Epidermal equivalents of filaggrin null keratinocytes ...

5 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
observed a patchy expression of claudin-4 (Cldn-4) and occludin (Ocln) in FLG-/- HEEs compared to the. 92 continuous expression in FLG+/+ HEEs (Figure 1b).
Accepted Manuscript Epidermal equivalents of filaggrin null keratinocytes do not show impaired skin barrier function Hanna Niehues, MSc, Joost Schalkwijk, PhD, Ivonne M.J.J. van Vlijmen-Willems, BSc, Diana Rodijk-Olthuis, BSc, Michelle M. van Rossum, PhD, MD, Ewa Wladykowski, BSc, Johanna M. Brandner, PhD, Ellen H.J. van den Bogaard, PhD, Patrick L.J.M. Zeeuwen, PhD PII:

S0091-6749(16)31116-2

DOI:

10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.016

Reference:

YMAI 12380

To appear in:

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Received Date: 15 April 2016 Revised Date:

8 August 2016

Accepted Date: 7 September 2016

Please cite this article as: Niehues H, Schalkwijk J, van Vlijmen-Willems IMJJ, Rodijk-Olthuis D, van Rossum MM, Wladykowski E, Brandner JM, van den Bogaard EHJ, Zeeuwen PLJM, Epidermal equivalents of filaggrin null keratinocytes do not show impaired skin barrier function, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.016. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Epidermal equivalents of filaggrin null keratinocytes do not show impaired skin barrier

2

function

3 Authors:

5

Hanna Niehues1, MSc, Joost Schalkwijk1, PhD, Ivonne M.J.J van Vlijmen-Willems1, BSc, Diana Rodijk-

6

Olthuis1, BSc, Michelle M. van Rossum1, PhD, MD, Ewa Wladykowski2, BSc, Johanna M. Brandner2,

7

PhD, Ellen H.J. van den Bogaard1,$, PhD and Patrick L.J.M. Zeeuwen1,$ , PhD

RI PT

4

8 9

Institute:

10

1

11

Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and 2Department of Dermatology and Venerology,

12

University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

14

$

These authors share senior authorship

15

M AN U

13

SC

Department of Dermatology, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Molecular

Contact information of corresponding authors:

17

Ellen van den Bogaard

18

Adress: René Descartesdreef 1, 6525 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands

19

Phone number: +31 24 36 14093

20

e-mail: [email protected]

21

EP

TE D

16

Patrick Zeeuwen

23

Adress: René Descartesdreef 1, 6525 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands

24

Phone number: +31 24 36 17245

25

e-mail: [email protected]

26 27

AC C

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 28

Capsule summary:

29

We investigated differentiation and barrier properties of epidermal equivalents derived from

30

ichthyosis vulgaris keratinocytes that were homozygous for FLG null mutations. We found no effect

31

on penetration of tracer molecules, compared with filaggrin proficient keratinocytes.

32 Keywords:

34

filaggrin, ichthyosis vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, 3D epidermal equivalent, stratum corneum

35

permeability

RI PT

33

36 Abbreviations:

38

AD, atopic dermatitis; FLG, filaggrin; HE, hematoxylin and eosin; HEE, human epidermal equivalent;

39

IL, interleukin; IV, ichthyosis vulgaris; LY, Lucifer Yellow; SC, stratum corneum; TEWL, trans epidermal

40

water loss; TJ, tight junction; 3D, three dimensional

M AN U

SC

37

41 42 43 44

AC C

EP

TE D

45

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 46

To the Editor, The discovery that null alleles of the filaggrin (FLG) gene are a strong genetic risk factor for atopic

48

dermatitis (AD) has caused a paradigm shift in understanding the etiology of this disease [1]. FLG

49

deficient mouse models showed barrier impairment and enhanced percutaneous allergen

50

sensitization, exemplifying the potential functional consequences of insufficient FLG expression [2].

51

Both in AD patients carrying FLG mutations and in FLG proficient patients, increased transepidermal

52

water loss (TEWL) and skin permeability was noted in non-lesional skin suggesting that skin barrier

53

abnormalities are a general phenomenon in AD, not necessarily restricted to FLG mutations [3].

54

Others reported a mild increase of TEWL in ichthyosis vulgaris patients carrying two FLG null alleles,

55

but failed to demonstrate increased TEWL in heterozygous carriers of a FLG null allele [4]. It could be

56

argued that in vivo there may be confounding factors such as concomitant subclinical inflammation

57

of the apparently normal skin that would obscure the effect of FLG deficiency on barrier function per

58

se. For this reason, three dimensional (3D) skin models represent excellent models to investigate skin

59

barrier function, in a well-controlled setting. In vitro studies using various keratinocyte sources, 3D

60

models, FLG gene knockdown approaches and barrier assays have been published (summarized in

61

Supplemental Table E1). Due to different experimental procedures these studies appear

62

contradictory and are difficult to interpret. None of them used genetically defined FLG null (FLG-/-) or

63

FLG+/- keratinocytes, but all relied on gene knockdown approaches to lower FLG expression levels. In

64

this study we have used human epidermal equivalents (HEEs) generated from FLG null keratinocytes

65

derived from ichthyosis vulgaris (IV) patients to study the effect on epidermal differentiation and

66

barrier function, without confounding factors. We analyzed the outside-in and inside-out barrier of

67

these equivalents using low molecular weight tracers as previously employed in other studies.

68

Remarkably, we did not observe altered skin barrier function in HEEs of completely FLG deficient

69

keratinocytes.

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

47

All procedures for cell culture, cytokine stimulation, analysis of gene and protein expression and

71

epidermal barrier function were performed as described in Supplemental Materials and Methods.

72

Experiments were performed on fully differentiated HEEs expressing all markers of normal skin

73

(Supplemental Figure E1). For the FLG-/- HEEs we used keratinocytes isolated from IV patients (N=5)

74

which carry the two most frequent mutations of the FLG gene, leading to complete absence of FLG

75

protein as verified by immunohistochemistry (Supplemental Figure E2). Healthy volunteer

76

keratinocytes (N=6) were used as control (FLG+/+). We also considered the possibility that the FLG

77

genotype may drive skin barrier impairment depending on a concomitant Th2-cytokine milieu. We

78

therefore compared FLG-/- and FLG+/+ HEEs with and without stimulation by Th2-cytokines interleukin

79

(IL)-4 and IL-13 during the entire air-liquid interface culture (Figure 1). Overall, despite the absence of

AC C

70

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT keratohyalin granules and FLG protein in FLG-/- HEEs, we found no major differences between FLG-/-

81

and FLG+/+ HEEs concerning general epidermal development, stratification and morphology. The

82

stratum corneum of FLG-/- HEEs was found to be marginally thinner but this was not significant

83

(Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure E3). Th2-cytokines induced thickening of the viable epidermis

84

(Supplemental Figure E3) spongiosis and apoptosis, as we have described previously [5].

85

Differentiation proteins were strongly downregulated by Th2 cytokine treatment as reported before

86

[6], however, expression levels were equal for both FLG genotypes (Figure 1a). Quantitative PCR

87

analysis revealed that Th2-cytokine stimulation caused a significant decrease in the expression of

88

many genes that encode structural stratum corneum (SC) proteins (Supplemental Figure E4 and

89

Supplemental Figure E5). However, these were, with the exception of loricrin and caspase 14, not

90

significantly different between the two FLG genotypes. As tight junctions (TJs) are important in

91

epidermal barrier formation, we analyzed expression of TJ proteins of our HEEs. Occasionally, we

92

observed a patchy expression of claudin-4 (Cldn-4) and occludin (Ocln) in FLG-/- HEEs compared to the

93

continuous expression in FLG+/+ HEEs (Figure 1b). A previous study in mice, however, reported that

94

the epidermal tight junction barrier is not affected by the loss of filaggrin [7].

95

In vitro epidermal barrier function of the HEEs described above was assessed by outside-in and

96

inside-out tracer penetration assays (Lucifer Yellow (LY) and EZ-Link™ Sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-Biotin). To

97

validate the LY penetration assay for detection of SC defects in our system, we used the detergent

98

sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as a positive control, to compromise the HEE barrier capacity. We found

99

LY penetration through the SC reaching the keratinocytes of the living epidermis following SDS

100

treatment (Supplemental Figure E6). Interestingly, under normal conditions as well as in a Th2

101

cytokine milieu, where expression of most structural proteins was strongly diminished, both stratum

102

corneum of FLG+/+ and FLG-/- HEEs appeared impermeable for LY (Figure 1c) and EZ-Link™ Sulfo-NHS-

103

LC-LC-Biotin (Supplemental Figure E7) when applied at the SC side of the HEE. The inside-out barrier

104

with respect to water evaporation across the stratum corneum was measured by transepidermal

105

water loss (TEWL) determination of FLG+/+ and FLG-/- HEEs. No differences were found between the

106

groups (Figure 1d). In addition, we used EZ-Link™ Sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-Biotin inside-out diffusion to

107

investigate stratum corneum permeability in HEEs of both genotypes (Figure 1e). Again, no

108

differences were found.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

80

109

As sensitization against environmental antigens is a hallmark of AD, a leaky skin barrier has been

110

postulated as the most plausible mechanism linking genetic alterations to disease phenotype.

111

Conflicting outcomes of studies that have addressed this question during the last years

112

(Supplemental Table E1) may be caused by differences in experimental setup or the lack of proper

113

controls. Insufficient numbers of biological replicates, and off-target effects, a well known

114

phenomenon in knockdown studies, may have played a role. Most of these studies obtained a

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT significant reduction of FLG mRNA or protein expression (70-90%), but none of them reached

116

complete absence of expression. We used genetically defined keratinocytes, completely deficient of

117

FLG protein, in a 3D epidermal equivalent model. This provided a unique possibility to study the role

118

of FLG in skin barrier defects, reported for both IV and AD. Thereby, knockdown-derived off-target

119

effects were excluded, while potential compensatory mechanisms by naturally occurring FLG

120

deficiency were taken into account.

RI PT

115

In our study barrier function was tested by the polar solutes LY and biotin as these are commonly

122

used in comparable studies. Although alteration of the permeability for these low molecular weight

123

tracers was not observed, this does not completely rule out alterations of FLG-deficient epidermis

124

with respect to permeability for environmental molecules with other biophysical properties such as

125

microbial or airborne antigens, or fragments thereof. As microbiome alterations (e.g. Staphylococcus

126

aureus colonization) may play a role in AD, the penetration of environmental stimuli may be the

127

result of an interaction between microorganisms and genetic factors like FLG mutations, as

128

suggested in a recent study [8]. Clearly, this is an interesting area for future research.

M AN U

SC

121

129 130 131

Hanna Niehues1, MSc Joost Schalkwijk1 , PhD

Ivonne M.J.J van Vlijmen-Willems1, BSc

132

TE D

133 134 135 136

EP

137 138

140

AC C

139

Diana Rodijk-Olthuis1, BSc

Michelle M. van Rossum1, PhD, MD Ewa Wladykowski2, BSc Johanna M. Brandner2, PhD Ellen H.J. van den Bogaard1,$, PhD Patrick L.J.M. Zeeuwen1,$ , PhD

141

1

142

Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and 2Department of Dermatology and Venerology,

143

University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Dermatology, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Molecular

144 145

Conflict of interest

146

The authors state no conflict of interest.

147 148

Acknowledgements

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT We thank the patients and volunteers that participated in this study, which is funded by a TOP grant

150

(91211052) of The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw)

151

awarded to Joost Schalkwijk. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis,

152

decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The work of JMB was supported by the

153

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant No Br-1982-4).

RI PT

149

154 Figure legends

156

Figure 1. Comparison of epidermal proliferation, differentiation and epidermal barrier between

157

FLG+/+ and FLG-/- HEEs under normal or Th2-cytokine stimulated condition. (a) Morphological

158

analysis and protein analysis by immunohistochemistry for markers of epidermal proliferation (Ki67)

159

and differentiation (FLG, K10, IVL, LOR, LCE3 and TGM-1. (b) Immunofluorescence staining of HEE

160

shows TJ proteins Cldn-4 (green) and Cldn-1 (red) at the left part and Ocln (green) at the right part

161

combined with nuclear DAPI staining (blue). Amongst areas with normal TJ protein expression there

162

are some areas with patchy or almost absent expression of Cldn-4 and Ocln in the FLG-/- HEEs; these

163

are represented in the photographs. The arrows indicate the specific location of staining. (c) Outside-

164

in stratum corneum permeability assay by LY penetration (green) combined with nuclear DAPI

165

staining (blue). (d) TEWL analysis of unstimulated HEEs. (e) Inside-out stratum corneum permeability

166

assay by EZ-Link™ Sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-Biotin penetration (red) combined with nuclear DAPI staining

167

(blue). Pictures show combination of fluorescence and light microscopy images. White bars indicate

168

stratum corneum (SC) layer. All scale bars = 100 µm. N=11 (N=6 FLG+/+ and N=5 FLG-/- HEEs).

169 References

171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183

1.

2. 3. 4.

5.

AC C

170

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

155

Palmer, C.N., et al., Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nat Genet, 2006. 38(4): p. 4416. Kawasaki, H., et al., Altered stratum corneum barrier and enhanced percutaneous immune responses in filaggrin-null mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2012. 129(6): p. 1538-46 e6. Jakasa, I., et al., Skin barrier function in healthy subjects and patients with atopic dermatitis in relation to filaggrin loss-of-function mutations. J Invest Dermatol, 2011. 131(2): p. 540-2. Perusquia-Ortiz, A.M., et al., Complete filaggrin deficiency in ichthyosis vulgaris is associated with only moderate changes in epidermal permeability barrier function profile. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2013. 27(12): p. 1552-8. van den Bogaard, E.H., et al., Coal tar induces AHR-dependent skin barrier repair in atopic dermatitis. J Clin Invest, 2013. 123(2): p. 917-27.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 184 185 186 187 188 189 190

6. 7. 8.

Kim, B.E., et al., Loricrin and involucrin expression is down-regulated by Th2 cytokines through STAT-6. Clin Immunol, 2008. 126(3): p. 332-7. Yokouchi, M., et al., Epidermal tight junction barrier function is altered by skin inflammation, but not by filaggrin-deficient stratum corneum. J Dermatol Sci, 2015. 77(1): p. 28-36. Jones, A.L., D. Curran-Everett, and D.Y.M. Leung, Food allergy is associated with Staphylococcus aureus colonization in children with atoppic dermatitis. JACI, 2016. 137(4): p. 1247–1248.e3

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

191

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

epidermal differentiation

Th2 control *

0.5

***

***

**

** **

***

0.0 LOR

IVL

HRNR LCE2A CASP14 TGM1

SC

FLG2

**

Th2 control

***

0.0

CLDN1

EP

OCLN

TE D

0.5

AC C

fold difference

*

M AN U

tight junction 1.0

RI PT

fold difference

1.0

CLDN4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Knockdown

Skin equivalent features

Barrier assay

siRNA + lipofectamine

- Less keratohyalin granules - Normal SC - Impaired lamellar bodies - 60% decrease in UCA - Increased UV sensitivity - Increased DNA damage - Normal keratin intermediate filament integrity

Lucifer Yellow penetration

Lanthanum perfusion

Increased paracellular permeability

- Intercellular and intracellular spongiosis

1% SDS for 15 min followed by testosterone and caffeine absorption

Increased IL-6 and IL-8 release and testosterone absorption

- Normal epidermal morphogenesis - Normal SC lipid organization and lipid composition - Less NMF - Normal skin surface pH - Altered lipid profile

Butyl-PABA

No differences in permeability

Testosterone and caffeine absorption

No differences in absorption (not shown)

Lucifer yellow penetration

Increased permeability

85% mRNA 95% protein

Gruber et al. 2011 [E2] (adapted from Mildner et al.)

Neonatal foreskin KC’s

siRNA + lipofectamine

Kuchler et al. 2011 [E3] (adapted from Mildner et al.)

Neonatal foreskin KC’s

>90% (not shown) siRNA + HiPerFect

Van Drongelen et al. 2013 [E4]

N/TERT immortalized KC cell line

Vavrova et al. 2014 [E5] (adapted from Mildner et al.) Pendaries et al. 2014 [E6]

82% mRNA

Neonatal foreskin KC’s

Adult epidermal KC’s

shRNA + electroporation 85% mRNA 80% protein siRNA + lipofectamine 75% mRNA shRNA + lentivirus

TE D

90% mRNA 90% protein

- Less KC layers - Reduced SC thickness - Less keratohyalin granules - Impaired SC formation - Reduction in proliferation - Normal skin surface pH - Decreased NMF levels - Increased UV sensitivity - Altered epidermal differentiation - Activation pro-caspase 14 inhibition

Barrier permeability Increased permeability

RI PT

Mildner et al. 2010 [E1]

Keratinocyte source Neonatal foreskin KC’s

SC

Authors

M AN U

Supplemental Table E1: Filaggrin knockdown studies using in vitro 3D skin models

AC C

EP

Abbreviations: Butyl-PABA, butyl 4-aminobenzoate; KC, keratinocyte; mRNA, messenger RNA; NMF, natural moisturizing factor; N/TERT, normal human keratinocytes immortalized by stable human telomerase transfection; SC, stratum corneum; shRNA, small hairpin RNA (stable transduction); siRNA, small interfering RNA (transient transfection); UCA, urocanic acid; UV, ultra violet radiation

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Supplemental Table E2. Antibodies for immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence (grey) Antibody clone, manufacturer

Dilution

Cytokeratin-10

DE-K10, Euro Diagnostics

1:100

Filaggrin

NCL-Filaggrin, Novocastra

1:200

Loricrin

PRB145P, Covance

1:2000

Transglutaminase-1

H-87, Santa Cruz

Involucrin

MON-150, generated by our group [E13]

1:20

Late cornified envelope 3

Generated by our group [E14]

1:5000

4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

Boehringer Mannheim

Streptavidin Alexa Fluor 594

Life Technologies

Claudin-1

JAY.8, Thermo Fisher Scientific

1:1500

Claudin-4

3E2C1, Thermo Fisher Scientific

1:700

Occludin

N19, Santa Cruz

1:250

RI PT

Target protein

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

1:100

1:3000 1:200

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Supplemental Table E3. Primers used for qPCR. HUGO alias gene name

forward primer 5’-3’

reverse primer 3’-5’

E*

CASP14

Caspase 14

acaaaccatcccaacatacac

gatatgtcctttcctcttcgt

2,12

CLDN1

Claudin 1

ccagtcaatgccaggtacga

ttggatagggccttggtgtt

1,78

CLDN4

Claudin 4

gctgtaaacaggtttgggca

tcagaggggatcagtctcca

1,85

FLG

Filaggrin

acttcactgagtttcttctgatggtatt

tccagacttgagggtctttttctg

1,89

FLG2

Filaggrin 2

accaggttcacttaaacttgca

atgacatccactgtgtctggatc

1,96

HRNR

Hornerin

tacaaggcgtcatcactgtcatc

IVL

Involucrin

acttatttcgggtccgctaggt

SC

atctggatcgtttggattcttcag

2,12

gagacatgtagagggacagagtcaag

1,93

M AN U

Late cornified envelope LCE2A

RI PT

symbol

ggacctgtcccagagtgatg

gatccaggatgggctcttg

2,10

2A LOR

Loricrin

aggttaagacatgaaggatttgcaa

ggcaccgatgggcttagag

2,08

OCLN

Occludin

attggtcaccgagggagga

taaaccaatctgctgcgtccta

1,86

caccattgaaatcctgagtgatgt

tgaccagcccaaaggagaag

2,02

cccccgcaatgagatctaca

atcctcatggtccacgtacaca

1,99

hARP, 60S acidic ribosomal protein P0 TGM1

TE D

RPLP0

Transglutaminase 1

AC C

EP

*E is efficiency as fold increase in fluorescence per PCR cycle

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT