[Downloaded free from http://www.joacp.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 83.86.42.214]
Editorial
Minimizing medication errors: Moving attention from individual to system The erroneous intravenous infusion of a large dose of magnesium sulfate during labor published in this issue as a case report,[1] is certainly another awakening call for introspection. Most of us have witnessed such errors, which may or may not have resulted in mishaps. In spite of being aware of the problem and the probable solutions, these continue to occur possibly due to poor implementation of the solutions. It is the unsafe environment which increases potential for errors and the solution lies in creating safe practice norms. The history of iatrogenic errors is at least a century old with the first report published in 1910 and it has been getting renewed attention whenever new data or major mishap has surfaced.[2,3] In 2000, British Medical Journal devoted an issue to medical errors.[4] Medical errors, and infections contribute to more than 99,000 deaths annually, in US alone as per the institute of medicine’s landmark report, “to err is human,” published a decade back.[5] In a recent update, death toll is reported to be approximately 155,000 deaths/year.[6] Introspection and critical incident reporting becomes pertinent to discern the true incidence and to perform root cause analysis.[7] Healthcare professionals in the west have addressed the problem with continuous education and working through human engineering and ergonomics. Recent advances in anesthesia and intensive care dedicated chapters on safety solutions.[8,9] Some solutions implemented in aviation like the introduction of check‑lists etc., have been applied in healthcare with success. Learning from either aviation or industry focuses on one common aspect that is human mind and preoccupation with possibility of failure. Authors of the Thai anesthesia incident monitoring study (AIMS),[10] and those of a published review of critical incidents related to drug errors,[11] accounted human errors for majority of the drug related incidents and defined human error as situations where established practice was not followed. In these studies, half of incidents were considered as a rule‑base mistake. Haste (42.7%), lack of Access this article online Quick Response Code:
Website: www.joacp.org
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.117037
experience (22%) and miscommunication (15.9%) were the common causes of human error. Vigilance (72%) a state of clinical awareness in which risky conditions are anticipated or diagnosed and treated promptly, were considered as the most common factor in minimizing drug incidents.[10] The three most common factors minimizing the adverse incidents included prior experience, high awareness and experienced assistance. The recommended corrective strategies were guideline practice, quality assurance activity, improvement of supervision, improvement of communication and regular training particularly for the constant change‑over of trainee. Hence we need to improve patient safety by addressing the system concerns under which individuals work and also to institute rescue systems to avert errors and mitigate their effects. The report in question,[1] of an inadvertent accidental infusion of a high dose of magnesium in a laboring parturient highlights the likelihood of its occurrence in a busy labor room. Medication errors are common in emergency operation theatre and critical care areas because of the high dynamic activity. Drug related incidents form 7‑32% of reported errors.[11,12] Among 1996 incident reports of the Thai AIMS database, there were 82 incidents of drug errors (4.1%). Most of drug errors incidents occurred in maintenance phase (57.3%), general anesthesia (87.8%), and in the operation theatre (91.5%).[10] There are number of cases where wrong drug administration has resulted in cardiac and respiratory arrests. Problems have also occurred with both types of drug delivery systems; volumetric as well as syringe pumps. High concentration of vasoactive drugs, muscle relaxants and sedatives through syringe pumps may get flushed inadvertently if care is not taken. One should use dedicated infusion lines and must aspirate while stopping or changing drugs through syringe pumps. There is a need to understand that investment in safety measures is cost‑effective when compared with the cost of loss of human life and the legal claims resulting from the medical errors.[13] Addressing system issues is easy and effective. System errors occur as an instruction that is either not recognized by an operating system or is in violation of the procedural rules. Incorporating tools like critical incident reporting, checklists, plan‑do‑check‑act cycles and simulation, can lead to continual improvement in our systems.[10,14] Long working hours without breaks, multitasking, uncongenial environment, sleeplessness, understaffing and overwork are important causes of skipping
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology | July-September 2013 | Vol 29 | Issue 3
293
[Downloaded free from http://www.joacp.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 83.86.42.214] Gautam: Minimizing medication errors
or violation of procedural steps. Also unbalanced incentives can cause poor performance resulting in working beyond one’s capacity which lowers rather than improving efficiency. Attitude of safety can be cultivated by organizational belief in safety. Stress also plays a significant role in causing inattention, thereby making the whole process unsafe.
Address for correspondence: Dr. Parshotam Lal Gautam, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. E‑mail:
[email protected]
References 1.
Staffing, duty shifts, administrative environment to improve efficiency in terms of quantitative and economic values can upset the balance.[14,15] Administrators and quality control personnel need to look into these things. It has been found that two shift system as compared to three shifts, week shifts rather than daily shift can reduce the handover errors and diurnal stress.[14‑16] It is indeed essential that uniform guidelines on optimal working hours for practicing anesthesiologists akin to minimum monitoring standards be formulated. These recommendations which need to be reinforced on an urgent priority in our country have been well exemplified in an editorial, “Maximum working hours and minimum monitoring standards‑need for both to be mandatory”.[17] Statistics have revealed the potential for medication errors at three different stages; prescription, dispensing and administration. However, it is not only the medication errors which needs attention but other errors too, like missed or wrong diagnosis, wrong prescription, wrong‑site injection or wrong patient. Misinformation or misinterpretation of data from malfunctioning monitors and ventilators do result in adverse outcome in patients with poor reserves in critical areas. Recently Hu et al. studied deviations in operating room (OR) protocols and found that unanticipated events are common in the OR. Deviations from protocols result from poor organizational design and suboptimal team dynamics, with caregivers compensating to avoid patient harm.[18] To conclude, there is need to shift attention from individual to system. The key to effective, efficient and safe management in any hazardous enterprise is to target the most remediable problems. Creating a culture of safety requires attention not only to the design of our tasks and processes, but to the conditions under which we work, schedules and workloads; how we interact with one another; and perhaps more importantly, how we train every member of the healthcare team to participate in safer and effective patient care. There is need for all stake holders, the government and other health care agencies, hospital administrators, doctors, biomedical engineers and other paramedical teammates to work for a common goal of patient safety. Parshotam Lal Gautam Department of Anaesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India 294
2. 3.
4. 5.
6.
7. 8.
9.
10.
11. 12.
13.
14. 15. 16.
17.
18.
Kumar K, Arebi AA, Singh I. Accidental intravenous infusion of a large dose of magnesium sulphate during labour: Report and analysis of a drug error 2013;29: 379-81. Kaul TK, Gautam PL. Imbibe safe culture for safe anaesthesia practice. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 2004;20:423. Gore DC, Gregory SR. Historical perspective on medical errors: Richard Cabot and the Institute of Medicine. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:609‑11. Wu AW. Medical error: The second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320:726‑7. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err is Human: Building a safer health system. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine National Academy Press; 1999. Available from: http://www.leanblog.org/2009/08/statistics‑ on‑healthcare‑quality‑and/. [Updated on 2012 Jul 13; Accessed on 2013 Mar 20]. Tewari A, Sinha A. Critical incident reporting: Why should we bother? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013;29:147‑8. Landrigan CP, Parry GJ, Bones CB, Hackbarth AD, Goldmann DA, Sharek PJ. Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2124‑34. Wilson ME. Morbidity and mortality in anaesthetic practice. In: Atkinson RS, Adams AP, editors. Recent advances in anaesthesia and analgesia. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1985. p. 209‑25. Charuluxananan S, Sriraj W, Lapisatepun W, Kusumaphanyo C, Ittichaikulthol W, Suratsunya T. Drug errors from the Thai anesthesia incidents monitoring study: Analysis of 1,996 incident reports. Asian Biomed 2012;6:541‑7. Khan FA, Hoda MQ. Drug related critical incidents. Anaesthesia 2005;60:48‑52. Webb RK, Currie M, Morgan CA, Williamson JA, Mackay P, Russell WJ, et al. The Australian incident monitoring study: An analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993;21:520‑8. Parker D, Lawton R. Managing medical mishaps: Learning lessons from industry. In: Adams AP, Cashman JN, Grounds RM, editors. Recent advances in anesthesia and intensive care. London: Greenwich Medical Medial Limited; 2003. p. 209‑23. Sinha A, Singh A, Tewari A. The fatigued anesthesiologist: A threat to patient safety? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013;29:151‑9. Ebben SF, Gieras IA, Gosbee LL. Harnessing hospital purchase power to design safe care delivery. Biomed Instrum Technol 2008;42:326‑31. Thomas GL. Shift work and its effect upon staff performance. In: Nayyar V, Peter JV, Kishan R, Srinivas S, editors. Critical Care Update 2009. Bengaluru, India: Jay Pee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.; 2010. p. 21‑30. Trikha A, Singh PM. Maximum working hours and minimum monitoring standards‑need for both to be mandatory. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013;29:1077‑91. Hu YY, Arriaga AF, Roth EM, Peyre SE, Corso KA, Swanson RS, et al. Protecting patients from an unsafe system: The etiology and recovery of intraoperative deviations in care. Ann Surg 2012;256:203‑10.
How to cite this article: Gautam PL. Minimizing medication errors: Moving attention from individual to system. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013;29:293-4. Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology | July-September 2013 | Vol 29 | Issue 3
