Technology Transfer and World Competitiveness

6 downloads 830 Views 342KB Size Report
1. Introduction. Japanese companies invented or were the first to produce ... (3) World competitiveness evaluated by IMD: 1st in 1990 to 27th in 2012 [1]. .... dominated the world economy, and Japan's industry was once referenced as “Japan as No.1. ... The evolution of the use of software in automobile electronics systems is ...
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 69 (2014) 121 – 127

24th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, 2013

Technology Transfer and World Competitiveness Soemon Takakuwa a*, Ivica Vezab a Nagoya University,Graduate School of Economics and Business Administration, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8601, Japan University of Split, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, R. Boskovica 32, 21000 Split, Croatia

b

Abstract Technology transfer and international competitiveness are closely related. In Japan, many companies that once dominated manufacturing technology have lost their market share to foreign companies. In this study, global manufacturing and technology transfer are first described, introducing Toyota’s global manufacturing strategy, the flying geese paradigm and China’s Technology Transfer from Opening Domestic Market (TTODM) strategy. Then, some major aspects of a competitive environment in today’s economy are described, with comparisons between Japanese companies and foreign companies from the standpoints of economics and technology management. © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. © 2014 The Published Elsevier Ltd.of DAAAM International Vienna. Selection andAuthors. peer-review underby responsibility Selection and peer-review under responsibility of DAAAM International Vienna Keywords: management of technology, global manufacturing, technology transfer; competitiveness

1. Introduction Japanese companies invented or were the first to produce commercial products such as the DVD player, the car navigation system, DRAM memory, the lithium-ion battery and the liquid crystal display. After these products were first produced, however, foreign companies soon caught up with the Japanese companies that produced these products and established dominant positions in the associated markets. The evolution of the market share of Japanese companies in these product markets is shown in Fig. 1. This pattern is observed since 1990s, when the bubble economy in Japan collapsed; the recent twenty-year period in Japan is called the two “lost decades.” During this period, Japan’s economic position in the world has changed drastically, as demonstrated by the followingstatistics:

* Corresponding author. Tel.:+81-52-789-2389; fax: +81-52-789-2389. E-mail address:[email protected]

1877-7058 © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of DAAAM International Vienna doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.211

122

Soemon Takakuwa and Ivica Veza / Procedia Engineering 69 (2014) 121 – 127

(1) GDP per capita: 3rd in 2000 to 23rd in 2008. (2) Japan’s share of the global GDP: 14.3% in 1990 to 8.9% in 2008. (3) World competitiveness evaluated by IMD: 1 st in 1990 to 27th in 2012 [1]. The reasons why a company that used to dominate in manufacturing technology loses its market share to foreign companies are discussed in the following sections. Many Japanese companies have lost their competitive position as a global hub. Global manufacturing and technology transfer are described in section 2, and then, some major aspects ofa competitive environment in the current economy are considered in section 3.

100%

90%

80%

70%

Market share

60%

50%

DVD player Car navigation system

40%

DRAM memory

30%

Lithium-ion battery 20% Liquid crystal panel 10%

0% 1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Year

Fig. 1. Global product marketshare for Japan. (Source: [2])

2. Global manufacturing and technology transfer 2.1. Trade The evolution of intermediate goods trade among countries and regions in Asia and Asia Pacific is illustrated in Fig. 2. In 1990, Japan dominated the intermediate goods market, whereas in 2010, China took over the dominant position in the market. In addition, Japan’s trading partners are shown in Fig. 3. China is the first trading partner for Japan and the U.S.A. which used to be a first trading partner for Japan but is now a second trading partner. Furthermore, South Korea, Taiwan and ASEAN countries are major trading partners for Japan. Today, various supply chains have been constructed across Asia.

㻯㼔㼕㼚㼍

㻝㻥㻥㻜

㻞㻜㻜㻜

㻶㼍㼜㼍㼚

㻶㼍㼜㼍㼚

㻭㻿㻱㻭㻺

㻿㻚㻌㻷㼛㼞㼑㼍

㼁㻚㻿㻚㻭㻚

㻯㼔㼕㼚㼍

㻿㻚㻌㻷㼛㼞㼑㼍

㻞㻜㻝㻜 㻶㼍㼜㼍㼚

㻭㻿㻱㻭㻺

㼁㻚㻿㻚㻭㻚

㻯㼔㼕㼚㼍

㻿㻚㻌㻷㼛㼞㼑㼍

㻼㼑㼞㼏㼑㼚㼠㼍㼓㼑㻌㼛㼒㻌㻱㼤㼜㼛㼞㼠㻌㼛㼒㻌㻵㼚㼠㼑㼞㼙㼑㼐㼕㼍㼠㼑㻌㻳㼛㼛㼐㼟㻌㻝㻜㻙㻞㻜䠂䚷䚷䚷䚷䚷䚷㻞㻜䠂㻌㼍㼚㼐㻌㼛㼢㼑㼞

Fig. 2. The percentage of intermediate goods exports. (Source: [3])

㻭㻿㻱㻭㻺

㼁㻚㻿㻚㻭㻚

123

Soemon Takakuwa and Ivica Veza / Procedia Engineering 69 (2014) 121 – 127

Others J¥34.69 trillion 26.0%

China, Hong Kong J¥31.04 trillion 23.2%

U.S.A. J¥15.9 trillion 11.9%

EU27 J¥14 trilion 10.5% Russia J¥2.5 trillion 1.9%

S. Korea J¥8.44 trillion 6.3%

ASEAN J¥19.7 14.7%

India J¥1.42 trillion 1.1%

Taiwan J¥5.91 trillion 4.4%

Fig. 3. Trading partners of Japan. (Source: [4])

2.2. Global manufacturing This section discusses the history of global manufacturing. Fig. 4 shows the evolution of global manufacturing, including foreign and domestic production for Toyota Motor Corporation. The subsequent phases are as follows: [Phase 1] Single unit pack [Phase 2] Knock down (KD) production [Phase 3] Production in developed countries [Phase 4] Production in BRICs.

Production volume ( 10,000 units) 㻥 㻜㻜 䐠㏵ୖᅜ䛷䛾 (2) (KD) 䠧䠠⏕⏘᫬௦ Knock

(1) single unit pack

down production

㻢㻜㻜

(4) Production in BRICs

51% 518

Overseas production

Overseas production

821 (3) Production in developed countries

381

Export to 31% overseas territories

234

Domestic sales

47

18%

㻜 㻓㻡㻡

㻓㻢㻜

㻓㻢㻡

㻓㻣㻜

㻓㻣㻡

㻓㻤㻜

㻓㻤㻡

㻓㻥㻜

㻓㻥㻡

㻓㻜㻜

Fig. 4. Global manufacturing of Toyota. (Source: [5])

㻓㻜㻡

㻓㻜㻣

6

㻓㻜㻤6

Domestic production

㻟 㻜㻜

124

Soemon Takakuwa and Ivica Veza / Procedia Engineering 69 (2014) 121 – 127

2.3 Flying geese paradigm Trade is the most important vehicle for transferring new goods and technology across countries. Imports from more advanced countries, i.e., “leaders,” introduce new goods to “follower” countries, Through imports, “follower” countries also receive the technology and capital goods that are needed for the subsequent production of these new goods and, eventually, for their export to other countries. Lastly, when a country loses its competitive position in a particular product market, its domestic production is phased out and replaced by imports from a “follower” that has successfully established a competitive position in that product market. The subsequent phases are as follows [6]: [Phase 1] A developing country exports particular products to a developed country and imports industrial consumer goods. [Phase 2] A developing country increases its economy to produce consumer goods that have been imported. [Phase 3] A developing country exports consumer goods, and begins to produce capital goods and consumer durable goods. In addition, the developing country increases its economy to import primary products, such as materials and provisions [Phase 4] A developing country exports capital goods and consumer durable goods and, at this point, becomes an advanced industrial nation. 2.4 China’s TTODM strategy As an emerging country, China introduced Technology Transfer from Opening Domestic Market (TTODM) in the mid-1980s as a strategy to gain advanced foreign technology and managerial skills through an inflow of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). China’ automobile industry is a model case of this strategy, and China’s high-speed train industry is the latest example [7]. The evolution of automobile production in China is shown in Fig. 5. The subsequent phases are as follows: [Phase 1] Opening the market [Phase 2] Attracting foreign investment [Phase 3] Establishing effective competition [Phase 4] Facilitating technological innovation [Phase 5] Developing technology

14000

Automobile Production (1000 units)

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

Year

Fig. 5. Automobile production in China. (Source: [8])

2007

2009

125

Soemon Takakuwa and Ivica Veza / Procedia Engineering 69 (2014) 121 – 127

3. Current aspects on international competitiveness 3.1. Structural change of the world economy When G7 was established in the mid-1970s, approximately one-half of the global GDP was produced by the seven G7 countries, but the global GDP share of these countries has gradually decreased. Today, G20, which includes several developing countries, accounts for most of the global GDP. Western industrialized nations once dominated the world economy, and Japan’s industry was once referenced as “Japan as No.1.” Asia, which had been considered the world’s factory, became a large market. The middle-income class of emerging countries has been increasing, and these consumers in each country demand products at low prices. In emerging Asian economies, many companies have achieved rapid growth by specializing in low-cost mass production as OEM/ODM for European and U.S. companies. Japanese companies should be encouraged to develop a new manufacturing strategy, by considering various global manufacturing trends [3]. 3.2. Product architecture Product architecture is description of the ways in which functional elements of a product or system are assigned to its constituent sections or subsystems as well as the ways in which these elements interact. In integrated architecture, the physical elements of a product of system share functions. By contrast, in modular architecture, each function is delivered by a separate element. Modular and integrated architecture schemes are illustrated in Fig. 6. Product architecture influences product design and manufacturing methods, including assembly, sales, usage and maintenance. It is easier for a new comer to entry a market as a manufacturer of products with modular architecture. For example, a personal computer is composed of a display, a hard disk, a keyboard, and a CPU. Companies from Asian countries, including China, South Korea and Taiwan, have recently become prominent manufacturers of such components.



䠄㻲㼡㼚㼏㼠㼕㼛㼚㻌㻭䠅

䠄㻲㼡㼚㼏㼠㼕㼛㼚㻌㻮䠅

䠄㻲㼡㼚㼏㼠㼕㼛㼚㻌㻯䠅

䠄㻲㼡㼚㼏㼠㼕㼛㼚㻌㻰䠅



䠄㻹㼛㼐㼡㼘㼑㻌㻭䠅

䠄㻹㼛㼐㼡㼘㼑㻌㻯䠅

䠄㻹㼛㼐㼡㼘㼑㻌㻮䠅

䠄㻹㼛㼐㼡㼘㼑㻌㻰䠅

Fig. 6. (a) integrated architecture; (b) modular architecture.

3.3. Information technology In our advanced society, information technology has influenced not only business and manufacturing but also society and the economy, particularly since the mid-1990s when the internet was introduced to world. Digitization enables data and information to be converted into a digital format that can be easily handled with various types of media, and to be sent around the world instantly. In the manufacturing industry, technologies such as CAD/CAM have increased the effectiveness and efficiency of manufacturing processes. Moreover, the introduction of highperformance production facilities has facilitated the manufacturing of products of a consistent quality in emerging economies [3].The evolution of the use of software in automobile electronics systems is shown in Fig. 7.

126

Soemon Takakuwa and Ivica Veza / Procedia Engineering 69 (2014) 121 – 127

㻺㼡㼙㼎㼑㼞㻌㼛㼒㻌㼘㼕㼚㼑㼟㻌㼛㼒㻌㼏㼛㼐㼑㻌㻔㼘㼕㼚㼑㼟㻕

㻝㻜㻜㻜㻜㻜㻜㻜㻜

㻰㻯

㻝㻜㻜㻜㻜㻜㻜㻜

䠄㼃㼍㼞㼐䇻㻌 㻭㼡㼞㼛㻌 㼃㼛㼞㼘㼐䠅

㻳㻹

㻝㻜㻜㻜㻜㻜㻜

㻰㻯

䠄㼃㼍㼞㼐䇻㻌 㻭㼡㼞㼛㻌 㼃㼛㼞㼘㼐䠅

㼀㼛㼥㼛㼠㼍

㻺㼕㼟㼟㼍㼚

㻳㻹

㻝㻜㻜㻜㻜㻜

㻳㻹

䠄㻺㼕㼗㼗㼑㼕㻌 㻮㼡㼟㼕㼚㼑㼟㼟䠅

䠄㻱㻯㻺䠅

㻰㻯

㻝㻜㻜㻜㻜

㻺㼕㼟㼟㼍㼚 㼚

㻝㻜㻜㻜 㻝㻜㻜

㻰㻯 㻰㻯

㻰㻯䠖䚷㻮㻯㻳㻌㻰㼍㼠㼍 㻳㻹䠖䚷㼑㼃㼛㼞㼗 㼀㼛㼥㼛㼠㼍䠖䚷㻺㼕㼗㼗㼑㼕㻌㻮㼡㼟㼕㼚㼑㼟㼟㻌 㻰㼍㼕㼘㼥 㻺㼕㼟㼟㼍㼚䠖䚷㻺㼕㼗㼗㼑㼕㻌㻱㼘㼑㼏㼠㼞㼛㼚㼕㼏㼟

㻰㻯

㻝㻜 㻰㻯

㻝 㻝㻥㻢㻜

㻝㻥㻣㻜

㻝㻥㻤㻜

㻝㻥㻥㻜

㻞㻜㻜㻜

㻞㻜㻝㻜

㻞㻜㻝㻡 㻞㻜㻞㻜

㼅㼑㼍㼞

Fig. 7. Evolution of the use of software in automobile electronics systems. (Source: [3])

3.4. Vertical integration and horizontal integration Vertical and horizontal integration (or specialization) are manufacturing strategies. A company can increase profitability and efficiency through vertical and/or horizontal integration. Traditionally, in Japan, most manufacturers of assembled products tended to adopt vertical integration with domestic parts suppliers to promote self-sufficiency. By contrast, companies in emerging economies have succeeded in producing products at a lower cost with horizontal integration, increasing their global market share. These two strategies can be used together and should be used to suit the occasion. 3.5. R & D and intellectual property Trends in the efficiency of capital investment (operating profit/R & D expenses) from 2005 to 2010 are shown in Fig. 8. Enterprises in Western countries spend much more on R & D, whereas those in Asian countries spend less. In this context, it is important to establish strategies for managing intellectual property and know-how produced through R & D. Whether to “open” or “close” (i.e. in a black-box) the manufacturing of a developed technology should be determined carefully to dominate the international market of the associated product in the future. 

(US$ 1 million) 200000

N. America

180000

Operating profit

160000 140000 120000 100000

Japan

80000

Europe

60000

Asia

40000 20000 0 0

10000

20000

30000

40000

R & D expenses

50000

60000

70000

80000

(1US$ 1 million)

Fig. 8. Trends in the efficiency of capital investment (operating profit/R & D depreciation). (Source: [3])

Soemon Takakuwa and Ivica Veza / Procedia Engineering 69 (2014) 121 – 127

127

3.6. Human resource in terms of technology leakage Personnel and engineers within a company achieve innovation through continuous daily activities. Engineers are occasionally acquired from foreign companies. In addition, experienced engineers who played an important role in developing a key technology retired. These engineers may then work at new foreign companies, and the core technologies that they developed may transfer to these companies. Hence, human resource management should be used after engineers retire or leave a company to prevent technology leakage to foreign competitors. 3.7. Enterprises in relation to the nation In Japan, relatively more companies may operate within a specific industry such as the railway, liquid crystal display and water industry, whereas foreign countries such as South Korea may have one or a few companies operating within the same industry. Although the overall market size in South Korea is smaller than that in Japan, South Korean companies generally have a higher domestic market share compared with Japanese companies within the same industry. However, prevailing in the global market differs from doing so in the domestic market. In addition, the industrial policies of countries such as the U.S.A., Korea and China aggressively target specific strategic fields. Moreover, the corporate tax in Japan is relatively high compared with that in foreign countries. Furthermore, state capitalism has had serious implication for the global economy and competitiveness [9]. 4. Summary This study discusses the reasons why the Japanese companies that once dominated the technology market lost their markets share to foreign companies, considering technology transfer and world competitiveness. First, global manufacturing and technology transfer are described, introducing Toyota’s global manufacturing strategy, the flying geese paradigm and China’s TTODM strategy. Then, some major aspects of a competitive environment in today’s economy, including the structural change of the world economy, product architecture, information technology, virtual and horizontal integration, R & D and intellectual property, human resource management and the relation of enterprises to the nation, are discussed. Although these factors may affect each other, they are discussed individually to analyze the reasons why Japanese technology companies lost their market share to foreign companies, especially from the standpoints of international economics and technology management. Acknowledgment This research was supported by the Grant-in-Aid of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). References [1] IMD, World Competitiveness Yearbook 2012, IMD International, Lausanne, 2012. [2] Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan, Status and Problems over Japanese Industry, 2010. http://www.meti.go.jp/committee/materials2/downloadfiles/g100225a06j.pdf (in Japanese) [3] Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan, The White Paper on Manufacturing Industry (Monodzukuri) 2012, 2012. http://www.meti.go.jp/report/whitepaper/mono/2012/ (in Japanese) [4] Ministry of Finance, Japan, Trade Statistics of Japan http://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/info/ [5] S. Takakuwa (ed.), Manufacturing Management in East Asia, Chuo Keizaisha, Tokyo, 2012. (in Japanese) [6] K. Akamatsu, A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries, Developing Economies, 1, 1962. 1-23. [7] S. Takakuwa (ed.), Management of Manufacturing and Technology in East Asia, Science Publisher, Beijing, 2012. (in Chinese) [8] China Bureau of National Statistics, Automobile Production in China, 2010. [9] I. Bremmer, The End of the Free Market, Portfolio, New York, 2010.