Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, September 2010 (Ó 2010) pp. 331–332 DOI: 10.1007/s12195-010-0126-y
Erratum
Erratum to: Model Convolution: A Computational Approach to Digital Image Interpretation MELISSA K. GARDNER,1 BRIAN L. SPRAGUE,3 CHAD G. PEARSON,4 BENJAMIN D. COSGROVE,1 ANDREW D. BICEK,1 KERRY BLOOM,2 E. D. SALMON,2 and DAVID J. ODDE1 1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 7-132 Nils Hasselmo Hall, 312 Church St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; 2Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; 3Lab of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; and 4MCD Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0347, USA
Erratum to: Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering DOI 10.1007/s12195-010-0101-7 Due to errors introduced during the production process, figures 1 and 3 were published incorrectly. They appear correctly here.
Address correspondence to David J. Odde, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 7-132 Nils Hasselmo Hall, 312 Church St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic mail:
[email protected] The online version of the original article can be found under doi: 10.1007/s12195-010-0101-7.
331 1865-5025/10/0900-0331/0
Ó 2010 Biomedical Engineering Society
332
GARDNER et al.
(a)
(a)
600 nm
Model convolution 800 nm
Typical Experimental Image
(b)
Model convolution
Theoretical pointsource fluorophores
(c)
Minimum Experiments Required
(b) Predicted Experimental Resolution (p
