The ALFA test beam 2008. ***. A short summary and outlook. K Hiller DESY
Zeuthen. K.Hiller, DESY Zeuthen on behalf of the test beam crew. Bruno
Allongue ...
The ALFA test beam 2008 *** A short summary and outlook K.Hiller, K Hiller DESY Zeuthen on behalf of the test beam crew Bruno Allongue, Allongue Francis Anghinolfi, Anghinolfi Anatoli Astvatsatourov, Astvatsatourov Pierre Andreas Barrillon, Barrillon Georges Blanchot, Andre Braem , Antonio De Aguiar E Pestana De Morais, Beniamino Di Girolamo, Sebastien Franz, Per Grafstrom, Maurice Haguenauer, Wieslaw Iwanski, Krzysztof Korcyl, Alessandro Mapelli, Alberto Marcalo Da Palma, Dieter Notz, Patrick Michel Puzo, Thomas Schneider, Hasko Stenzel Stenzel, Tomas Sykora , Dennis Petschull, Petschull Uli Koetz, Koetz Vit Vorobel, Vorobel Matthieu Heller
Æ Some images from the last run Æ The beginning in 251 ÆThe measurements in H8 - data review - man power - lessons for the next iteration - coming analysis scenario ÆSummary & outlook
The last run: August 28, 8:00 (1) ALFA, mapping of X Y position y [mm]
50 60
40
50
30
40
20
30
10
20
0
10
−10 −25 −20 −15 −10 −5
Run 60145 42 kevts central position X/Y = -3.5 / -0.1 HV = 900 V Gain = 16 Thermo Th =8
0
5
10
15
20 25 0 x [mm]
Nearly full detector coverage
Fibers vs Layer: event _0
Fibers vs Layer: event _1
Fibers vs Layer: event _2
fibers
fibers
fibers
The last run: August 28, 8:00 (2) 60
60
60
50
50
50
40
40
40
30
30
30
20
20
20
10
10
10
8
10
12
14
16
18
20 layers
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2
20 layers
4
6
Fibers vs Layer: event _3
Fibers vs Layer: event _4
Fibers vs Layer: event _6 fibers
6
fibers
4
fibers
2
60
60 50
50
40
40
40
30
30
30
20
20
20
10
10
10
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20 layers
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20 layers
all events indicate track projections noisy & dead MAPMTs/PMFs rather th high hi h level l l off noise i hits hit & cross ttalk lk sometimes indications of mapping problems
10
12
14
16
18
20 layers
?
60
50
2
8
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20 layers
Preparations in 251 long period of motherboard debugging until August 6 followed by 5 day of DAQ runs from August 7 - 11 LED instead of fiber detector in pot Lund motherboard with latency ~ 200nsec, power supply l ffailure il PMFs 1-8 with LVDS, 9-23 CMOS all Kapton rows in R/O HV: mostly 950 V, some data with 850, 900 V verify MAPMT and fiber mapping S-curve measurements with DAC = 250, …3000 runs on
[email protected], l id @ tb tl04 h passwd: LumiDaq
Results from 251: mapping check HistPmPins_MD_9
MD MAPMT Fired Pins for PMF #9 8
59027
7
59029
6
57889
5 4
59029
8
46
7
29
6
34
59030
59031
59029
59029
59030
59030
59032
59029
59029
59032
59027
59028
59029
59030
59032
59032
59030
59030
59027
59031
59030
59028
59028
59031
59029
5
90
49
38
47
42
59007
59029
59029
59030
59029
59027
59030
59028
4
342
198
306
346
371
3
59028
59032
59031
2
59029
59030
1
59031
1
9
noisy
52
138
266
364
476
59029
59027
59030
59029
59027
59028
2
786
667
732
697
672
535
594
531
59030
59031
59029
59027
59031
59031
59030
1202
1092
1205
1141
1054
1067
994
1104
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
HistPmPins_MD_11
12
12
11
18
129
135
113
128
4
644
480
483
621
623
527
417
3
724
726
820
766
772
590
2
840
821
804
818
679
667
1
1672
1357
1497
1355
1379
1337
1194
1
2
3
4
5
6
69
6
1876
497
384
426
370
384
325
1306
245
5
6403
4748
4324
4327
5066
3747
3906
4019
639
4
22635
18876
17893
18918
19555
14463
14149
12892
698
849
3
23484
19817
21160
21810
21148
17479
15385
14515
740
768
2
23819
21964
20284
19666
16495
18654
16639
14962
1193
1
32514
29431
29786
28988
26715
26441
24357
20180
1
2
3
4
5
6
30
21
4
2
5
7 8 MAPMT Fired Pins
HistPmPins_MD_21
MD MAPMT Fired Pins for PMF #21
21 2
278
Entries Mean x Mean 266y RMS x RMS y
12
65
552
493
449
394
100
92
112
196
7 8 MAPMT Fired Pins
8
747
437
Entries Mean x Mean65 y RMS x RMS y
467
440
302
147
86
242
204
242
109
23
8
258
266
218
105
14
1
7
21
1
4
21
194
208
196
7
450
51
217
206
163
216
6
442
39
236
237
188
223
5
516
22 255
233
230
107
1
55
246
215
188
235
4
462
312
276
237
87
3
8
7
43
205
215
169
198
3
480
280
263
198
93
14
5
11
2
533
271
318
281
96
30
6
21
957
747
750
659
364
232
143
109
1
2
3
4
5
6
3
3
41
170
209
203
231
1
43
51
69
125
206
299
305
290
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
7 8 MAPMT Fired Pins
HistPmPins_MD_23
MD MAPMT Fired Pins for PMF #23 56
57
52
61
87
Entries Mean x Mean61y RMS x RMS y
13886 4.393 2.179 2.43 1.771
307
267
207
218
T
9
4
8
3
7
2
6
1
5
13
12
X
18
23
17
22
16
21
11
15
20
10
14
19
HistPmPins_MD_20
35
21
7
66
3
2
4
4
5
7
58
7
227
192
259
163
53
2
1
6
113
8
5
3
5
9
7
85
6
270
163
168
129
54
6
1
5
181
37
28
26
26
28
27
98
5
254
142
138
4
341
152
121
184
175
131
99
167
4
292
172
3
370
168
194
204
165
142
131
252
3
284
2
389
202
210
184
180
150
148
269
2
1
945
859
979
1000
985
1000
970
1098
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8 MAPMT Fired Pins
14914 2.779 4.151 1.681 2.641
7 8 MAPMT Fired Pins
MD MAPMT Fired Pins for PMF #20 8
11 MAPMTs covered ½ by black tape with unique pattern
HistPmPins_MD_22
MD MAPMT Fired Pins for PMF #22
60
5
23
466
86
3
2
42
7843 6.118 4.426 1.484 2.46
405
3
2
1
304
Entries 713784 Mean x 4.182 Mean 944y 2.539 RMS x 2.267 RMS y 1.38
1105
34
1
270
MD MAPMT Fired Pins for PMF #12 1143
28
5
103
29188 4.405 2.342 2.326 1.382
HistPmPins_MD_12
7
20
4
62
Entries Mean x Mean75 y RMS x RMS y
21999 4.367 2.195 2.308 1.325
7 8 MAPMT Fired Pins
8
18
40
1
7 8 MAPMT Fired Pins
9
71
44
268
451
115
1
78
501
13
1
2
639
130
3
3
1
608
179
4
2
4
621
5
3
6
597
11
5
3
4
660
54
2
22
3
6
2
7
23
59029
36
6
2
10
Entries Mean x Mean59 y RMS x RMS y
23
59027
33
7
21
59030
7
36
24
59031
8
8
19
59028
MD MAPMT Fired Pins for PMF #11
8
HistPmPins_MD_10
MD MAPMT Fired Pins for PMF #10
Entries 3776719 Mean x 4.501 59033 Mean y 4.5 RMS x 2.291 RMS y 2.291 59027
59028
Entries Mean x Mean20 y RMS x RMS y
3
122
60
240
166
55
6
1
6
172
147
158
53
4
2
313
151
186
178
76
11
3
5
489
310
416
264
142
64
61
32
1
2
3
4
5
6
dummy
6
7 8 MAPMT Fired Pins
7947 2.628 4.164 1.504 2.495
this pattern was found in the MAPMT pixel plots after reconstruction (not yet ?)
Results from 251: S-curves
Pedestals only
Threshold Th h ld th thermo = 3 sufficient ffi i t to cut most electronic noise Efficiency cy
S-curve, 0
at thermo = 7..8 7 8 low light signals disappear
1
0.8
only rudimental measurements possible due to instability of DAQ
0.6
0.4
With LED
0.2
Î ss-curve curve measurements can only be used for qualitative conclusions
0 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 Voltage
In the H8 test beam area Before installation …
… with ALFA
Tunnel view with Si-telescope
Data Overview: 3 periods 1) Lund-1 data - malfunctioning motherboard, latency ~ 200nsec due to power supply failure - PMFs 1-8 with LVDS, 9-23 CMOS - eye y tracking g efficiency y ~ 10% - ALFA - fiber-silicon DAQ synchronization stable, few events offset 2) Orsay data - all PMFs with LVDS ((?)) - parameter scan: * HV: 950, 900, 850 V * DAC: 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000 * Gain: 8, 16, 24, 32, uniformity y corrections * Kaptons rows in R/O: 1+2, 4+5, 3+5, 2+4, 2+5, 1+5 * X/Y: 0.0/0.0, -0.1/10.0, -0.1,15.0, -20.0/0.0, +20.0/0.0, +22.0/0.0, - fiber-silicon DAQ synchronization stable, few events offset
150 000 triggers 150.000
650.000 triggers
3) Lund-2 data - Lund motherboard with latency ~ 1000nsec, power supply failure cured - PMFs 1-4 with LVDS, 6-7 with CMOS, 8-10 LVDS, 11-23 CMOS - reduced p parameter scan: * HV: 900, 950 V * Gain: 16, uniformity corrections * DAC: 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 * X/Y: -2.9/+10.0, -6.0/+10.0, -17.9/+5.0, +6.0,/+5.0, +11.0/+10.0, -3.5/+5.0, -3.5/-0.1 - eye tracking efficiency ~ 80% - fiber-silicon synchronization bad, each spill add. 0(5) Si-events 370.000
triggers
Man Power Situation up to last ~ 2 days mostly working g in expert p mode majority of shifters left before stable running Î no real benefit f from f available man power
Many thanks to all:
Lund-2 Lund-1
Orsay
Experts E t always l on call, ll shifters dealing with frequent changes in soft + hardware
Lessons learned: a few examples Mechanics: detector installation tool (bottom-up version !!!) shielding hi ldi off overlap l ttrigger i til tiles effective dark box Æ see full list from Andre & Thomas Electronics: HV-cabling with access to PMFs, w/o short circuits motherboard: many problems understood understood, final version ? trigger electronics: completely missing ! Æ see full list from Francis Software: DAQ software rather outdated ALFA reconstruction software at veryy beginning g g how to get best benefit from fiber metrology in case of plate-to-plate coordinate jitters ? g point to improve are test beam data Æ best starting
Hard to imagine as final cabling
An analysis scenario 1) Si – tack reconstruction use the existing RD42 package for alignment and Si-track reconstruction Karlheinz, Karlheinz Antonio Antonio, Alberto 2) ALFA reconstruction: check / adjust mapping tables select and fit track candidates, different models possible calculate offsets and rotations of individual detector layers calculate resolution,, efficiency, y, noise for all parameter p samples p Anatoli, Alessandro, Dennis, Hasko, Matthieu, Sebastien, Karlheinz 3) ALFA versus Si-tracks resolution, efficiency, noise with clear reference track all people as before 4) GEANT3/4 simulation Vit, Tomas, Antonin Î man power is i an proposall to t be b discussed di d and d agreed d Î response time depends much on man power and experience !
Where we are ? We expect from this test beam measurements a realistic feedback about the data quality of a nearly final Roman Pot as it will be installed in the tunnel in terms of: resolution & efficiency of fiber tracking trigger efficiency handling experience, detector installation etc. test under pre-vacuum need and feedback of cooling options test of alignment for max. use of staggering
At the end we collected about 1.2 million triggers, but: most of them not with final electronics (faulty Lund board, board 2 Orsay boards) due to lack of time the most realistic data taking was compressed in 2 – 3 days, originally planned 6 + 20 days ! not all parameter options well measured with sufficient statistics most technical aspects with temporary workarounds, workarounds no tunnel solutions
My personal summary: 1) we got very important feedback in many technical aspects 2) we will learn a lot from the coming data analysis about data quality and where improvements are needed 3) the th step t ffrom proto-2 t 2 tto th the ttunnel-version l i iis ttoo llarge, tto kkeep th the risk i k on a reasonable level a next iteration of prototype is needed before installation