Superconductivity in Nanosystems. 2. Superconductivity is the result of the
formation of a quantum condensate of paired electrons (Cooper pairs). In small ...
Superconductivity at nanoscale
Superconductivity is the result of the formation of a quantum condensate of paired electrons (Cooper pairs). In small particles, the allowed energy levels are quantized and for sufficiently small particle sizes the mean energy level spacing becomes bigger than the superconducting energy gap. It is generally believed that superconductivity is suppressed at this point (the Anderson Criterion)
Q: Is superconductivity important for nano-devices? In which way superconductivity manifests itself at nanoscale?
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
2
Tunneling in superconductors Generally,
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
3
At the S-N interface, S
S
N
N
No single-electron tunneling possible until I
Δ Superconductivity in Nanosystems
V 4
Then, how the charge is transferred between the superconductor and normal metal? In a a normal metal ε
Hole branch
Fermi level p Electron-hole representation
Hole-like excitation
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
5
In a superconductor,
An electron can be reflected as a hole with opposite group velocity. In this way the charge 2e is transferred – Andreev reflection Superconductivity in Nanosystems
6
Reflected
Transmitted
Incident
An electron (red) meeting the interface between a normal conductor (N) and a superconductor (S) produces a Cooper pair in the superconductor and a retroreflected hole (green) in the normal conductor. Vertical arrows indicate the spin band occupied by each particle. Superconductivity in Nanosystems
7
In the presence of the tunneling barrier the Andreev reflection contains an extra tunneling amplitude. However, at exponentially.
the single-particle tunneling is suppressed
Andreev reflection is a way to bring Cooper pairs to a superconductor from a normal conductor in a coherent way.
For a perfect (non-reflecting) interface the probability of Andreev reflection is 1. In general case both reflection channels – normal and Andreev – have finite probabilities.
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
e
e
Cooper pair
h
8
Normal Reflection in an N/S Phase Boundary between semi-infinite N and S Layers
Total Andreev Reflection in an N/S Phase Boundary between semiinfinite N and S Layers
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
9
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
10
Parity effect How much we pay to transfer N electrons to the box? Coulomb energy:
We have taken into account that the electron charge is discrete.
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
11
We have arrived at the usual diagram for Coulomb blockade – at some values of the gate voltage the electron transfer is free of energy cost!
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
12
What happens in a superconductor? Energy depends on the parity of the electron number!
Parity effect:
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
13
The ground state energy for odd n is Δ above the minimum energy for even n Superconductivity in Nanosystems
14
Experiment (Tuominen et al., 1992, Lafarge et al., 1993) Coulomb blockade of Andreev reflection The total number of electrons at the grain is about 109. However, the parity of such big number can be measured.
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
15
Stability diagram of Cooper pair box By Hergenrother et al., 1993 SET
Superconductivity in small systems manifests itself through energy scales of current-voltage curves Superconductivity in Nanosystems
16
Crossover from 2e periodicity to e periodicity can be observed in external magnetic field suppressing superconductivity Observed in S’-S-S’ systems, where the physics of Coulomb blockade is similar
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
17
How one can convey Cooper pairs between superconductors?
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
18
Stationary Josephson effect S
I V
S
Weak link – two superconductors divided by a thin layer of insulator or normal conductor
What is the resistance of the junction? For small currents, the junction is a superconductor! Reason – order parameters overlap in the weak link B. Josephson Superconductivity in Nanosystems
19
Amplitude S
S
Since superconductivity is the equilibrium state, the overlap leads to the change in the Gibbs free energy. This energy difference is sensitive to the phase difference of the order parameter (the order parameter is complex). We will show that it leads to the persistent current through the junction – the Josephson effect. Superconductivity in Nanosystems
20
To calculate the current let us introduce an auxiliary small magnetic field with vector potential δA which penetrates the junction. Then
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
21
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
22
Josephson interferometer
(after intergration)
Denote:
Most sensitive magnetometer - SQUID Superconductivity in Nanosystems
23
Josephson junctions in magnetic field y
1
Narrow junction –> H= const
2 x
Penetrated regions
Therefore
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
24
In a wide junction the magnetic field created by the Josephson current becomes important. Then H and A become dependent on z
From the Maxwell equation
Ferrel-Prange equation
Josephson penetration length Josephson vortices
Distribution of current in narrow and wide contacts
(fluxons)
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
25
Non-stationary Josephson effect Due to the gauge invariance the electric potential in a superconductor can enter only in combination
Thus, the phase acquires the additional factor
Here θ is the phase difference while V is voltage across the junction.
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
26
Thus, is the voltage V is kept constant, then
where
is the Josephson frequency
This equation allows to relate voltage and frequency, which is crucial for metrology.
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
27
Dynamics of a Josephson junction: I-V curve
A particle with In a washboard potential
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
28
Macroscopic quantum tunneling A macroscopic Josephson junction can escape from its ground state via quantum tunneling – like the α-decay in nuclear physics. Quantum effects were observed through the shape of an I-V curve
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
29
Josephson junction in an a. c. field Important application – detection of electromagnetic signals Suppose that one modulates the voltage as
Then
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
30
Then one can easily show that at
a
time-independent step appears in the I-V-curve, its amplitude being
Shapira steps
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
31
Applications
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
32
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
33
Main Applications •Metrology, Volt standard
•High frequency applications
•Magnetometers, SQUIDs
•Amplifiers, SQUIDs
•Imaging, MRI, SQUIDs Superconductivity in Nanosystems
34
Medicine, biophysics and chemistry •Biomagnetism •Biophysics: - Diagnostics by magnetic tagging of antibodies -Special frequency characteristics, no rinsing •MRI (Magetic Resonance Imaging) - Low frequency, low noise amplifiers, sc solenoids •NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) -Low frequency, small fields, sc solenoids •NQR (Nuclear Quadropole Resonance) - Low frequency, low noise amplifiers, sc solenoids Superconductivity in Nanosystems
35
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
36
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
37
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
38
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
39
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
40
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
41
Superconductivity in Nanosystems
42
Summary • Andreev reflection allows coherent transformation of normal quasiparticles to Cooper pairs. • Cooper pairs can be transferred through tunneling barriers via Josephson effect. • Coulomb blockade phenomena manifest themselves as specific parity effect in superconductor grains. • Manipulation Cooper pairs allow devices of a new type, e. g., serving as building blocks for quantum computation Superconductivity in Nanosystems
43