Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of the HPV16/18 ... - CiteSeerX

IJC International Journal of Cancer

Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of the HPV-16/18 AS04adjuvanted vaccine in healthy Chinese women aged 18–25 years: Results from a randomized controlled trial Feng-cai Zhu1, Wen Chen2, Yue-Mei Hu1, Ying Hong3, Juan Li4, Xun Zhang2, Yi-Ju Zhang1, Qin-Jing Pan2, Fang-Hui Zhao2, Jia-Xi Yu5, Yan-Shu Zhang6, Xiaoping Yang7, Cheng-Fu Zhang8, Haiwen Tang9, Helen Zhang10, Marie Lebacq11, Marie-Pierre David11, Sanjoy K Datta11, Frank Struyf11, Dan Bi11, Dominique Descamps11, for the HPV-039 study group 1

Jiangsu Province Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing, China Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CICAMS) and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China 3 The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu province, China 4 National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China 5 Xuzhou Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China 6 Binhai Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Binhai, Jiangsu Province, China 7 Jintan Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Jintan, Jiangsu Province, China 8 Lianshui Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Lianshui, Jiangsu Province, China 9 GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Shanghai, China 10 GlaxoSmithKline, Beijing, China 11 GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium

Infectious Causes of Cancer

2

Key words: human papillomavirus vaccine, China, efficacy, safety, immunogenicity Abbreviations: AGC: atypical glandular cells; ASC-H: atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; ASC-US1: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or higher; ASC-US: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; ATP-E: according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy; CDC: Center for Disease Control and Prevention; CI: confidence interval; CICAMS: Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; ELISA: enzymelinked immunosorbent assay; EU: ELISA units; GMT: geometric mean antibody titre; HPV: human papillomavirus; HSIL: high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; LSIL: low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; MPL: 3-O-desacyl-40 -monophosphoryl lipid A; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; PI: persistent infection; SAE: serious adverse event; SD: standard deviation; TVC-E: total vaccinated cohort for efficacy; TVC: total vaccinated cohort; VE: vaccine efficacy This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. Contributors: Other authors from the HPV-039 study group who have contributed to the study and the review and approval of the article: Yong Chen, Yejiang Zhu (Binhai CDC). Shang-ying Hu, Feng Chen, Bin Liu, Jian-feng Cui, Xin-fu Liu, Unench Sharnuud and Wen-hua Zhang (CICAMS). Xiao-Li Cui (Shenyang Fourth People’s Hospital, Shenyang city, Liaoning Province). Hongxing Pan (Jiangsu Province CDC). Haihua Le, Changrong Wang (Jintan CDC). Shiyin Xue, Jiahong Zhu (Lianshui CDC). Yong Chen, Ling Ling Shen (Xuzhou CDC). Conflict of Interest: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare that their respective institutions received clinical trial funding from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies, through the Jiangsu Province CDC, the CICAMS (Beijing, China) and the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC) (Beijing, China). F. Zhu, F. Zhao, Y. Hu received support for travel to meetings related to the study from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. H. Tang, H. Zhang, M. Lebacq, M.-P. David, S. Datta, F. Struyf, D. Bi and D. Descamps are employees of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. H. Tang, M.-P. David, S. Datta, F. Struyf, D. Bi and D. Descamps hold restricted shares and/or stock options from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. Grant sponsor: This work was supported by GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines (registered as GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA). GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines designed the study in collaboration with investigators and coordinated gathering, analysis and interpretation of data and writing of the report. Investigators from the HPV-039 study group gathered data for the trial and cared for the women. All authors had full access to the complete final study report and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. The manuscript was developed and coordinated by the authors in collaboration with an independent medical writer and a publication manager, both working on behalf of GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28897 History: Received 10 Aug 2013; Accepted 20 Feb 2014; Online 17 Apr 2014 Correspondence to: Professor Fang-hui Zhao PhD, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 South Panjiayuan Lane, P.O. Box 2258, Beijing 100021, China, Tel.: [861087788900], E-mail: [email protected]

C 2014 The Authors. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of UICC Int. J. Cancer: 135, 2612–2622 (2014) V

2613

Zhu et al.

What’s new? With an estimated 75,000 new cases and 34,000 women dying from the disease annually, cervical cancer is a major publichealth concern in China. This is the first large scale randomised clinical trial of a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in China. The vaccine was found to be effective, immunogenic, and to have a clinically acceptable safety profile in young Chinese women. Prophylactic HPV vaccination thus has the potential to substantially reduce the burden of cervical cancers and precancers in China.

With an estimated 75,000 new cases and 34,000 women dying from the disease annually, cervical cancer is a major public health concern in China.1 A pooled analysis of population-based studies in China revealed a high prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 21, indicating that the cervical cancer burden may be underestimated.2 China could face a significantly increased burden of this disease in the absence of implementation of comprehensive vaccination and effective screening programs.2 Consistent with observations worldwide, HPV-16 and HPV-18 are the genotypes most commonly associated with cervical cancer in China,3–5 and two prophylactic vaccines based on L1 proteins of HPV-16 and HPV-18 have been developed. In clinical trials, the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine (CervarixV, GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines) was shown to be efficacious, immunogenic and to have a clinically acceptable safety profile in women from diverse geographic settings.6–9 The HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine is licensed in more than 120 countries worldwide and is currently undergoing regulatory evaluation in China. Following the completion of a Phase I trial in China,10 we now report data from the event-triggered final analysis of a Phase II/III trial of the vaccine in healthy young Chinese women. The primary objective was to assess vaccine efficacy (VE) for the prevention of 6-month persistent infection (PI) and/or histopathologically confirmed CIN11 associated with R

HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 (HPV-16/18). Secondary objectives included efficacy against other virological and clinical endpoints associated with HPV-16/18 and other high-risk HPV types, immunogenicity and safety. An interim analysis of immunogenicity and safety was performed on a subset of subjects at month 7.11 The study is continuing in a blinded fashion and participants will be followed to month 48.

Material and Methods Study design

This is an ongoing, double-blind, randomized placebocontrolled trial. Enrolment started in October 2008 and the last visit for the event-triggered analysis was in April 2011. The trial was carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00779766. The study protocol and informed consent were reviewed and approved by the ethics committees of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Jiangsu Province and the Cancer Foundation of China. An independent local Data Monitoring Committee was set up to provide advice and recommendation on statistical analysis and conduct of the study. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to the performance of any study-specific procedures.



This phase II/III, double-blind, randomized trial assessed the efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in young Chinese women (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT00779766). Women aged 18–25 years from Jiangsu province were randomized (1:1) to receive HPV vaccine (n 5 3,026) or Al(OH)3 control (n 5 3,025) at months 0, 1 and 6. The primary objective was vaccine efficacy (VE) against HPV-16/18 associated 6-month persistent infection (PI) and/or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 11. Secondary objectives were VE against virological and clinical endpoints associated with HPV-16/18 and with high-risk HPV types, immunogenicity and safety. Mean follow-up for the according-toprotocol cohort for efficacy (ATP-E) was ~15 months after the third dose. In the ATP-E (vaccine 5 2,889; control 5 2,894), for initially HPV DNA negative and seronegative subjects, HPV-16/18 related VE (95% CI) was 94.2% (62.7, 99.9) against 6-month PI and/or CIN11 and 93.8% (60.2, 99.9) against cytological abnormalities. VE against HPV-16/18 associated CIN11 and CIN21 was 100% (250.4, 100) and 100% (2140.2, 100), respectively (no cases in the vaccine group and 4 CIN11 and 3 CIN21 cases in the control group). At Month 7, at least 99.7% of initially seronegative vaccine recipients had seroconverted for HPV-16/18; geometric mean antibody titres (95% CI) were 6,996 (6,212 to 7,880) EU/mL for anti-HPV-16 and 3,309 (2,942 to 3,723) EU/mL for anti-HPV-18. Safety outcomes between groups were generally similar. The HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine is effective, immunogenic and has a clinically acceptable safety profile in young Chinese women. Prophylactic HPV vaccination has the potential to substantially reduce the burden of cervical cancer in China.

2614

HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in Chinese women

Participants

Healthy Chinese women aged 18–25 years at the time of first vaccination were enrolled at four sites in Jiangsu Province (Binhai, Jintan, Lianshui and Xuzhou CDCs). Women of childbearing potential were to be abstinent or to have used adequate contraceptive precautions for 30 days prior to first vaccination and agreed to continue such precautions for 2 months after completion of the vaccination series. Virgins were not enrolled in the study due to cultural and ethical considerations. Women had to have a single intact cervix. Women who were pregnant or breastfeeding, had an immunosuppressive or immunodeficient condition, a history of colposcopy, an allergic disease likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine or previously received HPV vaccination or 3-O-desacyl-40 -monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) or AS04 adjuvant were excluded.


Randomization and masking

Women were randomized 1:1 to receive HPV-16/18 AS04adjuvanted vaccine or aluminum hydroxide as a control. Treatment allocation at the investigator site was performed using a central internet-based randomization system. All participants, investigators and study staff were blinded to individual subject treatment assignments and results. Each vaccine dose contained HPV-16 and HPV-18 L1 virus-like particles (20 mg of each) adjuvanted with AS04 (50 mg MPL and 0.5 mg aluminum hydroxide). The vaccine and control were identical in appearance and were provided in prefilled syringes. 0.5 mL of vaccine or control was administered into the deltoid muscle at 0, 1 and 6 months. Cytology and histopathology

Women were scheduled to attend a gynaecological examination with cervical samples collected at day 0 and at 6-month intervals until month 48. Cytological evaluation was conducted at the Cancer Institute of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CICAMS); results were reported according to the Bethesda 2001 classification system.12 Participants with abnormal results were managed according to prespecified algorithms, based on the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and European guidelines. The algorithms were consistent with those used in other global efficacy studies conducted with this vaccine.6,7 Histopathological analysis was performed by a panel of gynaecological pathologists at CICAMS. An independent committee reviewed blinded data for women assumed to meet criteria for efficacy endpoints, to make final case assignments. HPV DNA testing

Cervical and biopsy samples were tested for DNA from 14 high-risk HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68) using SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 version 1 (manufactured by Labo Biomedial Product, Rijswijk, the Netherlands based on licensed Innogenetics technology).

HPV positive samples were also tested using HPV-16 and HPV-18 type-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR).13 Detection of HPV DNA in the tissue biopsies was regarded as associated with the lesion. If more than one HPV type was detected, causality was attributed on the basis of detection of the same HPV type in at least one of the two preceding cytological samples.6 Immunogenicity

Blood samples were scheduled for collection from a subset of women at the Binhai site at months 0, 7, 12, 24, 36 and 48. HPV-16 and HPV-18 antibodies were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)14 at the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, China. Assay cut-offs were 8 and 7 ELISA units (EU)/mL for anti-HPV-16 and anti-HPV-18, respectively. Safety

Solicited local (pain, swelling and redness) and general (fatigue, fever, gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, arthralgia, myalgia, rash and urticaria) symptoms were recorded in diary cards for 7 days after each vaccination. Unsolicited symptoms were recorded for 30 days after each vaccination. Pregnancies and outcomes, serious adverse events (SAEs) and medically significant conditions were reported throughout the study. Statistical analysis

The sample size was based on the number of events needed to demonstrate VE for key efficacy endpoints in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy (ATP-E), for those women who were seronegative by ELISA at month 0 and DNA negative by PCR at months 0 and 6 for the HPV type considered in the analysis. Assuming VE of 85%,6 it was calculated that 17 cases of the primary endpoint (6-month PI and/or CIN11 associated with HPV-16 and/or HPV-18) were needed to provide at least 90% power to obtain a significant result (defined as lower limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI] for VE above 0%). Thus, final analysis was to be triggered when at least 17 cases of the primary endpoint had accrued. Based on an estimated yearly event rate of 1% for 6-month PI and/or CIN11 in the control group,6 it was estimated that 3,000 evaluable subjects (1,500 per group) would be needed to accumulate 17 events before all subjects had completed their month 24 visit. The target enrolment of 6,000 women was estimated to provide 4,800 evaluable subjects (2,400 per group) at month 24 assuming that 20% of enrolled subjects would be nonevaluable because of drop-out or baseline seropositivity or DNA positivity for HPV-16 or HPV-18. Assuming VE of 90% for the secondary endpoint of CIN21 associated with HPV-16 and/or HPV-18,6,7 it was calculated that 12 cases of CIN21 would be needed in the ATP-E to have at least 80% power to obtain a significant result. Based on an estimated yearly rate of 0.16% for CIN21 associated with HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in the control


2615


Zhu et al.

Figure 1. Flow of participants through the trial. TVC, total vaccinated cohort (all vaccinated subjects for whom data were available); TVC-E, total vaccinated cohort for efficacy (all vaccinated women for whom efficacy data were available and who had normal or low-grade cytology at baseline); ATP-E, according to protocol cohort for efficacy (all evaluable women who met eligibility criteria and complied with protocol procedures who received three doses of vaccine or control and had normal or low-grade cytology at baseline). *n*: number present in one group only and duplicated to avoid unblinding of ongoing study. 1Completion status at Month 24 was unknown for these subjects at the time of this event-triggered analysis. 2ASC-H, HSIL, AGC or malignancy. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]

group,6,7 it is expected that 12 cases of CIN21 will have accrued by the time of the end-of-study analysis at month 48, assuming that 4,200 subjects (2,100 per group) will be evaluable at the time of that analysis. The principal analysis of efficacy was performed on the fully vaccinated ATP-E, which included all evaluable women who met eligibility criteria and complied with protocol procedures who received three doses of vaccine or control and had normal or low-grade cytology at baseline. Analysis was also performed on the total vaccinated cohort for efficacy (TVCE), which included all vaccinated women for whom efficacy

data were available and who had normal or low-grade cytology at baseline. The principal analysis was conducted in women who were HPV DNA negative at month 0 (ATP-E and TVC-E) and month 6 (ATP-E) and were seronegative at month 0 for the HPV type considered in the analysis. For virological endpoints, a subject was defined as having a persistent cervical infection for a specified HPV type if there was a sequence of positive HPV DNA samples for that HPV type, not interrupted by negative samples, such that the total range was more than 5 months (>150 days) apart for 6-month PI and more than 10 months (>300 days) apart for


2616


Table 1. Demographic and baseline characteristics (TVC) Vaccine N 5 3026

Control N 5 3025

23.0 (1.70)

23.0 (1.75)

Xuzhou City

842 (27.8)

842 (27.8)

Jintan County

771 (25.5)

771 (25.5)

Age at vaccination, years (SD) Region within Jiangsu Province, n (%)

Binhai County

601 (19.9)

601 (19.9)

Lianshui County

812 (26.8)

811 (26.8)

Received only one dose

30 (1.0)

33 (1.1)

Received only two doses

62 (2.0)

41 (1.4)

Received all three doses

2,934 (97.0)

2,951 (97.6)

Compliance with vaccination, n (%)

1

Previous and prevalent infection at entry, n (%) HPV-16 Seronegative and HPV DNA negative

2,085 (68.9)

2,047 (67.7)

Seropositive and HPV DNA negative

816 (27.0)

865 (28.6)

Seronegative and HPV DNA positive

26 (0.9)

36 (1.2)

Seropositive and HPV DNA positive

94 (3.1)

66 (2.2)

Missing data

5 (0.2)

11 (0.4)

Seronegative and HPV DNA negative

2,514 (83.1)

2,513 (83.1)

Seropositive and HPV DNA negative

467 (15.4)

465 (15.4)


HPV-18

Seronegative and HPV DNA positive

15 (0.5)

24 (0.8)

Seropositive and HPV DNA positive

24 (0.8)

11 (0.4)

Missing data

6 (0.2)

12 (0.4)

2,721 (89.9)

2,695 (89.1)

287 (10.6)

271 (10.1)

Cytological status at entry, n (%)2 Normal cytology With high-risk HPV DNA With high-risk HPV DNA other than vaccine type

226 (8.3)

236 (8.8)

With vaccine type (HPV-16/18) DNA3

83 (3.1)

58 (2.2)

266 (8.8)

290 (9.6)

157 (59.0)

156 (53.8)

ASC-US and LSIL With high-risk HPV DNA With high-risk HPV DNA other than vaccine type

134 (50.4)

130 (44.8)


45 (16.9)

55 (19.0)

HSIL, ASC-H and AGC With high-risk HPV DNA

34 (1.1)

29 (1.0)

29 (85.3)

24 (82.8)

With high-risk HPV DNA other than vaccine type

17 (50.0)

16 (55.2)


23 (67.7)

15 (51.7)

AGC: atypical glandular cells; ASC-H: atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL; ASC-US: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; HSIL: high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL: low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; N: number of subjects; n (%): number (percentage) of subjects in a given category. 1 Serostatus determined by ELISA and HPV DNA in cervical samples determined by PCR. 2 Five women in the vaccine group and 11 women in the control group had missing cytology results. 3 Includes women with HPV-16, HPV-18 or both. High-risk HPV includes HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68. High-risk HPV other than vaccine type includes HPV types 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68.

12-month PI. The start of the persistent cervical infection was defined as the date of the first positive sample in the sequence. Subjects had to have at least 5 months of follow-up

after Month 12 to be included in analyses of 6-month PI and at least 10 months of follow-up after Month 12 to be included in analyses of 12-month PI.


2617

Zhu et al.

Table 2. VE against incident and persistent infection, cytological abnormalities and CIN associated with HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in women who were HPV DNA negative and seronegative at baseline for the corresponding HPV type (according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy) Vaccine Endpoint

N

n

Event rate (95% CI)1

Control N

n


VE (95% CI)

6-Month PI and/or CIN11 (primary endpoint) HPV-16/182

2,497

1

0.03 (0.00, 0.18)

2,502

17

0.56 (0.33, 0.90)

94.2% (62.7, 99.9)

HPV-16

1,937

1

0.04 (0.00, 0.24)

1,884

15

0.67 (0.37, 1.10)

93.6% (58.1, 99.9)

HPV-18

2,320

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.13)

2,314

3

0.11 (0.02, 0.31)

100% (2140.3, 100)

HPV-16/182

2,497

15

0.49 (0.28, 0.82)

2,502

49

1.62 (1.20, 2.15)

69.6% (44.8, 84.2)

HPV-16

1,935

9

0.39 (0.18, 0.74)

1,884

30

1.34 (0.90, 1.91)

71.0% (37.3, 87.9)

HPV-18

2,321

7

0.25 (0.10, 0.51)

2,314

21

0.75 (0.46, 1.14)

66.9% (19.2, 88.1)

HPV-16/182

2,332

1

0.03 (0.00, 0.19)

2,326

15

0.52 (0.29, 0.86)

93.4% (57.1, 99.8)

HPV-16

1,810

1

0.04 (0.00, 0.25)

1,747

13

0.61 (0.32, 1.04)

92.6% (50.8, 99.8)

HPV-18

2,168

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.14)

2,154

3

0.11 (0.02, 0.33)

100% (2139.1, 100)

Incident infection

6-Month PI

12-Month PI HPV-16/182

1,111

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.22)

1,091

2

0.12 (0.01, 0.44)

100% (2421.8, 100)

HPV-16

799

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.30)

768

2

0.17 (0.02, 0.62)

100% (2410.6, 100)

HPV-18

1,034

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.24)

1,014

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.24)

–

HPV-16/182

2,494

1

0.04 (0.00, 0.22)

2,502

16

0.65 (0.37, 1.05)

93.8% (60.2, 99.9)

HPV-16

1,935

1

0.05 (0.00, 0.30)

1,884

12

0.67 (0.34, 1.17)

91.9% (45.5, 99.8)

HPV-18

2,318

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.16)

2,314

5

0.22 (0.07, 0.51)

100% (27.8, 100)

CIN11 HPV-16/182

2,497

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.15)

2,502

4

0.16 (0.04, 0.41)

100% (250.4, 100)

HPV-16

1,937

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.20)

1,884

4

0.22 (0.06, 0.57)

100% (246.9, 100)

HPV-18

2,320

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.16)

2,314

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.16)

–

CIN21 HPV-16/182

2,497

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.15)

2,502

3

0.12 (0.02, 0.35)

100% (2140.2, 100)

HPV-16

1,937

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.20)

1,884

3

0.17 (0.03, 0.48)

100% (2134.7, 100.0)

HPV-18

2,320

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.16)

2,314

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.16)

–

ASC-US1: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or higher; CIN11: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or higher; CIN21: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher; N: number of evaluable women in each group (for single HPV types women had to be DNA negative at months 0 and 6 and seronegative at month 0 for the corresponding HPV type; for combined HPV types women had to be DNA negative at months 0 and 6 and seronegative at month 0 for at least one HPV type); n: number of evaluable women reporting at least one event in each group; CI, confidence interval; PI: persistent infection. 1 Number of cases divided by sum of follow-up period (per 100 woman years); follow-up period started on day after third vaccine dose. 2 Women could be infected with one or both HPV types (thus, number of women with a HPV-16-associated lesion and number with a HPV-18associated lesion might not equal number of women with a HPV-16/18-associated lesion).

VE was calculated using a conditional exact method,15 which computes an exact CI around the ratio of event rates in vaccine versus control groups and takes into account the follow-up time of participants within each group. VE was defined as 1 minus the rate ratio. The follow-up for each woman started the day after third vaccination for the ATP-E and the day after first vaccination for the TVC-E. Follow-up ended either at the time of an event or the last date when data were available for the considered endpoint.

Safety analyses were performed on the total vaccinated cohort (TVC) of all vaccinated women for whom safety data were available and data are summarised using descriptive statistics. To prevent unblinding, the treatment assignment is not disclosed for events reported in one group only. Immunogenicity analyses were performed on the ATP cohort for immunogenicity (subjects who received three doses, met eligibility criteria, complied with protocol procedures and had results for antibodies against at least one vaccine antigen).



Any cytological abnormality (ASC-US1)

2618


Table 3. VE against incident and persistent infection, cytological abnormalities and CIN associated with HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in women who were HPV DNA negative and seronegative at baseline for the corresponding HPV type (TVC for efficacy) Vaccine Endpoint

N

n

Control


N

n


VE (95% CI)

6-Month PI and/or CIN11 (primary endpoint) HPV-16/182

2,543

4

0.09 (0.02, 0.23)

2,554

36

0.83 (0.58, 1.15)

88.9% (69.1, 97.1)

HPV-16

1,975

3

0.09 (0.02, 0.26)

1,930

24

0.74 (0.47, 1.10)

87.8% (60.0, 97.7)

HPV-18

2,362

1

0.02 (0.00, 0.14)

2,366

13

0.32 (0.17, 0.55)

92.3% (48.9, 99.8)

HPV-16/182

2,609

30

0.69 (0.46, 0.98)

2,637

78

1.79 (1.41, 2.23)

61.6% (40.9, 75.7)

HPV-16

2,021

19

0.57 (0.34, 0.88)

1,995

48

1.47 (1.08, 1.94)

61.4% (33.1, 78.6)

HPV-18

2,423

13

0.32 (0.17, 0.55)

2,441

35

0.86 (0.60, 1.20)

62.9% (28.2, 82.0)

HPV-16/182

2,517

3

0.07 (0.01, 0.20)

2,531

33

0.76 (0.53, 1.07)

91.0% (71.2, 98.2)

HPV-16

1,959

2

0.06 (0.01, 0.22)

1,915

21

0.65 (0.40, 0.99)

90.7% (62.1, 99.0)

HPV-18

2,340

1

0.02 (0.00, 0.14)

2,346

13

0.32 (0.17, 0.55)

92.3% (49.0, 99.8)

HPV-16/182

2,411

2

0.05 (0.01, 0.17)

2,434

12

0.28 (0.15, 0.49)

83.3% (24.9, 98.2)

HPV-16

1,877

1

0.03 (0.00, 0.17)

1,839

7

0.22 (0.09, 0.45)

86.0% (28.7, 99.7)

HPV-18

2,242

1

0.03 (0.00, 0.14)

2,260

5

0.13 (0.04, 0.30)

80.0% (279.2, 99.6)

Incident infection

6-Month PI

12-month PI


Any cytological abnormality (ASC-US1) HPV-16/182

2,539

3

0.08 (0.02, 0.23)

2,552

26

0.69 (0.45, 1.01)

88.5% (62.5, 97.8)

HPV-16

1,972

2

0.07 (0.01, 0.25)

1,929

19

0.68 (0.41, 1.06)

89.7% (57.5, 98.8)

HPV-18

2,358

1

0.03 (0.00, 0.16)

2,365

9

0.26 (0.12, 0.49)

88.9% (20.1, 99.8)

CIN11 HPV-16/182

2,543

1

0.03 (0.00, 0.15)

2,554

6

0.16 (0.06, 0.34)

83.3% (237.3, 99.6)

HPV-16

1,975

1

0.03 (0.00, 0.19)

1,930

6

0.21 (0.08, 0.46)

83.7% (234.3, 99.7)

HPV-18

2,362

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.10)

2,366

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.10)

–

CIN21 HPV-16/182

2,543

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.10)

2,554

4

0.11 (0.03, 0.27)

100% (251.4, 100)

HPV-16

1,975

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.13)

1,930

4

0.14 (0.04, 0.36)

100% (248.0, 100)

HPV-18

2,362

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.10)

2,366

0

0.00 (0.00, 0.10)

–

ASC-US1: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or higher; CIN11: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or higher; CIN21: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher; N: number of evaluable women in each group (for single HPV type women had to be DNA negative and seronegative for the corresponding HPV type at month 0; for combined HPV types women had to be DNA negative and seronegative for at least one HPV type at month 0); n: number of evaluable women reporting at least one event in each group; CI: confidence interval; PI: persistent infection. 1 Number of cases divided by sum of follow-up period (per 100 woman years); follow-up period started on day after first vaccine dose. 2 Women could be infected with one or both HPV types (thus, number of women with a HPV-16-associated lesion and number with a HPV-18associated lesion might not equal number of women with a HPV-16/18-associated lesion).

Subjects who acquired either HPV-16 or HPV-18 infection during the trial were excluded from this cohort. Seropositivity rates and geometric mean antibody titres (GMTs) for each antigen with 95% CI were calculated. To maintain blinding, all analyses were carried out by an external statistician. Statistical analyses were performed using SASV 9.2 and PROC StatXactV 8.1. R

R

Results Study population

A total of 6,081 women were enrolled at four sites in the Jiangsu Province of China and 6,051 subjects were included

in the TVC (Fig. 1). Mean age at time of first vaccination was 23.0 years in each group. Other demographic and baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Further description of baseline HPV DNA prevalence and seroprevalence are reported in a companion article.16 A total of 5,885 (97.3%) participants completed the full three-dose vaccination schedule (Table 1). The proportion of participants who were known to have withdrawn from the study at the time of this event-triggered final analysis was balanced between the groups (vaccine: 195 [6.4%]; control: 211 [7.0%]). 5,972 (98.7%) and 5,783 (95.6%) participants


2619

Zhu et al.

17 cases in the control group (2 cases of 6-month PI plus CIN11, 13 cases of 6-month PI alone and 2 cases of CIN11 alone) and 1 case in the vaccine group (of 6-month PI). High VE for the primary endpoint was also shown in the TVC-E (88.9% [69.1, 97.1]; Table 3). In the ATP-E, VE was 93.4% (57.1, 99.8) against HPV-16/ 18 associated 6-month PI, 69.6% (44.8, 84.2) against incident cervical infection and 93.8% (60.2, 99.9) against any cytological abnormalities (Table 2). VE against HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 associated 12-month PI was not statistically significant in the ATP-E (100% [-421.8, 100]), but was statistically significant in the TVC-E (83.3% [24.9, 98.2]) due to the additional cases accumulated in this larger cohort (Table 3). At the time of this analysis only a small number of cases of CIN were observed (Tables 2 and 3). In the ATP-E, VE was 100% (250.4, 100) against HPV-16/18 associated CIN11 and 100% (2140.2, 100) against CIN21, with 4 and 3 cases, respectively. All these cases were in the control group and were associated with HPV-16.

Figure 2. GMTs at Month 0 and Month 7 for women in the vaccine group by baseline serostatus (according-to-protocol cohort for immunogenicity). CI: confidence interval; GMT: geometric mean antibody titre; S-: seronegative prior to vaccination (n 5 244 for anti-HPV-16 and n 5 289 for anti-HPV-18); S1, seropositive (titre 8 EU/mL for anti-HPV-16 and 7 EU/mL for anti-HPV-18) prior to vaccination (n 5 107 for anti-HPV-16 and n 5 62 for anti-HPV-18); Total, all women irrespective of serostatus (n 5 351). Natural infection, GMT in women who had cleared a natural infection.6 Plateau level, GMT at the plateau level (Month 45–50) in a previous study in women aged 15–25 years in which sustained protection with the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine was shown up to 6.4 years after first vaccination.9 Numbers at the base of each bar are the percentage of seropositive women. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]

were included in the TVC-E and ATP-E. Reasons for withdrawal and for exclusion from cohorts are shown in Figure 1. At the time of analysis, the mean duration of follow-up was 15.3 months (standard deviation [SD] 3.8) for the ATP-E (counting started the day after the third dose) and 21.0 months (SD 4.7) for the TVC and TVC-E (counting started the day after the first dose). Follow-up will continue until Month 48. Efficacy

In the ATP-E, for initially HPV DNA and seronegative subjects, high VE was shown for the primary endpoint of HPV16/18 associated 6-month PI and/or histopathologicallyconfirmed CIN11 (94.2% [62.7, 99.9]) (Table 2). There were

In the ATP cohort for immunogenicity, the seroconversion rate at month 7 in initially seronegative women was 100% for anti-HPV-16 and 99.7% for anti-HPV-18 and GMTs (95% CI) were 6,996 (6,212 to 7,880) and 3,309 (2,942 to 3,723) EU/mL, respectively (Fig. 2). All initially seropositive women in the vaccine group remained seropositive for antiHPV-16 and anti-HPV-18 antibodies at month 7 and GMTs were 5,698 (4,703 and 6,904) and 3,242 (2,736 and 3,842) EU/mL, respectively. Safety

Solicited symptoms were generally mild, self-limiting and of short duration (Supporting Information 1 and 2). Injection site symptoms (pain, redness and swelling) were reported in a numerically higher percentage of subjects in the vaccine group than the control group. There were no apparent differences in the incidence of unsolicited symptoms, SAEs, medically significant conditions, new onset chronic diseases, new onset autoimmune diseases or pregnancy outcomes between groups (Table 4). At the time of this analysis, one fatal SAE (suicide) was reported, which was assessed by the investigator as unrelated to vaccination. One SAE (gastrointestinal tract infection) was assessed by the investigator as possibly related to vaccination. Treatment allocation for these events has not been disclosed to avoid unblinding.

Discussion China has a population of over 500 million women aged 15 years and older17 who are at risk of developing cervical cancer, but at present there are no vaccines licensed in mainland China for the prevention of this disease. In previous global studies with HPV vaccines, a relatively small proportion of subjects were of Chinese ethnicity.6,18,19 This trial of the



Immunogenicity

2620


Table 4. Safety and pregnancy outcomes at the time of eventtriggered final analysis (TVC) Vaccine N 5 3026

Control N 5 3025

Unsolicited symptoms within 30 days postvaccination, n (%) Any

793 (26.2)

775 (25.6)

Grade 3

18 (0.6)

18 (0.6)

35 (1.2)

32 (1.1)

1

Related to vaccination

Serious and other significant adverse events, n (%) Serious adverse events

29 (1.0)

55 (1.8)

Number of serious adverse events

36

57

Number of serious adverse events related to vaccination1

*1*

*1*

Fatal adverse events

*1*

*1*

Adverse events leading to premature discontinuation

5 (0.2)

4 (0.1)

Medically significant conditions

158 (5.2)

156 (5.2)

New onset chronic diseases

8 (0.3)

11 (0.4)

New onset autoimmune diseases

2 (0.1)

2 (0.1)

Live infant: no apparent congenital anomaly

106 (56.4)

124 (54.1)

Live infant: congenital anomaly2

*1*

*1*

Elective termination: no apparent congenital anomaly

41 (21.8)

65 (28.4)

Elective termination: congenital anomaly2

*1*

*1*

Spontaneous abortion: no apparent congenital anomaly

7 (3.7)

9 (3.9)

Still birth: no apparent congenital anomaly

*1*

*1*

Ectopic pregnancy

4 (2.1)

6 (2.6)

Pregnancy ongoing

27 (14.4)

23 (10.0)


Pregnancy outcomes, n (%)

N: number of evaluable women in each group; n (%): number (percentage) of subjects with the event. *n*: number present in one group only and duplicated to avoid unblinding of ongoing study. 1 Assessed as causally related by the investigator. 2 The congenital anomalies for the live births were acleistocardia, congenital muscular torticollis and cleft lip and palate. The congenital anomaly for the elective termination was cyst on head and hydrocephalus.

HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine is the first large, controlled clinical study of an HPV vaccine in mainland China. The current prospectively defined, event-triggered analysis showed that the vaccine has an acceptable safety profile and good immunogenicity in Chinese women and provides preliminary evidence regarding VE in this population. This timely information will be useful to policy makers in China and other Asian countries to support decisions regarding HPV vaccination for the prevention of cervical cancer in addition to cervical screening programs. Moreover, our data

add to the body of evidence on HPV vaccines across different regions and ethnicities. Our trial had a largely similar design to other large trials evaluating the efficacy of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine, including the global PATRICIA (PApilloma TRIal against Cancer In young Adults) trial6,7 and the community-based trial in Guanacaste, Costa Rica,20 with regard to age of study subjects, vaccination schedule, clinical management for abnormal cytology and colposcopy referral and HPV DNA testing. A major difference between the current trial and these other studies is that the primary endpoint was prospectively defined as prevention of 6-month PI and/or histopathologically confirmed CIN11 associated with HPV-16/18, with CIN21 as a secondary endpoint, whereas the PATRICIA and Guanacaste trials defined CIN21 as the primary endpoint.6,7,20 Although CIN21 is the traditional surrogate to cervical cancer for evaluation of VE,21 it is limited by the large sample size and/or extensive follow-up required to obtain enough cases for assessment. PI is a reliably determined and objective clinical marker, independent of HPV type multiplicity, which shows good predictive value to CIN3 and cervical cancer.22–28 Global bodies such as the World Health Organization have recognized the utility of virological endpoints for the evaluation of HPV vaccines,21 although there is some debate on how persistent HPV infection should be defined when used as a surrogate. A meta-analysis conducted by Koshiol et al. suggested that association between HPV persistence and highgrade disease appeared strongest for longer duration of HPV infection (>12 months) and wider HPV testing intervals (>6 months or >12 months), but even the shortest HPV duration and testing intervals (6 months) were associated with an increased relative risk for development of high-grade disease.22 Thus, to gain an early insight into VE in the Chinese setting over the first 2 years of our study, in addition to immunogenicity and safety, the current event-triggered analysis used a composite of virological and clinical endpoints, incorporating a 6-month definition of PI. The trial is ongoing and efficacy data from a 4-year end-of-study analysis will allow further evaluation of efficacy, including longer term persistence and CIN21, when more endpoints have accrued. This event-triggered final analysis demonstrated high prophylactic efficacy of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against the composite primary endpoint of 6-month PI and/or CIN11 associated with HPV-16 and/or HPV-18. High VE against incident infection, 6-month PI and cytological abnormalities associated with HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 was also shown. Due to the relatively short duration of follow-up at the time of this eventtriggered analysis, the effect size for the primary composite endpoint was principally driven by cases of 6-month PI. The number of cases of CIN was limited, although all observed cases in the ATP-E were in the control group. There was also an insufficient number of HPV-18 infections to robustly assess VE against 6month PI and/or CIN11 associated with HPV-18 alone. It is expected that by the time of the end-of-study analysis, more data will be available for these endpoints.


Our results are in line with observations from the global PATRICIA trial, which evaluated the efficacy of the HPV-16/ 18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in women aged 15–25 years from a broad range of nationalities and ethnicities.6,7 In PATRICIA, high VE was shown against 6-month and 12month PI and CIN21, associated with HPV-16/18.6,7 In a 4-year end-of-study analysis of PATRICIA high VE was also shown against CIN21 and CIN31 irrespective of HPV type in the lesion29 and consistent cross-protective efficacy was shown against HPV-31, -33, -45 and -51.30 Results from the current trial are also consistent with a Phase II trial of the HPV-16/18-AS04 adjuvanted vaccine conducted in Japan, in which statistically significant VE was shown against 6-month and 12-month PI and cytological abnormalities associated with HPV-16/18.31 The follow-up time for our analysis is closer to that of the interim analysis of the global PATRICIA trial (15 months after the first vaccine dose)6 than that of the event-triggered final analysis,7 or the end-of-study analysis.29 This is an important consideration when comparing results across studies, because the observed efficacy estimates appeared to increase with longer duration of follow-up in PATRICIA. The planned 4-year follow-up of more than 6,000 subjects in the current trial should contribute to a better understanding of VE in the Chinese population, including cross-protection against non-vaccine HPV types. Strong antibody responses were elicited by the vaccine against both HPV-16 and HPV-18 in the population of young Chinese women. Antibody levels one month after the last vaccine dose were in the same range as those observed in women of a similar age participating in global studies.6,32 It has previously been shown that total and neutralising antibody titres elicited by the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine are sustained at levels several-fold above those observed for natural infection for up to 9.4 years after vaccination.33 We are continuing to evaluate immunogenicity in the current study and the kinetics of the immune response in Chinese women will be reported more fully in due course. Safety outcomes between groups were generally similar, except injection site symptoms were more common following administration of vaccine than control, in line with global findings.8 Symptoms did not affect overall compliance with the vaccination schedule. Incidence of solicited symptoms was generally lower than in a previous pooled analysis evaluating the safety of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in a multiethnic and geographically diverse cohort of almost 30,000 girls and women aged 10 years, which showed that the vaccine had an acceptable safety profile in women of all ages.8 The only notable difference compared with the established reactogenicity profile is that the incidence of fever was higher in the current study than reported previously (10% vs. 5%).8

This is due to the threshold for fever, which was defined as oral or axillary temperature of >37.0 C in the current study (as per Chinese clinical trial regulation) and >37.5 C in global studies. The incidence of fever was 2% in this study using the definition of 37.5 C. The incidence of grade 3 fever, defined using a universal threshold of >39.0 C, was similarly low in this study and the previous pooled analysis (