L-Fuzzy Vector Subspaces and Its Fuzzy Dimension - Scientific

1 downloads 0 Views 382KB Size Report
Dec 28, 2016 - In this paper, we introduce the definition of L-fuzzy vector subspace, define its di- .... We denote the family of L-fuzzy vector subspaces by LFVS .
Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory, 2016, 6, 158-168 http://www.scirp.org/journal/alamt ISSN Online: 2165-3348 ISSN Print: 2165-333X

L-Fuzzy Vector Subspaces and Its Fuzzy Dimension Chun’e Huang1*, Yan Song2, Xiruo Wang2 College of Biochemical Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China Mudanjiang Normal University, Mudanjiang, China

1 2

How to cite this paper: Huang, C.E, Song, Y. and Wang, X.R. (2016) L-Fuzzy Vector Subspaces and Its Fuzzy Dimension. Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory, 6, 158-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/alamt.2016.64015 Received: November 8, 2016 Accepted: December 25, 2016 Published: December 28, 2016 Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access

Abstract In this paper, we introduce the definition of L-fuzzy vector subspace, define its dimension by an L-fuzzy natural number. For a finite-dimensional L-fuzzy vector subspace, we prove that the equality dim E + E + dim E ∩ E = dim E + dim E

(

1

2

)

(

1

2

)

1

2

holds without any restricted conditions. At the same time, we deduce that the forf =  f + dim kef mula dim im dim E holds.

(

)

(

)

Keywords L-Fuzzy Sets, L-Fuzzy Vector Subspace, L-Fuzzy Dimension

1. Introduction Firstly, fuzzy vector subspace was introduced by Katsaras and Liu [1]. Then its properties and characters were investigated (see [2] [3] [4] [5], etc). The dimension of a fuzzy vector space was defined as a n-tuple by Lowen [6]. Subsequently, it was defined as a non-negative real number or infinity by Lubczonok [5], and proved that the formula

(

)

(

)

dim E1 + E 2 + dim E1 ∩ E 2 = dim E1 + dim E 2

(1)

is valid under certain conditions, where E1 and E 2 are fuzzy vector spaces. Recently, basis and dimension of a fuzzy vector space were redefined as a fuzzy set and a fuzzy natural number by Shi and Huang [7], respectively. Under the definitions, more properties of (crisp) vector spaces were correct in fuzzy vector spaces. In this paper, we generalize the results in [7] to L lattice, and prove that some formulas still hold in the lattice L. In particular, we present the definition of L-fuzzy vector subspace and its -fuzzy dimension. The L-fuzzy dimension of a finite dimensional fuzzy vector subspace is a fuzzy natural number. We prove that (1) holds without any reDOI: 10.4236/alamt.2016.64015 December 28, 2016

C. E Huang et al.

(

)

(

)

 f + dim im f = stricted conditions and dim kef dim E holds.

2. Preliminaries Given a set X and a completely distributive lattice L, we denote the power set of X and the set of all L-fuzzy sets on X (or L-sets for short) by 2 X and LX , respectively . For any A ⊆ X , we denote the cardinality of A by A . An element a in L is called a prime element if a ≥ b∧c implies a ≥ b or a ≥ c . a in L is called co-prime if a ≤ b∨c implies a ≤ b or a ≤ c [8]. The set of non-

unit prime elements in L is denoted by P ( L ) . The set of non-zero co-prime elements in L is denoted by J ( L ) . The binary relation < in L is defined as follows: for a, b ∈ L , a < b if and only if for every subset D ⊆ L , the relation b ≤ sup D always implies the existence of

d ∈ D with a ≤ d [9]. {a ∈ L : a < b} is called the greatest minimal family of b in the sense of [10], denoted by β ( b ) , and β *= ( b ) β ( b ) ∩ J ( L ) . Moreover, for b ∈ L , * op we define α ( b ) = and α = b a ∈ L : a < b ( ) α ( b ) ∩ P ( L ) . In a completely distri{ } butive lattice L , there exist α ( b ) and β ( b ) for each b ∈ L , and b = ∨ β (b ) = ∧α ( b ) (see [10]). In [10], Wang thought that β ( 0 ) = {0} and α (1) = {1} . In fact, it should be that β ( 0 ) = ∅ and α (1) = ∅ . Throughout this paper, L denotes a completely distributive lattice, and E is a crisp vector space. We often do not distinguish a crisp subset A of E and its characteristic function χ A . If A ∈ LX and a ∈ L , we can define

{

A[ a ] = { x ∈ X : A ( x ) ≥ a} ,

{

}

A( a ) =x ∈ X : a ∈ β ( A ( x ) ) .

}

a (a) A[ ] =x ∈ X : a ∈ { x ∈ X : A ( x )  a}. / α ( A ( x )) , A =

Some properties of these cut sets can be found in [11]-[16].

In [17] Shi introduced the concept of L-fuzzy natural numbers(denoted by  ( L ) ), defined their operations and discussed the relation of α -cut sets. We simply recall as

follows: for any λ , µ ∈  ( L ) , a ∈ L , (1) ( λ + µ )( a ) ⊆ λ( a ) + µ( a ) ⊆ λ[ a ] + µ[ a ] ⊆ ( λ + µ )[ a ] ; (2)

( λ + µ )(

a)

[a] a a a a ⊆ λ ( ) + µ ( ) ⊆ λ[ ] + µ[ ] ⊆ (λ + µ ) ;

(3) For any λ , µ ∈  ( L ) and a ∈ P ( L ) , it follows that

( λ + µ )(

a)

=λ ( ) + µ ( ) . a

a

3. L-Fuzzy Vector Subspaces Definition 3.1. L-fuzzy vector subspace is a pair E = ( E , µ ) where E is a vector space on field F , µ : E → L is a map with the property that for any x, y ∈ E , k , l ∈ F , we have µ ( kx + ly ) ≥ µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) .

In this definition, when L = [ 0,1] , L-fuzzy vector subspace is exactly the fuzzy vector subspace defined in [1]. We denote the family of L-fuzzy vector subspaces by LFVS . Let E = ( E , µ ) be a member of LFVS , we denote

159

C. E Huang et al.

{

E[ a ] = µ[ a] = { x ∈ E : µ ( x ) ≥ a} ,

{

}

E ( a ) = µ( a ) =x ∈ E : a ∈ β ( µ ( x ) ) .

}

a E [ ] = µ [ a] =x ∈ E : a ∈/ α ( µ ( x ) ) , E ( a ) = µ (a) = { x ∈ E : µ ( x )  a} .

We can obtain some properties of LFVS analogous to fuzzy vector subspaces as follows.

Theorem 3.2. Let E = ( E , µ ) be a member of LFVS , then (1) µ ( 0 ) = sup µ ( x ) . x∈E

(2) For any k ∈ F \ {0} and x ∈ E , µ ( kx ) = µ ( x ). The prove is trivial and omitted. Remark: Since L is a completely distributive lattice, the property that if µ ( x ) ≠ µ ( y ) , then µ ( x + y ) = µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) not holds for LFVS . This can be seen from the following example. Example 3.3. Let L be a completely distributive lattice with four elements as follows.

(

Let E =  2 , µ

)

be an L-fuzzy vector subspace on  2 where µ is defined by

1,   a, µ ( x) =  b, 0, 

x = ( 0, 0 ) . x ∈ {( y, 0 ) : y ∈  \ {0}}.

x ∈ {( 0, y ) : y ∈  \ {0}}.

otherwise.

We can easily check E is an L-fuzzy vector subspace on  2 . Suppose that x = ( 3, 2 ) and = y ( 0, −2 ) , then µ ( x + y ) = µ ( 3, 0 ) = a > µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) = 0 ∧ b = 0.

This example illustrates for L-fuzzy vector subspace µ ( x ) ≠ µ ( y ) ,

µ ( x + y ) > µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) . Theorem 3.4. Let E be a vector space, µ ∈ LE and E = ( E , µ ) . Then the following statements are equivalent: (1) E is an L-fuzzy vector subspace. (2) (a) For all x ∈ E and k ∈ F , µ ( kx ) ≥ µ ( x ) . (b) For any x, y ∈ E , µ ( x + y ) ≥ µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) . (3) For any x1 , , xr ∈ E and k1 , , kr ∈ F , where r is a finite natural number, we have

160

C. E Huang et al.



r



r



i =1

µ  ∑ki xi  ≥ ∧ µ ( xi ) .  i =1

The prove is trivial and omitted. In the following paper, the vector spaces we discuss are finite-dimensional. For their

L-fuzzy vector subspaces, the following observation will be useful. Remark: Let E = ( E , µ ) be a member of LFVS . Suppose that = µ ( E ) {µ ( x ) : x ∈ E} . Since E is finite-dimensional vector space, denotes dim E = n , then µ ( E ) is a finite subset of L. In the fact, let B be a basis of E , then B = n . Suppose that µ ( E ) is infinite, then for all a ∈ L , the total number of E[ a ] is infinite. Since B ∩ E[ a ] is a basis of E[a] , we have E[= B ∩ E[ a ] . Again since B is finite, the total number of E[ a ] is a] also finite. It contradicts with the hypothesis. Therefore µ ( E ) is a finite subset of L with at most 2n + 1 values; 2n values which can be attained at the vectors of E \ {0} and the maximum which is attained at 0.

Theorem 3.5. Let E be a vector space, µ ∈ LE and E = ( E , µ ) . Then the following statements equivalent: (1) E is an L-fuzzy vector subspace. (2) For all a ∈ L , E[ a ] is a vector space. (3) For all a ∈ J ( L ) , E[ a ] is a vector space. (4) For all a ∈ L , E [ a ] is a vector space.

(5) For all a ∈ P ( L ) , E [ a ] is a vector space. (6) For all a ∈ P ( L ) , E ( a ) is a vector space. Proof. We prove (1) ⇔ ( 4 ) and (1) ⇔ ( 6 ) , the others can be proved analogously. (1) ⇒ ( 4 ) We show that E [a] is a vector space as follows. Suppose that x, y ∈ E [a] ,

then a ∈ α ( µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) ) . / α ( µ ( x )) ∪ α ( µ ( y )) = / α ( µ ( y ) ) , i.e. a ∈ / α ( µ ( x ) ) and a ∈ Since E = ( E , µ ) be an L-fuzzy vector subspace, then α ( µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) ) ⊇ α ( µ (( kx + ly ) ) , [a] [a] we have a ∈ is a vector space. / α ( µ ( kx + ly ) ) , this means kx + ly ∈ E . Therefore E

Suppose that for all a ∈ L , E [ ] is a vector space. Let x, y ∈ E and k , l ∈ F . Since E [ a ] is a vector space, then kx + ly ∈ E [ a ] if and only if

( 4 ) ⇒ (1)

a

a a x ∈ E [ ] and y ∈ E [ ] . We have

(

)

a ∧ a∧ E [ ] ( kx + ly ) µ ( kx + ly ) = a∈L

( (

a a = ∧ a∨ E [ ] ( x )∧ E [ ] ( y ) a∈L

( (

)) ( (

))

a a = ∧ a∨ E [ ] ( x ) ∧ ∧ a∨ E [ ] ( y ) a∈L

a∈L

))

= µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) . Therefore E is an L-fuzzy vector subspace.

(1) ⇒ ( 6 ) Suppose that x, y ∈ E ( a ) , then µ ( x )  a and µ ( y )  a . Since a ∈ P ( L ) , then µ ( x )∧ µ ( y )  a . Because E = ( E , µ ) is an L-fuzzy vector subspace, we can a have µ ( kx + ly )  a , this implies kx + ly ∈ E ( ) . Thus E ( a ) is a vector space. ( 6 ) ⇒ (1) Let x, y ∈ E and k , l ∈ F . Since E ( a ) is a vector space, then 161

C. E Huang et al.

kx + ly ∈ E (

a)

if and only if x ∈ E ( ) and y ∈ E ( ) . We have the following implications. a

a

( a∨E ( ) ) ( kx + ly ) = ∧ ( a∨( E ( ) ( x )∧ E ( ) ( y ) ) ) ( )  ∧ a∨ E ( ) x ∧ ∧ a∨ E ( ) y  = ( ))   ( ) ( ( ))   ( )(    

µ ( kx + ly ) = ∧

a

a∈P ( L )

a

a

a∈P L

a

a

a∈P L

a∈P L

= µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) .

Therefore E is an L-fuzzy vector subspace. Theorem 3.6. Let E be a vector space, µ : E → L be a map, E = ( E , µ ) , and for

all a, b ∈ L, β ( a∧b ) =∩ β ( a ) β ( b ) . Then the following statements equivalent:  (1) E is an L-fuzzy vector subspace. (2) For all a ∈ L , E ( a ) is a vector space. Proof. (1) ⇒ ( 2 ) Suppose that x, y ∈ E ( a ) , then a ∈ β ( µ ( x ) ) and a ∈ β ( µ ( y ) ) , i.e. a ∈ β ( µ (( x ) ) ∩ β ( µ ( y ) ) . Since for all a, b ∈ L, β ( a∧b ) =∩ β ( a ) β ( b ) and E

is an L-fuzzy vector subspace, we can know a ∈ β ( µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) ) ⊆ β ( µ ( ax + by ) ) , this implies ax + by ∈ E ( a ) . Therefore E ( a ) is a vector space. ( 2 ) ⇒ (1) Suppose that for all a ∈ L , E( a ) is a vector space. Let x, y ∈ E and

k , l ∈ F . Since E ( a ) is a vector space, then kx + ly ∈ E ( a ) if and only if x ∈ E ( a ) and y ∈ E ( a ) . We have

)

(

∨ a∧ E ( a ) ( kx + ly ) µ ( kx + ly ) = a∈L

( (

= ∨ a∧ E ( a ) ( x ) ∧ E ( a ) ( y ) a∈L

=

( ∨ ( a∧E a∈L

(a)

))

( x ) ) )∧ ∨ ( a∧ E( a ) ( y ) ) 

= µ ( x )∧ µ ( y ) .

 a∈L



Therefore E is an L-fuzzy vector subspace. We can define the operations between two L-fuzzy vector subspaces analogous to fuzzy vector subspaces.

Definition 3.7. Let E1 =

E , µ1 ) and E 2 ( E , µ2 ) (=

be two L-fuzzy vector subspaces on E . Define the intersection of E1 and E 2 to be E1 ∩ E 2 = ( E , µ1 ∧µ2 ) . Define the sum of E1 and E 2 to be E1 + E= ( E , µ1 + µ2 ) where µ1 + µ2 is defined by for 2 all x ∈ E

∨ ( µ1 ( x1 ) ∧ µ2 ( x2 ) ) ( µ1 + µ2 )( x ) = x= x + x 1

2

= ∨ ( µ1 ( x1 ) ∧ µ2 ( x − x1 ) ) . x1∈E

Definition 3.8. Let E1 =

E1 , µ1 ) and E 2 ( E2 , µ2 ) (=

be two members of LFVS   and E = E1 ⊕ E2 . We define the direct sum of E1 and E2 to be E1 ⊕ E= ( E , µ1 ⊕ µ2 ) 2 where µ1 ⊕ µ2 is defined by for all x ∈ E , x =x1 ⊕ x2 , xi ∈ Ei , i = 1, 2

( µ1 ⊕ µ2 )( x ) = ( µ1 ⊕ µ2 )( x1 ⊕ x2 ) = µ1 ( x1 )∧µ2 ( x2 ) . 162

C. E Huang et al.

E , µ1 ) and E 2 ( E , µ2 ) (=

Theorem 3.9. Let E1 =

be two members of LFVS on

E . We have

(1) E1 ∩ E 2 is a member of LFVS on E . (2) E1 + E 2 is a member of LFVS on E . The proof of the theorem is trivial and it is omitted. Theorem 3.10. Let E1 = ( E , µ1 ) and E 2 = ( E , µ2 ) be the members of LFVS . We

have

( E ∩ E )[ ] = ( E )[ ] ∩ ( E )[ ] .

(1) For all a ∈ L ,

1

2

1

a

[a]

2

a

[a]

a

[a]

( E ∩ E ) = ( E ) ∩ ( E ) . ( ) ( ) ( ) a ∈ P ( L ) , ( E ∩ E ) = ( E ) ∩ ( E ) . ( ) ( ) ( ) a ∈ P ( L ) , ( E + E ) = ( E ) + ( E ) .

(2) For all a ∈ L ,

1

2

1

2

a

(3) For any

1

2

1

2

a

2

a

(4) For any

a

1

a

a

1

2

Proof. The proofs of (1) and (2) are easy by the definition of E1 ∩ E 2 and the properties of L-fuzzy sets. (3) For any a ∈ P ( L ) , we have

(

x ∈ E1 ∩ E 2

)

(a)

⇔ µ1 ( x )∧ µ2 ( x )  a

⇔ µ1 ( x )  a and µ2 ( x )  a

( )

⇔ x ∈ E1

(a)

( )

∩ E 2

(a)

(4) By the definition of the sum of L-fuzzy vector subspaces, for any a ∈ P ( L ) we have

(

x ∈ E1 + E 2

)

(a)





x= x1 + x2

( µ1 ( x1 )∧µ2 ( x2 ) )  a

⇔ ∃x1 , x2 ∈ E and x = x1 + x2 , such that µ1 ( x1 )∧ µ2 ( x2 )  a. ⇔ ∃x1 , x2 ∈ E , µ1 ( x1 )  a and µ2 ( x2 )  a. ⇔ x = x1 + x2 ∈ E1( ) + E 2( ) . a

a

Theorem 3.11. Let E1 = ( E , µ1 ) and E 2 = ( E , µ2 ) be two members of LFVS .

Suppose that for any a, b ∈ L , we have β ( a∧ b ) β ( a ) ∩ β ( b ) . Then = (1) ( E ∩ E ) = ( E ) ∩ ( E ) , 1

(2)

(

2

E1 + E 2

(a)

1

(a)

2

(a)

)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) . a

= E1

a

+ E 2

a

The prove is trivial and omitted.

4. Fuzzy Dimension of L-Fuzzy Vector Subspaces Definition 4.1. Let  ( L ) be the family of L-fuzzy natural number. The map dim : LFVS →  ( L ) is defined by

(

dim E ( n ) = ∨ a∧dim E[ a ] a∈L

) (n)

is called the L-fuzzy dimensional function of the L-fuzzy vector subspace E , and dim E is called the L-fuzzy dimension of E , it is an L-fuzzy natural number. We 163

C. E Huang et al.

usually use another form of dim E as follows.

{

}

dim E ( n ) = ∨ a ∈ L : dim E[ a ] ≥ n . Theorem 4.2. For each E ∈ LFVS and n ∈  , we have

(

dim E ( n ) = ∨ a∧dim E ( a ) a∈L

) ( n ) =∨{a ∈ L : dim E( ) ≥ n} a

(

)

Proof. For any n ∈  , let λ = ∨ a∧dim E ( a ) ( n ) . Obviously λ ≤ dim E ( n ) . Next a∈L

(

)

we show that λ ≥ dim E ( n ) . Suppose that b ∈ L and b ∈ β dim E ( n ) , then there exists a ∈ L and dim E[ a ] ≥ n such that b ∈ β ( a ) . In this case,

{

}

n ≤ dim E[a] ≤ dim E (b ) ≤ dim E[b] which implies λ = ∨ a ∈ L : dim E ( a ) ≥ n ≥ b . Thus we have

{

}

λ ≥ ∨ b b ∈ β ( dim E ( n ) ) =dim E ( n ) . This completes the proof.

Theorem 4.3. Let the pair E = ( E , µ ) be a member of LFVS . Then for any a ∈ L,

( dim E )( ) ≤ dim E[ ] ≤ ( dim E )[ ] . a

a

a

If β ( a∧ = b ) β ( a ) ∩ β ( b ) for all a, b ∈ L , then

( dim E )( ) ≤ dim E( ) ≤ dim E[ ] ≤ ( dim E )[ ] . a

a

a

a

( dim E )[ ] = dim E[ ] for any a ∈ J ( L ) . Proof. In order to prove ( dim E ) ≤ dim E ( ) . Suppose that n ≤ ( dim E ) , then ( ) ( ) a ∈ β ( dim E ( n ) ) . Since β is a preserve-union map, there is b ∈ L and In particular,

a

a

a

a

a

n ≤ dim E[b] , such that a ∈ β ( b ) . Because E[b] ⊆ E ( a ) ⊆ E[a] , thus n ≤ dim E ( a ) . Therefore

( dim E )( ) ≤ dim E( ) . a

a

dim E( a ) ≤ dim E[a] is obvious. Moreover, we can obtain that dim E[a] ≤ ( dim E )

[a]

( )

from the definition of dim E .

(

In order to prove for any a ∈ J ( L ) , dim E

( dim E )[ ] ⊆ dim E[ ] . Since the set a

(

a

a

µ ( E ) is finite, for any a ∈ J ( L ) we have

a

n ≤ dim E

dim E[ ] , we only need to show )[ ] =

)[ ] ⇒ dim E ( n ) ≥ a a

{

}

⇒ ∨ b ∈ L : dim E[b] ≥ n ≥ a ⇒ ∃a ≤ b, such that n ≤ dim E[b] ⇒ n ≤ dim E[ a ]

Therefore 164

( dim E )[ ] = dim E[ ] . a

a

C. E Huang et al.

Theorem 4.4. Let E = ( E , µ ) be a member of LFVS . Then

( dim E )

(

)

( dim E ) = dim E ( ) for any a ∈ P ( L ) . ( ) ( dim E ) ≤ dim E ( ) can be proved from the following implications. (a)

In particular,

Proof.

[a] a a ≤ dim E ( ) ≤ dim E [ ] ≤ dim E .

(a)

a

a

a

(

n ≤ dim E

)

(a)

⇔ dim E ( n )  a

{

}

⇔ ∨ b ∈ L : dim E[b] ≥ n  a ⇔ ∃b  a, such that n ≤ dim E[b]   (a) ⇒ dim E= dim   E[b]  ≥ n.  ba 

(

a Let a ∈ P ( L ) . In order to show dim E ( ) ≤ dim E

)

(a)

, we need to show that

    dim   E[b]  ≤ ∨ dim E[b] . Suppose that n ≤ dim   E[b]  . Since the number of E[a]  ba  ba  ba    is finite, then when b  a, the number of E is finite, denotes E , E , , E , [b ]

where ai  a for any i ∈ {1, 2, , r} . Thus

[ a1 ]

r

 E[b] = E[a ] .

ba

i =1

we have c = a1 ∧ a 2 ∧  ∧ a r  a. Further we have

r

E[a ] ⊆ E [c] . Thus for any i =1

i

(

( dim E )

(a)

[ ar ]

Since a ∈ P ( L ) , then

i

   r  = n ≤ dim dim E[b] ≤ ∨= dim E   E[b]  dim  E[ ai ]  ≤ dim E[c] ≤ b∨ [b ] a ba  i =1   ba  Therefore for any a ∈ P ( L ) ,

[ a2 ]

)

( dim E )

(a)

.

a = dim E ( ) .

[a] a a a in the followdim E ( ) ≤ dim E [ ] is obvious. We show that dim E [ ] ≤ dim E )

(

)

ing implications. a dim E [ ] dim =



b b E ( ) ≤ ∧ dim E ( ) a∈α ( b ) b∈P ( L )

a∈α ( b ) b∈P ( L )

(

= ∧ dim E a∈α ( b ) b∈P ( L )

)

(b )

a (dim E )[ ] . =

Theorem 4.5. Let E1 = ( E , µ1 ) and E 2 = ( E , µ2 ) be two L-fuzzy vector subspaces.

Then the following equality holds

(

)

(

)

dim E1 + E 2 + dim E1 ∩ E 2 = dim E1 + dim E 2 .

Proof. We denote the sum of E1 and E 2 by E1 + E 2 = ( E , µ ) . From Theorem 11, we know that E1 + E 2 is a L-fuzzy vector subspace. By the properties of L-fuzzy natural numbers, Theorem 12 and the dimensional formulation of vector spaces, we know for any a ∈ P ( L ) ,

165

C. E Huang et al.

( dim ( E + E ) + dim ( E ∩ E )) ( ) ( ) = ( dim ( E + E ) ) + ( dim ( E ∩ E ) ) (a)

1

2

1

2

a

1

a

2

(

= dim E1 + E 2

(

1

)

(a)

2

(

+ dim E1 ∩ E 2

)

(

)

(a)

)

a a a a = dim E1( ) + E 2( ) + dim E1( ) ∩ E 2( )

(

) (

a a a a a a = dim E1( ) + dim E 2( ) − dim E1( ) ∩ E 2( ) + dim( E1( ) ∩ E 2( )

 (a)

)

 (a)

= dim E1 + dim E2

(

)

(

)

Therefore dim E1 + E 2 + dim E1 ∩ E 2 = dim E1 + dim E 2 . Definition 4.6. Suppose that E = ( E , µ ) is an L-fuzzy vector subspace. A map

f : E → E is called an L-fuzzy linear transformation, if it satisfies the following conditions: (1) f is a linear map on E . (2) For all x ∈ E , µ ( f ( x ) ) ≥ µ ( x ) . Theorem 4.7. Suppose that E = ( E , µ ) is an L-fuzzy vector subspace, f is an  f = kerf , µ L-fuzzy linear transformation on E , then ker and kerf  are L-fuzzy vector subspaces. im f = imf , µ

(

imf

(

)

)

The prove is trivial and omitted. Theorem 4.8. Suppose that E = ( E , µ ) is an L-fuzzy vector subspace, f : E → E

is an L-fuzzy linear transformation, then

(

)

(

)

 f + dim im f = dim ker dim E

Proof. Suppose that ϕ is a linear transformation on (crisp) vector spaces V , then

the equality dim ( imϕ ) + dim ( kefϕ ) = dimV holds. Hence, for all a ∈ P ( L ) , we have

f ) f ) ( dim (im f ) + dim ( ker ) = ( dim(im f ) )( ) + ( dim ( ker ) (a)

a

f ) ( ) + dim ( ker dim ( E ( ) ∩ imf ) + dim ( E ( ) ∩ keff ) (a)

f = dim im = Since f

a E ( )

(a)

(a)

a

a

is a linear transformation on E ( a ) , we have

f ) ( dim (im f ) + dim ( ker )

(a)

=dim ( imf

= dim = E ( ) a

(

)

(

) + dim ( kef f ( ) ( dim E ) .

a E ( )

a E ( )

)

a

)

 f + dim im f = Therefore dim ker dim E . .

5. Conclusion In this paper, L-fuzzy vector subspace is defined and showed that its dimension is an

L-fuzzy natural number. Based on the definitions, some good properties of crisp vector spaces are hold in a finite-dimensional L-fuzzy vector subspace. In particular, the equality dim E1 + E 2 + dim E1 ∩ E 2 = dim E1 + dim E 2 holds without any restricted

(

166

)

(

)

C. E Huang et al.

(

)

(

)

 f + dim kef f = conditions. At the same time, dim im dim E holds.

Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Fund The project is by the Science & Technology Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (KM201611417007), the NNSF of China (11371002), the academic youth backbone project of Heilongjiang Education Department (1251G3036), the foundation of Heilongjiang Province (A201209).

References [1]

Katsaras, A.K. and Liu, D.B. (1977) Fuzzy Vector Spaces and Fuzzy Topological Vector Spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 58, 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(77)90233-5

[2]

Lubczonok, G. and Murali, V. (2002) On Flags and Fuzzy Subspaces of Vector Spaces. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 125, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(00)00129-9

[3]

Abdukhalikov, K.S., Tulenbaev, M.S. and Umirbarv, U.U. (1994) On Fuzzy Bases of Vector Spaces. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 63, 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90350-6

[4]

Abdukhalikov, K.S. (1996) The Dual of a Fuzzy Subspace. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 82, 375381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(96)84977-3

[5]

Lubczonok, P. (1990) Fuzzy Vector Spaces. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 38, 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(90)90206-L

[6]

Lowen, R. (1980) Convex Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 3, 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(80)90025-1

[7]

Shi, F.G. and Huang, C.E. (2010) Fuzzy Bases and the Fuzzy Dimension of Fuzzy Vector Spaces. Mathematical Communications, 15, 303-310.

[8]

Gierz, G., et al. (2003) Continuous Lattices and Domains. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542725

[9]

Dwinger, P. (1982) Characterizations of the Complete Homomorphic Images of a Completely Distributive Complete Lattice I. Indagationes Mathematicae (Proceedings), 85, 403414. https://doi.org/10.1016/1385-7258(82)90034-8

[10] Wang, G.-J. (1992) Theory of Topological Molecular Lattices. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 47, 351-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(92)90301-J [11] Huang, H.-L. and Shi, F.-G. (2008) L-Fuzzy Numbers and Their Properties. Information Sciences, 178, 1141-1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.001 [12] Shi, F.-G. (2000) L-Fuzzy Relation and L-Fuzzy Subgroup. Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, 8, 491-499. [13] Negoita, C.V. and Ralescu, D.A. (1975) Applications of Fuzzy Sets to Systems Analysis, Interdisciplinary Systems Research Series 11, Birkhaeuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5921-9 [14] Shi, F.-G. (1995) Theory of Lβ-Nested Sets and Lα-Nested Sets and Its Applications. Fuzzy 167

C. E Huang et al.

Systems and Mathematics, 4, 65-72. (In Chinese) [15] Shi, F.-G. (1996) L-Fuzzy Sets and Prime Element Nested Sets. Journal of Mathematical Research and Exposition, 16, 398-402. (In Chinese) [16] Shi, F.-G. (1996) Theory of Molecular Nested Sets and Its Applications. Journal of Yantai Teachers University, 1, 33-36. (In Chinese) [17] Shi, F.-G. (2009) A New Approach to the Fuzzification of Matroids. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160, 696-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2008.05.007

Submit or recommend next manuscript to SCIRP and we will provide best service for you: Accepting pre-submission inquiries through Email, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc. A wide selection of journals (inclusive of 9 subjects, more than 200 journals) Providing 24-hour high-quality service User-friendly online submission system Fair and swift peer-review system Efficient typesetting and proofreading procedure Display of the result of downloads and visits, as well as the number of cited articles Maximum dissemination of your research work

Submit your manuscript at: http://papersubmission.scirp.org/ Or contact [email protected] 168

Suggest Documents