Framework for Watermark Robustness. Adjustment. Using Image Depth Map. Hoda Mohaghegh, Nader Karimi and Shadrokh Samavi. Mohaghegh, H.; Karimi ...
Framework for Watermark Robustness Adjustment Using Image Depth Map Hoda Mohaghegh, Nader Karimi and Shadrokh Samavi Mohaghegh, H.; Karimi, N.; Samavi, S., “Framework for Watermark Robustness Adjustment Using Image Depth Map,” Proceedings of Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), May 2015.
Outline
● Introduction ● Proposed Method ● Experimental Results ● Conclusion
2
Introduction Explosion in the use of digital multimedia
The enforcement of multimedia copyright protection
Digital watermarking 3
Introduction
Watermark Embedding
Secret Key
Watermarked Image
Original Watermark
Sender
Attack/ Distortion in Channel
Original Image
Secret Key
Distorted Watermarked Image Receiver
Watermark Extraction
Recovered Watermark
General Model of Watermarking System
4
Introduction Requirements on watermarking :
• Imperceptibility • Robustness • Security • Capacity 5
Introduction Tradeoff between Imperceptibility and Robustness
6
Introduction Watermarking Methods Classification Based on:
Spatial
● Domain
● Adaptivity
Frequency
Adaptive Non Adaptive 7
Input Image
Proposed Method Embedding Scheme
16x16 Blocking
Depth Estimation
Bi Foreground / Background Separation
4x4 Blocking Bi1
Bi16 SVD
SVD
16x16 Blocking
S11
S11 DCT
Alpha Selection
DCT Coefficients Modification
Inverse DCT S’11 Inverse SVD
S’11 Inverse SVD
B’i1
B’i16
Sub block retiling B’i Block retiling Watermarked Image
8
Proposed Method DCT Coefficients Modification
9
Proposed Method Depth Estimation and Foreground/Background Separation
Original Image¹
Depth Map¹
FG/BG Map
10 ¹.http://vision.middlebury.edu/.
Proposed Method
• •
•
Extraction Scheme Extraction procedure is completely blind, including: Partitioning SVD – DCT formation Watermark reconstruction based on the following rule:
11
Experimental Results Evaluation Metrics
12
Experimental Results Evaluation Metrics
13
Experimental Results Perceptual Quality - Objective Visual Quality Metric
Ours
Method [17]
PSNR
40.27
40.89
DBPSNR
44.91
42.57
14 [17] H. Guan, Z. Zeng, J. Liu, S. Zhang, and P. Guo, “A novel geometrically invariant blind robust watermarking algorithm based on SVD and DCT,” International Conference on Image Analysis and Signal Processing (IASP), pp. 1-5, 2012.
Experimental Results Perceptual Quality - Subjective
Ours
Method [17]
15 [17] H. Guan, Z. Zeng, J. Liu, S. Zhang, and P. Guo, “A novel geometrically invariant blind robust watermarking algorithm based on SVD and DCT,” International Conference on Image Analysis and Signal Processing (IASP), pp. 1-5, 2012.
Experimental Results Robustness – BER of extracted watermark
16
[17] H. Guan, Z. Zeng, J. Liu, S. Zhang, and P. Guo, “A novel geometrically invariant blind robust watermarking algorithm based on SVD and DCT,” International Conference on Image Analysis and Signal Processing (IASP), pp. 1-5, 2012.
Experimental Results Robustness – BER of extracted watermark Attacks
Attack’s parameter
Variance = 0.01 Variance = 0.02 Scaling Factor = 10 Scaling Factor = 25 Scaling Scaling Factor = 50 Scaling Factor = 75 Scaling Factor = 125 Window Size = 3 Window Size = 5 Median Filter Window Size = 7 Window Size = 9 Window Size = 11 AWGN
Ours 0.040 0.046 0.500 0.0015 0 0 0 0 0.0104 0.0766 0.3601 0.5402
BER Method [17] 0.0860 0.0900 0.5491 0.0871 0.0060 0 0 0.0060 0.0588 0.2381 0.4457 0.4985
17
[17] H. Guan, Z. Zeng, J. Liu, S. Zhang, and P. Guo, “A novel geometrically invariant blind robust watermarking algorithm based on SVD and DCT,” International Conference on Image Analysis and Signal Processing (IASP), pp. 1-5, 2012.
Experimental Results Perceptual Quality – PSNR and DBPSNR Adaptive Method PSNR = 34.92 DBPSNR = 44.40 BER = 0
Non-Adaptive Method PSNR = 35.65 DBPSNR= 42.55
BER = 0
18
Conclusion ● Using
hybrid procedure.
SVD-DCT
domain
for
embedding
● Depth as an adaptivity factor for controlling the strength
of embedding. ● A proper tradeoff between visual quality of watermarked
images with respect to Human Visual system and robustness.
19