the implementation of altmetrics in library as an ...

PROCEEDINGS International Conference on Science Mapping and the Development of Science

Library and Information Management Graduate School, Gadjah Mada University April 20-21 2016

PROCEEDINGS International Conference on Science Mapping and the Development of Science © 2016n xviii + 352 hlm; 20,5 cm x 29,5 cm

Editor: Moh. Mursyid Tata Letak: Hanania Alfia Lathif Perancang Sampul: Sahabat Ladang Kata Diterbitkan oleh: Library and Information Management Graduate School, Gadjah Mada University

Nuning Kurniasih ....................................................................................................................

63

Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. iii Organising Committee................................................................................................................... vii Conference Program....................................................................................................................... ix A Brief Introductory Note.............................................................................................................. xv 66 Part 1 SCIENCE MAPING 1. Science Mapping As a Tool For Presentation of Information on The Information Repackaging for The Policy Maker Ira Maryati, Ambar Yoganingrum, Andre Sihombing .......................................................... 1 2. Pemetaan Publikasi Ilmiah Literasi Informasi di Indonesia Nining Sudiar, Fiqru Mafar, Vita Amelia............................................................................... 9 3. Dialog Dua Konsep: Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Queer Theory untuk Move On Keilmuan Wiji Suwarno........................................................................................................................

17

4. Fenomenologi dalam Arsitektur: Mengungkap Bidang Sosial dan Fenomena ‘Ruang-Masyarakat’ Udjianto Pawitro.......................................................................................................................

27

5. Memory Institution Design of a Higher Education: A Study of Professional Development in Information Science Wina Erwina............................................................................................................................. 37 6. Teknologi Informasi, Sistem Informasi, Manajemen Informasi, Ilmu Informasi dan Pendidikannya Dr. Ir. Eko Nugroho, Msi......................................................................................................

47

7. Tradisi Lisan sebagai Program Studi dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Baru: Sejarah dan Perkembangannya di Sulawesi Tenggara Syahrun..................................................................................................................................

57

66 Part 2 METRICS AND ASSESSMENT OF SCIENCE 1. The Implementation of Altmetrics in Library as an Alternative Measurement Method for Scholarly Article Impact in Social Web Ecosystem Nuning Kurniasih ....................................................................................................................

63

2. Pemetaan Ilmu Pengetahuan dengan Pendekatan Kebudayaan pada Kurikulum Pendidikan Menengah di Bali Tahun 2016 Richard Togaranta Ginting, S.Sos., M.Hum ................................................................................ 75

iii

3. Assesment of Indonesian Scientific Journal Based on Citation Impacts Lukman, Deden Sumirat Hidayat........................................................................................... 83 66 Part 4 ACADEMIA AND INFORMATION BEHAVIOUR 1. Perubahan Kultur Akses Informasi Pemustaka dalam Bingkai Mediasi dan Mediatisasi Endang Fatmawati................................................................................................................

95

2. Influence of Information Behavior Toward Services and Using Library Munawaroh ..........................................................................................................................

103

3. Information Behaviour of Undergraduate Students in North Sumatera at Hedonis Style (Case Study: Students of Some University in North Sumatera) Ida Mariani Pasaribu, S.Sos., M.A., Fransiska Timoria Samosir, S.Sos., M.A. ................

107

4. Foreign Students’ Information Seeking Behavior: A Case Study of Foreign Students at Gadjah Mada University Rahmat Fadhli, Berlian Eka Kurnia....................................................................................... 117 5. Perilaku Pencarian Informasi Tutor Melalui Portal Eresources dengan Pendekatan Model Kuhlthau Dwi Fajar Saputra.................................................................................................................... 127 6. Digital Life, Digital Tattoo and The Filter Bubble: Raising The Awareness and The Cautions on Online Activities Through Information Literacy Education Lis Setyowati..........................................................................................................................

137

7. Senior High School Students’ Use of Library Resources and Services Dessy Harisanty....................................................................................................................

143

8. Perpustakaan dan Komodifikasi Pemustaka Luki Wijayanti, Wisma Nugraha Christianto Richardus.............................. 153 9. Information Behavior: Perilaku Ilmiah Generasi Muda dan Generasi Tua Civitas Akademika Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta Ragil Tri Atmi............................................................................................................................ 163 66 Part 3 SCIENCE MAPPING, BIBLIOMETRICS, AND LIS 1. Analisa Bibliometrik terhadap Skripsi Mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu Informasi dan Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga Dewi Puspitasari, Novita Dwi Anawati................................................................................. 175 2. Pemetaan Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi di Universitas Gadjah Mada (Analisis Bibliometrikatesis Mahasiswa Manajemen Informasi dan Perpustakaan Universitas Gadjah Mada Tahun 2005-2015) Nurlistiani.................................................................................................................................. 185 3. Research Trend in Library and Information Science at Universitas Indonesia Margareta Aulia Rachman, M.Hum....................................................................................... 195

iv

4. Jurnal Apa yang Harus Kita Langgan? Pemetaan Jurnal Utama dalam Referensi Publikasi Internasional Indonesia Yaniasih......................................................................................................................................

205

5. Analisis Peran Pusat Penelitian dalam Meningkatkan Peringkat Webometrics (Studi Kasus Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia) Slamet Riyanto, Ekawati Marlina, Hendro Subagyo.............................................................

213

6. Citra Pustakawan dalam Film Heartbreak Library dan The Librarian: Perubahan Stereotip? Nina Mayesti.............................................................................................................................

219

7. Interdisiplinaritas Ilmu Kesehatan pada Jurnal Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada Chatarina Eka Oktavilia................... ...................................................................................

229

8. Keterpakaian Koleksi pada Penelitian Staf Universitas Terbuka M.Pandu Ristiyono..................................................................................................................

237

66 Part 5 DATA MANAGEMENT 1. Potensi Implementasi Big Data pada Perpustakaan: Studi Kasus pada Perpustakaan Nasional RI Irhamni Ali................................................................................................................................

245

2. Big Data and Data Management: The Role and Opportunity of Academic Libraries in Data Management Anastasia Tri Susiati.................................................................................................................

255

3. Sistem Rekomendasi Buku Berbasis Data Mining Nurrun Muchammad Shiddieqy Hadna, Paulus Insap Santosa..........................................

263

4. Big Data In Library: A New Challenge For The Future Librarians In Indonesia Moh. Mursyid............................................................................................................................

269

66 Part 6 EMBEDDED LIBRAIANSHIP AND IFORMATION 1. Peran Pusat Dokumentasi dan Informasi dalam Pengelolaan Data Penelitian Ekawati Marlina, Slamet Riyanto, Yaniasih...........................................................................

281

2. The Application of Indegenous Knowledge in Information Literacy Model in Higher Education: A Case of Application of Indigenous Knowledge as One of Information Science Studies Wina Erwina, Yulianti............................................................................................................. 291 3. Literasi Bencana untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar Melalui Perpustakaan Sekolah Edwin Rizal, Ninis Agustini, Ute Lies Siti Khadijah, Rully Khairul Anwar........................ 301

v

4. Design of Culture Documentation Repository System in Higher Education: Research Action Study Towards Arrangement of Information Architecture on Culture Documentation Repository System With Digital-Based in Universitas Padjadjaran Wina Erwina, Kusnandar.......................................................................................................

311

5. Penguatan Peran Perpustakaan dan Pustakawan di Wilayah Pelosok Kalimantan Barat Atiqa Nur Latifa Hanum ....................................................................................................

319

6. Media Promosi Komunikasi Point Of Purchase terhadap Pendayagunaan Perpustakaan oleh Pemustaka (Studi Pengaruh Komunikasi Point of Purchase terhadap Pendayagunaan Perpustakaan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia) Majidah...................................................................................................................................... 327 7. Wikimedia Sebagai Pengenalan Budaya Open Acces Wikimedia, An Introduction To Open Acces Culture Mufida Cahyani........................................................................................................................

331

8. Partnership In Community-Based Literacy Movement Andri Yanto, Saleha Rodiah, Elnovani Lusiana .................................................................... 9. Public Healt Information Behavior at Flood-Prone Area In Bandung Regency: A Case Study in Baleendah Village, Andir Village, Bojongsoang Village and Dayeuh Kolot Village Nuning Kurniasih, Sukaesih ......................................................................................................

vi

343

353

Organising Committee Advisory

:

Conference Chair Secretary

: :

Treasurer

:

Event

:

Sponsorship

:

Proceeding

:

Accommodation

:

Publication and Documentation :

Registration

:

Consumption

:

Prof. Ir. Suryo Purwono, MA.Sc., Ph.D. Prof. Nunung Prajarto, M.A., Ph.D. Drs. Ida Fajar Priyanto, M.A., Ph.D. Dr. Ir. Eko Nugroho, M.Si. Chatarina Eka Oktavilia, S.T. Agus Wiyanto Enny Suprihatin, S.Sos. Titan Violeta, S.Hum. Jatmiko Hadi Wibowo, SIP. (Pj) Berlian Eka Kurnia, S.IIP. Anjas Alifah Bakry, S.Hum. Mufida Cahyani, S.IIP. Futri Fuji Wijayanti, S.Hum. Muharram Septiono, S.IIP. Anastasia Tri Susiati, M. A. (Pj) Vincentius Widya Iswara, S.Sos. Titan Violeta, S.Hum. Vincentius Widya Iswara, S. sos. (Pj) Nur’aini Perdani SP, S.Hum. Enny Suprihatin, S.Sos. Resti Laras Gilang Parindra, S.Hum. Mohamad Very Setiawan, S. Hum. Agung Pambudi, M.A. Evy Mardiani Dewi, S.Sos. Murad Maulana, S.Sos. (Pj) Ericson Hutapea, S.Sos. Christye Dato Pango, S.Sos Lukito Adhi Utomo, S.Hum. (Pj) Rahmat Fadhli, S.IIP. Miftha khulzannah, S.Sos. Agung Pambudi, M.A. (Pj) Nadlrotussariroh, M.A. Aditya Ramadhani, S.IIP. (Pj) Suprihatin, SIP.

vii

Vincentius Widya Iswara, S.Sos. Enny Suprihatin, S.Sos. Winisudarwanti, S.Sos.

Email Contact Vincentius Widya Iswara (0817 5016 595)/Email: [email protected] Agung Pambudi (0818 257 447)/Email: [email protected] Agus Agus Wiyanto (081227248164) Correspondence: Program Manajemen Informasi dan Perpustakaan, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Gadjah Mada Pogung, Depok, Sleman Yogyakarta E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: sps@[email protected] Telp./Fax. (0274) 544975, 555881, 564239 website: mip.pasca.ugm.ac.id

viii

Conference Program CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE MAPPING GADJAH MADA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA DayOne: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 TIME

AGENDA

SPEAKERS/CP

LOBBY(5th FLOOR) 08:00-09:00

Registration

Organizing Committee

ROOM A (5th FLOOR) : OPENING AND KEYNOTE SPEECH 09:00-09:05

Announcement

MC

09:05-09:10

Indonesia Raya, National Anthem

MC dan Dirigent OC Chair

09:10-09:20

Remarks & Opening

Rector/Vice Rector for AcademicAffairs,UGM

Keynote speech: 09:20-09:45

Prof. Dr. Ali Ghufron Mukti, MSc. “The Indonesian Science Development Ph.D.Directorate General of Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia Policy”

09:45-10:00

Coffee break

FB Committee

ROOM A (5th FLOOR): SCIENCE MAPPING On Science Mapping and leaders of Prof. Ursula Georgy scientific Cologne University 10:00-12:00

Leaders of sciences

Prof. Dr. Ir.Sahid Susanto, MS. Interdisciplinary Graduate School

The role of Bibliometrics and Science Prof. Sulistyo-Basuki Mapping in science development Gadjah Mada University Discussion

Moderator LOBBY(5th FLOOR)

12:00-13:00

Lunch Break

FB Team

ix

ROOM A (5th FLOOR): Open Science, Open Access, and Paradigm Shift Open Science and Open Access, including Prof. Lambert Heller the question of science data access & TIB Hanover, Germany Storage 13:00-14:30

drg. Ika Dewi Ana, M.Kes., Ph.D Paradigm shift: Science tree vs. Science Director, Center for Innovation and Mapping Academic Assessment Discussion

Moderator LOBBY(5th FLOOR)

14:30-14:15

Coffee Break

FB Team

ROOM A (5th FLOOR): SCIENCE MAPPING Ira Maryati Science Mapping as a Tool for Presentation Andre Sihombing of Information on the Information LIPI, Jakarta Repackaging for the Policy Maker 14:45-16:15

Peran Science Mapping dalam Pengembangan Sains dan Akademik: Pemetaan Publikasi Ilmiah Literasi Informasi di Indonesia

Nining Sudiar, Fiqru Mafar, & Vita Amelia Lancang Kuning University, Sumatra

ROOM A (5th FLOOR) : METRICS AND ASSESSMENT OF SCIENCE Pemetaan Ilmu Pengetahuan dengan Richard Togaranta Ginting Udayana Pendekatan Kebudayaan pada Kurikulum University, Bali Pendidikan Menengah di Bali tahun 2016 14:45-16:15

The Implementation of Altmetrics in Library as Alternative Measurement Method for Scientific Paper Quality

Nuning Kurniasih, University, Bandung

Padjadjaran

Assesment of Indonesian Scientific Journal Lukman, Deden Sumirat, LIPI, Based on Citation Impacts Jakarta 16:15-16:20

Discussion

Moderator

Closing of Day One and Announcement

MC

GARDEN AND LOBBY(1st FLOOR) 19:00-21:00

x

Reception

Organizing Committee

Day 2: Thursday, April 21, 2016 Time

Agenda

07:30-08:30 Registration

Speakers/Contact Person Team

ROOM A (5th FLOOR): DISCUSSION ON LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN GERMANY, MALAYSIA, AND INDONESIA Prof. Ursula Georgy, Cologne Discussion: Library and Information Science University, Germany 08:30-10:10 in Germany, Malaysia and Indonesia Dr. Eko Nugroho, UGM, Indonesia Prof. Sulistyo Basuki, UGM, Indonesia ROOM B (5th FLOOR): ACADEMIA AND INFORMATION BEHAVIOR Information Seeking Behavior Of Foreign Students In Gadjah Mada University (Case Rahmat Fadhli, Berlian Eka Kurnia, Study 3 Foreign Students Of Gadjah Mada Gadjah Mada University University) Information Behaviour of Undergraduate Students in North Sumatera at 08:30-10:10 Hedonismestyle (Case Study: Students of Some University in North Sumatera)

Ida MarianiPasaribu,University of St. Thomas, Sumatera FransiskaTimoriaSamosir, Bengkulu University

Influence of Information Behavior Toward Munawaroh, Perbanas, Surabaya Services and Using Library Perubahan kultur akses informasi pemustaka Endang Fatmawati, Diponegoro dalam bingkai mediasi dan mediatisasi University, Semarang ROOM C (5th FLOOR): SCIENCE MAPPING, BIBLIOMETRICS, AND LIS Research Trend in Library and Information Margareta Aulia Rachman, Universitas Science at University of Indonesia Indonesia

08:30-10:10

Analisa Bibliometrik terhadap Skripsi Dewi Puspitasari, Novita Dwi Anawati, Mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu Informasi Airlangga University, Surabaya dan Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga Pemetaan Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi di Universitas Gadjah Mada (Analisis Nurlistiani, Universitas Negeri Bibliometrika Tesis Mahasiswa Manajemen Semarang, Semarang Informasi dan Perpustakaan Universitas Gadjah Mada Tahun 2005-2015) LOBBY 5th FLOOR

10:10-10:30 Coffee Break

FB Team

ROOM A (5th FLOOR): THE ROLE OF NATIONAL LIBRARIES IN GERMANY, MALAYSIA, AND INDONESIA

xi

Mr. Lambert Heller, TIB Germany Library System and The role of National Dra. Welmin Snyi Aminingsih, Mlib. 10:30-12:10 Libraries in Germany, Malaysia, and Former Deputy, National Library of Indonesia Indonesia ROOM B (5th FLOOR): DATA MANAGEMENT Potensi Implementasi Big Data Pada Perpus­ Irhamni Ali, National Library of takaan: Studi Kasus Pada Perpustakaan Indonesia Nasional RI Big Data Dan Manajemen Data: Peran dan Anastasia Tri Susiati, Atmajaya Peluang Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi University, Yogyakarta Dalam Manajemen Data ROOM C (5th FLOOR): EMBEDDED LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION LITERACY The importance and coverage of information Widya Listyo Wulan, CSR Manager, for CSR programs. Corpo Affairs, Washington, D.C. The Role of Documentation and Information Ekawati Marlina, Slamet Riyanto, & Center in The Management of Research Yaniasih, LIPI, Jakarta Data Penerapan Pengetahuan Lokal dalam Model Wina Erwina & Yulianti Sodiqin, 10:10-12:10 Literasi Informasi di Perguruan Tinggi: Padjadjaran University, Bandung Aplikasi Pengetahuan Lokal sebagai Salah Satu Kajian dalam Sains Informasi. Edwin Rizal, Ninis Agustini, Ute Lies Literasi Bencana untuk Siswa Sekolah Siti Khatidjah, &Rully Khairul Anwar, Dasar Melalui Perpustakaan Sekolah Padjadjaran University, Bandung LOBBY (5th FLOOR) 12:10-13:10 Lunch Break

FB Team ROOM A(5th FLOOR)

xii

Prof. Hartono,M.Sc., DEA, Former Director, Interdisciplinary Graduate School, Gadjah Mada University Prof. Ursula Georgy, Cologne University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany Prof. Lambert Heller, TIB, Germany 13:10-15:00

Partnership and Collaboration: Membangun ChristelManhke, Goethe Institute, kerja sama Indonesia &Jerman Jakarta Prof.SuryoPurwono, Vice Director, Interdisciplinary Graduate School, Gadjah Mada University Prof. Nunung Prajarto, Head of Department, Graduate School of Information and Library Management, Gadjah Mada University ROOM A (5th FLOOR)

15:00-15:15 Closing

Prof. Dr. Nunung Prajarto, Head of Department

xiii

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ALTMETRICS IN LIBRARY AS AN ALTERNATIVE MEASUREMENT METHOD FOR SCHOLARLY ARTICLE IMPACT IN SOCIAL WEB ECOSYSTEM

Nuning Kurniasih Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor-Indonesia [email protected]

ABSTRACT: Altmetrics is an alternative method to complement the traditional method to measure impact of scholarly articles in social web ecosystem. This paper aims to examine how the librarians can implement Altmetrics in their library so it can deliver high impact scholarly article. The method to reach the aim is by evaluation method. The study shows that (1) The librarian has an important role in disseminating, training as well as for administrative assessor of Altmetrics (2) The scholarly trends in publishing articles mostly use digital format with interactive dialog. It is marked by the increasing presence of the scholar in various social media platform which can build effective communication among researchers. (3) that social media have brought the activity of sharing and collaborating not only among researchers on the same field but also on the different field. (4) The impact of scholarly article on the social web can be seen from how many clicks, reads, shares, saves/downloads, discussions in a forum, adaptations, reviews of a scholarly article, etc.(5) To implement Altmetrics in the Library, the library will need to prepare (a) Altmetrics knowledge and skills for librarians (b) organization support (c) good willing to start (d) librarian assistantship to help writers or researchers to create scholarly article that has an impact. From Altmetrics, the scholar can (1) explore the impact of scholarly article; (2) manage the scholarly reputation. The result of this study can be a basic consideration for the librarians to develop their collection based on the impact of scholarly article and the requirement of users. Key words: Altmetrics, Scholarly Article, Social Web Ecosystem INTRODUCTION For decades, libraries have been used Bibliometrics as a method to measure the impact factor of a scholarly journal and h-index of personal reputation by counting the citation number. Along with the inception of various media platform of information and commu­ nication, however, Bibliometrics is considered no longer able to meet the requirement of measurement standard published in new

media, especially in social web or social media. However, nowadays social web makes scholarly communication more open and variable than before. The use of scholarly articles is not only marked by a conventional citation, but also can share through the links, blog posts, tweets, bookmarks, discussions on social forum and others. These are the reasons why Bibliometrics cannot represent the impact of the scholarly article properly and need an alternative metrics. 63

Altmetrics comes up as an alternative 1. Many papers are not published in journals, method to complement the traditional method to while the Bibliometrics focus on the journal. measure impact of scholarly articles in social web 2. Bibliometrics needs much time so it delays ecosystem. By using Altmetrics, scholarly articles the calculation of the citations. impact is not only seen from the number of 3. Bibliometrics does not accommodate infor­ citations but also the number of visitors, readers, mation search and dissemination through links shared, mentions, conversation, saves / new media such as social web or social media. downloads, adaptations, reviews, and other On the other hand, Webometrics / Cyber­ social media usage in real time and immediately. metrics and Altmetrics come up to cover web metrics. Sources of Webometrics are link analysis, Study Purposes This paper aims to examine how the librarian web citation analysis, search engine evaluation can implement Altmetrics in their library so it and purely descriptive studies of the web.

Since 2004, every 6 months, webometrics. can deliver high impact articles for the users. info provides assessment for university ranking From this study, it can be concluded: 1. What are the roles of librarians on Altmetrics in the world through the university’s website. According to webometrics.info, dissemination? 2. How is the tendency of the scholar in publishing their article on the internet? 3. How does the scholar share the knowledge and collaborate with other scholars? 4. How is the impact of scholarly article published in social web?

“The original aim of the ranking is to promote academic web presence, supporting the Open Access initiatives for increasing significantly the transfer of scientific and cultural knowledge generated by the universities to the whole Society” (Aguillo, 2016).

5. How to implementation of Atmetrics in a Like Bibliometris, Webometrics has some library? disadvantages, especially when a website is not The result of this study can be a basic indexed by Google and no major search engine consideration for the librarians to develop their allows useful hyperlink searches. collection based on the trend or popularity and Another web metrics is Altmetrics. Altme­ the requirement of users. trics or Alternative Metrics used for measuring

the impact of online events and interactions (Didegah, Bowman, & Holmberg, 2015). Altmetric using “doughnut” symbol. This symbol 1. Bibliometrics vs Web Metrics To measure the quality of scholarly works, is a way for visualising the reach and impact of an Bibliometrics used Journal Impact Factor (JIF) article. The symbol can be seen at Figure 1 below: Figure 1 and counted the citation number. JIF created by Doughnut/Symbol of Altmetrics Institute of Scientific Information (ISI – now Thomson Reuters) in 1960. JIF is used to assess the quality and prestige of a journal. A journal and an article are considered to have the prestige Source : altmerics.com and quality when article in the journals cited by From Figure 1, we can see that the symbol many authors. of Altmetrics is colorful. It shows the various However, Bibliometrics have some disad­ of online sources and it can be attached to the vantages: Literature Review

64

online resource. The score in the center of the doughnut is based on: (1) how many people share or mention the article (2) where they mention it (3) who is talking about it (University of Leeds, 2014).

6. Altmetric.com

The Relationship between the Different Metrics based

13. Scholarometer

7. ImpactStory 8. Plum Analytics 9. Figshare

10. PaperCritic Briefly, research area among Bibliometrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics can be seen at 11. PLoS (Public Library of Science) Impact Explorer Figure 2 below: 12. ResearchGate, Figure 2 Research Area

14. Publish or Perish 15. ScienceCard 16. Academia.edu

(Holmberg, 2016)

Those tools of Altmetrics are supported by social media such as: Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Wikipedia, Vimeo, Google+, SlideShare, Blogs, Researchblogging.org, Nature Blogs, Pinterest, Weibo users, Reddiators, Delicious, GitHub, Reddit, StackExchange, SourceForge, Amazon, Science Seeker, Datasift, etc.

From Figure 2, we can see that Informatics overshadows all research fields with analyzing quantitative aspects in Library and Information Science, consist Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, 3. How Altmetrics Works Cybermetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics. There are several steps to start working with Some references reveal that Cybermetrics is altmetrics: Webometrics, while some others distinguish a. Embed Altmetrics to website, for example both. from altmetric.com : 2. Tools of Altmetrics

1. Copy and paste the javascript snippet of altmetric.com into the website HTML.

Altmetrics is Article-Level-Metrics (ALMs). 2. Find the DOI or other persistent “ALMs are rapidly emerging as important tools identifier of the item and use it to build to quantify how individual articles are being a badge of website. discussed, shared, and used” (Tananbaum, 2013). According to Richard Cave of Public 3. Copy and paste a simple snippet of Library of Science (PLOS), the sources of ALM HTML into the webpage to display the can be broken down into five categories, there badge. are usages, captures, mentions, social media and b. Use Altmetrics in all your social web. Source: citations (Tananbaum, 2013). (University of Leeds, 2014) Tools of Altmetrics including: 1. CiteULike 2. F1000 3. Google Scholar Citations 4. Mendeley 5. Zotero 65

Agents of Altmetrics According to González-FernándezVillavicencio, et al, there are six agents of altmetris, consisting of: “1) Suppliers, 2) editors, firms and organizations which measure the impact of research with alternative metrics; 3) scientific journals; 4) repositories; 5) researchers 6. Librarians” (González-FernándezVillavicencio, Dominguez-Aroca, CalderónRehecho, & Hernández, 20XX) For supplier the main tool is PLUM Analytics by EBSCO. PLUM Analytics is a payment service. They have ORCID Identifiers to connect with researchers’s profile, Public Library of Science (PLOS) to connect among the editors which supply altmetrics data. Key Performance Indicators of Social Media To maximize Altmetrics, we need to select the appropriate social media. Here is some Key Performance Indicator for social media: Table 1 Matrix KPI for Social Media

Social Media

Success Indicators 1. Increase Twitter in overall 1. Favorite Engagement engagement 2. Retweet Metrics 2. Increase in 3. Mention website visits from Twitter 1. Increase in Twitter 1. Followers followers Followers 2. Follow2. Increase in Metric ing engagements 1. Increase in page likes Facebook 1. Page Likes 2. Increase in Page Like 2. Visits visits Metric 3. Increase in engagements

66

Key Term

1. Likes 1. Increase in Facebook 2. Comments People Talking People 3. Shares About This Talking 4. Mention 2. Increase About This 5. Event in overall Metric RSVP engagement 6. Review Increase in overall 1. Likes engagement. Facebook 2. Comments Increase in post Engagement 3. Shares reach. Metrics 4. Clicks Increase in 5. Reach website visits from Facebook. 1. Website referrals Impact of social 2. ConverKey Social media efforts on sions, Metrics other marketing 3. Engagechannels ment on social sites (Klipfolio Inc, 2016)

Hoffman and Fodor in Holmberg (2016) explained that KPI for social web includes indicating awareness such as number of members, comments, replies, likes, subscribers, active users, etc., and word of mouth to deliver opinion by number of retweets, inlinks, bookmarks, etc. (Holmberg, 2016) STUDY METHOD This study is an evaluation research. The steps of an evaluation research are: a. Pre-Evaluation Program as a preliminary study. b. Ongoing Program to solve the problem. c. Expose Evaluation program to see the program impact. One of evaluation models was developed by Stufflebeam, consisting of: CONTEXT–INPUT– PROCESS-PRODUCT (Stufflebeam, 2003)

STUDY RESULTS 1. The Roles of Librarians in Altmetrics Dissemination The main purpose of the library service is to meet the information needs and interests of users. To provide the information the users needed quickly and appropriately, we require an in-depth analysis of various data. The data can be seen from the number of access to the level of popularity and impact of information resources, including scholarly articles.

The result of Altmetrics can be a basic consideration for the librarians to develop their collections and repositories based on the impact of scholarly article and the requirement of users.

What about the Altmetrics application in Indonesia? Currently there is no library in Indonesia implementing Altmetrics to measure the impact of a scholarly article. To disseminate Altmetrics can be started by adding Altmetrics in Subject of Bibliometrics in university curriculum, and trainings or workshops organized by the association of profession in Librarianship. When In online environment, level of popularity Altmetrics course can be disseminated properly and impact can be seen from how many clicks, to the librarian, the library is expected to be able reads, shares, saves/downloads, discussions in a to implement of Altmetrics to their library. forum, adaptations, reviews of a scholarly article, 2. The Tendency of The Scholar in Publishing etc. their Article The librarian has an important role to accommodate conventional media to new media characteristics changes. The changes in these characteristics lead to the development of a new measurement tool in assessing a scholarly article impact. For example, when librarians aware of the limitations of Bibliometrics and Webometrics / Cybermetrics in measuring the scholarly articles impact that published via the social web, then the librarian could try Alternative Metrics (Altmetrics). Librarians have an important role in the disseminating of Altmetrics as mention by González-Fernández-Villavicencio, et al, :

A study shows that there is an increased presence of researchers and research groups on social media (González-Fernández-Villavicencio, Dominguez-Aroca, Calderón-Rehecho, & Hernández, 20XX).

“Librarians have an important role in the disseminating of altmetrics and in the training of using them in the best interests of their researchers’ scientific publications. This role is also important as assessors for the administration in order to value these metrics in university processes, as well as their inclusion in catalogs, databases or repositories” (González-Fernández Villavicencio, Dominguez-Aroca, CalderónRehecho, & Hernández, 20XX).

3. Connecting with associated content environ­ ments.

According to Dunham, there are six trends that have impacted positively on the dissemination of research, regardless of the discipline, by making the content to be more accessible, visible, and sustainable: 1. Digital forms of publishing. 2. Parsing and leveraging content.

4. Increasing receptivity to multimedia compo­ nents. 5. Growing interactivity and dialogue using Web 2.0. 6. Moving to mobile. (Dunham, 2011)

The trend changes of dissemination of research influence the change of scholarly Thus, the librarian has an important role landscape. For example, a survey result reveals in disseminating and training as well as for that: administrative assessor. 67

a. Social media tools are gaining acceptance 5. and trust in academic circle. 6. b. Scholar use social media to keep up date with 7. development in their area. 8.

Post (work) content

The Social networking which are the most popular in Science and Engineering scholarly circles are Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Linkedln, Facebook, Google+, Twitter, Rese­ archerID, Mendeley, ORCID, Academia.edu, BioMedExperts and Microsoft Academic Search. Meanwhile, the social networking which are most popular in Social Science, Art and Humanities are GoogleScholar, Facebook, Linkedln, ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Twitter, Google+, Mendeley, ResearcherID, ORCID and Microsoft Academic Search (Noorden, 2014).

(Noorden, 2014)

Contact Peers Track Metrics

Discover Jobs c. Many academics like to read or comment on 9. Discover Peers blog posts, but fewer are incline to maintain 10. Discover Recommended Papers their own blog. 11. Use informally d. Academics social networking sites are 12. Browse only: not maintaining profile becoming more popular. 13. Incase contacted (Gruzd, Goertzen, & Mai, 2012) Sharing and collaborating is important activities besides transferring knowledge to each other. Talja divides information sharing to four types: 1. Strategic sharing for maximizing efficiency in a research group. 2. Paradigmatic sharing within a discipline or across disciplines. 3. Directive sharing: information sharing between teachers and students.

From the research results above, it can be 4. Social sharing as a relationship- and concluded that the scholarly trends in publishing community-building activity. articles mostly use digital format with interactive (Talja, 20xx) dialog. It is marked by the increasing presence Information sharing is the essence to build of the scholar in various social media platform which can build effective communication among and maintain social relationships (ERDELEZ & RIOUX, 2000, p. 228). Good social relation researchers. That phenomenon is very obvious that we among individuals with the organization is the need the other measuring tools that complements key to be successful in scholar collaboration. Scholar collaboration can be arranged in two Bibliometrics, and Altmetrics can accommodate ways, namely: it. 3. The Scholars Share and Collaborate on the Internet A research result shows what the scholars do when visiting academics social networks as follows: 1. Follow discussion 2. Comment on research 3. Actively discuss research 4. Share links and authored content 68

1. Vertical Research Collaboration (VRC) In VRC, a researcher collaboration with another researcher from the same field to complete a very specific research project and area. 1. Horizontal Research Collaboration (HRC). In HRC a researcher collaboration with another researcher from interdisciplinary to look for diverse avenues for research from different fields.

(Shaikh, 2014) There are four factors that affect the success of the scholar collaboration: 1. Common ground, which is character sharing among the members and its cover a range of concept of work.

Specialized research tools

2. Coupling work. 3. Collaborative readiness, which is a motivation to collaborate. 4. Technical readiness means availability of technology to support collaboration. (He & Jeng, 2016)

Publisher platforms

Links, bookmarks, recommendations, additions to reading groups Web page views, PDF downloads, Abstract views

Research Views, recoutput, ommendapublishing tions, shares components

Zotero.org, Mendeley.com, Citeulike.org

PLoS, Scopus, Pubmed Github.com, Datadryad.org, Slideshare.net, Figshare.com,

In the Evolution of scholarly access and sharing there is Scholarly Collaboration Net­ Source: ImpactStory in (Taylor, 2013) works (SCN) Working Group. SCNs is a platforms that enable researchers to develop and According to Hoffmann, CristophLutz, maintain professional relationships, enabling the & Meckel, impact matrics are described as discussion of research and the sharing of results, mulifaced constructs, base on four pillars: usage, articles and data (King, 2015) peer-review, citation and Altmetrics (Hoffmann, Hence, it can be concluded that social CristophLutz, & Meckel, 2014). media have brought the activity of sharing and Altmetrics service ImpactStory, for example, collaborating not only among researchers on the collects data from social media like we can see same field but also on the different field. This on the Table 2. Then it creates a statistics to show advancement is supported by the platform which the article impact. enable them to build effective communication Here is an example how Altmetrics on among researchers. altmetric.com works. Firstly, we need to (1) install How many a scholarly article discussed and a free browser bookmarklet from Altmetric shared by the authors who collaborate will be (2) open the article to see its metrics through collected by Altmetrics. PubMed, arXiv or pages containing a DOI. (3) Click “Altmetric It” on Bookmark (4) Altmetrics 4. The Impact of Scholarly Article Published shows. “Altmetric started supporting a publisher in Social Web after July 2011 then Twitter mentions are only There are types of data in social web: available from that date onwards“ (Altmetrics. Table 2 com, n.d.) Classes of Platform and Tool that Provide Data for It is the result of Altmetrics for the article with Altmetrics Applications the tittle: Effect of a Vitamin/Mineral Supplement on Children and Adults with Autism. Types of Examples data General Mentions, Twitter, social links, ‘likes’, Facebook, Del. networking bookmarks icio.us applications to articles

69

Figure 3 Summary of Altmetrics

So, the impact of scholarly article on the social web can be seen from how many clicks, reads, shares, saves/downloads, discussion in a forum, adaptations, reviews of a scholarly article, etc. From Altmetrics, the scholar can: 1. Explore the impact of scholarly article. 2. Manage the scholarly reputation. 5. The Implementation of Atmetrics in Library To implement Altmetrics in the Library, the library will need to prepare the following things: a. Having an equal perception that one of the tasks of the library is to help institutions and researchers to provide information sources up to date and have the impact. b. Support from the institution. c. Training of the librarians with knowledge of Altmetrics. d. The librarian assistantship, so the librarian can help writers or researchers to create scholarly article that has an impact. e. The identification of trends scholarly article by the librarian to develop collections and repositories. f. The dissemination of Altmetrics knowledge to the other librarians or writers. Discussion Altmetrics is a new measurement tool so it is still in the experimental and development stage. There are several advantages in using Altmetrics, such as 1. The ability to measure the number of citation based on social web quickly;

2. The ability to measure the diverse impact Altmetrics shows that the article with the from a scholarly article quickly; title “Effect of a Vitamin/Mineral Supplement on 3. Improving information sharing and Children and Adults with Autism” is in the top 5% collaboration among the authors. of all research outputs ever tracked (5,000,595) On the other hand, Altmetrics has limitation: (Altmetric.com, 2016).

70

a. Social websites tend to have no quality control so Altmetrics cannot measure the quality of scholarly article.

and adults with autism. Retrieved from Altmetric: https://www.altmetric.com/ details/489541#score

b. Concerns about data manipulation on the Altmetrics.com. (2014). Case Study : University of metrics. Cambrige. Retrieved from Altmetrics.com: https://www.altmetric.com/case-studies/ CONCLUSION university-of-cambridge-2/ Altmetrics can be implemented in the library Altmetrics.com. (n.d.). Bookmarklet for with some considerations: Researchers. Retrieved from Altmetrics:

1. There is an increased presence of researchers https://www.altmetric.com/products/freeand research groups and distribute scholarly tools/bookmarklet/ article on social web. Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a 2. The evolution of scholarly access, sharing and basic framework for webometrics. Journal of collaboration based on social web. the American Society for Information Science and Technology Vol.55, 1216-1227. 3. Bibliometrics is considered no longer able to meet the requirement of measurement Bonasio, A. (2015, January 12). Newsflo brings standard published in new media, especially new impact metrics to Mendeley. Retrieved in social web or social media. April 2, 2016, from https://blog.mendeley. com/2015/01/12/newsflo-brings-new4. Altmetrics is an alternative method to impact-metrics-to-mendeley/ complement the traditional method to measure impact of scholarly articles in social Didegah, F., Bowman, T. D., & Holmberg, K. web ecosystem. (2015, October 25). The need for more sophisticated altmetric indicators: A proposal 5. The impact of scholarly article on the social for the categorization and development of web can be seen from how many clicks, reads, aggregate indicators. Retrieved from The 2015 shares, saves/downloads, discussions in a Altmetrics Workshop: http://altmetrics.org/ forum, adaptations, reviews of a scholarly altmetrics15/didegah/ article, etc. 6. The librarian has an important role in Duke University Medical Center Library & Archives. (2015, December 2015). Altmetrics disseminating, training as well as for admi­ for Researchers. Retrieved April 1, 2016, from nistrative assessor. http://guides.mclibrary.duke.edu/altmetrics 7. The result of Altmetrics can be a basic

consideration for the librarians to develop Dunham, G. (2011, February). What are Trends in Scholarly Publishing? Retrieved from their collections and repositories based asha.org: http://www.asha.org/Academic/ on the impact of scholarly article and the questions/Trends-Scholarly-Publishing/ requirement of users. ERDELEZ, S., & RIOUX, K. (2000). Sharing REFERENCES information encountered for others on the Aguillo, I. F. (2016, January 1). Methodology. Web. New Review of Information Behaviour Retrieved from Ranking Web of Universities: Research 1(1), 2000, 219-233, 219-233. h t t p : / / w w w. w e b o m e t r i c s . i n f o / e n / Galloway, L. M., & Pease, J. L. (2013). Altmetrics Methodology for the Information Professional: A Primer. Altmetric.com. (2016, April). Effect of a Libraries’ and Librarians’Publications, : vitamin/mineral supplement on children http://surface.syr.edu/sul/105. 71

González-Fernández-Villavicencio, N., profit. Retrieved from Klipfolio Inc: https:// Dominguez-Aroca, M.-I., Calderónwww.klipfolio.com/resources/kpi-examples/ Rehecho, A., & Hernández, P. G. (20XX). social-media What role do librarians play in altmetrics? Kock, N. (2009). E-Collaboration: Concepts, Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis. Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. org/25481/1/Altmetrics.pdf Hershey - New York: Information Science Gruzd, A., Goertzen, M., & Mai, a. P. (2012). Reference. Survey Results Highlights: Trends in Liu, J., & Adie, E. (2014, March 26). Realising Scholarly Communication and Knowledge the Potential of Altmetrics within Institutions Dissemination in the Age of Social Media. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue72/liuSocial Media . Canada: Lab Report, Dalhousie adie#sthash.M5HVe4iv.dpuf. Retrieved April University. 1, 2016, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/

He, D., & Jeng, W. (2016). Scholarly issue72/liu-adie#sthash.M5HVe4iv.dpuf Communication on the Academic Social Web. López-Cózar, E. D., Robinson-García, N., & Chapel Hill: Morgan & Claypool Publishers. Torres-Salinas, D. (2012). Manipulating Hoffmann, C. P., CristophLutz, & Meckel, Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar M. (2014, January). Impact Factor 2.0 Metrics:simple, easy and tempting. Granada: : Appliying Social Networks Alalysis to Universidad de Granada. Scientific Impact Assesment. Retrieved from Melero, R. (2015). Altmetrics – a complement ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/ to conventional metrics. Biochem Med publication/259702938_Impact_Factor_20_ (Zagreb). 2015 Jun; 25(2), 152-160. Applying_Social_Network_Analysis_to_ Noorden, R. V. (2014, August 15). Online Scientific_Impact_Assessment collaboration: Scientists and the social Holmberg, K. (2016). Altmetrics for Information Professionals : Past, Present and Future. USA: Elsevier.

network. Retrieved from Nature International Weekly Journal of Science Vol. 512 Issue 7513: http://www.nature.com/news/onlinecollaboration-scientists-and-the-socialnetwork-1.15711

Howard, J. (2013, Juni 03). Rise of ‘Altmetrics’ Revives Questions About How to Measure Impact of Research. Retrieved April 01, 2016, Scott, N. (2012, December 17). Altmetrics are from http://chronicle.com/article/Rise-ofthe central way of measuring communication Altmetrics-Revives/139557/ in the digital age but what do they miss? Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Retrieved April 1, 2016, from http://blogs.lse. Analysis as Theory and Method. London ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/12/17/ • Thousand Oaks • New Delhi: SAGE scott-altmetrics-central-digital-whatsPublications. missing/

King, G. (2015, October 5). The Evolution of Shaikh, A. A. (2014, November 24). A brief Scholarly Access and Sharing: A Summary. guide to research collaboration for the young Retrieved from Digital Science: https:// scholar. Retrieved from Elsevier: https:// www.digital-science.com/blog/events/thewww.elsevier.com/connect/a-brief-guideevolution-of-scholarly-access-and-sharingto-research-collaboration-for-the-younga-summary/ scholar Klipfolio Inc. (2016). Social Media Metrics and KPI Examples : Interact, measure, analyze, 72

Slater, R. (2014, June 24). Altmetrics. Retrieved April 1, 2016, from http://www.library. illinois.edu/learn/research/altmetrics.html Stufflebeam, D. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, & T. Kellaghan, The international handbook of educational evaluation (p. Chapter 2). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Talja, S. (20xx). Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/: http:// citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?d oi=10.1.1.96.163&rep=rep1&type=pdf Tananbaum, G. (2013, April). Article-LevelMetrics : A SPARC Primer. Retrieved from SPARC ALM Primer: http://www.sparc.arl. org/sites/default/files/sparc-alm-primer.pdf Taylor, M. (2013, June). The Challenges of Measuring Social Impact Using Altmetrics. Retrieved from Research Trends Issue 33: http://www.researchtrends.com/issue-33june-2013/the-challenges-of-measuringsocial-impact-using-altmetrics/ University of Leeds. (2014, August xx). Bibliometrics : an Overview. Retrieved from Researcher at Library, The University Library: https://library.leeds.ac.uk/downloads/ file/265/bibliometrics_an_overview.

73