Storage CloudSim: A Simulation Environment for Cloud ... - Tobias Sturm

14 downloads 18332 Views 931KB Size Report
Apr 3, 2014 - STEINBUCH CENTRE FOR COMPUTING - SCC www.kit.edu. Storage CloudSim: A Simulation Environment for. Cloud Object Storage ...
Storage CloudSim: A Simulation Environment for Cloud Object Storage Infrastructures http://github.com/toebbel/StorageCloudSim [email protected], {foud.jrad, achim.streit}@kit.edu STEINBUCH CENTRE FOR COMPUTING - SCC

KIT – Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und nationales Forschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft

www.kit.edu

Agenda Introduction & Use Cases Motivation STaaS Simulation Concept Implementation Evaluation Conclusion & Future Work

2

03.04.2014

[email protected], {foud.jrad, achim.streit}@kit.edu

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Cloud Computing and STaaS Cloud computing: scalable hardware and service provisioning [5] Deployment Models

X+Y Public

Software

IaaS

PaaS

Service Models

SaaS

Community

Private

Hybrid

VMs / STaaS

Platform Infrastructure

Storage as a Service (STaaS) Online / near-line, non-volantine storage at low costs [6] Object or block storage 3

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

CDMI (Cloud Data Management Interface) Standard API to access object STaaS, released by SNIA, 2012 [3] RESTful, HTTP based Organizes objects in containers, user separation, access via IDs or names

4

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

CloudSim Popular Java eventbased simulation environment for IaaS, developed by CLOUDS Lab at University of Melbourne [1] [2] Lacks for STaaS modeling: No standard Cloud user interface Not realistic disk model No simulation of concurrent use of bandwidths Coarse file size model

5

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Motivation Simulations required to Estimate costs for users in multi cloud scenarios Compare different constellations of hardware components & policies

No known STaaS simulation environment

StorageCloudSim Develop extension for CloudSim to simulate STaaS Accurate models for servers & disks Realistic simulation of IO limitations Use of STaaS standards like CDMI Model multi-Cloud STaaS usage

6

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Implementation - Class Diagram EventTracker

TrackableResource

UsageHistory



CdmiEntity

ReportGenerator StorageCloud



CdmiRootContainer

CdmiObjectContainer

CdmiCloudCharacteristics

CdmiMetadata



CdmiObject

StorageBlob

TimeawareResource GETContainerRequest

IObjectStorageDevice

CdmiRequest

StorageBlobLocation



GETObjectRequest

ScheduleEntry

StorageBroker

ObjectStorageServer



PUTObjectRequest

DELETEObjectRequest ...

CdmiResponse

/

StorageMetaBroker

7

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

UserRequest

SLARequest

UsageSequence

TrackableResource



*

SLARequirement

UsageSequenceFileGenerator

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Implementation - Components EventTracker

Monitoring

TrackableResource

UsageHistory



CdmiEntity

ReportGenerator StorageCloud



CdmiRootContainer

CdmiObjectContainer

CdmiCloudCharacteristics

CdmiMetadata

CDMI



CdmiObject

StorageBlob

TimeawareResource

CDMI

GETContainerRequest

Storage Models IObjectStorageDevice

CdmiRequest

GETObjectRequest

StorageBlobLocation



ScheduleEntry

StorageBroker

ObjectStorageServer



PUTObjectRequest

DELETEObjectRequest ...

CdmiResponse



UserRequest

/

03.04.2014

StorageMetaBroker

Tobias Sturm

*

SLARequirement

Usage Models

8

SLARequest

UsageSequence



TrackableResource

UsageSequenceFileGenerator

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Example STaaS Request Workflow (Single Cloud)

9

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Implementation - SLA based StaaS Brokering SLA requirements are defined in UsageSquence UsageSquence independent from each other MetaBroker chooses best provider for each UsageSquence using SLA matching policies and SLA rankings Example SLA matching policies: Supports Capability (WebDav export, metadata modification, …) Does not have Restriction (max. container/object size) Max./min. allowed feature metric (max. latency, min bandwidth, max storage cots per GB,…)

Example SLA Ranking: Assign Score to each Cloud: 𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 =

𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝐺𝐵

Rate availability of capabilities

10

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Evaluation – STaaS Clouds Setup Modelling of a single- (Amazon S3) and multi-Cloud (all three) scenario Linear pricing model Amazon S3

SCC intra

Swift Cloud

#servers / #disks per server

6/6

1/3

4/4

write/read rate, write/read latency capacity per disk

156 MB/s 9.5 ms / 8.5 ms 2 TB

64 MB/s / 156 MB/s 156 MB/s 11 ms / 9 ms 9.5 ms / 8.5 ms 1 TB 2 TB

# allowed replica

3

3

1

Max. obj. size

Unlimited

16 GB

unlimited

total capacity

72 TB

3 TB

32 TB

$ per uploaded GB $ per stored GB $ per down. GB 11

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

0.0002 $ 0.05 $ 0.01 $

0.04 $ 0.0002 $

0.01 $ 0.1 $ Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Evaluation – Modeled STaaS UsageSquences Simulations with two types of UsageSquences Three experiments: mixed (50, 500, 5000 input sequences), normal only and scientific only (250 input sequences) total traffic per sequence

Sequence A

Sequence B

Gamma distr. 𝛼 = 2, 𝛽 = 3, max 15 GB

1..100 GB (uniform distr.)

upload-download ratio

3:1

uploads only

size of biggest object

1 KB .. 1 GB

1..100 GB (uniform distr.)

Idle time between two requests

10 ms – 30 s

Bursts of 5 operations, 510 min idle between bursts

SLAs

cdmi_create_container cdmi_delete_container

cdmi_create_container cdmi_delete_container No max_container_size max_object_size > X SLA available capacity > Y 1 1 + 𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑢𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑

SLA available capacity > Y 1 1 1 + + 𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑢𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑

Rating 12

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Evaluation – Effect of Object Size MetaBroker selects Clouds with lowest Costs with respect of SLA SCC Cloud selected for small objects as it is the cheapest Cloud For big objects, Swift is preferred to Amazon as it is cheaper

50 mixed sequences, Mutli-Cloud experiment. Used storage per Cloud 13

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Evaluation – STaaS requests SLA Violations Due to over capacity, all sequences after minute 28000 are declined. Only 15 requests failed due to SLA violation (object size can not be satisfied)

Single Cloud, 5000 mixed sequence types 14

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Evaluation – Total Usage Costs Multi-Cloud is more cost-saving compared to single Cloud (in terms of costs per succeeded requests)

50, 500 and 5000 mixed sequences – Mutli & Single Cloud 15

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Evaluation – Effect of UsageSquence Type Restrictive SLA (as in Scientific sequences) leads not to cost-savings for the multi-Cloud usage

Type A

16

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Type B

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Conclusion Development of STaaS extension for CloudSim simulation environment Modelling of different SLA requirements and SLA matching policies for STaaS Clouds Evaluation of used Storage and costs for single and multi-Cloud scenario with different UsageSquence types Usage of multiple Clouds lead to cost-savings if SLA is not too restrictive

Future Work More complex SLA matching policies (location, throughput) More complex price models for STaaS Dynamic Broker Decisions Modeling of different storage controller policies (example: OpenStack Swift Ring) 17

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

References [1] Rodrigo N Calheiros, Rajiv Ranjan, Anton Beloglazov, C´esar AF De Rose, and Rajkumar Buyya. Cloudsim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Software: Practice and Experience, 41(1):23–50, 2011. [2] Rodrigo N Calheiros, Rajiv Ranjan, C´esar AF De Rose, and Rajkumar Buyya. Cloudsim: A novel framework for modeling and simulation of cloud computing infrastructures and services. arXiv preprint arXiv:0903.2525, 2009. [3] Cloud Data Management Interface (CDMI) Version 1.0.2. [4] Amazon Inc. Amazon s3, cloud computing storage for files, images, videos, 2013. [Online; accessed 17-July-2013]. [5] Peter Mell and Timothy Grance. The nist definition of cloud computing (draft). NIST special publication, 800(145):7, 2011. [6] A. Schill and T. Springer. Verteilte Systeme: Grundlagen und Basistechnologien. Springer London, Limited, 2007. 18

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Questions ?

19

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Implementation – Cloud User Interface

20

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Implementation – Storage Models CdmiObject

StorageBlob TimeawareResource IObjectStorageDevice

StorageBlobLocation

ObjectStorageServer

21

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Implementation – Storage Models CdmiEntity

StorageCloud

CdmiRootContainer

CdmiObjectContainer

CdmiCloudCharacteristics

CdmiMetadata

CdmiObject



CdmiRequest

ScheduleEntry

CdmiResponse

22

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Implementation – Usage Models CdmiRequest

SLARequirement *

StorageBroker UserRequest

1



CdmiResponse

SLARequest

/

StorageMetaBroker

UsageSequence





UsageSequenceFileGenerator

23

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Simulation Workflow Plots, Logs, CSV

Cloud Scenario

Stat. Generator

Sample Streams, Traces, Logs

24

03.04.2014

Tobias Sturm

SequenceGenerator

Simulation

UsageSequences in XML

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Implementation – Provider Side Hardware Modeling

Used Capacity Used UsedCapacity 100% 100%

Operation Operation 44

60% 60%

Operation Operation22 Operation Operation 11

t1

25

03.04.2014

Operation Operation33

t2 t2

Tobias Sturm

t3 t3

t4 t4

t5t5

t6

Operation 5

t7t7

t8

Time

Steinbuch Centre for Computing

Suggest Documents