NSTA 2011, San Francisco Drs. Mai Yin Tsoi, Julia Paredes, Richard Pennington, David Pursell, Joseph Sloop Georgia Gwinne> College School of Science and Technology
Study A: Use of iTouch in
Organic Chemistry Course Videos Flashcards Student Surveys Student Interviews Class Quizzes
Study B: Development of App in
an Interdisciplinary Project
Organic Class = client Hiring of ITEC Class for project Modeling real-‐world SoMware Development App helps Organic students learn Interviews / Surveys
School of Science and Technology
GGC Vision and Mission RaQonale/Literature Review Timeline/DescripQon of Project Design QuanQtaQve Results QualitaQve Results School of Science and Technology
GGC Vision1 Ø learning takes place con6nuously in and beyond the classroom Ø innova6ve use of educa6onal technology Ø integrated educa6onal experience that develops the whole person Ø wellspring of educa6onal innova6on Ø dynamic learning community Ø faculty engagement in teaching and mentoring students Ø innova6ve approaches to educa6on SST Mission2
. . . provides an innova?ve, engaging, outcomes-‐based learning experience for students in science courses . . . (charge from Dean Thomas G. Mundie) 1Georgia 2School
Gwinnett College Web page, http://www.ggc.usg.edu/about-ggc of Science and Technology Mission, http://www.ggc.usg.edu/academics/school-of-science-and-technology
School School of of Science Science and and Technology Technology
Adapt to Today’s Students To Make Chemistry and Biology Easier • Students o>en find Chemistry and Biology challenging • Learning is more 6ed to technology • Technology enhances learning experience IF used • Take the work load to the student, • keep the busy work out of learning
School of Science and Technology
Flashcards + Cellphone??? • Flashcards à memoriza6on • Repe66on is key! • Rare: carry flashcards everywhere • Common: carry cell phones everywhere! • Why not take advantage of the learning poten6al?!? School of Science and Technology
Lower cost of ownership versus Laptops Can expect access outside school May lead to more “access” of material = more review/learning
Small learning curve MulQmedia Higher moQvaQon, engagement, Qme on task
Sturgeon, J., T H E Journal, 2007, 34, 16-‐18. School of Science and Technology
“I always have my phone, now I always have my flash cards.” • • • •
Cell phone with PowerPoint Mobile Cards organized by text chapter Format of cards is flexible Provide students a semester worth of cards at beginning of term • Encourage use during homework, problem solving sessions, and lab • Phones not allowed on graded events School of Science and Technology
“Front”
“Back”
Ether example:
School of Science and Technology
• “seamless learning contexts”1 • “one-‐to-‐one” learning2 • Tailored to class needs • preliminary empirical data: posiQve • Access • SoMware/hardware compatability • Limited by Powerpoint issues Looi, C. et al. (2010) Mobilizing the Research. EducaQon Week, 29, 6, p 34, 36. 1
2 Banister, S. (2010) IntegraQng the iPod Touch in K-‐12 EducaQon: Visions and Vices. Computers
in the Schools, 27, 2, p 121-‐31
School of Science and Technology
Internal GGC Grant = $5000 Purchased 25 Apple iTouch devices Distributed to 2 class secQons Voluntary ParQcipaQon Demographic Survey Chemistry Amtude Survey (CAEQ)1 Surveys aMer each quiz Interviews of selected 1. Dalgety, J. et al. (2003) Development of Chemistry Amtudes and Experiences students QuesQonnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 7, p 649-‐668. School of Science and Technology
• No significant difference in quiz scores (only 2 of 12 available so far) • No significant difference in Chemistry AXtudes and Experiences (CAEQ scores) • Demographic data not analyzed yet
• Low number of students • Limited content resources • Quizzes not directly linked to iTouch resources • Usage not regulated/ documented • Steep learning curve – students AND faculty!
Ages: 21 to 28 years old, self-‐selected Allen: Asian male Keith: Asian male Dora: Caucasian female Valerie: Caucasian female
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐ Phung – Asian female Brenda – Caucasian female Ma> – Caucasian male School of Science and Technology
School of Science and Technology
School of Science and Technology
Summary – Cellphone Cards Users
School of Science and Technology
School of Science and Technology
Summary – iTouch Users Study Interviewee Purpose
Did/Did Not Use
General Comments
Necessity
Phung
Did Lots of personalizaQon
MulQ-‐ FuncQon, mobile
Thorough
Brenda
Did, Some personalizaQon
Uses all given resources
Efficient
Ma>
Did, Lots of personalizaQon
Saves Qme, minimize effort USED OWN iPHONE
School of Science and Technology
Trends in Interviews If technology supported learning/study style à USE If learning style was not enhanced by technology à NO USE iTouch added “study purpose” to use Study purpose affected how iTouch used
School of Science and Technology
• Students enjoy using iTouch • Material accessed more frequently • Low n, low power = non-significant statistical results • Learning style/ purpose impacts use (or lack of) of mobile device
School of Science and Technology
School of Science and Technology
School of Science and Technology
School of Science and Technology
School of Science and Technology
Drs. Mai Yin Tsoi and Sonal Dekhane
School of Science and Technology
Background and Results of Part I ITEC 3870 CHEM 2211 Fundamentals of TsoiChem App FuncQonal Groups
QuanQtaQve Results Quiz scores Usability TesQng
DemonstraQon of TsoiChem App School of Science and Technology
Background: InspiraQon: daughter’s iTouch experience Dr. Tsoi’s goal: iTouch à learning tool
Main objec6ve: Will using a device like an iTouch be effecQve for learning a new skill?
Hypothesis: If a student learns a task on an iTouch hand held device, than they will have significantly be>er test scores and increased confidence on using an iTouch device for learning how to write Chinese characters.
School of Science and Technology
1.)
2.)
3.)
4.) 1 h>p:// lingkuncheng.blog spot.com/ 2009/07/pracQce-‐ chinese-‐wriQng-‐ lite.html School of Science and Technology
Page one
Page two
School of Science and Technology
Page three
Number of parQcipants:110 Males:51 Females: 59 Age range:18 – 60+ years old Ethnicity: all ethnic backgrounds parQcipated in this study Owned a touch item: 51.8% of parQcipants owned a touch device
School of Science and Technology
No significant differences in iTouch vs worksheet No significant differences in gender (regardless of iTouch or worksheet) No significant differences in ownership (regardless of iTouch or worksheet) School of Science and Technology
• No significance = iTouch comparable to pen/paper • iTouch = portable, multimedia, multi-function
More Exposure = More Learning POTENTIAL?
Junior/senior level course Goal: teach students how to implement SD in real-‐world projects Project-‐based course – project can change each semester Small enrollment Mobile apps introduced 1st class meeQng School of Science and Technology
Required course for majors in: Biology, Nursing, Pharmacy, Dental, etc. Historically VERY difficult Visual in nature – uQlizes spaQal, logical, abstract thinking FuncQonal groups – difficult because of variety of representaQons School of Science and Technology
Specific group of atoms à reacQons of molecule Can be represented different formats Students must be able to: Recognize FG in all formats Name FG Adjust molecule name to reflect FG (future goal)
School of Science and Technology
Amine
Ester
Alcohol
Textbook says: AMINE is But, these ALL are amines…
CONFUSI NG!
CH3CH2NHCH3
Scaffolded Learning Immediate feedback Self-‐ReflecQon HapQc Learning MulQple Modes of Learning (audio, visual) Extrinsic MoQvaQon Shallow learning curve Bloom’s Taxonomy (higher levels) School of Science and Technology
3 Modes of Learning PracQce It, Name It, Find It
Friendly avatar Tutorial screens, Help screens Colors to differenQate / guide user Visuals re-‐affirmed by color and sound PosiQve visuals/sounds as rewards Gentle encouragement when incorrect School of Science and Technology
No staQsQcal difference – app vs. non-‐app users à App users at least comparable to non-‐app users App did not adversely affect learners’ scores Need more data -‐ may indicate factors HOW TsoiChem was used – WHEN TsoiChem was used HOW OFTEN TsoiChem was used
Possible: App users = less Qme studying, but got same score, etc. School of Science and Technology
Ease of Use? Yes
No
Somewhat
8 7
7
4
4
3 1
1
1
PracQce
Name It
Find It
School of Science and Technology
IS THE APP CLEAR? Yes 6
No
Somewhat
6
6
5 4
4 2
2
1
PracQce
Name It
School of Science and Technology
Find It
HELPFUL? Yes No Somewhat
0
2
4
6
8
School of Science and Technology
10
PRACTICE IT
NAME IT School of Science and Technology
FIND IT
• Pilot TsoiChem at other institutions • Continue refining/editing TsoiChem • Develop more chemistry apps • Acids/bases • Spectroscopy • Mechanisms
• Grants to support faster development
Dr. Mai Yin Tsoi
[email protected] (678) 524-7992