European Journal of Endocrinology (2007) 157 S33–S37
ISSN 0804-4643
Idiopathic short stature: will genetics influence the choice between GH and IGF-I therapy? Martin O Savage, Cecilia Camacho-Hu¨bner, Alessia David, Louise A Metherell, Vivian Hwa1, Ron G Rosenfeld2 and Adrian J L Clark Endocrinology Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary, University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ UK, 1Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, 97239-3098 USA and 2Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health, Palo Alto, California, 94304 USA (Correspondence should be addressed to M O Savage who is now at Department of Endocrinology, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; Email:
[email protected])
Abstract Background: Idiopathic short stature (ISS) includes a range of conditions. Some are caused by defects in the GH–IGF-I axis. ISS is an approved indication for GH therapy in the USA and a similar approval in Europe may be imminent. Genetic analysis for single-gene defects has made enormous contributions to understanding the physiology of growth regulation. Can this type of investigation help in predicting growth responses to GH or IGF-I therapy? Methods: The rationale for choice of GH or IGF-I therapy in ISS is reviewed. Many ISS patients have low IGFI, but most can generate IGF-I levels in response to short-term GH administration. Some GH resistance seems to be present. Mutation analysis in several cohorts of GHIS and ISS patients is reviewed. Results: Low IGF-I levels suggest either unrecognised GH deficiency or GH resistance. In classical GHIS patients, there was a positive relationship between IGFBP-3 levels and height SDS. No relationship exists between mutations and phenotype. There is a wide variability of phenotype in patients carrying identical mutations. Heterozygous GH receptor (GHR) mutations were present in !5% of ISS patients and their role in causing growth defects is questionable. Exceptions are dominant negative mutations that have been shown to disturb growth. Conclusions: Analysis for single-gene defects does not give sensitive predictions of phenotype and cannot predict responses to GH or IGF-I therapy. Endocrine abnormalities have closer correlations with phenotype and may thus be a better guide to therapeutic responsiveness. European Journal of Endocrinology 157 S33–S37
Introduction The child with short stature presents a diagnostic puzzle in which the clinical phenotype, endocrine characteristics and genetic factors may all contribute to the categorisation of the patient into a specific diagnostic group. The development of molecular genetics has changed the face of diagnostic endocrinology and there may be a temptation to short-circuit the traditional process of clinical evaluation through careful history taking, detailed clinical assessment and appropriate investigations. The analysis of the patient’s genotype without taking into account these fundamental steps should not be encouraged, because the interpretation of the genetic findings can only be performed in the light of the knowledge of the extent to which an endocrine
This paper was presented at the Ipsen symposium, ‘The evolving biology of growth and metabolism’, Lisbon, Portugal, 16–18 March 2007. Ipsen has supported the publication of these proceedings.
q 2007 Society of the European Journal of Endocrinology
mechanism is disturbed and hence attributable to the genetic defect. The term idiopathic short stature (ISS) is descriptive of a wide range of short children without specific aetiologies (1). In the ISS patient, specific causes such as growth hormone (GH) deficiency, Turner syndrome, short stature due to birth weight, small for gestational age, other dysmorphic syndromes and chronic paediatric illness have been excluded. The exclusion of these causes leaves a large heterogeneous selection of children with short stature, which will include patients with genetic or familial short stature, constitutional growth delay and those who are abnormally short for their parental target height, who might have an unrecognised endocrine defect (1, 2). It is this latter group that is important from the therapeutic point of view. In broad terms, if patients in this group have unrecognised GH deficiency, they will respond well to GH therapy, whereas if they have GH resistance, they may be candidates for treatment with recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I DOI: 10.1530/EJE-07-0292 Online version via www.eje-online.org
34
M O Savage and others
(rhIGF-I). The question of whether genetic analyses can help to predict the appropriate therapeutic modality will be addressed in this short review.
Endocrine features of ISS By definition, children with ISS have normal GH secretion, which is almost always investigated by a pharmacological GH provocation test. Assessment of spontaneous GH secretion is very rarely included in the clinical evaluation of short stature. The entity of GH neurosecretory dysfunction (3) remains controversial; however, most clinicians have seen patients conforming to the description of a short child with a normal peak GH value after pharmacological stimulation, who is growing slowly and responds well to GH therapy. Our group studied spontaneous GH secretion in a series of ISS patients and found that overall mean GH secretion was slightly decreased (4). GH secretion, expressed in SDS, compared with 66 normal stature controls was: basal GH K0.48 (K0.84–0.93), height of GH peaks compared with zero K0.36 (K1.26–1.51; both P!0.05), total GH secretion K0.76 (K1.22–0.42) and total GH secretion above baseline K0.67 (K1.21– 0.94; both P!0.01). Children with ISS have relatively normal levels of GH binding protein (GHBP). However, some patients who had been selected for treatment with GH were found to have low concentrations of GHBP suggesting reduced GH receptor (GHR) function (5). These patients tend to have lower IGF-I levels yet higher endogenous GH secretion, suggestive of partial GH insensitivity (6). Baseline IGF-I levels are usually low to low normal in children with ISS (4). However, the degree of IGF-I deficiency in ISS is less marked than that in severe GH deficiency or in classical or atypical GHIS patients. Some studies of the IGF-I generation test in children with ISS have demonstrated that IGF-I and IGF binding protein (IGFBP-3) production is reduced, consistent with some degree of GH resistance, but remains much greater than in patients with homozygous GHR defects (7). Our group demonstrated satisfactory IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation during standard and low-dose IGF-I generation tests, indicating that most children with ISS can respond to short-term stimulation with GH (4). Abnormalities of the GH–IGF-I axis in ISS patients are well recognised (8).
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2007) 157
short stature and normal facial appearance with less biochemical abnormalities (10). It should be emphasised here that no relationship was demonstrated between homozygous mutations of the GHR and clinical phenotypes in the European GHI series (11). This contrasted with the close positive relationship which was reported between the biological defect, expressed as IGFBP-3 SDS values, and height SDS scores (11). In 1997, Ayling et al. provided new insights into the genetics of abnormal growth from the study of a family with short stature without Laron syndrome features (12). The child and her mother were reported to have the first heterozygous mutation with a dominant negative effect. The mutation (IVS8as-1 G/C) was situated in the acceptor splice site of intron 8 resulting in the skipping of exon 9 and the production of a truncated GHR. The mutant GHR formed heterodimers with the wild-type GHR and exerted a dominant negative effect on the normal protein. A second mutation (IVS9dsC1 G/A) leading to the same consequence was described by Iida (13). Both patients had positive GHBP and normal facial appearance. We described a similar phenotype in four siblings with a mutation causing the insertion of a pseudoexon between exons 6 and 7 (14). The 108 bp insertion caused the addition, in frame, of 36 amino acids between codons 206 and 207 (Fig. 1). We predicted that this would affect dimerisation of the receptor; however, crystal structure modelling of the mutant GHR showed no alteration of the dimerisation domain and cell studies resulted in a defect in trafficking. A more recent report described our further experience of several more patients with this mutation; however, the lack of genotype–phenotype correlation remains (15).
Further heterozygous GHR mutations in ISS Patients with ISS and normal GH secretion have been evaluated for GHR abnormalities. Although more than A → G base change
2 3
4
5
23 4
Genetic studies in ISS An overlap exists between ISS patients and those with partial or atypical GH insensitivity (GHI). This was appreciated from the study of the European cohort of GHI patients (9), some of whom did not have the typical appearance of Laron syndrome. In fact, some had milder www.eje-online.org
6
5
6ψ
6
7
8
6ψ 7 8 9
9
10
10
GHR mut mRNA 6ψ Figure 1 Aberrant splicing in the GH receptor gene. The nucleotide base change (A/G) activates the pseudoexon (6J) and causes splicing in of 6J between exons 6 and 7. The resulting mutant mRNA transcript has an extra 108 bp of sequence leading to the insertion of an extra 36 amino acids, in frame, between codons 206 and 207 of the mature protein.
Genetic analysis in idiopathic short stature
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2007) 157
60 molecular defects in the GHR have been described (16), the majority of ISS patients have been found to have normal coding regions of the GHR. In 1995, Goddard et al. studied a group of ISS patients with low serum GHBP suggestive of partial GHIS (17). Four patients had heterozygous GHR mutations. In a compound heterozygote, the two deleterious mutations (E44K and R161C) would explain the patient’s short stature. In the other three cases, there may have been a second unidentified mutation in the intracellular domain giving rise to the ISS because the transmembrane and intracellular domains of these patients were not sequenced. Further to this, Goddard’s group studied 100 patients across the spectrum of ISS, resulting in the discovery of three more carriers of heterozygous extracellular mutations and one patient with a heterozygous mutation (A478T) in exon 10 (18). Similarly a study of 17 ISS subjects found a novel heterozygous mutation (V144I) in exon 6 of one patient and no mutation on the other allele (19). Another study of 26 ISS patients resulted in one patient with a heterozygous GHR mutation described previously (R161C; 20). A more recent study of 37 patients with ISS revealed two novel GHR mutations (21; C94C, V144A) not found in 100 controls. These studies relied primarily on the examination of exons by single-strand conformational analysis rather than complete sequencing of the GHR gene. In summary, it can be estimated that not more than 5% of patients with ISS have heterozygous GHR mutations, of which the role on causing growth disturbance remains uncertain (Fig. 2).
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms and short stature Polymorphisms in the GHR have also been identified in patients with ISS. Two mutations (C422F and P561T) were associated with ISS, but proof is lacking that either IVS6 IVS8 pseudoexoninsertion as_1 G → C homozygous heterozygous
IVS9 ds+1 G → A ds+2 T → C heterozygous
Splice site mutations
2
3
4
5
C122X E44K hetero T51I Q65X heterozygous
6
V144I R161C hetero
7
R211H E224D hetero
8
9
10
A478T hetero Single nucleotide mutations
Figure 2 Single-nucleotide and splice-site mutations reported in patients with short stature who do not have Laron syndrome. A schematic of the GHR gene, coding exons 2–10 are represented by white boxes and introns by black lines. Single-nucleotide (below the gene) and splice-site mutations (above) are indicated along with their positions on the gene and whether they were found in heterozygous or homozygous form.
35
of these is functional. No difference in signalling between the wild-type and mutant C422F GHR was demonstrated (22). The P561T change was found in 15% of the normal population and showed no correlation with height (23).
New genetic defects of GH action relevant to short stature GHR intracellular signalling (STAT5b) defects Two studies have shown the absence of GH-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the STAT protein in patients with ISS, but the authors could not identify any mutations in these patients (24, 25). Only recently did the first reports appear of a defect in the GH-signalling cascade. Kofoed et al. reported a homozygous mutation in exon 15 of the STAT5b gene and demonstrated that the mutant protein could not be activated by GH, therefore failing to activate gene transcription (26). This child had features of severe GHI together with immunodeficiency consistent with a non-functional STAT5b. On careful scrutiny of the different cases reported, now numbering seven, and recently reviewed by Rosenfeld et al. (27), it is clear that this genetic mutation is associated with a growth phenotype, which is subtly less severe than that seen in Laron syndrome caused by a homozygous GHR mutation. Our own experience of two cases agrees with this. Nevertheless, the biochemical features demonstrate severe and unequivocal GHI.
Acid-labile subunit (ALS) defect IGF-I, the key GH-dependent effector protein regulating human growth, circulates as a ternary complex consisting of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and ALS (28). An ALS knock out animal model provided new insights into the role of ALS in the IGF-I system, with growth deficits seen 3 weeks after birth (29). GH levels were normal, however, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were significantly decreased. In 2004, Domene et al. (30) reported the first case of an inactivating ALS mutation. The defect was a guanine deletion at position 1338, resulting in a frameshift and the appearance of a premature stop codon (1338delG, E35fsX120). The patient had minimal post-natal growth impairment but basal GH levels were increased, associated with reduction in IGF-I and IGFBP-3, and undetectable ALS, unresponsive to stimulation by GH. Several additional cases of ALS mutation have since been reported. The relatively subtle growth defect could be explained by the preservation of local IGF-I production in the growth plate stimulated by an up-regulated GHR (Fig. 3). www.eje-online.org
36
M O Savage and others
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2007) 157
Pituitary GH Liver: ‘endocrine’ effect
Local effects GH
GH
Anti-insulin
GH receptor STAT5b Intracellular signaling pathway
IGFBP-3
Local IGF-I
Direct effects (independent of IGF-I)
IGF-I IGF-I
ALS Ternary complex (circulation)
IGF-I receptor
Linear growth
Figure 3 The effect of a homozygous mutation of the ALS gene on the GH–IGF-I axis and linear growth. Note that growth is only slightly affected, possibly because of negative feedback stimulation of GH secretion by low circulating IGF-I. Increased GH secretion may up-regulate the functional GH receptor increasing local IGF-I production that protects linear growth.
GH or IGF-I therapy for ISS?
Disclosure
As discussed above, ISS comprises a wide selection of patients with differing causes of short stature. Some may have a degree of GH deficiency and respond well to GH replacement, whereas others may have GH resistance and benefit more from IGF-I therapy. Experience of IGF-I therapy in ISS patients has not yet been reported. On the other hand, there are now many reports of GH therapy in ISS (31–34). The FDA approved GH for therapy in ISS in 2003 and this review will not discuss the benefits of GH therapy in non-GH-deficient short stature patients. As might be expected in any heterogeneous group of patients, there will be good responders and those who do not respond well. This is clearly, to some extent, a function of GH responsiveness or sensitivity. Circulating IGF-I levels during treatment correlate with the degree of response (35).
This paper forms part of a European Journal of Endocrinology supplement, supported by Ipsen. The authors disclose: M O Savage has a consulting agreement with Ipsen for 2007–2008. C CamachoHu¨bner, A David, L A Metherell, V Hwa, R G Rosenfeld and A J L Clark do not have any relationships with Ipsen. This article was subject to rigorous peer review before acceptance and publication.
Conclusions Genetic analysis has brought an additional dimension to the investigation of short stature. However, the nature of a particular mutation does not provide a sensitive prediction of the response to a specific growthpromoting therapy. Genotype–phenotype correlations are poor in the field of GH-resistant disorders. A better prediction of growth can be achieved by the study of basal and stimulated IGF-I levels. The identification of a specific single-gene mutation is, however, of great importance in clarifying the aetiology of a growth defect, as demonstrated by STAT5b and ALS mutations. Identification of gene defects, as opposed to polymorphisms, can help to elucidate physiological mechanisms, but currently fall short of sensitive predictions of optimal therapeutic choices or responsiveness. www.eje-online.org
References 1 Wit JM. Idiopathic short stature: reflections on its definition and spontaneous growth. Hormone Research 2007 67 (Suppl 1) 50–57. 2 Ranke MB. Towards a consensus on the definition of idiopathic short stature. Summary. Hormone Research 1996 45 (Suppl 2) 64–66. 3 Spiliotis BE, August GP, Hung W, Sonis W, Mendelson W & Bercu BB. Growth hormone neurosecretory dysfunction. A treatable cause of short stature. JAMA 1984 251 2223–2230. 4 Blair JC, Camacho-Hu¨bner C, Miraki-Moud F, Clayton PE, Burren C, Lim S, Albertsson-Wikland K, Rosberg S, Bjarnason R & Savage MO. Standard and low dose IGF-I generation tests and spontaneous growth hormone secretion in children with idiopathic short stature. Clinical Endocrinology 2004 60 163–168. 5 Carlsson LM. Partial growth hormone insensitivity in childhood. Baillieres Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1996 10 389–400. 6 Attie KM, Carlsson LM, Rundle AC & Sherman BM. Evidence for partial growth hormone insensitivity among patients with idiopathic short stature. The National Cooperative Growth Study. Journal of Pediatrics 1995 127 244–250. 7 Selva KA, Buckway CK, Sexton G, Pratt KL, Tjoeng E, GuevaraAguirre J & Rosenfeld RG. Reproducibility in patterns of IGF generation with special reference to idiopathic short stature. Hormone Research 2003 60 237–246. 8 Blair JC & Savage MO. The GH-IGF-I axis in children with idiopathic short stature. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 2002 13 325–330. 9 Savage MO, Blum WF, Ranke MB, Postel-Vinay MC, Cotterill AM, Hall K, Chatelain PG, Preece MA & Rosenfeld RG. Clinical features
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2007) 157
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
and endocrine status in patients with growth hormone insensitivity (Laron syndrome). Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1993 77 1465–1471. Burren CP, Woods KA, Rose SJ, Tauber M, Price DA, Heinrich U, Gilli G, Razzaghy-Azar M, AL-Ashwal A, Crock PA, Rochiccioli P, Yordam N, Ranke MB, Chatelain PG, Preece MA, Rosenfeld RG & Savage MO. Clinical and endocrine characteristics in atypical and classical growth hormone insensitivity syndrome. Hormone Research 2001 55 125–130. Woods KA, Dastot F, Preece MA, Clark AJ, Postel-Vinay MC, Chatelain PG, Ranke MB, Rosenfeld RG, Amselem S & Savage MO. Phenotype: genotype relationships in growth hormone insensitivity syndrome. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1997 82 3529–3535. Ayling RM, Ross R, Towner P, Von Laue S, Finidori J, Moutoussamy S, Buchanan CR, Clayton PE & Norman MR. A dominant-negative mutation of the growth hormone receptor causes familial short stature. Nature Genetics 1997 16 13–14. Iida K, Takahashi Y, Kaji H, Nose O, Okimura Y, Abe H & Chihara K. Growth hormone (GH) insensitivity syndrome with high serum GH-binding protein levels caused by a heterozygous splice site mutation of the GH receptor gene producing a lack of intracellular domain. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1998 83 531–537. Metherell LA, Akker SA, Munroe PB, Rose SJ, Caulfield M, Savage MO, Chew SL & Clark AJL. Pseudoexon activation as a novel mechanism for disease resulting in atypical growthhormone insensitivity. American Journal of Human Genetics 2001 69 641–646. David A, Camacho-Hubner C, Bhangoo A, Rose SJ, Miraki-Moud F, Akker SA, Butler GE, Ten S, Clayton PE, Clark AJL, Savage MO & Metherell LA. An intronic growth hormone receptor mutation causing activation of a pseudoexon is associated with a broad spectrum of growth hormone insensitivity phenotypes. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2007 92 655–659. Savage MO, Attie KM, Camacho-Hu¨bner C, David A, Metherell LA & Clark AJL. Investigation and treatment of patients with characteristics of growth hormone insensitivity. Nature Clinical Practice. Endocrinology and Metabolism 2006 2 395–407. Goddard AD, Covello R, Luoh SM, Clackson T, Attie KM, Gesundheit N, Rundle AC, Wells JA & Carlsson LM. Mutations of the growth hormone receptor in children with idiopathic short stature. The Growth Hormone Insensitivity Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine 1995 333 1093–1098. Goddard AD, Dowd P, Chernausek S, Geffner M, Gertner J, Hintz R, Hopwood N, Kaplan S, Plotnick L, Rogol A, Rosenfield R, Saenger P, Mauras N, Hershkopf R, Angulo M & Attie KM. Partial growth-hormone insensitivity: the role of growth-hormone receptor mutations in idiopathic short stature. Journal of Pediatrics 1997 131 S51–S55. Sanchez JE, Perera E, Baumbach L & Cleveland WW. Growth hormone receptor mutations in children with idiopathic short stature. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1998 83 4079–4083. Sjoberg M, Salazar T, Espinosa C, Dagnino A, Avila A, Eggers M, Cassorla F, Carvallo P & Mericq MV. Study of GH sensitivity in Chilean patients with idiopathic short stature. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2001 86 4375–4381. Bonioli E, Taro M, Rosa CL, Citana A, Bertorelli R, Morcaldi G, Gastaldi R & Coviello DA. Heterozygous mutations of growth hormone receptor gene in children with idiopathic short stature. Growth Hormone and IGF Research 2005 15 405–410.
Genetic analysis in idiopathic short stature
37
22 Iida K, Takahashi Y, Kaji H, Onodera N, Takahashi MO, Okimura Y, Abe H & Chihara K. The C422F mutation of the growth hormone receptor gene is not responsible for short stature. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1999 84 4214– 4219. 23 Chujo S, Kaji H, Takahashi Y, Okimura Y, Abe H & Chihara K. No correlation of growth hormone receptor gene mutation P561T with body height. European Journal of Endocrinology 1996 134 560–562. 24 Salerno M, Balestrieri B, Matrecano E, Officioso A, Rosenfeld RG, Di Maio S, Fimiani G, Ursini MV & Pignata C. Abnormal GH receptor signalling in children with idiopathic short stature. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2001 86 3882–3888. 25 Silva CM, Kloth MT, Whatmore AJ, Freeth JS, Anderson N, Laughlin K, Huynh T, Woodall AJ & Clayton PE. GH and epidermal growth factor signaling in normal and Laron syndrome fibroblasts. Endocrinology 2002 143 2610–2617. 26 Kofoed EM, Hwa V, Little B, Woods KA, Buckway CK, Tsubaki J, Pratt KL, Besrodnik L, Jasper H, Tepper A, Heinrich JJ & Rosenfeld RG. Growth hormone insensitivity associated with a STAT5b mutation. New England Journal of Medicine 2003 349 1139–1147. 27 Rosenfeld RG, Belgorosky A, Camacho-Hu¨bner C, Savage MO, Wit JM & Hwa V. Defects in growth hormone receptor signaling. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 2007 18 134–141. 28 Cohen P. Overview of the IGF-I system. Hormone Research 2006 65 3–8. 29 Ueki I, Ooi GT, Tremblay ML, Hurst KR, Bach LA & Boisclair YR. Inactivation of the acid labile subunit gene in mice results in mild retardation of postnatal growth despite profound disruptions in the circulating insulin-like growth factor system. PNAS 2000 97 6868–6873. 30 Domene H, Bengolea SV, Martinez AS, Ropelato MG, Pennisi P, Scaglia P, Heinrich JJ & Jasper HG. Deficiency of the circulating insulin-like growth factor system associated with inactivation of the acid-labile subunit gene. New England Journal of Medicine 2004 350 570–577. 31 Park P & Cohen P. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) measurements in growth hormone (GH) therapy of idiopathic short stature (ISS). Growth Hormone and IGF Research 2005 15 (Suppl 1) 13–20. 32 Leschek EW, Rose SR, Yanovski JA, Troendle JF, Quigley CA, Chipman JJ, Crowe BJ, Ross JL, Cassorla FG, Blum WF, Cutler GB Jr & Baron J. Effect of growth hormone treatment on adult height in peripubertal children with idiopathic short stature: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2004 89 3140–3148. 33 Wit JM & Rekers-Mombarg LT. Dutch Growth hormone Advisory Group. Final height gain by GH therapy in children with idiopathic short stature is dose dependent. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2002 87 604–611. 34 Hintz RL. Growth hormone treatment of idiopathic short stature: clinical studies. Growth Hormone and IGF Research 2005 15 S6–S8. 35 Cohen P, Rogol AD, Howard CP, Bright GM, Kappelgaard AM & Rosenfeld RG. IGF-based dosing of GH therapy in children: a randomized controlled study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2007 92 2480–2486.
Received 2 May 2007 Accepted 28 June 2007
www.eje-online.org