Program and Abstracts

0 downloads 0 Views 11MB Size Report
Sep 27, 2018 - Annette Horschmann. Tabo Cottages, Tuk Tuk. International Association of. Volcanology and Chemistry of the. Earth's Interior (IAVCEI).
IAVCEI IAVCEI Collapse Collapse Caldera Caldera Commission Commission VII VIIthth International International Workshop Workshop on on Collapse Collapse Calderas Calderas Toba Toba Caldera, Caldera, Sumatra, Sumatra, Indonesia Indonesia 21 21stst to to 27 27thth September, September, 2018 2018

Program and Abstracts

International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI)

IAVCEI Commission on Collapse Calderas

Badan Geologi (The Geological Agency of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia)

Local Organizing Committee Shanaka de Silva

Oregon State University, U.S.A

Ruly Setiawan

Center for Geological Survey of Indonesia

Indyo Pratomo

Geological Agency of Indonesia

Oktory Prambada

Center for Volcanic and Geological Hazard Management

Adonara Mucek

Oregon State University, U.S.A

Casey Tierney

Northern Arizona University, U.S.A

Annette Horschmann

Tabo Cottages, Tuk Tuk

1

List of Foreign Participants Last Name

First Name

Email

Affiliation

Country

Aguirre

Gerrardo

[email protected]

UNAM, Querretaro

Mexico

Barbee

Olivia

[email protected]

Michigan Technological University

U.S.A

Brugman

Kara

[email protected]

Arizona State University

U.S.A

Chesner

Craig

[email protected]

Eastern Illinois University

U.S.A

Danisik

Martin

[email protected]

Curtin University

Australia

de Silva

Shanaka

[email protected]

Oregon State University

U.S.A

Fabbro

Gareth

[email protected]

Nanyang Technological University

Singapore

Goto

Yoshihiko [email protected]

Muroran Institute of Technology

Japan

Gouramanis

Christos

[email protected]

National University of Singapore

Singapore

Gravely

Darren

[email protected]

University of Canterbury

N.Z.

Guillerme

Gualda

[email protected]

Vanderbilt University

U.S.A

Ito

Histoshi

[email protected]

CRIEPI

Japan

Kaneko

Katsuya

[email protected]

Kobe University

Japan

Kosik

Szabolcs

[email protected]

Massey University

NZ

Liu

Pingping

[email protected]

Peking University

China

Martinez-Cruz

Maria

[email protected]

Universidad Nacional OVSICORIUNA

Costa Rica

Massaro

Silvia

[email protected]

Bari University

Italy

Miura

Daisuke

[email protected]

Osaka Prefecture University

Japan

Moreno Millan

Juanita

[email protected]

National University of Singapore

Singapore

Mucek

Adonara

[email protected]

Singapore

Singapore

Pellicioli

Claudia

[email protected]

Università degli Studi di Milano

Italy

Rattigan

Pamela

[email protected]

University of Glasgow

UK

Rogozin

Aleksei

[email protected]

Institute of Volc. and Seismology

Russia

Self

Steve

[email protected]

UC Berkeley

U.S.A

Sulpizio

Roberto

[email protected]

University of Bari

Italy

Tierney

Casey

[email protected]

Northern Arizona University

U.S.A

Tomijima

Chiharu

[email protected]

Osaka Prefecture University

Japan

Uesawa

Shimpei

[email protected]

CRIEPI

Japan

Yasuda

Yuki

[email protected]

Kobe University

Japan

2

List of Indonesian Participants Last Name Suhendar

First Name Rudy

Affiliation Head of Geological Agency

Ratdomopurbo Antonius

Secretary of Geological Agency

Lelono

Head of Centre for Geological Survey

Eko Budi Kasbani

Head of CVGHM

Alcanadre

Rio

Centre for Geological Survey

Bangun

Baginta

Geological Agency

Effendi

Mutiara

Centre for Geological Survey

Handoko

Cipto

Geological Agency

Indyo

Pratomo

Geological Agency

Irawan

Wawan

CVGHM

Kusniadi

Ari

Geological Agency

Kusworo

Aries

Centre for Geological Survey

Lilies

Marie

Geological Agency

Permana

Asep Kurnia

Centre for Geological Survey

Prabowo

Arief

Centre for Geological Survey

Prambada

Oktory

Geological Agency

Pratomo

Indyo

CVGHM

Setiawan

Ruly

Centre for Geological Survey

Sipayung

Andhy

Geological Agency

Suhanto

Edy

Geological Agency

Dipowiguno Kristianto

Centre for Geological Survey CHGHM UNVERSITES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Ginting

Nurlisa

Halawa

Analise

Head of Lake Toba Tourism and Sustainability; Faculty of Engineering, University of North Sumatra Department of Mining and Geological Engineering, Faculty of Mineral Technology, Science and Technological Institute of TD. Pardede, Medan

Harijoko

Agung

Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gadjah Mada Univ., Yogyakarta 1. Head of Tourism Department, Provincial Government of North Sumatra. 2. Head of Caldera Toba Geopark Management Agency

Hidayati Lubis

Gustam

Faculty of Geological Engineering, Technological Institute of Medan

Sembiring

Gagarin

1. President of Indonesian Association of Geologists Region North Sumatra. 2. Dept. of Energy and Mineral Resources-Provincial Government of North Sumatra

3

Temporal-volumetric pattern of small-volume volcanism of the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand Szabolcs Kósik1, Károly Németh1, Darren M. Gravley2, Jonathan N. Procter1 1Volcanic Risk Solutions, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand 2 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand *[email protected] The Taupo Volcanic Zone (TVZ) is one of the most productive silicic volcanic regions on Earth of which mass magma output is dominated by 12 caldera-forming events in the past 350 ky (Wilson et al. 1995; Wilson et al. 2009). In addition to the caldera-forming eruptions, more than 300 small-volume eruptions occurred within the central TVZ producing more than 260 km3 DRE volume of volcanic material. Most of these eruptions meet the criteria for smallvolume volcanism due to their one-off eruption periods, relatively short durations and limited individual volumes (e.g. Németh and Kereszturi, 2015; Smith and Németh, 2017). The DRE volumes produced by these examined individual events range between 105-106 m3 to 17.5 km3. Excluding the Unit S eruption from the Taupo Volcanic Centre (3.55 ka, 7.5 km3; Wilson et al., 2009), the individual volume of a few coulees at Okataina Volcanic Centre, Edgecumbe and Tauhara lava dome complexes, exceed the volume of 2-3 km3 erupted from single vents. The 1 km3 limit for small-volume eruptions is defined on the basis of characteristic eruptive volumes of mafic volcanic fields (Németh and Kereszturi, 2015), which typically produce significantly smaller volume eruptions than the silicic volcanic systems. Hence, the acceptable volume for silicic small-volume eruptions is supposed to be higher than the typical limit. Accordingly, our study includes all eruptions having erupted volumes most likely insufficient for triggering caldera collapse. Our data indicates four distinct periods with different magma output rates of small-volume volcanism in the past 350 ka (Fig. 1), which may be an indication as to the evolution and overall magma production of the central TVZ and/or changing tectonic stress regimes. Fig. 1 Cumulative DRE volumes versus time for the central TVZ’s small- volume eruptions within the past 350 ka. For comparison, the caldera- forming eruptions’ tem- poral distribution and erupted DRE volumes are indicated after Wilson et al. (2009), Danišík et al. (2012) and Gravley et al. (2016).

31

Period 1 is characterised by an intense ignimbrite flare-up (cf. Gravley et al., 2016) and a comparably insignificant apparent magma output from small-volume eruptions. Period 2 begins at ~275ka when the end of the ignimbrite flare-up coincides with an increase in small volume eruptions. The increased small volume eruption activity declines significantly at ~180ka (start of Period 3), as indicated by the decrease in erupted magma from 0.8 km3/ky to 0.2 km3/ky. The relatively quiescent Period 3 continued until ~50 ka, when both calderaforming and small volume eruption activity accelerated (Period 4); the latter characterized by an order of magnitude increase in magma output (3 km3/ky). The small volume eruption magma output rate for Period 4 is seven times higher than the average for the previous 300 ky and twenty times higher than the previous 50 ky (Table 1). The ~150 km3 magma from smallvolume eruptions duing Period 4 is one and half times higher than the median volume for caldera-forming eruptions in the last 350 ky (cf. Wilson et al., 2009). Entire period Period 1 Period 2 350 ka to present 350 ka - 275 ka 275 ka - 180 ka Frequency (events / ky) Total DRE magma output (km3) Mean DRE volume (km3) Median DRE volume (km3) Average output rate (km3/ky)

Period 3 180 ka - 50 ka

Period 4 50 ka to present

0.96

0.34

1.31

0.73

1.82

264.8

12.2

77.1

28.1

147.4

0.79

0.51

0.62

0.29

1.64

0.18

0.27

0.30

0.10

0.20

0.76

0.16

0.81

0.22

2.95

Table 1 Characteristics of eruption frequency and magma output of smallvolume eruptions of the TVZ from 350 ka to present with respect to the inferred 4 periods distinguished by magma output rates (Fig. 1).

The two active volcanic centres (Taupo and Okataina) of the TVZ displayed very different temporal-volume patterns in the past 50 ky for small-volume eruptions. Okataina Volcanic Centre produced 111.7 km3 DRE of volcanic material from 24 eruptions and was characterized by higher volume eruptions with median yields of 3.35 km3 DRE (mean: 4.7 km3). In contrast, Taupo volcano only produced 18.8 km3 DRE of volcanic material from 39 distinct eruptive episodes. The median DRE volume of these eruptions is only 0.1 km3 and the mean is 0.48 km3. This may suggest that the magma reservoirs of the two volcanic centres are either characterized by different rates of magma resupply/generation (i.e. Okataina has higher magma generation rates than Taupo), or they have similar magma generation rates, but Okataina is more tectonically tuned for extraction and eruption of this magma. Considering the total magma output including the three caldera-forming eruptions (Rotoiti, Oruanui, and Taupo), Taupo Volcanic Centre may be characterised by a high ratio of magma generation versus erupted volume for small-volume volcanism (i.e. a leaky caldera magma system) indicating a potentially higher probability for future caldera-forming eruptions?? References Cited. Danišík, M., et al., 2012. Earth Planet. Sci. Letts. 349: 240–250. Gravley D.M., et al., 2016. Ear.-Sci. Rev. 162: 65–82. Németh, K., and Kereszturi, G., 2015. Int. J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.) 104: 2131–2146. Smith, I.E.M., and Németh, K., 2017. Geol. Soc., London, Sp. Pub., 446(1): 1–28. Wilson, C.J.N., et al., 1995. Jour. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 68(1-3): 1–28. Wilson, C.J.N., et al., 2009. Stud. in Volcanol.: The Legacy of George Walker, (Sp. Pub. of IAVCEI 2, 225–247). London, UK 32