The seasonal variations in anthropometric and ...

1 downloads 633 Views 954KB Size Report
participants were provided with nutrition and hydration strategies to optimise ..... Seo D-I, Kim E, Fahs CA, Rossow L, Young K, Ferguson SL, Thiebaud R, Sherk ...
Figures Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Publish Ahead of Print DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001861

1 2 Category of manuscript: Original article

4

Title: The seasonal variations in anthropometric and performance characteristics of elite inter

5

county Gaelic football players.

6

Authors: Richard A. Kelly1, 2, Kieran Collins1

7

Affiliations:

8

1. Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moore’s University, Henry

9

Cotton Campus, 15–21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET

TE

D

3

2. Gaelic Sports Research Centre, Department of Science, Institute of Technology Tallaght, Tallaght,

11

Dublin, Ireland.

C EP

10

12

Corresponding Author: Richard Kelly

14

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences,

15

Liverpool John Moore’s University,

16

Henry Cotton Campus,

17

15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET

19

A

C

13

20

Category of manuscript: Original article

18

Email: [email protected] Tel: (+44) 7763 085494

21 22 23

Copyright ª 2017 National Strength and Conditioning Association

24 ABSTRACT

25

There is limited research assessing the anthropometric and performance variations in elite

27

Gaelic football. The aim of the current study was to assess the anthropometric and performance

28

characteristics of an elite inter-county squad within a season. Following ethical approval and informed

29

consent 26 participants were assessed at the start of pre-season (November), following early in-season

30

(January) and mid-season (March). Measurements included stature, body mass, sum of 8 skinfold

31

sites (ΣSkf8), estimated body fat (bf%), squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ), 5-, 10-

32

and 20- m sprint time, upper and lower body strength (1RM) and Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test 2

33

(Yo-Yo IR2). A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to determine seasonal and

34

positional variations. Anthropometric variations were observed with an overall increase in

35

participants’ body mass and a concomitant decrease in ΣSkf8 and bf% (−21.5%, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.15;

36

−1.43 %, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.13). Performance variations showed improvements in sprint time over 5-

37

(p = 0.001, η2 = 0.19) and 10-m (p = 0.008, η2 = 0.11), SJ (p = 0.013, η2 = 0.1), CMJ (p = 0.013, η2 =

38

0.1) height and Yo-Yo IRT2 (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.34) noted from pre-season to mid-season. Significant

39

anthropometric variations are observed between the pre-season and early in-season, meanwhile

40

significant performance variations are observed between the pre-season and mid-season. Distinct

41

positional variations are evident for both anthropometric and performance characteristics at all time

42

points. Applied practitioners should consider these findings when implementing a seasonal training

43

plan.

45

TE

C EP

C

A

44

D

26

Key words: Intermittent sport, Kinanthropometry, Physiology, Field testing

46

Copyright ª 2017 National Strength and Conditioning Association

47 INTRODUCTION

49

Gaelic football is a high-intensity intermittent invasion field sport with an unstable, stochastic nature

50

(26). The sport has experienced a recent increased profile in the literature (7, 20, 33). Games last

51

seventy minutes and involve bouts of high-speed running, jumping and tackling interspersed with

52

brief recovery periods (17). Teams are made up of 15 players, with positional groups broken down

53

into defenders (full-back and half-back), midfielders, and forwards (half-forward and full-forwards)

54

(16). Playing positions place specific work-rate demands on players who require the necessary fitness

55

to meet these demands (20, 25). Significant differences in global and demarcated distances covered by

56

the central three positions are indicative of the unique role they play linking defensive and attacking

57

play (20). Reductions in total distance covered and high speed running actions are observed following

58

the first quarter of match play, with the middle three positions completing higher volumes of running

59

in all quarters of match play (20).

C EP

TE

D

48

Assessment of body composition, particularly ‘body fat percentage’ (bf%) is often used as a

61

default performance-profiling marker of Gaelic football players (10). Excess body fat is undesirable

62

as it may compromise performance where body mass must be accelerated or lifted against gravity in

63

aerial contests and running (9) (26). In both the research and applied Gaelic games setting, tissue

64

adiposity has been estimated primarily from skinfold thickness (SFT) using equations, such as Durnin

65

& Womersley (11) to equate bf%. Shortall, et al. (34) identified that there is a requirement for more

66

contemporary data regarding anthropometric characteristics of elite Gaelic football players as

68

A

C

60

69

the season when training loads were highest, with subsequent increases towards the end of the season,

70

when training loads were lowest and match loads were highest (14).

67

positional and seasonal variations are evident in Gaelic football. Anthropometric variations have previously been observed in rugby league, where skinfold thickness decreased in the early phases of

71

Copyright ª 2017 National Strength and Conditioning Association

Successful performance in Gaelic football requires an appreciation of the physiological

73

demands of the game (8). Performance tests are undertaken to assess player characteristics, with re-

74

testing undertaken to assess training adaptation (27). Horgan & Collins (16) observed a positional

75

variation in squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) scores in elite players. Recent

76

evidence highlights the importance of acceleration ability at the elite level of Gaelic football with a

77

positional variation evident, highlighting midfielders undertake the greatest number of accelerations

78

with full-backs and full-forwards undertaking the least (19, 20, 28). Midfielders, half-backs and half-

79

forwards also cover greater high-speed distances compared to full-backs and full-forwards, with

80

similar trends observed in sprint distances (21). Krustrup et al., (19) determined the Yo-Yo

81

intermittent recovery test (Yo-Yo IR) a reliable and sensitive test of an athlete’s ability to perform

82

high-intensity intermittent exercise and can show changes in performance across a season, as well as

83

across positions. Recent research has shown it is a reliable and valid assessment in Gaelic football

84

(15). Collins & Doran (8) showed significant positional differences (p < 0.001) were evident in Yo-

85

Yo IR2 performance with the middle three positional lines covering the greatest distances while the

86

full-backs and full-forwards covered the least.

C EP

TE

D

72

Seasonal variation refers to changes in players’ anthropometric and performance

88

characteristics, or both, throughout a typical competitive year. A competitive year may be divided in

89

to ‘off-season’ and ‘in-season’; indicative of a decrease or increase in training load and competitions,

90

respectively (18). The training arrangement could be regarded as ‘quasi-professional’, with players at

91

the elite level required to train 2-3 times on the pitch per week, supplemented by 1-2 gym sessions per

93

A

92

C

87

week. Performance testing has become widespread from underage teams all the way up to senior level (3). Variations are examined through repeated measurements of the anthropometric and performance

94

characteristics and should incorporate a period before commencement of the competitive season

95

(when there is a reduced training load), during the competitive season (when training load is

96

increased) and the latter stages of competition (when training load is reduced while game load is

97

increased). Variations have been documented in other field sports, such as rugby league (13) and

98

soccer (5, 23), however, studies documenting variations anthropometric and performance

Copyright ª 2017 National Strength and Conditioning Association

characteristics of Gaelic football players are limited (15, 16, 34). Although previous studies

100

measuring these characteristics have provided insight into the performance attributes of Gaelic

101

football players, they have been limited to a single measurement, performed at varying periods of the

102

competitive season (15, 16, 22, 24). Therefore, the objective of the current study was to examine

103

variations in the anthropometric and performance characteristics of elite Gaelic football players across

104

a competitive season. Additionally, this study aimed to determine variations with respect to playing

105

position. Furthermore, this study is the first to provide a full view of the variations which take place

106

across a competitive season in elite Gaelic football with respect to both anthropometric and

107

performance characteristics. METHODS

108 109

TE

D

99

Experimental Approach to the Problem

Twenty-six elite Gaelic football players underwent measurements of standard anthropometric

111

characteristics including stature, body mass, sum of eight skinfolds (ΣSkf8) and estimated body fat

112

percentage (bf%). Performance characteristics including counter-movement jump (CMJ), CMJ peak

113

power (CMJpeak), squat jump (SJ), 5-, 10-, 20-m sprint times, 1 repetition max deadlift (1RM DL), 1

114

RM bench press (1RM BP), and Yo-Yo IR2 distance were measured. Data collection took place at

115

three separate testing sessions across the season; pre-season (November), early in-season (January)

116

and mid-season (March).

117

midfield, half-forward, full forward) to allow for comparisons across positions (21), see Table 1. It

118

was hypothesised that the greatest performance variations exist between the start of pre-season and

120

C

Players were categorized according to position (full-back, half-back,

A

119

C EP

110

early in-season, with greater variations in anthropometric characteristics observed between pre-season

and mid-season.

121 122 123 124

Copyright ª 2017 National Strength and Conditioning Association

125

Participants Following ethical approval by the local Research Ethics Committee and informed consent,

127

twenty-six (n = 26), elite inter county footballers (mean ± SD age 26.6 ± 6 years, height 183.5 ± 7.4

128

cm, body mass 85.4 ± 10.2 kg), playing in Division 1 of the National Football League participated in

129

the study. When categorised by position the participants consisted of 5 full-backs, 6 half-backs, 5

130

midfielders, 5 half-forwards and 5 full-forwards. ** INSERT TABLE 1 NEAR HERE **

131 Procedures

TE

132

D

126

All tests were conducted in the same venue to remove external interferences, with

134

anthropometric assessments preceding performance assessments. Testing took place at the same time

135

of day to minimize the effects of circadian variations on the variables measured (25). Prior to testing,

136

participants were provided with nutrition and hydration strategies to optimise performance.

C EP

133

Anthropometry: Anthropometric measurements were taken in accordance with the standards

138

of the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). Stature and body

139

mass were measured using a SECA stadiometer and digital weighing scales (SECA Instruments Ltd,

140

Hamburg, Germany). Estimations of body fat percentage (bf%) were determined by measuring

141

subcutaneous fat tissue in millimetres at eight sites (biceps, triceps, subscapular, iliac crest, supra-

142

spinale, abdomen, front thigh and medial calf) using Harpenden skin-fold callipers (Harpenden

143

Instruments Ltd, England). The bf% was determined using the Reilly estimation equation (28). A

145

A

144

C

137

technical error of measurement was taken from all participants and was less than 3 %, which is within

the acceptable measurement error (1).

146

Performance: Lower-limb power was assessed using the highest value obtained from three

147

attempts of a squat jump (SJ) (participants squatted down until thighs were parallel with the floor and

148

paused for 3 s, before jumping as high as possible), while maximum vertical jump height was

149

determined using the highest value of three attempts of a counter-movement jump (CMJ) (4) with

150

assessments were performed on a Takei digital jump reader (Takei, Japan). Counter-movement jump

Copyright ª 2017 National Strength and Conditioning Association

peak power (CMJpeak) was determined from the equation of Sayers et al. (30). Participants’ sprint

152

times were measured over 20 m, with timing gates (Powertimer, Newtest, Oy, Finland) placed at 5-,

153

10- and 20-m. Participants started from stationary and in their own time sprinted to the end of the

154

outlined track and the quickest of three attempts, with 5 mins rest between attempts, was taken. Upper

155

and lower body strength was determined with a 1 repetition maximum bench press (1 RM BP) and

156

hexagonal-bar deadlift (1 RM DL) (32). Players’ ability to perform high-intensity intermittent

157

exercise was assessed using the Yo-Yo IR2. The Yo-Yo test is a suitable test as it involves

158

movements similar to those experienced during game play (2,18). Power and speed tests preceded

159

cardio-respiratory fitness tests in the testing order.

160

Statistical Analysis

TE

D

151

Descriptive statistics are presented as means ± standard deviations (± SD) and were calculated

162

for each data collection session as well as for all positional categories. A multivariate analysis of

163

variance (MANOVA) with position as the fixed factor, with a Fisher’s LSD post-hoc test was

164

performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS Version 22 for Windows 10,

165

Chicago, IL). Significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. Due to the limited sample size in each position,

166

estimates of effect size (37) were also undertaken using a partial eta-squared (η2p) and categorised

167

according to Cohen (6). A η2p of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 or 1.3 was considered small, moderate, large and very

168

large difference, respectively.

170 171 172

C

RESULTS

A

169

C EP

161

Anthropometric

There was a significant main effect for time of season on ΣSkf8 (F2, 63 = 5.5, p = 0.006, η2 =

0.15) and bf% (F2, 63 = 4.7, p = 0.012, η2 = 0.13), see Figure 1.

173

** INSERT FIGURE 1 NEAR HERE **

174

There was a significant main effect for position on player height (F4, 63 = 11.4, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.42)

175

body mass (F4, 63 = 5.18, p = 0.001, η2 = 0.25), ΣSkf8 (F4, 63 = 9.11, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.37) and bf% (F4, 63

176

= 10.4, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.4). Midfield players were significantly taller in comparison to all other

Copyright ª 2017 National Strength and Conditioning Association

positions (p < 0.05) with significantly greater body mass compared to half backs (p = 0.003) and half

178

forwards (p = 0.009). Full forwards were significantly heavier compared to half backs (p = 0.001) and

179

half forwards (p = 0.002) and presented with the highest ΣSkf8, significantly different from half-

180

backs, midfielders and half-forwards (p < 0.001; p = 0.038; p < 0.001, respectively), see Table 2. Full

181

forwards and full backs had the highest bf%, significantly different compared to half backs (both p