quasiparticle introduced in the context of the Fractional Quantum Hall effect. For bosons, the other ..... 18 M.Grayson et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 80, 1062 (1998).
F. Morales (*), M. Monteverde (â ), and M. Núñez-Regueiro. Centre de ..... We thank J.A. Azamar and R. Escudero for providing the type A samples and S. Tahir ... [4] GRAUGNARD E., DE PABLO P.J., WALSH B., GHOSH A.W., DATTA S. and.
Sep 30, 2002 - Nussinov and Wim van Saarloos, cond-mat/0103393. [2] D. Jerome, H. Schulz, Adv. Phys. 31, 299 (1982). [3] A.J. Epstein et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.
Mar 29, 2010 - It is given by Fred- ... several complementary approaches, including the Fred- ..... [16] C.L. Kane and M.P.A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 724.
the tunneling conductance obeys non-Ohmic power law, which is predicted both ... a crossover to Ohm's law with a Coulomb-blockade offset, which agrees with ...
arXiv:cond-mat/0406188v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 8 Jun 2004. Persistent currents in ...... We would like to thank Dionys Baeriswyl, George. Japaridze and Oleg ...
Dec 24, 2010 - arXiv:1006.4844v2 [cond-mat.str-el] 24 Dec 2010. Tunneling into a Luttinger liquid revisited. D. N. Aristov1,2, A. P. Dmitriev3,2, I. V. Gornyi2,3, ...
Apr 30, 2008 - in a disordered Luttinger liquid, focusing on the equilibration rate and its essential differences from the electron-electron scattering rate as well ...
repulsive interactions KÏ < 1, the tunneling term is an irrelevant coupling in the renormalization group sense. We can then calculate ÏJJM perturbatively in t. The.
arXiv:cond-mat/0307438v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 17 Jul 2003. Functional Integral Bosonization for Impurity in Luttinger Liquid. Alex Grishin, Igor V. Yurkevich and Igor ...
Apr 19, 2010 - Elmar Haller,1 Russell Hart,1 Manfred J. Mark,1 Johann G. Danzl,1 Lukas ..... [14] Kinoshita, T., Wenger, T. & Weiss, D. S. Observation of a ...
arXiv:cond-mat/9909138v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 15 Sep 1999. Experimental Evidence ..... 77, 2538 (1996); M. Grayson, D. C. Tsui, L. N.. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and ...
Apr 19, 2010 - In c, the error bars for fg are derived from the 1Ï error on the fit .... through the STREP FP7-ICT-2007-C project NAME-QUAM (Nanodesigning of.
Drude behaviour), and (c) Top: FL and TLL spectral func- tions as obtained in ...... M. Dressel, T. Giamarchi, D. Jérome, F. Mila and J. Voit for many illuminating ...
Mar 18, 2008 - Abstract. We consider a system of 2D interacting fermions with a flat Fermi surface. The apparent conflict between Luttinger and non Luttinger.
comes relevant in the renormalization group sense. This presumably drives the system into a metallic state with a linear I â V . We now provide details of these ...
Apr 27, 2015 - ing of axial symmetry in combination with electron- electron interactions ... tion technique can be understood within the framework of Luttinger ...
Nov 10, 2015 - p-1. arXiv:1511.03157v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 10 Nov 2015 ..... [10] Grayson M., Tsui D. C., Pfeiffer L. N., West K. W. and Chang A. M., Phys. Rev ...
arXiv:cond-mat/0601673v2 [cond-mat.str-el] 29 May 2006. Spectral signatures of the Luttinger liquid to charge-density-wave transition. M. Hohenadler,1, â G.
solution of the case g = 1. 2. (the equivalent of the Toulouse point) at any temperature T and impurity coupling, expressing the charge density in terms of a ...
Apr 27, 2015 - [21] G. Dolcetto, S. Barbarino, D. Ferraro, N. Magnoli, and. M. Sassetti, Phys. Rev. ... B 65, 165412. (2002). [50] N. H. Chris, and T. D. Lee, Phys.
aBell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, New Jersey, 07974. (March 28 ... istence of power-law correlation functions, which lead to the vanishing of ...
Apr 12, 2005 - [1], carbon nanotubes [2], and quantum Hall edges run- ning in opposite directions ..... [4] M. Grayson et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 032101 (2005).
Jan 31, 2013 - arXiv:1302.1077v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 31 Jan 2013. Luttinger Liquid and Polaronic Effects in Electron Transport through a Molecular. Transistor.
This led Haldane to propose the phenomenology of the Luttinger liquid (LL) ... excitation becomes a charge Q = 1/2 excitation in a model for fermions or bosons.
Wavefunctions for the Luttinger liquid K.-V. Pham, M. Gabay, P. Lederer
arXiv:cond-mat/9905020v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 3 May 1999
Laboratoire de Physique des Solides associ´e au CNRS Universit´e Paris–Sud 91405 Orsay, France Standard bosonization techniques lead to phonon-like excitations in a Luttinger liquid (LL), reflecting the absence of Landau quasiparticles in these systems. Yet in addition to the above excitations some LL are known to possess solitonic states carrying fractional quantum numbers (e.g. the spin 1/2 Heisenberg chain). We have reconsidered the zero modes in the low-energy spectrum of the gaussian boson LL hamiltonian both for fermionic and bosonic LL: in the spinless case we find that two elementary excitations carrying fractional quantum numbers allow to generate all the charge and current excited states of the LL. We explicitly compute the wavefunctions of these two objects and show that one of them can be identified with the 1D version of the Laughlin quasiparticle introduced in the context of the Fractional Quantum Hall effect. For bosons, the other quasiparticle corresponds to a spinon excitation. The eigenfunctions of Wen’s chiral LL hamiltonian are also derived: they are quite simply the one dimensional restrictions of the 2D bulk Laughlin wavefunctions∗ . Pacs Numbers: 71.10.Pm 71.27.+a
Many one dimensional gapless quantum systems admit a low-energy effective description similar to that of the Tomonaga-Luttinger model. This led Haldane to propose the phenomenology of the Luttinger liquid (LL) to describe these models1 . Luttinger liquids are quantum critical theories and in the language of conformal field theories (CFT) they are said to belong to the c = 1 universality class2 . The gaussian boson hamiltonian is a member of that class, which helps explain why the LL phenomenology is in essence that of an harmonic acoustic hamiltonian. An important property of the LL is the absence of Landau quasiparticles3 : it is therefore often believed that the only relevant excitations in a LL are phonons. Yet let us consider the Heisenberg spin chain which is a well known LL4 ; from Bethe ansatz one finds indeed that ∆S = 1 excitations are not magnons, in line with the expectation that there are no Landau quasiparticles in a LL. In fact ∆S = 1 excitations consist of two spin one-half spinons forming a continuum5 . It is important to stress that spinons are fractional excitations of a spin chain (i.e. carrying fractional quantum numbers) since ∆S must be an integer for physically allowed excitations: this is quite clear if we perform Jordan-Wigner or Holstein-Primakov transformations on the spin hamiltonian because then a spin ∆S = 1/2 excitation becomes a charge Q = 1/2 excitation in a model for fermions or bosons. Yet it is noteworthy that there exists no first principle derivation of fractional excitations within the framework of the LL which maps given models onto the LL gaussian boson hamiltonian. The description in the standard -non chiral- LL should be contrasted with that of Wen’s chiral LL, a variant of the former LL, used to describe edge states for the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE)6 where besides phonons one has fractional charge excitations: the Laughlin quasiparticles. Actually a first step aiming at including other types of excitations besides phonons for non-chiral LL was taken by Haldane in his own rigorous solution of the Tomonaga-Luttinger model, which yielded neutral collective density modes (phonons) plus charge and current excitations1 . The latter excitations are generated by the zero mode part of the boson hamiltonian and are customary in CFT2 . In the non-interacting case Landau quasiparticles created at ±kF are exact eigenstates of these zero modes; however they are not elementary excitations any more when interactions are turned on. Our paper revisits those charge and current excitations for the generic (non-chiral) LL boson hamiltonian. Due to chiral separation these charge and current excitations split into two independent chiral components, a property familiar from CFT; we will show that each of these chiral components must be viewed as a composite excitation built from two elementary fractional objects. One of these elementary excitations will be shown to be a Laughlin quasiparticle7 ; this will be established by computing the ground state and excitations eigenfunctions for the LL boson hamiltonian: we will prove that the ground state and one of the elementary excitations have wavefunctions which are the 1D analogs of FQHE Laughlin wavefunctions. The nature of the other elementary excitation depends on whether one considers fermions or bosons: for bosons (and spins), we recover a charge one-half object (the spinon) while for fermions we end up with a novel object coming from the decay of the electron. We will also derive the eigenfunctions for Wen’s chiral LL for the case of filling fractions ν = 1/(2n + 1). The gaussian boson hamiltonian is just a sum of harmonic oscillators so that the determination of the ground state and of its excitations is easy:
1
HB =
u 2
Z
L
dx K −1 (∇Φ)2 + K(∇Θ)2
(1)
0 √1 ∇Θ π
and δρ = − √1π ∇Φ (j and δρ are respectively √ 1/2 the particle current density √ and the particle density √ operators) and where ΨB = ρ exp(i πΘ) for bosons, and ΨF = ΨB (exp(ikF r − i πΦ) + exp(−ikF r + i πΦ)) for fermions (we have multiplied ΨB by a Jordan-Wigner phase). u and K are the usual LL parameters1. The Fourier-transform of HB is: ! b2 πu Q u X −1 2 2 b (2) + KJ K Πq Π−q + Kq Θq Θ−q + HB = 2 2L K where Θ and Π = ∇Φ are canonical conjugate boson fields, j =
q6=0
b and Jb are the charge and the current number operators. In the ground state, where q is quantized as qn = 2πn/L, Q HB reduces to a sum of harmonic oscillators (since Q = 0 = J); therefore the ground state is just a gaussian: Ψ0 = exp(−
1 X 1 Πn Π−n ) 2K |qn |
(3)
n6=0
returning to the original variables through Πq = Laughlin wavefunction!
p p P π/Lρq = π/L i exp(iqri ) , we find that Ψ0 is nothing but a