NSTA 2011, San Francisco

3 downloads 81751 Views 47MB Size Report
Development of App in an Interdisciplinary ... Timeline/Descrip?on of Project Design. Quan?ta?ve ... (2003) Development of Chemistry A tudes and Experiences.
NSTA  2011,  San  Francisco   Drs.  Mai  Yin  Tsoi,  Julia  Paredes,  Richard   Pennington,  David  Pursell,  Joseph  Sloop     Georgia  Gwinne>  College   School of Science and Technology

Study  A:    Use  of  iTouch  in  

Organic  Chemistry   Course    Videos    Flashcards    Student  Surveys    Student  Interviews    Class  Quizzes  

Study  B:    Development  of  App  in  

an  Interdisciplinary   Project  

 Organic  Class  =  client    Hiring  of  ITEC  Class  for   project    Modeling  real-­‐world   SoMware  Development    App  helps  Organic   students  learn    Interviews  /  Surveys  

School of Science and Technology

   GGC  Vision  and  Mission    RaQonale/Literature  Review    Timeline/DescripQon  of  Project  Design    QuanQtaQve  Results    QualitaQve  Results   School of Science and Technology

GGC Vision1 Ø  learning  takes  place  con6nuously  in  and  beyond  the  classroom   Ø  innova6ve  use  of  educa6onal  technology     Ø  integrated  educa6onal  experience  that  develops  the  whole  person   Ø  wellspring  of  educa6onal  innova6on   Ø  dynamic  learning  community   Ø  faculty  engagement  in  teaching  and  mentoring  students   Ø  innova6ve  approaches  to  educa6on   SST Mission2

.   .   .   provides   an   innova?ve,   engaging,   outcomes-­‐based   learning   experience   for   students   in   science   courses     .   .   .     (charge   from   Dean   Thomas  G.    Mundie)   1Georgia 2School

Gwinnett College Web page, http://www.ggc.usg.edu/about-ggc of Science and Technology Mission, http://www.ggc.usg.edu/academics/school-of-science-and-technology

School School of of Science Science and and Technology Technology

Adapt  to  Today’s  Students  To  Make   Chemistry  and  Biology  Easier   • Students  o>en  find  Chemistry  and  Biology   challenging   • Learning  is  more  6ed  to  technology     • Technology  enhances  learning  experience  IF   used   • Take  the  work  load  to  the  student,     •         keep  the  busy  work  out  of  learning  

School of Science and Technology

Flashcards  +  Cellphone???   • Flashcards  à  memoriza6on   • Repe66on  is  key!   • Rare:  carry  flashcards                    everywhere   • Common:  carry  cell  phones    everywhere!   • Why  not  take  advantage  of  the            learning  poten6al?!?   School of Science and Technology

   

  Lower  cost  of   ownership  versus   Laptops     Can  expect  access   outside  school     May  lead  to  more   “access”  of  material  =   more  review/learning  

  Small  learning  curve       MulQmedia         Higher  moQvaQon,   engagement,  Qme   on  task    

Sturgeon,  J.,  T  H  E  Journal,    2007,  34,  16-­‐18.   School of Science and Technology  

“I  always  have  my  phone,  now   I  always  have  my  flash  cards.”   •  •  •  • 

Cell  phone  with  PowerPoint  Mobile   Cards  organized  by  text  chapter   Format  of  cards  is  flexible   Provide  students  a  semester  worth   of  cards  at  beginning  of  term   •  Encourage  use  during  homework,   problem  solving  sessions,  and  lab   •  Phones  not  allowed  on  graded   events   School of Science and Technology

             “Front”  

 

           “Back”  

Ether example:

School of Science and Technology

•  “seamless  learning  contexts”1   •  “one-­‐to-­‐one”  learning2   •   Tailored  to  class  needs   •   preliminary  empirical  data:                posiQve   •  Access   •  SoMware/hardware  compatability   •  Limited   by  Powerpoint  issues    Looi,  C.  et  al.  (2010)  Mobilizing  the  Research.  EducaQon  Week,  29,  6,  p  34,  36.   1

2  Banister,  S.  (2010)  IntegraQng  the  iPod  Touch  in  K-­‐12  EducaQon:  Visions  and  Vices.  Computers  

in  the  Schools,  27,  2,  p  121-­‐31  

School of Science and Technology

  Internal  GGC  Grant  =  $5000     Purchased  25  Apple  iTouch   devices     Distributed  to  2  class  secQons     Voluntary  ParQcipaQon     Demographic  Survey     Chemistry  Amtude  Survey   (CAEQ)1     Surveys  aMer  each  quiz     Interviews  of  selected   1.  Dalgety,  J.  et  al.  (2003)  Development  of  Chemistry  Amtudes  and  Experiences   students   QuesQonnaire.  Journal  of  Research  in  Science  Teaching,  40,  7,  p  649-­‐668.     School of Science and Technology

• No  significant  difference  in  quiz   scores  (only  2  of  12  available  so  far)   • No  significant  difference  in   Chemistry  AXtudes  and  Experiences   (CAEQ  scores)   • Demographic  data  not     analyzed  yet  

• Low  number  of  students   • Limited  content   resources   • Quizzes  not  directly   linked  to  iTouch   resources   • Usage  not  regulated/ documented   • Steep  learning  curve  –   students  AND  faculty!  

 

  Ages:  21  to  28  years  old,  self-­‐selected     Allen:  Asian  male     Keith:  Asian  male     Dora:  Caucasian  female     Valerie:  Caucasian  female  

 -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐   Phung  –  Asian  female     Brenda  –  Caucasian  female     Ma>  –  Caucasian  male   School of Science and Technology

School of Science and Technology

School of Science and Technology

Summary  –  Cellphone  Cards  Users    

School of Science and Technology

School of Science and Technology

Summary  –  iTouch  Users   Study   Interviewee   Purpose  

Did/Did  Not   Use  

General   Comments  

Necessity  

Phung  

Did   Lots  of   personalizaQon  

MulQ-­‐ FuncQon,   mobile  

Thorough  

Brenda  

Did,  Some   personalizaQon  

Uses  all  given   resources  

Efficient  

Ma>  

Did,  Lots  of   personalizaQon  

Saves  Qme,   minimize  effort   USED  OWN   iPHONE  

School of Science and Technology

Trends  in  Interviews     If  technology  supported        learning/study  style  à    USE     If  learning  style  was  not  enhanced  by  technology   à  NO  USE   iTouch  added  “study  purpose”  to  use     Study  purpose  affected     how  iTouch  used  

School of Science and Technology

• Students enjoy using iTouch • Material accessed more frequently • Low n, low power = non-significant statistical results • Learning style/ purpose impacts use (or lack of) of mobile device

School of Science and Technology

School of Science and Technology

School of Science and Technology

School of Science and Technology

School of Science and Technology

Drs.  Mai  Yin  Tsoi  and  Sonal  Dekhane  

School of Science and Technology

  Background  and  Results  of  Part  I     ITEC  3870     CHEM  2211     Fundamentals  of  TsoiChem  App     FuncQonal  Groups  

  QuanQtaQve  Results     Quiz  scores     Usability  TesQng  

  DemonstraQon  of  TsoiChem  App     School of Science and Technology

  Background:     InspiraQon:  daughter’s  iTouch                experience     Dr.  Tsoi’s  goal:  iTouch  à  learning  tool    

  Main  objec6ve:       Will  using  a  device  like  an  iTouch  be  effecQve  for   learning  a  new  skill?  

  Hypothesis:     If  a  student  learns  a  task  on  an  iTouch  hand  held  device,  than  they  will   have  significantly  be>er  test  scores  and  increased  confidence  on  using   an  iTouch  device  for  learning  how  to  write  Chinese  characters.  

  School of Science and Technology

1.)  

2.)  

3.)  

4.)   1   h>p:// lingkuncheng.blog spot.com/ 2009/07/pracQce-­‐ chinese-­‐wriQng-­‐ lite.html   School of Science and Technology

     

Page  one  

Page  two  

School of Science and Technology

Page  three  

  Number  of  parQcipants:110     Males:51     Females:  59     Age  range:18  –  60+  years  old     Ethnicity:  all  ethnic  backgrounds  parQcipated  in   this  study     Owned  a  touch  item:    51.8%  of  parQcipants   owned  a  touch  device  

School of Science and Technology

No  significant  differences  in  iTouch  vs  worksheet     No  significant  differences  in  gender        (regardless  of  iTouch  or  worksheet)     No  significant  differences  in  ownership      (regardless  of  iTouch  or  worksheet)     School of Science and Technology

• No significance = iTouch comparable to pen/paper • iTouch = portable, multimedia, multi-function

More  Exposure  =   More  Learning   POTENTIAL?

  Junior/senior  level  course     Goal:  teach  students  how  to  implement  SD  in   real-­‐world  projects     Project-­‐based  course  –  project  can  change   each  semester     Small  enrollment     Mobile  apps  introduced  1st  class  meeQng   School of Science and Technology

  Required  course  for  majors  in:  Biology,  Nursing,   Pharmacy,  Dental,  etc.     Historically  VERY  difficult     Visual  in  nature  –  uQlizes  spaQal,  logical,   abstract  thinking     FuncQonal  groups  –  difficult  because  of  variety   of  representaQons   School of Science and Technology

  Specific  group  of  atoms  à  reacQons  of   molecule     Can  be  represented  different  formats     Students  must  be  able  to:     Recognize  FG  in  all  formats     Name  FG     Adjust  molecule  name  to  reflect  FG  (future  goal)  

School of Science and Technology

Amine

Ester

Alcohol

Textbook says: AMINE is But, these ALL are amines…

CONFUSI NG!

CH3CH2NHCH3  

Scaffolded  Learning     Immediate  feedback     Self-­‐ReflecQon   HapQc  Learning     MulQple  Modes  of  Learning  (audio,  visual)     Extrinsic  MoQvaQon     Shallow  learning  curve     Bloom’s  Taxonomy  (higher  levels)     School of Science and Technology

  3  Modes  of  Learning     PracQce  It,  Name  It,  Find  It  

  Friendly  avatar     Tutorial  screens,  Help  screens     Colors  to  differenQate  /  guide  user     Visuals  re-­‐affirmed  by  color  and   sound     PosiQve  visuals/sounds  as  rewards     Gentle  encouragement  when   incorrect   School of Science and Technology

  No  staQsQcal  difference  –  app  vs.  non-­‐app  users     à  App  users  at  least  comparable  to  non-­‐app   users     App  did  not  adversely  affect  learners’  scores     Need  more  data  -­‐  may  indicate  factors     HOW  TsoiChem  was  used  –       WHEN  TsoiChem  was  used     HOW  OFTEN  TsoiChem  was  used  

  Possible:  App  users  =  less  Qme  studying,  but  got   same  score,  etc.   School of Science and Technology

Ease  of  Use?   Yes  

No  

Somewhat  

8   7  

7  

4  

4  

3   1  

1  

1  

PracQce  

Name  It  

Find  It  

School of Science and Technology

IS  THE  APP  CLEAR?   Yes   6  

No  

Somewhat  

6  

6  

5   4  

4   2  

2  

1  

PracQce  

Name  It  

School of Science and Technology

Find  It  

HELPFUL?   Yes   No   Somewhat  

0  

2  

4  

6  

8  

School of Science and Technology

10  

PRACTICE  IT  

NAME  IT   School of Science and Technology

FIND  IT  

• Pilot TsoiChem at other institutions • Continue refining/editing TsoiChem • Develop more chemistry apps • Acids/bases • Spectroscopy • Mechanisms

• Grants to support faster development

Dr. Mai Yin Tsoi [email protected] (678) 524-7992