER KD for E2 is 10⫺10 to 10⫺9 M, which coincides with reported values of E2 in female mouse serum during the adult estrus cycle (57, 58). To determine whether E2 acted at the same threshold concentration in the FL- and GM-CSF-driven models, we performed a broad dose titration (10⫺13 to 10⫺8 M) using a water-soluble (cyclodextrinencapsulated) form of E2 in triplicate cultures of total BM cells in hormone-deficient medium and quantified the total number of live cells and DC after 8 days (Fig. 2). According to predetermined optimal cell concentrations, in GM-CSF cultures, ⬃1 ⫻ 105 leukocytes in 1 ml were plated, while in FL cultures, ⬃1.5 ⫻ 106 leukocytes in 1 ml were plated. In FL cultures, the number of live cells and DC decreased significantly upon addition of 5 ⫻ 10⫺11 to 10⫺10 M E2, and after 10⫺9 M, greater concentrations of E2 had no additional effect (Fig. 2A). These data indicate that E2 acts to decrease FL-mediated DC differentiation at physiological concentrations characteristic of adult females and at the ER KD for E2. However, in cultures containing 10⫺10 M, nearly all of the viable cells were DC (Fig. 2A), and despite the dramatic reduction in cell viability, the percentage of DC increased with increasing concentrations of E2 until 10⫺9 M (Fig. 2B). Thus, in FL-driven cultures, E2 may act in two independent ways. E2 may decrease the viability of a majority of DC progenitors, yet increase the DC differentiation from the remaining DC progenitors that are spared by E2. In GM-CSF-supplemented hormone-deficient medium, E2 increased the percentage of DC in a dose-dependent manner starting at 10⫺11 up to 10⫺9 M E2 (Fig. 2D). The total number of cells in the culture remained approximately constant over the E2 dose range, while the number of DC increased significantly in the range from 10⫺11 to 10⫺9 M (Fig. 2C). These data show that at the same threshold concentration of 10⫺10 M, at the ER KD, E2 leads to opposing outcomes during DC differentiation mediated by FL and GM-CSF. Estradiol acts primarily via ER␣ to regulate viable cell numbers and DC differentiation in FL- and GM-CSF-driven BM cultures ER␣ and ER␤ have distinct and common target genes, and in some cell types, ER␤ modulates gene expression networks regulated by ER␣ (59). Thus, we determined whether the differential effects of E2 on FL- and GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation were due to differential dependence on ER␣ and ER␤, using ER-deficient mice. Initially, we confirmed the report (60) that the number of MP, lymphoid

730

ESTRADIOL REGULATES DC DIFFERENTIATION

FIGURE 1. Estradiol decreases FLmediated DC differentiation. Total BM cells (after red cell lysis) (1.5 ⫻ 106 cells in 1 ml) from female C57BL/6 mice were cultured in FL-supplemented hormone-deficient medium with EtOH vehicle or 10⫺9 M E2. After 8 days, cells were assessed for relative expression of CD11c, B220, and CD11b using flow cytometry. A, These representative plots show the impact of E2 on viable cells on FSC vs SSC plots (top panels), and on the presence of PDC (CD11c⫹B220⫹) or conventional DC (CD11c⫹B220⫺) within the viable cell gate (middle panels). The CD11c⫹ B220⫺ DC may be subdivided into lymphoid DC (CD11c⫹B220⫺CD11blow/⫺) and myeloid DC (CD11c⫹B220⫺ CD11b⫹) based upon the relative expression of CD11b (bottom panels). Numbers in the plots indicate the percentage of cells in the gated populations within the indicated areas. B, Shown are the numbers of total live cells and DC subpopulations present in the FL cultures exposed to 10⫺9 M E2 or vehicle. The numbers were generated with hemocytometer counts and flow cytometry analyses as in A. Data in A and B are representative of 10 independent experiments with total BM cells. C, CD11c⫹ DC that developed in FL cultures in the presence or absence of 10⫺9 M E2 were assessed for MHCII and CD40 before (shaded histogram) and after (black line) overnight activation with CpG-A oligodeoxynucleotides (10 ␮g/ml) or LPS (0.1 ␮g/ml). Numbers in the histogram plots are the geometric mean fluorescence intensity of the marker on activated DC. Data are representative of two similar experiments; data for CD86 are not shown.

(CLP), and primitive (LSK) progenitors in the BM of ER␣⫺/⫺ or ER␤⫺/⫺ mice did not differ significantly from C57BL/6 mice (EC, data not shown). We previously published that GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation from ER␣⫺/⫺ BM cells was significantly impaired, indicating a primary role for ER␣ (28). To determine which ER was involved in FL-driven DC differentiation, total BM cells from ER␣⫺/⫺, ER␤⫺/⫺, and C57BL6 control mice were cultured in FL-supplemented hormone-deficient medium with or without E2 (10⫺9 M), and the total numbers of viable cells and DC determined on day 8 (Fig. 3A). In contrast to

the marked ⬃5- to 10-fold reduction in cell numbers upon addition of E2 to C57BL/6 BM cells, the addition of E2 to ER␣⫺/⫺ BM cells did not lead to a reduction in the number of viable cells and DC, indicating that ER␣ was required for this action of E2. Addition of E2 to cultures of ER␤⫺/⫺ BM cells also resulted in a decrease in the number of live cells and DC, although not as marked as with C57BL/6 BM. To confirm these results, we placed BM cells from ER␣⫺/⫺, ER␤⫺/⫺, and C57BL/6 mice in FL-supplemented “regular” medium, containing hormone-replete FCS and phenol red, with or

The Journal of Immunology

731

FIGURE 2. Estradiol differentially modulates FL- and GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation at a threshold concentration of 10⫺10 M. A and B, Water-soluble cyclodextrin-encapsulated E2 was titrated into triplicate cultures (1.5 ⫻ 106 cells in 1 ml each) of total (after red cell lysis) C57BL/6 BM cells in FL-supplemented hormone-deficient medium. A, The numbers of live cells and DC were determined on day 8 of culture. Data are shown as the mean and SD of triplicate cultures for each E2 dose. The numbers of live cells and DC were significantly lower beginning at 5 ⫻ 10⫺11 M E2, in comparison to 0 M E2. B, The percentage of CD11c⫹ DC in the FL-supplemented BM cultures increased with increasing concentration of E2. Data are shown as the mean and SD of triplicate cultures for each E2 dose. This effect of E2 was significant in comparison to 0 M E2, beginning at 10⫺11 M E2. C and D, Cyclodextrin-encapsulated E2 was titrated into triplicate cultures (⬃1 ⫻ 105 leukocytes in 1 ml each) of total C57BL/6 BM cells in GM-CSF-supplemented hormone-deficient medium. After 7 days, cells were assessed for the expression of CD11c, CD11b, Ly6C, and MHCII by flow cytometry and cell counts were determined by hemocytometer counting. C, The numbers of live cells and CD11c⫹ MHCII⫹ DC in triplicate cultures at each E2 concentration is shown (mean ⫹ SD). The number of DC increased significantly in the range from 10⫺11 to 10⫺9 M. D, The percentage of CD11c⫹ DC in the GM-CSF-supplemented BM cultures increased in a dose-dependent manner starting at 10⫺11 M E2. Data are shown as the mean and SD of triplicate cultures for each E2 dose. Individual data points were determined to be significantly different from 0 M E2 in an unpaired t test, ⴱ, p ⬍ 0.05; ⴱⴱ, p ⬍ 0.01; ⴱⴱⴱ, p ⬍ 0.001. Data in A–D are representative of two independent experiments.

without the ER antagonist ICI182,780 (100 nM). This steroidal antagonist binds and induces degradation of both ER, and inhibits the effect of agonist ER ligands present in regular medium (28, 61). Addition of ICI182,780 to C57BL/6 BM cells increased the number of viable cells and differentiated DC (Fig. 3B), indicating that blockade of ER responses effectively promotes DC differentiation, yielding a similar number of DC as in cultures of hormone-deficient medium without E2. Addition of ICI182,780 to ER␣⫺/⫺ BM cells did not enhance DC differentiation. When ICI182,780 was added to ER␤⫺/⫺ BM cells, the numbers of live cells and DC were increased to similar levels as with C57BL/6 cells. Thus, E2 is acting primarily via ER␣ to decrease cell numbers and DC differentiation in the FL-driven model. In sum, these data with ER␣- or ER␤-deficient BM cells show that E2 acts via the same ER form to differentially regulate FL- and GMCSF-mediated DC differentiation. Isolated BM DC progenitors express ER␣ Because our initial studies used total BM cells to define the effect of E2 in the differentiation cultures, we sought to determine whether E2 acts directly on DC progenitors, or alternatively, if E2 acts on mature cells in BM to elicit their production of factors important for DC differentiation. To determine whether DC progenitors express ER, distinct populations of DC progenitors were isolated from C57BL/6 BM and assessed for expression of ER␣ and ER␤ by quantitative real-time (QRT) PCR. Progenitors of lymphoid and myeloid cells are contained within a lineage marker-negative (Lin⫺) c-kit⫹ fraction of BM cells. We

used a combination of magnetic bead depletion and cell sorting to isolate 1) the LSK (Lin⫺Sca-1⫹c-kit⫹IL-7R␣⫺) population, which is enriched in multipotent progenitors of both lymphoid and myeloid cells, 2) committed MP defined as Lin⫺c-kit⫹IL-7R␣⫺Sca1⫺, and 3) Lin⫺c-kit⫹flt3⫹ cells, because DC progenitors are contained within the fraction of Lin⫺c-kit⫹ cells expressing flt3 (42) (Fig. 4). QRT PCR with ER␣- and ER␤-specific primers was used to determine expression of ER in Lin⫺c-kit⫹flt3⫹, LSK, and MP populations, in comparison to ovary tissue (Fig. 4C). Each progenitor population expressed ER␣ mRNA. ER␤ mRNA was not detected in these progenitors, although the primer set worked well with ovary RNA. Because there are splice variants of ER␤ mRNA, we tested multiple primer sets (62), but we did not detect any ER␤ transcripts (S. Turner, data not shown). These data show that defined DC progenitor populations in BM express ER␣ but not ER␤, in agreement with our finding that E2 acts primarily via ER␣ to regulate DC differentiation (Fig. 3A). Estradiol acts on the same highly purified MP to regulate FL- and GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation We hypothesized that E2 might mediate differential effects during FL- and GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation by acting on distinct DC progenitor populations in BM. Thus, we determined the effect of ER ligands on DC differentiation from defined DC progenitors in the GM-CSF- and FL-driven culture models. Our initial experiments with Lin⫺c-kit⫹flt3⫹ cells showed that DC differentiation from this undifferentiated population with DC potential was

732

FIGURE 3. Estradiol acts primarily via ER␣ to regulate viable cell numbers and DC differentiation in FL-driven BM cultures. A, Total BM cells (⬃8 ⫻ 106 leukocytes in 4 ml) from C57BL/6, ER␣⫺/⫺, and ER␤⫺/⫺ mice were incubated in hormone-deficient medium with FL ⫺/⫹ 10⫺9 M E2. After 9 days, the total cell number and CD11c⫹ DC number in the E2 and EtOH vehicle-treated cultures was calculated for each strain based on hemocytometer counts and flow cytometry analyses. Shown are the mean ⫹ SEM for each parameter, n ⫽ 2 mice of each strain. B, BM cells from C57BL/6, ER␣⫺/⫺, and ER␤⫺/⫺ mice were incubated in regular medium ⫺/⫹ the ER antagonist ICI182,780 (100 nM). After 9 days, the total cell number and CD11c⫹ DC number in the ICI182,780 and DMSO vehicletreated cultures was calculated for each strain (mean ⫹ SEM, n ⫽ 2). Note that the y-axis is a log scale.

regulated by ER ligands (Fig. 5C and data not shown). Because MP efficiently yield all DC subsets in vivo, highly purified MP were isolated by cell sorting from the pooled BM of eight C57BL6 mice according to two different definitions: Lin⫺c-kit⫹IL7R␣⫺Sca-1⫺ (termed MP) or Lin⫺c-kit⫹Sca-1⫺flt3⫹ (termed MPflt3⫹) (Fig. 4). Isolated MP or MP-flt3⫹ were placed into four parallel cultures with GM-CSF or FL: hormone-deficient medium with EtOH vehicle or 10⫺9 M E2, and regular medium with DMSO vehicle or 100 nM ICI182,780 (Figs. 5, 6, and 7; Table I). The cells present in each culture on day 7 were analyzed with mAbs specific for CD11c, CD11b, Ly6C, B220, and MHCII to define DC subsets. In GM-CSF-driven cultures, the addition of E2 to hormonedeficient medium increased 2- to 4-fold the percentage and the numbers of CD11c⫹ DC that developed from both the MP and MP-flt3⫹ populations (Figs. 5, A–C, and 7; Table I). In agreement with this observation, the addition of ICI182,780 to regular medium inhibited 2- to 4-fold the GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation from MP and MP-flt3⫹ cells (Figs. 5, A–C, and 7; Table I). The percentage of both CD11bhigh and CD11bint DC subsets was altered by the ER ligands, with a more profound effect on CD11bint DC as noted previously with cultures initiated from total BM (Fig. 5, A and B); CD11bhigh DC were Ly6C⫹MHCII⫹ and CD11bint DC were Ly6C⫺MHCII⫹ (E. Carreras, data not shown). We also tested a recently described Lin⫺c-kit⫹sca-1⫺IL-7R␣⫺CX3CR1⫹

ESTRADIOL REGULATES DC DIFFERENTIATION progenitor (MP-CX3CR1⫹) of DC and macrophages isolated from the BM of heterozygous CX3CR1⫹/gfp mice (45). E2 also directly increased DC differentiation from this most specific DC precursor (Fig. 5C). As with cultures initiated from total BM, in MP-derived cultures, the total number of cells (CD11c⫹ plus CD11c⫺) on day 7 remained approximately the same regardless of the added ER ligand (Fig. 7; Table I), indicating that the primary effect of ER ligands in GM-CSF cultures is to modulate the extent of DC differentiation rather than alter cell viability. The effect of ER signaling on DC differentiation from MP was reproducible: each of the three defined MP populations was isolated and tested on separate days and in two independent experiments. DC differentiation from each of the highly purified MP was increased by E2 and decreased by ICI182,780, resulting in a 2- to 4-fold change in the percentage and numbers of DC (Figs. 5C and 7; Table I). In FL-driven cultures, the addition of E2 to both MP and MP-flt3⫹ populations in hormone-deficient medium decreased the number of live cells and CD11c⫹ DC 2- to 5-fold (Fig. 7; Table I). Addition of the ER antagonist ICI182,780 to MP and MP-flt3⫹ populations in regular medium increased the number of live cells and differentiated CD11c⫹ DC 2- to 4-fold (Fig. 7; Table I). Each of the two MP populations were isolated and tested in two independent experiments. Fig. 6 shows representative flow cytometry profiles of cells in FL-driven cultures initiated from MP or MP-flt3⫹. The DC subsets that were generated from MP after 7 days of culture with FL are comparable in cell surface phenotype and percentage to the DC subsets that are found in unfractionated BM cell cultures containing hormone-deficient or regular medium. However, unlike the experiments initiated with total BM cells, the addition of E2 to MP did not result in a shift in the ratio of CD11b⫹ myeloid and CD11blow/⫺ lymphoid DC subsets (compare Fig. 1A with Fig. 6). These data show that during FLdriven DC differentiation, E2 acts directly on MP to ultimately decrease viable cell numbers with a consequent reduction in differentiated DC. In sum, our data show that E2 acts via ER␣ to differentially regulate FL- and GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation from the same highly purified MP, suggesting differential interaction of ER signaling with signals downstream of the receptors for FL and GM-CSF. Estradiol acts on MP to regulate DC differentiation mediated by the combination of FL and GM-CSF We next sought to determine how ER signaling in MP might regulate DC differentiation mediated by the combination of FL and GM-CSF. We isolated MP, MP-flt3⫹, and LSK populations from C57BL/6 BM and placed them with the combination of GM-CSF and FL into the four parallel cultures with variable ER ligands. Previous reports using unfractionated BM showed that GM-CSF inhibited the ability of FL to promote PDC differentiation (55). We obtained a similar result when MP were incubated with both cytokines, as we did not find PDC and the majority of DC were CD11c⫹CD11b⫹ similar to when MP or unfractionated BM cells were incubated with GM-CSF alone (Fig. 8A). However, the surface expression of CD11b on CD11c⫹ DC could be divided into three distinct levels, with the CD11bhigh and CD11bint levels characteristic of DC in a GM-CSF culture and the CD11blow/⫺ level characteristic of LDC in a FL culture (Fig. 8A). When DC differentiation from MP was mediated by the combination of GM-CSF and FL, the presence of E2 (e.g., deficient medium with 10⫺9 M E2 or regular medium) increased the percentage of CD11c⫹ DC after 7 days of culture, with ⬃2- to 3-fold increases in the percentage and numbers of CD11bint DC, and a ⬃2-fold decrease in numbers of CD11blow/⫺ DC (Fig. 8A). Although the numbers of DC were the same in the absence or presence of E2, the total number of viable cells at the end of the culture was ⬃20 – 40% lower in the cultures that contained E2. We saw a

The Journal of Immunology

733

FIGURE 4. Isolation of hemopoietic progenitors from bone marrow. BM cells were enriched for lineage marker-negative (Lin⫺) cells by incubation with Abs to cell surface lineage markers followed by negative selection using magnetic beads. The enriched Lin⫺ cells were stained again with mAbs to the lineage marker mixture, c-kit, Sca-1 and IL-7R␣ or CD135/flt3 before isolation of specific progenitors by cell sorting. A, Scheme for isolation of MP and LSK by cell sorting. Lin⫺ cells were divided into MP (Lin⫺IL-7R␣⫺c-kithighSca-1⫺) and LSK (Lin⫺IL-7R␣⫺c-kithighSca-1⫹) populations. B, Scheme for isolation of the MP-flt3⫹ population (Lin⫺Sca-1⫺c-kit⫹flt3⫹). C, RNA was isolated from the indicated BM progenitors and ovary tissue and converted to cDNA. The ␤-actin, Esr1 (ER␣), and Esr2 (ER␤) genes were amplified using specific primers and QRT PCR for 40 cycles. The number of cycles needed to reach a threshold indicating logarithmic amplification was determined. Data are normalized to cycle thresholds (CT) obtained for ovary cDNA, CT ⫽ 26 for Esr1, CT ⫽ 26 for Esr2. The CT for ␤-actin varied between 18 and 23 for all samples; nd, not detected.

similar effect of E2 when the differentiation of total BM, MP-flt3⫹ or LSK cells was mediated by the combination of GM-CSF and FL. The presence of E2 in either hormone-deficient or regular medium led to a higher percentage of DC and a decrease in the total cell number at the end of the culture, while the absence of E2 or ER blockade by ICI182,780 had a complementary effect (Fig. 8B; Table I). These data show that when DC differentiation from MP is mediated by the combination of GM-CSF and FL, ER signaling appears to differentially regulate GM-CSF- and FL-mediated signaling pathways such that E2 promotes DC differentiation as in GM-CSF cultures, but also reduces cell viability as in FL cultures. Second, these data show that ER signaling also modulates DC differentiation initiated from the more primitive BM LSK fraction, which contains multipotent precursors of committed MP and LP.

Discussion Because DC differentiation is mediated by FL or GM-CSF in vivo, it is important to identify factors that regulate these two cytokinedriven differentiation pathways. Our previous studies identified estradiol acting via ER␣ as a potent positive regulator of GM-CSFmediated Langerhans DC differentiation from BM cells (28, 29). We now show that ER signaling has differential effects on GMCSF- and FL-driven differentiation in cultures initiated from highly purified ER␣⫹flt3⫹ MP. Remarkably, while E2 acted on MP to increase GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation, E2 acted on MP to significantly decrease the number of viable cells and differentiated DC during FL-mediated DC differentiation. In cultures

containing both GM-CSF and FL, E2 appeared to mediate both positive and negative effects on MP, by increasing the percentage of MDC as in GM-CSF cultures, and decreasing total cell numbers as in FL cultures. Our results are based upon imposition of physiological E2 levels found in males and adult cycling females and at the ER KD of 10⫺10–10⫺9 M. We validated a role for ER signaling in a complementary model in which the ER antagonist ICI182,780 was added to hormone-replete medium; in all cases, blockade of ER led to the opposite outcome to E2 addition. In the GM-CSF model, ER ligands acted to promote DC differentiation from MP defined in three different ways based upon subsets of the Lin⫺c-kit⫹Sca-1⫺ population. The IL-7R␣⫺ MP population is heterogeneous and contains the CMP, and two more restricted myeloid lineage progenitors, the granulocyte/monocyte progenitor (GMP) and megakaryocyte/erythrocyte progenitor (63); DC potential is contained within the CMP and GMP. Because the megakaryocyte/ erythrocyte progenitor lacks flt3 and the GMP was reported to express little or no flt3 (41, 42), the MP-flt3⫹ population we isolated is primarily the flt3⫹ CMP, indicating that ER signaling regulates DC differentiation from the earliest progenitor committed to the myeloid lineage. In addition, E2 promoted DC differentiation from a dedicated Lin⫺c-kit⫹CX3CR1⫹ precursor of DC and macrophages that is most similar to the GMP (45). A population of undifferentiated CD31⫹Ly6C⫹ myeloid blasts (46) also was directly responsive to E2 during GM-CSF-mediated differentiation (V. Paharkova-Vatchkova and A. Mao, unpublished observations). Blockade of ER by addition of ICI182,780 at selected times after culture initiation from Lin⫺ BM

734

ESTRADIOL REGULATES DC DIFFERENTIATION

FIGURE 5. Estradiol acts on highly purified MP to regulate GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation. Sorted MP (Lin⫺IL-7R␣⫺c-kithighSca-1⫺) or MP-flt3⫹ (Lin⫺c-kithighSca-1⫺flt3⫹) cells were incubated 1 day in hormone-deficient medium without GM-CSF and E2 to deplete ER-bound E2 acquired in vivo. Subsequently, MP were plated at 2 ⫻ 104 cell/ml (3 ⫻ 104 cells in 1.5 ml) (A) and MP-flt3⫹ were plated at 103 cell/ml (1.5 ⫻ 103 cells in 1.5 ml) (B) in four parallel GM-CSF-supplemented cultures which contained either hormone-deficient medium ⫺/⫹ 10⫺9 M E2 or regular medium ⫺/⫹ 100 nM ICI182,780. After 7 days, cells were harvested, counted, and assessed for cell surface expression of CD11c and CD11b by flow cytometry. The percentage of each DC subpopulation (CD11c⫹CD11bhigh and CD11c⫹CD11bint) is indicated in each plot. CD11c⫹CD11bhigh DC were Ly6C⫹ and CD11c⫹CD11bint DC were Ly6C⫺. The data are representative of two independent experiments made with each MP or MP-flt3⫹ population. C, This graph summarizes the experiments with sorted hemopoietic progenitor populations in the GM-CSF-driven culture model. Lin⫺c-kit⫹flt3⫹, MP, MP-flt3⫹, and MP-CX3CR1⫹ were incubated in GM-CSF-supplemented hormone-deficient medium ⫺/⫹ E2 or in regular medium ⫺/⫹ ICI182,780. After 7 days, cells were harvested, counted, and assessed for cell surface expression of CD11c and CD11b as in A. Shown are the percentages of CD11c⫹ DC present in the cultures after 7 days (mean ⫹ SD of two independent experiments for each progenitor population). When data from the six independent experiments with the three distinctly defined MP were pooled and subjected to a t test with unequal variance, the difference in the percentage of differentiated DC in the absence or presence of E2 was highly significant, p ⫽ 0.00006.

cells showed that ER signaling begins to promote DC differentiation in the first 24 h of culture; however, cumulative effects may be observed throughout the 7-day culture period, suggesting that E2 acts on MP as well as later developmental intermediates (E. Carreras, unpublished observations). During FL-mediated DC differentiation, E2 acted on total BM cells to greatly diminish the number of viable cells and consequently the number of differentiated plasmacytoid and conventional DC. Our data suggest that E2 may act in two independent ways during FL-mediated DC differentiation. E2 may decrease the survival of a majority of DC progenitors, yet promote DC differentiation from the remaining DC progenitors that are spared by E2. LP were selectively depleted by in vivo treatment with supraphysiological levels of E2 (20). This depletion was alleviated in Bcl-2-transgenic mice, suggesting that E2 altered LP survival (20). Thus, initially we hypothesized that within total BM, E2 would decrease differentiation from LP while increasing DC differentiation from MP. However, physiological levels of E2 also negatively regulated numbers of viable cells and differentiated DC in FL-driven cultures initiated from MP, although the E2 impact on MP was less marked than with total BM. It is possible that in addition to MP, ER signaling could regulate DC differentiation from other flt3⫹ progen-

itor populations. We could not reach a conclusion regarding E2 effects on DC differentiation from the CLP, because these culture systems did not support GM-CSF- or FL-mediated differentiation of CLP as reported (64). E2 also might act on mature cells to either enhance or decrease secretion of factors that modulate DC differentiation in cultures initiated with unfractionated BM cells. PDC were reported to arise with differential efficiency from the flt3⫹ CMP and LP, including the early lymphoid progenitor (ELP) (Lin⫺c-kithighSca-1highIL-7R␣⫺RAG-1⫹/⫺) and CLP (25, 26, 42, 64 – 66). Relevant to our study, the sensitivity of PDC differentiation to the imposition of constant supraphysiological levels of E2 to ovary intact mice has been used to determine the nature of PDC progenitors in vivo. Imposition of E2 for 1–2 wk decreased numbers of BM ELP and CLP, while sparing myelopoiesis and reducing BM PDC numbers (20, 25). In another study, in vivo E2 treatment significantly depleted the ELP and CLP, yet also reduced numbers of CMP by ⬃30%, indicating that albeit less profound, E2 negatively regulates numbers of MP in vivo (26). Despite this reduction in numbers of MP and LP, PDC numbers in BM and spleen were unaffected by E2 in the study (26), indicating that most PDC arise from the more estrogen-resistant MP.

The Journal of Immunology

735

FIGURE 6. Estradiol acts on highly purified MP to regulate FL-mediated DC differentiation. Isolated MP (9 ⫻ 104 cells in 0.5 ml) (A) or MP-flt3⫹ (9 ⫻ 103 cells in 0.5 ml) (B) populations were cultured in FL-supplemented hormone-deficient medium ⫺/⫹ E2 (10⫺9 M) or regular medium ⫺/⫹ ICI182,780 (100 nM). After 7 days, cells were counted and DC subsets assessed by flow cytometry. PDC were defined as CD11c⫹B220⫹, LDC as CD11c⫹B220⫺ CD11blow/⫺ and MDC as CD11c⫹B220⫺CD11b⫹. Conventional CD11c⫹B220⫺ DC (top panels) were divided into myeloid and lymphoid subsets based on expression of CD11b (bottom panels). The number of live cells at the end of each treatment and the percentage of cells within each gate are indicated for these representative experiments. Each progenitor population was isolated and tested in two independent experiments.

These studies of ovary intact mice subjected to constant supraphysiological levels of E2 suggest differential sensitivity of LP and MP to negative regulation by ER agonists (20, 25, 26). In our dose titration in culture, the most profound decrease in viable cell and DC numbers occurred between 10⫺11 and 10⫺10 M, a level comparable to the plasma E2 levels in males (5 ⫻ 10⫺11 M) and ovary intact females (10⫺10–10⫺9 M), suggesting that the E2-mediated decrease in steady-state BM MP might occur normally and imposition of a greater constant amount of E2 to an ovary-bearing mouse has a more minor effect on MP than LP numbers. Thus, our data and the data of others show that in the presence of physiological levels of E2, ER signaling regulates DC progenitor homeostasis, serving to limit the number of MP and LP in the steady state. ER signaling by agonists may synergize with cytokine receptor signaling to modulate the survival or proliferation of MP or their descendents, or regulate genes that specify DC fate. The cytokines that instruct DC differentiation from progenitors induce the rapid activation of STAT transcription factors and act to suppress apoptosis (67). GM-CSF activates STAT5 and regulates survival, proliferation, and differentiation of MP (39, 68).

FL activates STAT3, leading to an increase in hemopoietic progenitor survival and initiation of a DC differentiation program, but is a poor mitogen (69 –71). Interestingly, in endothelial or epithelial cells, ER ligands were reported to regulate the phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, and transcriptional activity of STAT3 and STAT5, indicating a role for early ER-signaling events (72–76). ER agonist signaling may synergize with GMCSFR/STAT5 signaling to promote cell survival and proliferation, because E2-ER signaling is known to directly regulate survival and proliferation of breast cancer cells by up-regulating Bcl-2 and cyclin D1 (12). Conversely, ER agonist signaling may negatively regulate Flt3/STAT3 signaling, leading to a decrease in cell survival and STAT3-mediated induction of other genes involved in DC development (70). Future experiments will clarify the multiple roles that E2 might play in survival, proliferation, or cell fate induction in BM progenitors under the influence of distinct growth factors. A current paradigm is that ER ligands have agonist or antagonist activity in a particular cell type due to the relative expression of

736

ESTRADIOL REGULATES DC DIFFERENTIATION

FIGURE 7. Estradiol acts directly on MP to differentially regulate numbers of DC in FL- and GM-CSF-driven cultures. A, E2 acted on MP and MP-flt3⫹ to increase the numbers of differentiated DC 2- to 3-fold in GMCSF cultures containing hormone-deficient medium, and to decrease the numbers of differentiated DC 2- to 5-fold in FL cultures. ICI182,780 addition to regular (hormone-replete) medium had complementary effects on DC numbers in both models. The fold change in CD11c⫹ DC numbers due to the addition of E2 to hormone-deficient medium, relative to addition of the EtOH vehicle, is indicated for the MP and MP-flt3⫹ populations incubated in the GM-CSF or FL culture model (mean ⫹ SEM, n ⫽ 2). The fold change in DC numbers due to the addition of the ER antagonist ICI182,780 to regular (hormone-replete) medium, relative to addition of the DMSO vehicle, is indicated for each progenitor population (mean ⫹ SEM, n ⫽ 2). In the graph, fold decreases are represented as a negative fold change. B, The fold change in live cell numbers due to the addition of E2 to hormonedeficient medium is indicated for the MP and MP-flt3⫹ populations incubated in the GM-CSF or FL culture model (mean ⫹ SEM, n ⫽ 2). The fold change in live cell numbers due to the addition of the ER antagonist ICI182,780 to regular (hormone-replete) medium is indicated for each progenitor population (mean ⫹ SEM, n ⫽ 2).

FIGURE 8. Estradiol acts on MP to regulate DC differentiation mediated by the combination of FL and GM-CSF. A, Sorted MP (6000 cells in 1.5 ml) were cultured with the combination of GM-CSF and FL in hormone-deficient medium in the presence of 10⫺9 M E2 or EtOH vehicle. After 7 days, cells were assessed for relative expression of CD11c, CD11b, and B220 by flow cytometry. Shown are the three subsets of CD11c⫹CD11b⫹ DC, subdivided based on the relative expression of CD11b, obtained in these cultures; all DC were B220⫺. The percentage of cells in each gate is indicated. Data are representative of two independent experiments. E2 promotes the development of the CD11bint DC subset, while it inhibits the CD11blow/⫺ DC subset. B, Unfractionated BM, MP, MP-flt3⫹, or LSK populations were cultured with the combination of GM-CSF and FL in hormone-deficient medium ⫺/⫹ E2 (10⫺9 M) or in regular medium ⫺/⫹ ICI182,780 (100 nM). Shown is the percentage of CD11c⫹ DC obtained in each culture condition (mean ⫹ SD of two independent experiments for each cell population).

ER␣ or ER␤, and the intrinsic cellular complements of coactivators or corepressors that complex with ligand-bound ER. In a variation of this paradigm, our data show that depending on the cytokines present in the extracellular environment, ER ligands may act differentially on the same target cells due to intracellular interactions between ER and cytokine receptor signaling. It will be of

Table I. ER ligands regulate DC differentiation from isolated progenitors Live Cell Numberb Deficient medium Cytokine

GM-CSF

FL GM-CSF plus FL

a b c

Progenitor ⫺



Input Cell Numberc

a



Lin c-kit flt3 MP MP-flt3⫹ MP-CX3CR1⫹ MP MP-flt3⫹ MP MP-flt3⫹ LSK

⫺E2

Regular medium

⫹E2

⫺ICI

8.5 ⫻ 104 1.8 ⫻ 105 2.9 ⫻ 105 1 ⫻ 104 6.9 ⫻ 103 1.6 ⫻ 105 1 ⫻ 105 3.8 ⫻ 104

3.8 ⫻ 10 1.5 ⫻ 105 6.3 ⫻ 104 6.7 ⫻ 104 3.4 ⫻ 104 5.3 ⫻ 103 4.8 ⫻ 104 2 ⫻ 105 6.3 ⫻ 103

4

10 3 ⫻ 104 1.5 ⫻ 103 104 9 ⫻ 104 9 ⫻ 103 6 ⫻ 103 2 ⫻ 103 4 ⫻ 103

DC Number

⫹ICI 5

7.3 ⫻ 104 2.1 ⫻ 105 3.1 ⫻ 105 2.9 ⫻ 104 2.0 ⫻ 104 2.1 ⫻ 105 1.7 ⫻ 105 6 ⫻ 104

Deficient medium ⫺E2

4 ⫻ 10 1 ⫻ 105 7.1 ⫻ 104 9.9 ⫻ 104 7.2 ⫻ 104 1.6 ⫻ 104 4.9 ⫻ 104 2 ⫻ 105 1.2 ⫻ 104

Numbers shown are from one representative experiment with each progenitor in each culture model. Number of live cells or DC in one well at the end of the culture period. Number of sorted progenitors plated in one well.

Regular medium

⫹E2

⫺ICI

6 ⫻ 104 8.3 ⫻ 104 1.6 ⫻ 105 4.2 ⫻ 103 4.6 ⫻ 103 1.2 ⫻ 105 7.2 ⫻ 104 3 ⫻ 104

2 ⫻ 10 6.7 ⫻ 104 2.1 ⫻ 104 3.5 ⫻ 104 2 ⫻ 104 3.7 ⫻ 103 3.3 ⫻ 104 1.4 ⫻ 104 4.1 ⫻ 103

5

⫹ICI 5

2.6 ⫻ 104 2.9 ⫻ 104 7.8 ⫻ 104 1 ⫻ 104 1.1 ⫻ 104 1 ⫻ 105 9 ⫻ 104 3.2 ⫻ 104

1 ⫻ 105 2.1 ⫻ 104 6.8 ⫻ 103 1.6 ⫻ 104 3.9 ⫻ 104 1.1 ⫻ 104 1.5 ⫻ 104 9 ⫻ 103 5.3 ⫻ 103

The Journal of Immunology interest to determine whether the synergy between ER and cytokine receptor signaling leads to altered expression of coactivators or corepressors and consequent changes in gene expression. It is possible that changes in chromatin conformation mediated by cytokine receptor signaling lead to altered accessibility of ER-regulated promoter sequences, thus changing the potency of ER-ligand transcription complexes. Our data support the hypothesis that ER ligands in combination with cytokines present in the local extracellular environment will modulate pathways of DC differentiation in vivo and ultimately regulate numbers of DC in tissues. The finding that ER signaling differentially regulates GM-CSF- and FL-mediated DC differentiation raises the important question of how and when ER ligands might modulate these two pathways to regulate numbers of DC in vivo. Studies have shown that both GM-CSF and FL contribute to steady-state DC differentiation in vivo (33–38). FL deficiency most significantly reduced all DC populations in lymphoid organs, and decreased numbers of BM MP and LP (33). GM-CSF- and GM-CSFR␤c-deficient mice have a minor decrease in numbers of DC populations, with the most significant impact on the steadystate development of CD11bhighCD8␣⫺ DC, and have deficient T cell function mediated by DC (77). Studies of LC development in GM-CSFR␤c-deficient, GM-CSF-transgenic, and FL-injected mice provided evidence that the development of epidermal LC is dependent upon GM-CSF, while independent of FL (78). The role of GM-CSF as a regulator of myeloid cell survival, proliferation, activation, or differentiation in vivo is most prominent during inflammation and autoimmunity, during which the production and action of GM-CSF occurs locally (39). Thus, while GM-CSF has a minor but normal role in DC (including LC) differentiation in the steady-state, GM-CSF-mediated DC differentiation is likely to be most important in vivo as GM-CSF levels rise during inflammation resulting from infection, injury, or autoimmunity. In contrast, FL-mediated differentiation of the DC subsets found in lymphoid organs appears to predominate in the steady state. Thus, we hypothesize that agonist ER ligands will regulate FL-flt3 signaling to decrease DC progenitor numbers and DC differentiation during homeostasis. Second, we hypothesize that agonist ER ligands in synergy with GM-CSF receptor signaling will have the most impact on LC differentiation and on new DC differentiation that might occur during systemic or local inflammation. Indeed, ⬃80% of autoimmune diseases occur in women, and increases in DC numbers or function in some autoimmune diseases such as SLE correlate with increased GM-CSF production during inflammation (4, 40). In sum, our data suggest that due to the action of ER ligands on MP, DC differentiation in vivo will be responsive to physiological, pharmacological, and environmental ER ligands present in the individual. These effects of ER ligands are likely to be dependent on the cytokine pathways that might be operative in the steady state or during inflammation and disease. In addition, it is possible that SERM with tissue-specific antagonist or partial agonist activity, including drugs developed for treatment or prevention of breast cancer and osteoporosis (79), or pregnancy doses of estriol used to treat multiple sclerosis (21), will modulate DC differentiation, and thus immunity, in vivo. By affecting pathways of DC differentiation, endogenous or pharmacological ER ligands might regulate pathogen and tumor immunity, as well as aberrant immune responses during autoimmunity.

Acknowledgments We thank Diana Hamilton and Jacob Bass in the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation Flow Cytometry Core Facility for assistance with cell

737 sorting. We thank Drs. Paul Kincade, Rob Welner, Rosana Pelayo, and Jose Alberola-Ila for helpful discussions.

Disclosures The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

References 1. Mellman, I., and R. M. Steinman. 2001. Dendritic cells: specialized and regulated antigen processing machines. Cell 106: 255–258. 2. Steinman, R. M., and M. C. Nussenzweig. 2002. Avoiding horror autotoxicus: the importance of dendritic cells in peripheral T cell tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 351–358. 3. Blanco, P., A. K. Palucka, M. Gill, V. Pascual, and J. Banchereau. 2001. Induction of dendritic cell differentiation by IFN-␣ in systemic lupus erythematosus. Science 294: 1540 –1543. 4. Banchereau, J., V. Pascual, and A. K. Palucka. 2004. Autoimmunity through cytokine-induced dendritic cell activation. Immunity 20: 539 –550. 5. O’Lone, R., M. C. Frith, E. K. Karlsson, and U. Hansen. 2004. Genomic targets of nuclear estrogen receptors. Mol. Endocrinol. 18: 1859 –1875. 6. Nilsson, S., S. Makela, E. Treuter, M. Tujague, J. Thomsen, G. Andersson, E. Enmark, K. Pettersson, M. Warner, and J. A. Gustafsson. 2001. Mechanisms of estrogen action. Physiol. Rev. 81: 1535–1565. 7. Dutertre, M., and C. L. Smith. 2000. Molecular mechanisms of selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) action. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 295: 431– 437. 8. Ren, M. Q., G. Kuhn, J. Wegner, and J. Chen. 2001. Isoflavones, substances with multi-biological and clinical properties. Eur. J. Nutr. 40: 135–146. 9. Ahmed, S. A., B. D. Hissong, D. Verthelyi, K. Donner, K. Becker, and E. Karpuzoglu-Sahin. 1999. Gender and risk of autoimmune diseases: possible role of estrogenic compounds. Environ. Health Perspect. 107(Suppl. 5): 681– 686. 10. Hall, J. M., J. F. Couse, and K. S. Korach. 2001. The multifaceted mechanisms of estradiol and estrogen receptor signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 36869 –36872. 11. McDonnell, D. P. 2004. The molecular determinants of estrogen receptor pharmacology. Maturitas 48(Suppl. 1): S7–S12. 12. Frasor, J., J. M. Danes, B. Komm, K. C. Chang, C. R. Lyttle, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen. 2003. Profiling of estrogen up- and down-regulated gene expression in human breast cancer cells: insights into gene networks and pathways underlying estrogenic control of proliferation and cell phenotype. Endocrinology 144: 4562– 4574. 13. Manavathi, B., and R. Kumar. 2006. Steering estrogen signals from the plasma membrane to the nucleus: two sides of the coin. J. Cell. Physiol. 207: 594 – 604. 14. Deroo, B. J., and K. S. Korach. 2006. Estrogen receptors and human disease. J. Clin. Invest. 116: 561–570. 15. Whitacre, C. C., S. C. Reingold, and P. A. O’Looney. 1999. A gender gap in autoimmunity. Science 283: 1277–1278. 16. Igarashi, H., T. Kouro, T. Yokota, P. C. Comp, and P. W. Kincade. 2001. Age and stage dependency of estrogen receptor expression by lymphocyte precursors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 15131–15136. 17. Marriott, I., and Y. M. Huet-Hudson. 2006. Sexual dimorphism in innate immune responses to infectious organisms. Immunol. Res. 34: 177–192. 18. Kovacs, E. J. 2005. Aging, traumatic injury, and estrogen treatment. Exp. Gerontol. 40: 549 –555. 19. Whitacre, C. C. 2001. Sex differences in autoimmune disease. Nat. Immunol. 2: 777–780. 20. Medina, K. L., K. P. Garrett, L. F. Thompson, M. I. Rossi, K. J. Payne, and P. W. Kincade. 2001. Identification of very early lymphoid precursors in bone marrow and their regulation by estrogen. Nat. Immunol. 2: 718 –724. 21. Soldan, S. S., A. I. Alvarez Retuerto, N. L. Sicotte, and R. R. Voskuhl. 2003. Immune modulation in multiple sclerosis patients treated with the pregnancy hormone estriol. J. Immunol. 171: 6267– 6274. 22. Grimaldi, C. M., L. Hill, X. Xu, E. Peeva, and B. Diamond. 2005. Hormonal modulation of B cell development and repertoire selection. Mol. Immunol. 42: 811– 820. 23. Howell, A. L., S. N. Asin, G. R. Yeaman, and C. R. Wira. 2005. HIV-1 infection of the female reproductive tract. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 2: 35–38. 24. Medina, K. L., and P. W. Kincade. 1994. Pregnancy-related steroids are potential negative regulators of B lymphopoiesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 5382–5386. 25. Welner, R. S., R. Pelayo, K. P. Garrett, X. Chen, S. S. Perry, X. H. Sun, B. L. Kee, and P. W. Kincade. 2007. Interferon-producing killer dendritic cells (IKDCs) arise via a unique differentiation pathway from primitive c-kitHiCD62L⫹ lymphoid progenitors. Blood 109: 4825– 4931. 26. Harman, B. C., J. P. Miller, N. Nikbakht, R. Gerstein, and D. Allman. 2006. Mouse plasmacytoid dendritic cells derive exclusively from estrogen-resistant myeloid progenitors. Blood 108: 878 – 885. 27. Nalbandian, G., and S. Kovats. 2005. Understanding sex biases in immunity: effects of estrogen on the differentiation and function of antigen presenting cells. Immunol. Res. 31: 91–106. 28. Paharkova-Vatchkova, V., R. Maldonado, and S. Kovats. 2004. Estrogen preferentially promotes the differentiation of CD11c⫹CD11bintermediate dendritic cells from bone marrow precursors. J. Immunol. 172: 1426 –1436. 29. Mao, A., V. Paharkova-Vatchkova, J. Hardy, M. M. Miller, and S. Kovats. 2005. Estrogen selectively promotes the differentiation of dendritic cells with characteristics of Langerhans cells. J. Immunol. 175: 5146 –5151. 30. Nalbandian, G., V. Paharkova-Vatchkova, A. Mao, S. Nale, and S. Kovats. 2005. The selective estrogen receptor modulators, tamoxifen and raloxifene, impair dendritic cell differentiation and activation. J. Immunol. 175: 2666 –2675.

738 31. Shortman, K., and S. H. Naik. 2007. Steady-state and inflammatory dendritic-cell development. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7: 19 –30. 32. Wu, L., and Y. J. Liu. 2007. Development of dendritic-cell lineages. Immunity 26: 741–750. 33. McKenna, H. J., K. L. Stocking, R. E. Miller, K. Brasel, T. De Smedt, E. Maraskovsky, C. R. Maliszewski, D. H. Lynch, J. Smith, B. Pulendran, et al. 2000. Mice lacking flt3 ligand have deficient hematopoiesis affecting hematopoietic progenitor cells, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells. Blood 95: 3489 –3497. 34. Vremec, D., G. J. Lieschke, A. R. Dunn, L. Robb, D. Metcalf, and K. Shortman. 1997. The influence of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor on dendritic cell levels in mouse lymphoid organs. Eur. J. Immunol. 27: 40 – 44. 35. O’Keeffe, M., H. Hochrein, D. Vremec, J. Pooley, R. Evans, S. Woulfe, and K. Shortman. 2002. Effects of administration of progenipoietin 1: Flt-3 ligand, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and pegylated granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on dendritic cell subsets in mice. Blood 99: 2122–2130. 36. Daro, E., B. Pulendran, K. Brasel, M. Teepe, D. Pettit, D. H. Lynch, D. Vremec, L. Robb, K. Shortman, H. J. McKenna, et al. 2000. Polyethylene glycol-modified GM-CSF expands CD11bhighCD11chigh but not CD11blowCD11chigh murine dendritic cells in vivo: a comparative analysis with Flt3 ligand. J. Immunol. 165: 49 –58. 37. Maraskovsky, E., K. Brasel, M. Teepe, E. R. Roux, S. D. Lyman, K. Shortman, and H. J. McKenna. 1996. Dramatic increase in the numbers of functionally mature dendritic cells in Flt3 ligand-treated mice: multiple dendritic cell subpopulations identified. J. Exp. Med. 184: 1953–1962. 38. Mach, N., S. Gillessen, S. B. Wilson, C. Sheehan, M. Mihm, and G. Dranoff. 2000. Differences in dendritic cells stimulated in vivo by tumors engineered to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or Flt3-ligand. Cancer Res. 60: 3239 –3246. 39. Hamilton, J. A. 2002. GM-CSF in inflammation and autoimmunity. Trends Immunol. 23: 403– 408. 40. Willeke, P., B. Schluter, H. Schotte, M. Erren, E. Mickholz, W. Domschke, and M. Gaubitz. 2004. Increased frequency of GM-CSF secreting PBMC in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus can be reduced by immunoadsorption. Lupus 13: 257–262. 41. Karsunky, H., M. Merad, A. Cozzio, I. L. Weissman, and M. G. Manz. 2003. Flt3 ligand regulates dendritic cell development from Flt3⫹ lymphoid and myeloidcommitted progenitors to Flt3⫹ dendritic cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 198: 305–313. 42. D’Amico, A., and L. Wu. 2003. The early progenitors of mouse dendritic cells and plasmacytoid predendritic cells are within the bone marrow hemopoietic precursors expressing Flt3. J. Exp. Med. 198: 293–303. 43. Mende, I., H. Karsunky, I. L. Weissman, E. G. Engleman, and M. Merad. 2006. Flk2⫹ myeloid progenitors are the main source of Langerhans cells. Blood 107: 1383–1390. 44. Manz, M. G., D. Traver, T. Miyamoto, I. L. Weissman, and K. Akashi. 2001. Dendritic cell potentials of early lymphoid and myeloid progenitors. Blood 97: 3333–3341. 45. Fogg, D. K., C. Sibon, C. Miled, S. Jung, P. Aucouturier, D. R. Littman, A. Cumano, and F. Geissmann. 2006. A clonogenic bone marrow progenitor specific for macrophages and dendritic cells. Science 311: 83– 87. 46. Nikolic, T., M. F. de Bruijn, M. B. Lutz, and P. J. Leenen. 2003. Developmental stages of myeloid dendritic cells in mouse bone marrow. Int. Immunol. 15: 515–524. 47. Naik, S. H., A. I. Proietto, N. S. Wilson, A. Dakic, P. Schnorrer, M. Fuchsberger, M. H. Lahoud, M. O’Keeffe, Q. X. Shao, W. F. Chen, et al. 2005. Cutting edge: generation of splenic CD8⫹ and CD8⫺ dendritic cell equivalents in Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand bone marrow cultures. J. Immunol. 174: 6592– 6597. 48. Inaba, K., M. Inaba, N. Romani, H. Aya, M. Deguchi, S. Ikehara, S. Muramatsu, and R. M. Steinman. 1992. Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Exp. Med. 176: 1693–1702. 49. Wilkinson, R. F. 1993. The effect of charcoal/dextran treatment on select serum components. In Art to Science in Tissue Culture, Vol. 12, No. 3/4. Hyclone, Logan, UT, pp. 1–10. 50. Berthois, Y., J. A. Katzenellenbogen, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen. 1986. Phenol red in tissue culture media is a weak estrogen: implications concerning the study of estrogen-responsive cells in culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 2496 –2500. 51. Lutz, M. B., N. Kukutsch, A. L. Ogilvie, S. Rossner, F. Koch, N. Romani, and G. Schuler. 1999. An advanced culture method for generating large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow. J. Immunol. Methods 223: 77–92. 52. Qin, Z., G. Noffz, M. Mohaupt, and T. Blankenstein. 1997. Interleukin-10 prevents dendritic cell accumulation and vaccination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene-modified tumor cells. J. Immunol. 159: 770 –776. 53. Dascher, C. C., K. Hiromatsu, X. Xiong, M. Sugita, J. E. Buhlmann, I. L. Dodge, S. Y. Lee, C. Roura-Mir, G. F. Watts, C. J. Roy, et al. 2002. Conservation of CD1 intracellular trafficking patterns between mammalian species. J. Immunol. 169: 6951– 6958. 54. Divanovic, S., A. Trompette, S. F. Atabani, R. Madan, D. T. Golenbock, A. Visintin, R. W. Finberg, A. Tarakhovsky, S. N. Vogel, Y. Belkaid, et al. 2005.

ESTRADIOL REGULATES DC DIFFERENTIATION

55.

56.

57. 58. 59.

60.

61. 62.

63.

64.

65.

66.

67.

68.

69.

70.

71. 72.

73.

74.

75.

76.

77.

78.

79.

Negative regulation of Toll-like receptor 4 signaling by the Toll-like receptor homolog RP105. Nat. Immunol. 6: 571–578. Gilliet, M., A. Boonstra, C. Paturel, S. Antonenko, X. L. Xu, G. Trinchieri, A. O’Garra, and Y. J. Liu. 2002. The development of murine plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors is differentially regulated by FLT3-ligand and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Exp. Med. 195: 953–958. Katzenellenbogen, B. S., K. L. Kendra, M. J. Norman, and Y. Berthois. 1987. Proliferation, hormonal responsiveness, and estrogen receptor content of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells grown in the short-term and long-term absence of estrogens. Cancer Res. 47: 4355– 4360. Foster, H. L., J. D. Small, and J. G. Fox. 1983. Normative Biology, Immunology and Husbandry. Academic Press, Orlando. Couse, J. F., and K. S. Korach. 1999. Estrogen receptor null mice: what have we learned and where will they lead us? Endocr. Rev. 20: 358 – 417. Chang, E. C., J. Frasor, B. Komm, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen. 2006. Impact of estrogen receptor ␤ on gene networks regulated by estrogen receptor ␣ in breast cancer cells. Endocrinology 147: 4831– 4842. Smithson, G., J. F. Couse, D. B. Lubahn, K. S. Korach, and P. W. Kincade. 1998. The role of estrogen receptors and androgen receptors in sex steroid regulation of B lymphopoiesis. J. Immunol. 161: 27–34. Howell, A., C. K. Osborne, C. Morris, and A. E. Wakeling. 2000. ICI 182,780 (Faslodex): development of a novel, “pure” antiestrogen. Cancer 89: 817– 825. Lambert, K. C., E. M. Curran, B. M. Judy, D. B. Lubahn, and D. M. Estes. 2004. Estrogen receptor-␣ deficiency promotes increased TNF-␣ secretion and bacterial killing by murine macrophages in response to microbial stimuli in vitro. J. Leukocyte Biol. 75: 1166 –1172. Akashi, K., D. Traver, T. Miyamoto, and I. L. Weissman. 2000. A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages. Nature 404: 193–197. Karsunky, H., M. Merad, I. Mende, M. G. Manz, E. G. Engleman, and I. L. Weissman. 2005. Developmental origin of interferon-␣-producing dendritic cells from hematopoietic precursors. Exp. Hematol. 33: 173–181. Pelayo, R., J. Hirose, J. Huang, K. P. Garrett, A. Delogu, M. Busslinger, and P. W. Kincade. 2005. Derivation of 2 categories of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in murine bone marrow. Blood 105: 4407– 4415. Yang, G. X., Z. X. Lian, K. Kikuchi, Y. Moritoki, A. A. Ansari, Y. J. Liu, S. Ikehara, and M. E. Gershwin. 2005. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells of different origins have distinct characteristics and function: studies of lymphoid progenitors versus myeloid progenitors. J. Immunol. 175: 7281–7287. Lyman, S. D., and S. E. Jacobsen. 1998. c-kit ligand and Flt3 ligand: stem/ progenitor cell factors with overlapping yet distinct activities. Blood 91: 1101–1134. Feldman, G. M., L. A. Rosenthal, X. Liu, M. P. Hayes, A. Wynshaw-Boris, W. J. Leonard, L. Hennighausen, and D. S. Finbloom. 1997. STAT5A-deficient mice demonstrate a defect in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factorinduced proliferation and gene expression. Blood 90: 1768 –1776. Veiby, O. P., F. W. Jacobsen, L. Cui, S. D. Lyman, and S. E. Jacobsen. 1996. The flt3 ligand promotes the survival of primitive hemopoietic progenitor cells with myeloid as well as B lymphoid potential: suppression of apoptosis and counteraction by TNF-␣ and TGF-␤. J. Immunol. 157: 2953–2960. Onai, N., A. Obata-Onai, R. Tussiwand, A. Lanzavecchia, and M. G. Manz. 2006. Activation of the Flt3 signal transduction cascade rescues and enhances type I interferon-producing and dendritic cell development. J. Exp. Med. 203: 227–238. Laouar, Y., T. Welte, X. Y. Fu, and R. A. Flavell. 2003. STAT3 is required for Flt3L-dependent dendritic cell differentiation. Immunity 19: 903–912. Bjornstrom, L., and M. Sjoberg. 2002. Signal transducers and activators of transcription as downstream targets of nongenomic estrogen receptor actions. Mol. Endocrinol. 16: 2202–2214. Yamamoto, T., T. Matsuda, A. Junicho, H. Kishi, F. Saatcioglu, and A. Muraguchi. 2000. Cross-talk between signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and estrogen receptor signaling. FEBS Lett. 486: 143–148. Faulds, M. H., K. Pettersson, J. A. Gustafsson, and L. A. Haldosen. 2001. Crosstalk between ERs and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 is E2 dependent and involves two functionally separate mechanisms. Mol. Endocrinol. 15: 1929 –1940. Leung, K. C., N. Doyle, M. Ballesteros, K. Sjogren, C. K. Watts, T. H. Low, G. M. Leong, R. J. Ross, and K. K. Ho. 2003. Estrogen inhibits GH signaling by suppressing GH-induced JAK2 phosphorylation, an effect mediated by SOCS-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1016 –1021. Wang, L. H., X. Y. Yang, K. Mihalic, W. Xiao, D. Li, and W. L. Farrar. 2001. Activation of estrogen receptor blocks interleukin-6-inducible cell growth of human multiple myeloma involving molecular cross-talk between estrogen receptor and STAT3 mediated by co-regulator PIAS3. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 31839 –31844. Wada, H., Y. Noguchi, M. W. Marino, A. R. Dunn, and L. J. Old. 1997. T cell functions in granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 12557–12561. Burnham, K., L. Robb, C. L. Scott, M. O’Keeffe, and K. Shortman. 2000. Effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on the generation of epidermal Langerhans cells. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 20: 1071–1076. Jordan, V. C., S. Gapstur, and M. Morrow. 2001. Selective estrogen receptor modulation and reduction in risk of breast cancer, osteoporosis, and coronary heart disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 93: 1449 –1457.