Figure S5. Memory for the placed brands (Recognition: F=14.571, p
Total Number of Animals. Died/Total. Figure 2. Juglone. N2. 6. 8. 14. 35/61 tdp-â1(ok803). 2.
Cornejo R, Velez-Zuazo X, Gonzalez-Pestana A, Kouri C, Mucientes GR. An updated checklist of Chondrichthyes from the southeast Pacific off Peru. Check List.
line in (B)), subsequent directions soon come back to α (blue lines in (A), (C)). In general, the wrapped Cauchy distribution is more strictly concentrated around μ ...
Additive partitioning of biodiversity effect in ABC (ΔABC) over species richness (SR, left) and over functional richness (F-Ric, range of the hyper-trait, right).
S4 Appendix. Model comparison for effects of microclimate and leaf traits on herbivory of Fagus sylvatica across forest layers. Displayed are the twenty best ...
g be ng. 12. Then the average fitness of cooperators is given by. 13. Vc = V0 +. 1. pN. G. â g=1 (kg - 1 ng - 1b - c)kg. = V0 +. 1. pN. G. â g=1 ( k2 g ng - 1 b - kg.
Table A42. Saturated Fatty Acids (SFA) (g/day): Women ... Monounsaturated Fatty Acids (MFA) (%kcal): ..... Table A172 Total Trans Fatty Acids (%kcal): Women .
S4 Appendix. Expected number of kernel calls, conditional entry method. Let i be an infectious node in cell a, and b̸=a be a cell containing n sus- ceptible ...
S4 Appendix: The mathematical deduction of the death rate. In this paper, we consider the population in each age group to be in equilibrium. This means the ...
S4 Tables: Skeletal Muscle Disposition Index early phase. Mean. SEM. Control. 1.5. 0.3. MIE. 1.4. 0.4. HIE. 1.0. 0.2. Hepatic Disposition Index early phase. Mean.
S4 Appendix. Proportional contribution to allelic (up) and mitochondrial (down) diversity of each of the 15 extant sites using data from nuclear microsatellites and.
Model summary statistics for the change in yellowness index (YI) under the HotQUV and CyclicQUV exposures (Model 1). Eq S4.1 is the fitted expression using ...
Aug 6, 2013 - In this study we used stool profiling to identify intestinal bacteria and ..... that may be involved in activation of carcinogens and xenobiotic.
Aug 25, 2017 - histology under stereomicroscopy (SM), but dentin aspects under SM ... ography result in similar correlations between ICDAS and histology; SM ...
Aug 29, 2016 - in migratory locusts [68] and to pupal diapause termination in the flesh fly ..... Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W (2015) HTSeqâA Python framework to ...
Sep 18, 2017 - 1 Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2 Department ... set/flight offset. ... Citation: Kydd E, Padalino B, Henshall C, McGreevy ... when the so-called gyrus was used to train horses [15].
Dec 15, 2017 - complete 96 hours of post-bachelor degree work with a mix of courses and research, a mini- ..... The TD students' public health and TD train-.
3A-1. Section 3 – Appendix. Steam Tables. Properties of saturated steam – from
0.08865 to 15,500 lb/sq.in. absolute pressure ...
S4 Appendix: Tables of shape differences between scans and ... - PLOS
S4 Appendix: Tables of shape differences between scans and between hemispheres Arno Klein Mindboggle supplement (http://mindboggle.info) Cortical region caudal anterior cingulate caudal middle frontal cuneus entorhinal fusiform inferior parietal inferior temporal isthmus cingulate lateral occipital lateral orbitofrontal lingual medial orbitofrontal middle temporal parahippocampal paracentral pars opercularis pars orbitalis pars triangularis pericalcarine postcentral posterior cingulate precentral precuneus rostral anterior cingulate rostral middle frontal superior frontal superior parietal superior temporal supramarginal transverse temporal insula
Table A. Shape differences between MRI scans This table lists shape differences between two scans of the same brain averaged across 41 brains. The shape differences are computed for each of the 31 left cortical regions as the absolute value of the difference between the region’s shape values between the two scans divided by the first scan’s shape value. For the surface-based shape values, we used the median value for all vertices within each region. [thick = thickinthehead cortical thickness; travel = travel depth; geodesic = geodesic depth; curv = mean curvature; FScurv = FreeSurfer’s curvature; FSthick = FreeSurfer’s thickness]
Cortical regions caudal anterior cingulate caudal middle frontal cuneus entorhinal fusiform inferior parietal inferior temporal isthmus cingulate lateral occipital lateral orbitofrontal lingual medial orbitofrontal middle temporal parahippocampal paracentral pars opercularis pars orbitalis pars triangularis pericalcarine postcentral posterior cingulate precentral precuneus rostral anterior cingulate rostral middle frontal superior frontal superior parietal superior temporal supramarginal transverse temporal insula
Table B. Shape differences between left and right hemispheres Shape differences between hemispheres are computed for each of the 31 cortical regions in all 101 of the Mindboggle-101 subjects as the absolute value of the difference between the region’s left and right shape values divided by the left shape value. For the surface-based shape values, we used the median value for all vertices within each region. (Refer to Table A caption for