Trauma Quality Improvement Trauma Quality Improvement

0 downloads 244 Views 948KB Size Report
TPM … MD PI. Comm. Self. Review. PI Review Process. Review. Trauma. M&M. Other. M&M. Peer. Review. TMD /. TPM.
Trauma Quality Improvement

Michael D. McGonigal MD

Trauma Quality Improvement

Michael D. McGonigal MD

1

P

ERFORMANCE

I

MPROVEMENT &

P

ATIENT

S

AFETY

2

Disclosures 

Reviewer for the ACS



Opinions expressed are mine alone



I LOVE PI!

3

Objectives 

Recognize the importance of PI to trauma care in general



Review generic PI program design for trauma centers and prehospital providers



Understand how to deal with common quality problems



Appreciate nuances in PI for EMS and at Level III centers

www.TheTraumaPro.com/rimrock

4

What Is PI?



“This event is less likely to occur again because…”

5

What Is PI?



“This event is less likely to occur again because…”

Importance of PI Program 

Important to verifying agencies – EMS Board – Department of Health – American College of Surgeons



Important to you – Documents the quality of the trauma care that you provide – Monitors the care before transfer out at Level III centers – Monitors care during prehospital transport

6

Performance Improvement Program 

What it is – Continuous monitoring of processes and outcomes – Time and data intensive – Vitally important to the existence of your agency



What it is not – Easy – Cheap – A guarantee of passing your site visit

7

PI Components

Review Process

Inputs

Outputs

PI Inputs – Trauma Center Hot Line Registry Scans

Audit Filters

Review

“Word of Mouth”

Incident Reports



M&M

8

PI Review Process Trauma M&M Self Review

Other M&M

Review MD PI Comm.

Peer Review

TMD / TPM



PI Review Process Trauma M&M Self Review

Other M&M

Review MD PI Comm.

Peer Review

External Review

TMD / TPM

L III

9

PI Outputs 

Peer problem vs



System problem

PI Outputs 

System problems – Massive Transfusion Protocol – Guidelines & protocols – Education – Enhanced resources ($)



Peer (provider) problems – Education – Counseling – Change in privileges



Documentation

– Trauma program – Hospital

10

PI Outputs 

Most Common!

System problems – Massive Transfusion Protocol – Guidelines & protocols – Education – Enhanced resources ($)



Peer (provider) problems – Education – Counseling – Change in privileges



Documentation

– Trauma program – Hospital

11

PI Components - Prehospital

Review Process

Inputs

Outputs

PI Inputs Base Hospital Comm. Hospital Referral

Chart Audits

Review

“Word of Mouth”

Incident Reports



Run Reviews

12

PI Review Process Supervisor

Review Run Review

Outside Review

PI Outputs 

System problems – Far less emphasis



Peer (provider) problems – Education – Counseling – Change in privileges



Documentation

– To trauma program – Into personnel record

13

“Closing The Loop” - Hospital 

Identification – Finding patterns of problems 



Dramatic increase in number of admits to non-surgical services

Correction – Providing remediation – example: nonsurgical admissions (NSA)

14

“Closing The Loop” - Hospital 

Identification – Finding patterns of problems 



Dramatic increase in number of admits to non-surgical services

Correction – Providing remediation – example: NSA 

Reviewing trauma activation and consultation criteria with new ED physicians

“Closing The Loop” - Hospital 

Identification – Finding patterns of problems 



Dramatic increase in number of admits to non-surgical services

Correction – Providing remediation – example: NSA 



Reviewing trauma activation and consultation criteria with new ED physicians Educating nonsurgical service chiefs

15

“Closing The Loop” - EMS 



Needle thoracostomy found not to be in the pleural space Peer problem – Counsel provider – Educate the group – Personnel file

16

“Closing The Loop” - EMS 



Needle thoracostomy found not to be in the pleural space System problem! – Needles too short – New brand/type – No more problem!

“Closing The Loop” 

Monitoring – Repeat data collection 



Monitor all needle thoracostomies until enough performed to judge effectiveness

Documentation – Maintain an easily followed audit trail of entire process

17

Specific Pointers 

PI personnel & staffing needs to make sense for your program!

18

Specific Pointers 

Work closely with your PI personnel – Don’t abandon/hate them!



Make sure all possible routes into the hospital are covered – How to deal with admits to nonsurgical services – Direct admits

Specific Pointers 

Attend to all PI in a timely manner



Maintained detailed documentation of all discussions, in writing – Direct – Minutes – Email?

19

Specific Pointers 

Organize, organize, organize – Use your registry or other software   

Patient folders System issue folders Open item list

– Keep a list of your successes

Specific Pointers - Hospital 

Mind your registrars – 1 FTE per 500-750 trauma registry admits – Don’t underestimate TQIP



Don’t forget trauma activation patients who are discharged from the ED!

20

Specific Pointers - Hospital 

Organize your PI well for your site visit – – – – –

Patient folders System issue folders Flag key areas of your medical records Assign one EMR expert to each reviewer Test everything that is not made of paper

Final Pointers 

Design a solid PI program foundation



Take the initiative to make the process meaningful



Pay as much attention to PI as you do to your clinical responsibilities



Find creative solutions to tough problems and document them well



Document everything, and document it in an easy to follow format.

21

• @regionstrauma

#traumapro

• TheTraumaPro.com

• Linkedin.com/in/MichaelMcgonigal • Michael.D.McGonigal

22