Rapid Non-Contact Tension Force Measurements on Stay Cables ∗
†
Marcus Schmieder, Alex Taylor-Noonan, Roland Heere
Abstract
‡
may exceed the replacement cost, especially when the repairs involve full or partial closure. Therefore,
Vibration to Tension Force calculations are known in
maintaining the structure and xing the issues when
the engineering community through the Taut String
they arise will be most cost ecient in the long run.
Theory. Precise calculations require accurate identication of the natural frequencies and incorporation
Periodic
of correction factors.
Additionally, the duration of
ten include a measurement of the cable tension
individual measurements must be optimized to allow
forces. Traditional methods to measure cable tension
for sucient data aquisition. The work presented in
forces in stay cables can be classied into 2 main
this paper describes a cost eective and optimized
categories:
approach to determine the tension force in stay ca-
Lift-o
bles. This optimization is necessary to accommodate
inspection
plans
for
these
bridges
of-
direct measurement by the lift-o method,
using hydraulic jacks.
any funding restrictions.
Frequency-based
1 Introduction
indirect
measurement
via
the
natural frequency of the cable. The natural frequency-based method centers on the
Cable Stay bridges gain more and more popularity
Taut String Theory, where the tension force
in the structural engineering world. The reasons for
cable of known length
T in a L and unit weight w can be cal-
the popularity of these structures include the cost ef-
culated from the
n-th
natural frequency of vibration
ciency of construction and the pleasing appearance
fn
by
of cable stay bridges. However, the main structural elements holding the deck in place are the stay cables
T =
which are in most cases not thoroughly inspected over the lifetime of the bridge.
The life span of
where
the structure may be shortened due to corrosion, slippage, settlement of the structure or part of the
An
structure, resulting in load imbalances in the cables.
Eng.
(1)
is the gravitational constant.
experimental
validation
of
the
determina-
tion of tension force through natural frequencies was
The costs of repairing signicant structural damages ∗ M. Ind.
g
4wL2 fn2 n2 g
published in Russell and Lardner [1998].
& Mgmt., NDT Specialist, Metro Test-
ing Laboratories Ltd, Burnaby, British Columbia.
As
Email:
[email protected]
the
size
of
bridges
presents
challenges
for
accelerometer installation, remote sensing methods
† B.A.Sc. E.I.T., Materials Engineer, Metro Testing Labo-
have been explored.
ratories Ltd. Email:
[email protected]
A Laser Vibrometer is one
such device, in which a laser beam is directed at
‡ M.A.Sc. P.Eng., Senior Materials Engineer, Metro Testing
the
Laboratories Ltd. Email:
[email protected]
1
location
of
interest
and
the
velocity
of
the
2
COMPARISON OF METHODS
1
vibration is measured .
2
Systems of this kind are
measured directly.
However, this method requires
capable of conducting measurements from distances
heavy jacking equipment which is costly to mobilize,
of up to 200 m. In 1999, Cunha and Caetano used
install and operate.
a
to
accessible and clear of lling materials. Furthermore,
those from cable-mounted accelerometers. Excellent
a suitable bearing location for the jacking mechanism
agreement was found.
is required.
laser
vibrometer
and
compared
the
results
A laser vibrometer was also
The anchorage points must be
used successfully by Miyashita and Nagai [2008] and Chen and Petro [2006] to determine the frequency of
Using
bridge cables.
measurements requires no access to the anchorage
accelerometers
to
conduct
frequency-based
points but does require access to the cable surface or This
paper
ca-
sleeve surface. A suciently sensitive accelerometer
laser-based
needs to be physically mounted onto the cable at
vibration measurements. First, the main methods of
a position where vibrations of multiple modes can
bridge cable tension assessment are compared. Next,
be
the authors present the results of original research
for instance).
on the importance of measurement duration. Three
lightweight (usually between 50 and 500 grams), this
methods for identifying the natural frequency from
task typically requires a boom lift for a technician.
the frequency plot are compared for varying mea-
Then, cabling must be run back to the frequency
surement durations.
analyzer.
ble
tension
describes
an
application
determination
through
of
stay
Then, a literature review on
detected
and
measured
(near
the
third-point
While the sensors themselves are
Trac control, or a bridge closure, may
the eects of sag-extensibility and bending stiness
be required if this equipment or cabling interferes
is conducted, and a system of correction factors is
with normal operation. Each stay cable may require
presented.
between 20 to 60 minutes for sensor installation and cabling.
2 Comparison of Methods As outlined previously, the primary methods to measure bridge stay cable tension are:
•
Lift-o method
•
Frequency-based method
By
using
non-contact
laser
based
sensors
like
a
Laser Vibrometer, no physical access to the cable is required.
This allows the location of the mea-
surement point to be at third or midpoint of the cable,
not limited by the reach of the available
boom lifts. per location.
Set-up time is only a few minutes At a rate of $100-150 per hour per
technician on site, reducing the set up time per caUsing accelerometers mounted on the cable Conducting remote measurements using a laser vibrometer.
ble will generate signicant cost savings for the client. A
full
investigation
of
a
cable
stay
structure
may include more than 100 cables. To evaluate these
The lift-o method has the advantage that each
cables a simultaneous or sequential measurement
strand can be jacked and its tension load may be
can be selected. The simultaneous approach usually
1 The
involves using many accelerometers at once. principle behind this device is that a laser beam re-
ected o a moving surface will experience a phase change
Given
that enough accelerometers and signal cables are
and will also have its frequency shifted through the Doppler
available, and the frequency analyzer has enough
eect.
A Laser Vibrometer is in eect an interferometer; in
input channels (these devices can often support 8,
which a single laser beam is split into a measurement beam
16 or 32 seperate channels), many measurements
and reference beam. After reecting o the vibrating surface, the measurement beam is recombined with the reference beam
can be conducted simultaneously.
However,
this
(which never left the instrument) and the interference pattern
requires the installation of many accelerometers and
is measured.
signal cables while ensuring that no cable confusion
3
IMPORTANCE OF MEASUREMENT DURATION
occurs.
Conversely,
a laser vibrometer can only
measure one point at a time,
and therefore the
3
As the duration of the measurement increases, the frequency resolution
fs
improves, and the natural
data collection phase becomes a large part of the
frequency can be determined to within a smaller
overall project.
interval.
Section 3 outlines the implications
of choosing an appropriate measurement duration Insucient
and an experimental verication is performed.
measurement
durations
will
result
in inadequate frequency resolution of the FFT analThe cost & time expenditures for each method
ysis. However, measurements beyond the minimum
are compared in Table 1. Because the time savings
required time will extend the time on site and may
during setup of each measurement location greatly
lead to higher costs for the client. The objective is to
outweigh the extra time spent during measurement,
minimize data acquisition time whilst still identifying
conducting
pro-
the natural frequency with adequate precision. This
gramme using a laser vibrometer is much quicker
section presents three analytical methods to increase
than with accelerometers.
the accuracy in identifying the natural frequency
a
cable
vibration
measurement
from
measurements
of
shorter
duration.
These
Overall, contactless laser vibrometer systems require
methods are then compared using experimental data
less equipment and less time and are therefore a cost
in order to determine an appropriate measurement
ecient
length.
based
alternative
and
lift-o
to
traditional
methods.
accelerometer-
Furthermore,
laser
vibrometers are generally quite transportable (an
The
entire system can be wheeled by one technician
Peak Method, where the rst natural frequency is
and checked as airline luggage) and provide similar
read from the FFT. Given a frequency resolution
measurement precision as accelerometer systems.
of
simplest
fs ,
identication
method
is
the
First
identifying the natural frequency (f1 ) via the
First Peak Method only gives us the certainty that
fs fs < f1T rue < f1F P + 2 2
3 Importance of measurement duration
3.1
The number of samples collected during data acqui-
Methods that consider multiple use harmonics use
sition is critical for the precise determination of the
the relation of each
natural frequency.
quency
The natural frequency and har-
f1F P −
Considering multiple harmonics
frequency-domain representation of a time-domain function. For a discrete time series sampled at rate
fa
for duration
T,
tains a series of discrete frequency bins uniformly distributed between 0 Hz and
fa .
bins is the frequency resolution
n-th
harmonic, we have the certainty that
fnM easured −
fs fs < fnT rue < fnM easured + 2 2
(5)
The width of these
fs ,
which is indepen-
dent of the frequency setting of the analyzer, and is simply related to the measurement time
fs =
(4)
If we consider our certainty of identication of the
the FFT result is also a discrete
sequence of the same length (fa T ). This result con-
n-th harmonic to the natural frefn = nf1
monics are determined by nding the peaks of the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), which provides the
(3)
fa 1 = fa T T
T
fnM easured −
by
(2)
fnM easured − n
fs fs < nf1T rue < fnM easured + 2 2 fs 2
< f1T rue
1 (in-plane)
(17)
for all n (out-of-plane)
[ Le = L 1 +
( wL cos θ )2 ] H
8
(18)
5
CONCLUSION
9
of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical
where
H
is the initial estimate of tension force along the
chord, determined by Equation 1. λ2 is as dened in Equation 12. For higher modes of vibration (n tion 13 becomes
and Physical Sciences, 341(1626):299, 1974. T. Miyashita and M. Nagai. Vibration-based Structural Health Monitoring for Bridges using Laser
> 1),
ωn = βn ωn s
Equa(19)
The bending stiness and sag-extensibility correction factors in this section should be calculated and applied to each measured peak before utilizing any of the three methods presented previously in Section 3.
Doppler Vibrometers and MEMS-based Technologies.
International Journal of Steel Structures, 8
(12):325331, 2008. YQ Ni, JM Ko, and G. Zheng. Dynamic analysis of large-diameter sagged cables taking into account exural rigidity. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 257(2):301319, 2002. J. C. Russell and T. J. Lardner.
5 Conclusion
Experimental de-
termination of frequencies and tension for elastic cables.
Stay bridge cable tension measurements are sometimes required to conrm the cables are indeed carrying the designed loads, calculated by the bridge de-
Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124
(10):10671072, 1998. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)07339399(1998)124:10(1067).
URL
http://link.aip.org/link/?QEM/124/1067/1.
signer. Laser-based vibration measurement systems
H. Tabatabai, A.B. Mehrabi, and P.Y. Wen-huei.
provide a fast and ecient solution to measure vi-
Bridge stay cable condition assessment using vi-
bration frequencies on stay cables without the need
bration measurement techniques.
for physical access to the cables. Identifying multiple
of SPIE, volume 3400, page 194, 1998.
harmonics allows the natural frequency to be identied to a greater precision by using methods such as a Variance-Weighted Average. Due to the non-contact approach and the long measurement range, these systems allow for fast set up and data acquisition. A fast set up and quick data acquisition results in signicant cost savings for the client.
References S.E. Chen and S. Petro. Nondestructive bridge cable tension assessment using laser vibrometry. Exper-
imental Techniques, 29(2):2932, 2006. A. Cunha and E. Caetano. Dynamic measurements on stay cables of cable-stayed bridges using an interferometry laser system.
Experimental Tech-
niques, 23(3):3843, 1999. H.M. Irvine. Cable Structures. MIT Press, 1981. H.M. Irvine and T.K. Caughey. The linear theory of free vibrations of a suspended cable.
Proceedings
In Proceedings