Makroökonomik. Monetary and Fiscal Policy. • Monetary policy: small scale New
Keynesian model (NKM). – Empirical problems. – Unappealing/unrealistic ...
Macroeconomics of the Labor Market By Christian Merkl
CES-Lecture 3: Monetary and Fiscal Policies under Frictional Labor Markets Munich, August 2013
Monetary and Fiscal Policy
• Monetary policy: small scale New Keynesian model (NKM) – Empirical problems – Unappealing/unrealistic normative issues • Fiscal policy: Real Business Cycle model (RBC) or NKM – Size of fiscal multipliers – Non-traditional crisis measures – Optimal tax behavior 2
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Agenda
• Monetary Policy – Show most important building block of NKM – Empirical shortcomings – Labor markets: • Positive issues • Normative issue
• Fiscal policy – Issues – Virtues of labor market analysis 3
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
The New Keynesian Model
• Key ingredients: – RBC model (see lecture 2 for a labor centric RBC model without capital) – Monopolistic competition – Price rigidities (e.g. Calvo, Taylor, Rotemberg)
4
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Stylized Model Structure
5
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Wholesale and Retail Sector CES production technology: Rotemberg adjustment costs:
s.t.:
6
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Problem 1: No endogenous persistence Reaction of the standard small scale loglinearized three equation model to a one-off interest rate shock:
No (endogenous) model persistence at all!
7
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Problem 2: The Divine Coincidence
• The standard small-scale new Keynesian framework implies no trade-off between output and inflation stabilization. • Stabilizing the welfare relevant output is equivalent to stabilizing inflation. • Blanchard and Galí (2007) write that the divine coincidence is at odds with central bankers’ perception. • The introduction of real rigidities may break the divine coincidence. 8
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Monetary Policy and the Labor Market Channel 1: Wage Rigidities • A labor market with flows offers the possibility to solve these problems. • The bilateral monopoly and the wage bargaining in search and matching model offers the natural laboratory for modeling wage rigidities (no Barro critique). • Wage rigidities may make marginal costs more persistent and thus may make inflation more persistent • In addition: breaking the divine coincidence 9
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Standard Framework: Wage Rigidities and Inflation
1 1 r t Et t 1 mct
More persistent real marginal costs generate more persistent inflation! BUT: Barro Critique
10
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Search and Matching Framework: Wage Rigidities and Inflation • However, Krause and Lubik (2007) show that there is countervailing effect in the search and matching framework: – Rigid wages labor market tightness varies more over the cycle – Thus, the costs of hiring a worker is more cyclical with rigid wages (i.e. increases more in a boom)!
11
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Search and Matching Framework: Wage Rigidities and Inflation
Baseline: money growth shock
Source: Krause/Lubik (2007)
12 Rigid wages: money growth shock
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Monetary Policy and the Labor Market Channel 2: Firing Costs • Firing costs can only be integrated into a labor market with flows. • Firing costs depress labor market flows and thereby increase the persistence of employment and output. Positive analysis: Lechthaler, Merkl, Snower (2010) • Firing costs generate an important externality! Normative analysis: Faia, Lechthaler, Merkl (2013) 13
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Digression: Labor Selection • Every searching employee can contact one employer per discrete time period. • Suitability of employers and employees is determined in an interview (drawing an idiosyncratic iid cost shock). • Applicants with low idiosyncratic cost shocks obtain a job offer. • Existing worker-firm pairs also draw from idiosyncratic shock distribution. • The labor market is driven by selection/deselection. 14
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Digression: Why Labor Selection instead of Search and Matching? • Advantages – No black box – Analysis of labor market institutions more explicit – No amplification puzzle
15
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Graphical Illustration Cumulative distribution
1 Firing Rate
Job Finding Rate
0 Important Retention rate > job finding rate 16
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Labor Selection: Equations
• Hiring threshold
with Thus: • Firing threshold 17
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Illustration: Reaction to an Autocorrelated Interest Rate Shock
Source: Lechthaler et al. (2010)
18
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
The Role of Labor Turnover Costs
Source: Lechthaler et al. (2010)
19
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Price Stability versus Optimal Ramsey Policy: Reaction to Productivity Shock
Source: Faia et al. (2013)
20
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Externality • More recruiting today reduces the pool of future applicants (not taken into account by atomistic firms). • Entrants have lower idiosyncratic costs on average composition effect! • Externality is not internalized by standard wage bargaining mechanisms. • Optimal monetary policy reduces the externality. • Mechanism: Employment fluctuations
21
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Optimal Inflation Volatility and Firing Costs
Source: Faia et al. (2013)
22
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Fiscal Policy
• Add fiscal sector to the model (e.g. income taxes, value added taxes and profit taxes and government spending). • Advantages of having a labor market: – Reconsider size of fiscal multiplier – Reconsider adjustment path – Analyze non-standard measures (e.g. labor market subsidies or short-time work).
23
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Fiscal Policy: Evaluation of Different Measures
Source: Faia et al. (2012)
24
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Optimal Fiscal Policy: Tax Smoothing? • Frictionless labor market model calls for smooth labor taxation over the cycle. • Arseneau and Chugh (2013) show that this result may not hold any more under search and matching labor markets (Hagedorn/Manovskii calibration) tax volatility may induce efficient (smaller) fluctuations of labor markets. • This result is linked to the result that the search and matching model can only generate amplification under inefficient wage formation (social planner solution is not decentralized). 25
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
Conclusion • Monetary policy: – Wage rigidities: break divine coincidence, but do not necessarily generate more inflation persistence. – Firing costs: break divine coincidence and generate more output persistence. • Fiscal policy: – Reaction to traditional government spending changes. – Analysis of non-standard measures. – Optimal taxation different! The labor market matters for macroeconomic policies!
26
Lehrstuhl für VWL Makroökonomik
References • Arseneau, David and Chugh, Sanjay (2012). “Tax Smoothing in Frictional Labor Markets.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 120, 926985. • Blanchard, Olivier, and Galí, Jordi (2007): "Real Wage Rigidities and the New Keynesian Model." Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 39, No. 1, Supplement, 35-65. • Faia, Ester, Lechthaler, Wolfgang, and Merkl, Christian (2013): “Labor Selection, Turnover Costs and Optimal Monetary Policy.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, forthcoming. • Faia, Ester, Lechthaler, Wolfgang, and Merkl, Christian (2013): “Fiscal Stimulus and the Labor Market Policies in Europe.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 37 (3), 2013, 483-499. • Krause, Michael, Lubik, Thomas (2007). “The (Ir)relevance of Real Wage Rigidity in the New Keynesian Model with Search Frictions.” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 54 (3), 706–727. • Lechthaler, Wolfgang, Merkl, Christian, and Snower, Dennis (2010): “Monetary Persistence and the Labor Market: A New Perspective.” für VWL Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 34 (5), 2010, 968-983. 27 Lehrstuhl Makroökonomik