Arthroplasty Today xxx (2017) 1e2
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Arthroplasty Today journal homepage: http://www.arthroplastytoday.org/
Editorial
Surgical hexing can curse outcomes Brian J. McGrory, MD, MS a, *, Jessica Taylor, FNP-C b a b
Arthroplasty Today, Rosemont, IL, USA Western Maine Family Medicine, Norway, ME, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 16 July 2017 Accepted 18 July 2017 Available online xxx Keywords: Risk stratification Outcomes Total joint arthroplasty Expectations Complementary medicine Editorial
Orthopaedic surgeons rely on high-level data, objective studies, and evidence-based medicine when diagnosing and treating patients. While essential for patient care, framing this information when outlining outcome expectations and discussing surgical preparation may have some inadvertent consequences. Using best practices, orthopaedic surgeons may be guilty of “surgical hexing” simply by telling a patient what is known about their stratified risk profile for joint replacement. Outcomes of elective surgery, like so much in medicine, rely heavily on a complex relationship between the surgeon and the patient that is founded on trust. With a patient-centered care model, the expectation should be that surgeons focus on not only the physical but also the holistic elements of the surgical process. In addition to appropriate surgical preparation, execution, and recovery, arthroplasty success has been shown to depend on the patient's state of mind. For example, risk stratification models now point to patient depression as a major factor in less positive results, and patients with somatization behaviors have more pain and poorer function
One or more of the authors of this paper have disclosed potential or pertinent conflicts of interest, which may include receipt of payment, either direct or indirect, institutional support, or association with an entity in the biomedical field which may be perceived to have potential conflict of interest with this work. For full disclosure statements refer to http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2017.07.004. * Corresponding author. 9400 West Higgins Road, Suite 230, Rosemont, IL 60018, USA. Tel.: þ1 207 781 1551. E-mail address:
[email protected]
than their nondepressed counterparts [1-3]. The most ethical care guidelines mandate that we explain why modifiable risk factors should and must be changed for the patient's safety and satisfaction. But telling the depressed patient that they can expect a poorer outcome may be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Orthopaedic surgeons have an effect on how patients perceive and grade their surgical outcome. The so-called “shared decision making” must strike a balance between, on one extreme, a disproportionate amount of time being spent going over the potential risks of the surgery, and on the other, incomplete consent where patients do not have a fair idea of the potential hazards involved. In a recent multicenter study looking at the relationship among total knee arthroplasty patient expectations, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, and patient satisfaction, the investigators found that patient demographics and preoperative function do not predict preoperative expectations of surgery [4]. Furthermore, they found that higher preoperative expectations do predict greater improvement in PRO measures and fulfillment of expectations [4]. So perhaps cheering on our patients to set high expectations helps them to score higher on PROs and fulfill their preoperative outlook. Surgeons can and should instill trust, confidence, and hope as they teach patients about their diagnosis and prognosis, and guide them through their treatment. Looking to the field of complementary medicine may offer some help. We should think of this field of holistic care not as an alternative, but rather an addition, to traditional and proven treatments like joint replacement surgery. Physician leaders in this field like Dean M. Ornish, MD, Andrew Weil, MD, Herbert Benson, MD, and David Servan-Schreiber, MD, PhD have shown evidence of the mind-body connection and how harnessing the power of that connection can augment traditional treatments for chronic and serious illness. Why not embrace these techniques for patients undergoing elective surgery? In discussing surgical preparation and expectations, we should cover all the customary bases. In addition, offering positive, nontraditional advice on how to treat comorbidities that are known to negatively impact a patient's surgical outcome will also help our patients. Providing integrative resources can help patients to become empowered by giving them tools for stress management, physical and emotional support, and immune system strengthening in the perioperative period. This is a straightforward addition that
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2017.07.004 2352-3441/© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NCND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
2
Editorial / Arthroplasty Today xxx (2017) 1e2
can turn good surgical care into excellent surgical care. Evidence is mounting that these interventions make a meaningful difference. Reference 1 Gold HT, Slover JD, Joo L, et al. Association of depression with 90-day hospital readmission after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016;31(11):2385.
2 Riediger W, Doering S, Krismer M. Depression and somatisation influence the outcome of total hip replacement. Int Orthop 2010;34(1):13. 3 Browne J, Sandberg B, D'Apuzzo M, Novicoff W. Depression is associated with early postoperative outcomes following total joint arthroplasty: a nationwide database study. J Arthroplasty 2014;29(3):481. 4 Jain D, Nguyen LC, Bendich I, et al. Higher patient expectations predict higher patient-reported outcomes, but not satisfaction, in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective multi-center study. J Arthroplasty 2017. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.008 [Epub ahead of print].
