Tenofovir Alafenamide versus Tenofovir Disoproxil ...

3 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
Mar 19, 2018 - 1.5 mg/dL among the Patients Treated with Tenofovir/Emtricitabine- .... cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment.
Review Article

Int J Pul & Res Sci

Volume 2 Issue 5 - March 2018 DOI: 10.19080/IJOPRS.2018.02.555600

Copyright © All rights are reserved by Md Jacques Lukenze Tamuzi

Tenofovir Alafenamide versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jacques Lukenze Tamuzi1*, Jonathan Lukusa Tshimwanga2, Andre Nyandwe Hamama Bulabula3 and Ley Muyaya Muyaya1 1Community Health Division, Stellenbosch University, South Africa 2Division of Family medicine, Stellenbosch University, South Africa 3Division of infectious diseases, Stellenbosch University, South Africa Submission: February 27, 2018; Published: March 19, 2018

*Corresponding author: Jacques Lukenze Tamuzi, Community Health Division, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa, Email: Abstract Background: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has greatly reduced morbidity and mortality. Despite the impact of antiretroviral therapy (ART), mortality in successfully treated HIV infected patients remains higher than in the general uninfected population, more specifically in Sub-Saharan. In fact, ART has demonstrated toxicity. tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) is widely known, even so, TDF is known as nephrotoxic. Recently, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) was found. TAF is a new oral prodrug of tenofovir, less toxic than TDF. TAF has potential intracellular accumulation; lower extracellular exposures of tenofovir may be realized with the potential to reduce off-target toxicities. Additionally, TAF has shown its efficacy in HIV-Hepatitis B co-infection. Objectives: To investigate whether TAF based regimens are less renal and borne toxic than TDF based regimens. To evaluate the efficacy of TAF versus TDF in HIV/hepatitis B co-infection. Methods: We searched in studies in following databases: CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Scopus, Web of science, LILACS, PubMed and CINAHL. We also searched conference abstract through HIV/AIDS website.

Main results: Among 916 studies found in different databases, 764 were screened after removing duplicate studies, 36 studies were included in qualitative studies. Among them, 16 studies were excluded with specific reasons. 18 RCTs were included in meta-analysis. Of the 12 RTCs assessing the OR of HIV-RNA