Germany - IEA Bioenergy Task 37

6 downloads 0 Views 334KB Size Report
CHP-Bonus. Technology bonus. Biomass bonus. Basic fee. Compensation for electricity 2007 (EEG) .... The total fee (not only the basic fee) will be reduced by.
IEA Bioenergy Seminar Ludlow, 17 April 2008

Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries Braunschweig/Germany

Contents

ƒ Introduction ƒ Plant construction ƒ Substrates for biogas production ƒ LCA of biogas production ƒ Gas grid injection act ƒ Amendment of the EEG (actual draft)

Biogas plants in Germany 4000

3750 3500

3500 Number of plants

3000

2700

2500 2050

2000

1600 1300

1500 850

1000 500

1750

186 100 120 139 159

274 370

450

1050

617

0 1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

Compensation for electricity 2007 (EEG)

25

CHP-Bonus Technology bonus

20 Euro-Ct/kWhel

2

15

Biomass bonus

2

Basic fee

2 2

2

6 6

4

10 5 0

2

2 10,99

< 150 kW

9,46

>150-500 kW

8,51

8,03

>500 KW-5 MW

>5-20 MW

Substrate application in agricultural biogas plants (2005-2007)

15%

2%

83%

Energy crops and manure Energy crops Manure

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

er s Su nf lo w

ai ze

or n C

Energy crops type

M

Co b

M

gr ai ns

ix

ra ss G

To ta lc er ea ls G ra ss si la ge

C

er ea l

m

gr ai ns

ai ze

More than 90 % of new biogas plants use silage maize

Si la ge

Frequency of use [%]

Use of renewable raw materials (2005 – 2006)

Share of energy crops on substrate input

2/3 of the biogas plants have more than 50 % energy crops in the input

Relative frequency [%]

30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0-24

25-49

50-69

70-89

90-99

Mass ratio of energy crops on substrate input [%]

100

Bread wheat [EUR/ton]

Growing substrate costs since 2006

150 145 140 135 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 Jul 06

Aug Sep 06 06

Oct Nov Dec 06 06 06

Jan 07

Feb Mar 07 07

Apr May Jun 07 07 07

Silage maize without transport and ensiling Oct 06: 18 EUR/ton FM – Oct 07: 33 EUR/ton FM

Cost increase: 83 %

Specific investment costs for biogas plants

Spec. investvestment costs €/kWel

Installed electric capacity [kWel] Source: DZ-Bank

Profit of a 500 kW biogas plant with silage maize (7,750 h/a, ηel=37 %, no heat utilization) Silage maize [EUR/ton] 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00

Investment costs [EUR/kWel] 3,000

3,500

4,000

155,500 135,800 116,00 96,200 76,500 56,700 36,900

129,800 110,000 90,300 70,500 50,700 31,000 22,200

104,000 84,300 64,600 44,800 25,000 5,300 -14,500 Source: DZ Bank

Reduction of the greenhouse effect by biogas production

Source: Pehnt, IFEU 2007

LCA of biogas plants (1)

ƒ In most of the applications biogas production result in reduction of greenhouse gases. ƒ The best ecological effect can be achieved by anaerobic treatment of manure. ƒ For biogas production with energy crops up to 60 % of the relevant ecological effects are caused by crop production (e.g. fuels consumption for sewing, fertilization, harvesting, transport). ƒ Energy crops with a high biomass yield per area should be used to reduce the ecological effect of this module.

LCA of biogas plants (2)

ƒ Without gas-tight covering of the storage tank biogas production can have a negative climate effect (methane losses: 2-10 %). ƒ The utilization of the heat from the CHP is important for a positive ecological effect. ƒ Biogas upgrading and gas injection with conventional upgrading technologies can enhance the greenhouse gas emissions. ƒ The lowest methane losses can be achieved by using mono ethanol amine scrubbing (MEA: 0,1%) for biogas upgrading.

New gas grid injection act (Gasnetzzugangsverordnung)

ƒ On 12 March 2008 the German Federal Cabinet has decided a new gas injection act in order to promote the injection of biomethane (BNG) into the gas grid. ƒ The aim of the act is to substitute at least 10 % of the natural gas consumption up to 2030 by biogas. ƒ This act regulates the priority of connections to the grid for suppliers of upgraded biogas. ƒ A considerable part of the costs for gas injection have to be paid by the grid operators and not by the biogas producers.

Important regulations of the gas injection act (1)

ƒ Gas grid operators must connect biogas plants to the grid (obligatory connection). ƒ 50 % of the costs for the grid connection must be paid by the grid operator. ƒ The grid operator is responsible for the odorization, the control of the gas quality and the compression to the grid pressure and has to cover all these costs. ƒ The gas can be supplied by the biogas plant at various pressures according the different upgrading processes.

Important regulations of the gas injection act (2)

ƒ The gas transport customer will receive a fee from the gas grid operator to the amount of 0,7 €-Cent/kWh because gas grid operator saves costs for long distance transport. ƒ The methane losses by upgrading must be lower than 1 % within the next 3 years, and afterwards maximally 0,5 %. ƒ The injected gas must be feed-out within 12 month with a flexibility of 25 %.

Amendment of the EEG act (actual draft) ƒ The basic fee is enhanced by 1 ct/kWhel for biogas plants with a capacity lower than 150 kW (11.67 ct/kWhel). ƒ The biomass bonus is enhanced from 6 ct/kWhel to 8 ct/kWhel for biogas plants up to 500 kW. ƒ A manure bonus of 2 ct/kWhel is paid for biogas plants with a capacity lower than 150 kWel if at least 30 vol-% manure is used for biogas production. ƒ The CHP-bonus is enhanced from 2 ct/kWhel to 3 ct/kWhel. ƒ The technology bonus of 2 ct/kWhel is cancelled for dry fermentation and will be paid for biogas upgrading if the methane losses are maximum 0.5 vol-%. ƒ The total fee (not only the basic fee) will be reduced by 1 % per year.

Outlook • A competition between food and biogas production does not exist, because only 2 % (350,000 ha) of the agricultural land is used for energy crops. • The increased costs for energy crops are the result of the high world market prices (increased demand in USA, India, China, Brasilia). • The share of small biogas plants which use manure, intermediate crops and organic wastes increases. • The number of large biogas plants with gas injection into grid increases. • Without using the heat from CHP most of the biogas plants cannot make a profit in future.

IEA Bioenergy Seminar Ludlow, 17 April 2008

Many thanks for your attention!