Multi-state open robust design models for dealing with ...

2 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
an example with sperm whales and opportunistic photo-ID data ... Eco-tourism (whale watching). Citizen Science. • Wide- ... Inside study area: Observable.
© KE Adventure

Multi-state open robust design models for dealing with incomplete sampling and imperfect detection: an example with sperm whales and opportunistic photo-ID data Rebecca M Boys, Cláudia Oliveira, Sergi Pérez-Jorge, Rui Prieto, Lisa Steiner, Mónica A. Silva

Estimating demographic parameters of highly-mobile species

• Wide-ranging

Azores

Steiner et al., 2015

Estimating demographic parameters of highly-mobile species

• Wide-ranging

Azores

Steiner et al., 2015

• Dedicated sampling

Estimating demographic parameters of highly-mobile species

• Wide-ranging

Azores

Steiner et al., 2015

• Dedicated sampling

• Opportunistic sampling Eco-tourism (whale watching) Citizen Science

R. Prieto@ImagDOP

Problem: Heterogeneity

Uneven sampling Movements Heterogeneity in capture probability

Biased estimates Lower precision

Problem: Heterogeneity

Uneven sampling Movements Heterogeneity in capture probability

Biased estimates Aim: • Open covariate-based model • Multi-state model

Lower precision

Solution: Open covariate-based POPAN model

• Open POPAN model with covariate describing variation in capture

• PriorCapL function – Was the animal seen in previous time periods?

Time 1

Time 2

Time 3

?

?

? Lisa Steiner

Solution: Multi-State Open Robust Design (MSORD)

• Multi-state models with Pollock’s Robust Design • Accounts for imperfect detection

Inside study area: Observable

Outside study area: Unobservable

(Pollock 1982; Kendall et al. 1997; Schwarz and Stobo 1997; Kendall and Bjorkland 2001)

POPAN: Demographic parameters

Outside study area Inside study area • Capture probability • Survival • Annual abundance

Super-population size

Entry probability

MSORD: Demographic parameters

Outside study area Inside study area • Capture probability • Survival • Annual abundance • Remaining probability • Residence time

Temporary emigration

Entry probability

Study site and dataset no. survey days

2500

cum no. ind

100 90

2000

80

70 1500

60 50

1000

40 30

500

20

10

Year

R. Medeiros@ImagDOP

2014

2012

2010

2008

2006

2004

2002

2000

1998

1996

1994

1991

1989

0 1987

0

Number survey days

Cumulative number individuals

• July-start September • POPAN:2009-15 (7 years) • MSORD:2011-15 (5 years)

Study site and dataset no. survey days

2500

cum no. ind

100 90

2000

80

70 1500

60 50

1000

40 30

500

20

10

Year

R. Medeiros@ImagDOP

2014

2012

2010

2008

2006

2004

2002

2000

1998

1996

1994

1991

1989

0 1987

0

Number survey days

Cumulative number individuals

• July-start September • POPAN:2009-15 (7 years) • MSORD:2011-15 (5 years)

MSORD: Estimates of inter-annual movement

Temporary emigration: Even-flow

Inside study area Observable

=

Outside study area Unobservable

Varied between years from 0.22-0.66

MSORD: Estimates of intra-annual movement

Probability of entry, remaining and average residence Start summer 0.40 (SE=0.047)

Study area Residence: 3 weeks Remaining: low 0.053 (SE=0.025)

End summer 0.33 (SE=0.041)

MSORD and POPAN: Survival

POPAN PriorCapL

MSORD Time Since Marking

0.95 (95%CI=0.56-0.99)

0.93 (95%CI=0.73-1.00)

High and constant Consistent with results from other studies

POPAN: Abundance

Total abundance estimate

Super-population estimate: 1468 (95%CI: 1202.8 – 1791.0) 1200 1000 800

600 POPAN 400 200 0 2009

2010

2011

2012

Year

2013

2014

2015

2016

Total abundance estimate

MSORD: Abundance 1200 1000 800

600

MSORD POPAN

400 200 0 2009

2010

2011

2012

Year

2013

2014

2015

2016

Total abundance estimate

MSORD: Abundance 1200

More Precise

Less Biased

1000 800

600

MSORD POPAN

400 200 0 2009

2010

2011

2012

Year

2013

2014

2015

2016

Model comparison

MSORD  Imperfect detection  Transience (Time Since Marking)  Temporary emigration  Intra-annual pooling of data  Coarse estimates

Model comparison

MSORD

POPAN

 Imperfect detection  Transience (Time Since Marking)  Temporary emigration

 Super-population  Transience (PriorCapL)

 Intra-annual pooling of data  Coarse estimates

 Temporary emigration  Biased annual abundance

Importance and applicability

• Permitted us to derive key population parameters

JorgeFontes@ImagDOP

Importance and applicability

• Permitted us to derive key population parameters • Importance of using appropriate CMR methods for modelling: – Opportunistic data – Wide-ranging species

JorgeFontes@ImagDOP

Importance and applicability

• Permitted us to derive key population parameters • Importance of using appropriate CMR methods for modelling: – Opportunistic data – Wide-ranging species JorgeFontes@ImagDOP

• MSORD reduces bias, improves precision and reliability of estimated parameters

Thank you for your attention [email protected] Azores Whale Lab whales.scienceontheweb.net We acknowledge IFAW for providing photo-identification data from 1987-1993 Biosphere Expeditions and clients of Whale Watch Azores for making data collection possible Sara Magalhães, Tiago Sá, João Medeiros, Yves Cuenot, Pablo Chevallard Navarro, and numerous volunteers that over the years helped with data collection and organization of the photo-identification catalogue. We are deeply grateful to Gary White, Bill Kendall, Jim Hines, James Nichols and Paul Conn for offering guidance and advice on CMR modelling.

JorgeFontes@ImagDOP

Suggest Documents