S4 Table. Kernel density estimation (KDE), minimum convex polygon ...
Recommend Documents
2 Feb 2012 - contingent kernel is determined by the convolution of a kernel function and a ..... Mathematica version 8.0.1 was used as an aid to the symbolic.
Most animals use the same area repeatedly over time, and a useful concept to define ... developed to describe the home range size (Worton. 1987; Seaman and ...
intersection graphs, using arbitrary finite base sets of rationally given convex polygons and rationally-constrained ...... acokratochvil.ppt. 26. J. Kratochvıl, M.
Apr 10, 2017 - The probability density function (PDF) of the received ..... Thomas' Calculus. 12th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson Education, 2010. 1172 ...
University of Chicago and Polish Academy of Sciences. In this paper we provide a detailed characterization of the asymptotic behavior of kernel density ...
May 20, 2003 - Nonparametric density estimation have been widely applied for analyzing density of a given data set. Nonparametric density estimation can be ...
Keywords: Edge Detection, Probability Density Function, Kernel. Density Estimation. 1. Introduction. In analysis systems and image processing is essential to.
May 25, 2017 - Unai Lopez-Novoa. Contributions to the Efficient Use of General Purpose Coprocessors: Kernel Den- sity Estimation as Case Study. PhD thesis ...
Kernel estimate Ë( ). f x of original f(x) assigns each i-th sample data point xi a function K(xi,t) called a ..... X. Jin, J. Kawczak, Annals of Economics and. Finance 4 ...
15 Dec 2006 - Fast Conditional Kernel Density Estimation. Niels Stender. University .... 2.0. 0.0. 0.5. 1.0. 1.5. 2.0 x1
Nov 11, 2010 - The Improved SheatherâJones bandwidth selection rule in ... the work of Hall, Park and Marron [17, 45]), we call our new algorithm the.
Jul 13, 2016 - theoretical and practical concerns, see e.g., Masry (1983, 1986); Robinson (1983); Tran. (1989b,a); Hart and Vieu (1990); Yu (1993) and Hall et ...
Key words and phrases: statistics, geometry, Nonparametric estimation, ... Pelletier([10]) proposed a family of nonparametric estimators for the density function.
flexible epidemiological model fitting in Python. Michael A. ... develop an adaptive approximate Bayesian computation scheme to fit a variety of epidemiologically relevant data with ..... kernel density estimation algorithm is as follows (Fig. 1).
Dec 12, 2013 - 1, JANUARY 2014. 1. Kernel Density Estimation, Kernel Methods, and Fast Learning in Large Data Sets. Shitong Wang, Jun Wang, and Fu-lai ...
gb|AY584193.1| Homo sapiens clone G10. Trypanosoma cruzi infected macrophage p15 gene disrupted by LINE-1 element and. Trypanosoma cruzi minicircle.
state conditions under which the minimum complexity density estimator converges in squared Hellinger distance di(p, b,,) = I(& - a)' with rate bounded by the in-.
Call Algorithm 3 with row i from table for Tn as a parameter. From the .... Hurtado algorithm, the class App calls its own method Hurtado() while the Block.
method is derived from two combinatorial problems: ballot problem and problem of lattice ..... polygons then equality v = n + 2 is true (based on the formula (4)).
The set of all triangulations of the convex polygon Pn is denoted by Tn. A diagonal connecting ... This quadrilateral can be triangulated in two ways, so each triangulation from Tnâ1 appears as a ..... witch we try to accelerate. Experiment with ..
S4 Table. Kernel density estimation (KDE), minimum convex polygon (MCP), and α-Hull results for nesting Kemp's ridley turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) with ...
S4 Table. Kernel density estimation (KDE), minimum convex polygon (MCP), and α-Hull results for nesting Kemp’s ridley turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) with unsuccessful state-space model (SSM) runs.
Turtle ID #a
Tag no.
Bandwidth
50% area (km2)c
KDE 50% centroid depth (m)
α-Hull
MCP 50% centroid to land (km)
95% area (km2)c
Area (km2)
Centroid depth (m)
Centroid to land (km)
Area (km2)c
Centroid depth (m)
Centroid to land (km)
7247.7
22
13.0
4667.4
30
23.0
1911.4
26
16.6
1307.6
29
21.5
6331.6
31
23.7
1343.6
24
13.5
Padre Island National Seashore, Texas, USA P09
7681Ab 21811
b
P14
18281
b
P16
18160
2309.6
28
23.5
2309.6
28
23.5
P18
18277
901.3
20
10.9
607.6
20
10.9
P11
P15
18308
b
2935.5
254.6
18
8.7
1518.6
9533.3
1952.3
27
14.9
7695.1
9413.2
37
30.2
3718.6
26
14.5
d
1355.0
11
2.8
4176.8
5056.2
26
19.3
2248.5
26
18.7
P21
18277A
P23
24857
3499.6
25
13.9
2493.6
17
7.0
P08
29351
3003.2
34
25.4
750.0
16
6.9
4874.2
31
26.8
1415.3
20
10.2
5164.7
31
27.0
1499.2
19
10.2
P20
24858
P28
29350
0.3
b
d
P30
25220
0.3
P12
25217
10189.6
P31
25218
P21
25219
3518.3
22
12.6
8090.8
8748.2
31
27.7
4259.4
22
13.6
2590.3
20
12.7
8609.2
7293.1
25
19.6
3238.6
16
7.4
4659.7
21
15.1
2477.7
20
14.6
4251.2
23
15.7
1331.3
16
6.7
1551.3
25
17.3
284.0
18
9.3
9088.9
26
22.6
3410.9
21
12.9
b
P45
15520
P42
17804
P43
17806
244.7
14
3.5
244.7
14
3.5
P44
17807
2744.5
20
9.1
2380.6
18
7.6
P55
47791
2815.0
25
20.5
540.1
17
7.0
P09
53628
1077.2
14
6.7
360.1
14
7.5
P68 P69
53629 53630
6630.3
4068.5
2100.8
455.7
17
18
2.7
7.5
7173.7
2108.5
0.6
d
1806.3
22
11.9
3967.1
3884.0
28
21.3
2492.0
26
16.2
0.2
d
686.5
14
3.8
2606.1
4668.7
24
15.0
1339.7
19
8.4
P35
70701
0.1d
276.5
11
3.6
1248.1
4730.2
28
21.1
556.6
14
5.4
P104
70702b
3630.9
214.2
15
4.4
1287.9
1454.6
19
8.2
552.7
17
7.3
70703
0.4
d
603.4
14
5.5
1677.8
1451.4
19
9.4
832.1
17
7.3
0.3
d
731.2
12
3.2
3348.7
3499.3
24
16.6
797.0
24
18.4
d
867.1
15
5.1
2352.5
2694.0
28
19.7
922.3
18
7.9
216.0
15
4.0
1528.2
3902.6
28
19.3
472.3
18
6.8
P121 P28
82214
P92
82216
0.6
P15
47529
0.2d
P315
47709
467.7
14
5.6
250.5
12
4.7
P280
106339
4367.5
25
19.1
932.3
17
7.3
P113
117515
3215.6
45
42.7
588.6
40
37.6
P231
117521
233.9
19
9.1
84.1
20
11.3
Rancho Nuevo, Tamaulipas, Mexico
a
RN02
100397b
294.7
24
9.8
88.6
38
12.6
RN03
100398
865.0
20
7.5
721.0
20
7.7
RN14
100405
42.3
9
3.5
42.3
9
3.5
Does not include Tag nos. 18299, 18301, and 100396 which had unsuccessful SSM runs. Although these had distance, home ranges could not be calculated so they were excluded from home range maps and this table. Of these, only 18299 passed the site fidelity test. b p values for site fidelity test were > 0.95. c These values include only in-water area; any land within KDE, MCP, and α-Hull contour was removed from total area. d Bandwidth are based on re-scaled X and Y values due to uneven standard deviations.
