Systems Engineering and Integration, Technology ... - Systems Concepts

30 downloads 17307 Views 415KB Size Report
Apr 5, 2010 - Definitions. Risk. Management. Customer. Interaction. System. Architecture. Technical Specification. Mgt & Coordination. Systems. Integration.
Systems Engineering and Integration Technology Transition to Target (T4) Joseph J. Simpson April 5th, 2010

© 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

1

Overview Definitions Systems Engineering Approach Systems Integration Approach Organizational - People Program, Project and Process Technology Major Systems Engineering Process Technology Development Activities and Process Science and Technology Streams of Change Science and Technology Development Technology Target Analysis Technology Transition Example Rapid Technology Development Summary © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

2

Systems Engineering - Definition Systems Engineering (SE) is an interdisciplinary approach and means to enable the realization of successful systems.

Project Systems Engineering System Architecture

Task Definitions

Project Planning & Control Project Planning

Risk Management

Technical Specification Mgt & Coordination Systems Integration

Resource Allocation

Customer Interaction

Financial Contract Management

(Adapted from INCOSE SE Handbook, v. 3.2, January 2010) © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

3

Systems Integration - Definition *“Systems Integration – is the art and science of facilitating the marketplace of ideas that connects the many separate solutions into a system solution.” Mission Function Level 1

MF

MF

Mission:

Level 2

A property of the system function that determines how well the mission function is performed

MF1

+

+

MF2

MF3

MF

MF3.1 MF3.2 MF3.3

MF

Explosives Detection

Level 3

MF1.1 MF1.2 MF1.3

Operational Effectiveness

+

MF2.1 MF2.2

+

Risk Level 1

SF Level 2

SF1

+

SF2

+

SF3

A property of the mission SF function, the system function and the system SF architecture

Operational Suitability

Life Cycle Cost

Properties of the system architecture Level 1

SA

Level 3

SF1.1 SF1.2 SF1.3

+

SF2.1 SF2.2

+

SF3.1 SF3.2 SF3.3

SF

SA

Level 2

SA1

System Function

+

SA2

+

SA3

SA

SA3.1 SA3.2 SA3.3

SA

Level 3

SA1.1 SA1.2 SA1.3

+

SA2.1 SA2.2

+

System Architecture

*Jeffrey O. Grady, System Integration, 1994 © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

Candidate Systems: • Dogs • Technical Sensors • Behavioral Observation • Combination of above 4

Technology Readiness Levels - Definition Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) – provide a scale composed of nine measures that indicate a program's risk and potential for success. Technology metrics are associated only with technology attributes and characteristics TRL1

(in laboratory)

TRL4

Examples • Weight (Mass, Vibration) • Processing capacity • Processing speed • Volume • Power consumption • Resolution © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

Technology metrics are more likely to be associated with the performance of a given mission in a given environment TRL5

(in relevant environment)

TRL9

For Μ [Mission Accomplishment] on a scale of 0 to 1

Μ = ƒ ∑ (Technical Performance Measures) and is the probability of mission success

5

Presentation Point of View and Organization Cost, Metric ($)

Linear and Additive

Program Resources Linear and Additive

Schedule, Metric (Time)

Technical Performance, Metric (TPM)

Linear and Additive

SME Ex: Weight (Mass, Vibration)

Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) – are used to convert nonlinear technical metrics to the required linear and additive metric for technical performance measure (TPM) © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

6

Systems Engineering Processes *The systems engineering approach is based on the following: • Define problems before seeking solutions • Search for solutions that examines tradeoffs between alternative solution sets • Utilize traceable integration process that verifies that the product meets requirements and performs needed functions

Problem Statement WHAT INPUT Constraints From External Environment

Functional Analysis

HOW Alternatives Solution / Architecture

• Deploy information management system that can provide each team member and the customer with any information concerning the system that has been generated. * Adapted from Brian W. Mar, “Back to Basics,” 1992 © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

Tradable Derived Requirements

OUTPUT Test Validate /Verify

Solutions / System Complete

7

Systems Engineering Processes Abstraction Frame (n-1)

Abstraction Frame (n)

Abstraction Frame (n+1)

Δaf n

Δaf n+1

Overall Environment Δaf n-1

Example: DARPA large-scale integration © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

8

Systems Engineering Processes Abstraction Frame (n-1)

Abstraction Frame (n)

Abstraction Frame (n+1)

Discovery

Discovery

Discovery

Knowledge

Knowledge

Knowledge

Design

Design

Design

Systems Systems

Systems Systems

Systems Systems

Δaf n-1

Δaf n

Δaf n+1

Similar processes; different focus and systems © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

© 2003 Joseph J. Simpson, All Rights Reserved

9

Systems Engineering Processes Initialization

LIFE CYCLE ‘PHASES’

Implementation

Operations

Typical High-Tech Commercial Systems Integrator Study Period User Reqts Definition Phase

Concept Definition Phase

Implementation Period

System Specification Phase

Acq. Prep. Phase

Source Select. Phase

Development Phase

Operations Period

Verification Phase

Deployment Phase

Operations & Maintenance Phase

Deactivation Phase

Typical High-Tech Commercial Manufacturer Study Period Product Requirements Phase

Product Definition Phase

Implementation Period Product Development Phase

Engr. Model Phase

Internal Test Phase

Operations Period Full-Scale Manufacturing, Deactivation Production Sales & Phase Support Phase Phase

External Test Phase

ISO/IEC 15288 Development Stage

Concept State

Production Stage

Utilization Stage

Retirement Phase

Support Stage

US Department of Defense (DoD) 5000.2 A A

B B

C C

Pre-systems Acquisition

IOC IOC

FOC FOC

Systems Acquisition Production & Deployment

System Development & Demonstration

Concept and Technology Development

Sustainment Operations & Support (including Disposal)

US Department of Energy (DOE) Project Planning Period Pre-Project

Typical Decision Gates

Preconceptual Planning

New Initiative Approval

Concept Approval

© 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

Project Execution Conceptual Design

Preliminary Design

Development Approval

Final Design

Construction

Production Approval

Adapted from INCOSE SE Handbook v. 3

Mission Acceptance

Operational Approval

Operations

Deactivation Approval 10

Systems Engineering Processes • SE Life Cycle Phase processes are based on relatively stable types of problems, technologies and organizations • Changes drive technology and system risk higher • New organizations and organizational controls • Processes • Technology frameworks

• Established technology metrics facilitate management of technology risk • Operational environments, customer operational needs and technology interfaces impact the system design, technology risk and integration processes This represents an opportunity to develop a set of system and integration readiness levels that can be used to reduce program/organizational risk © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

11

Streams of Change

Science Stream

New Science

t

Incremental (sustaining)

Technology Stream

lly ta al) n e ic m rad a ( nd w Fu ne

New Technology

Incremental (sustaining)

Application Stream

lly ta al) n e ic m rad a ( nd w Fu ne

Application

Incremental (sustaining)

Product Stream

lly ta al) n e ic m rad a ( nd w Fu ne

Product (System)

Organization Stream

lly ta al) n e ic m rad a ( nd w Fu ne

Organization (System)

Incremental (sustaining)

Example: BMW parts obsolescence; standard interfaces © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

12

Impact of Change on Systems Development Abstraction Frames Over Time (n – 1)

(n)

(n + 1)

Impacts of Change Organization

Technology Readiness Levels

Product

≈ TRL8 Application TRL6 New Tech TRL1 → TRL5 New Science

Fundamentally New, Radical Incremental, Sustaining

Streams of Change in the Environment

New science/technology NOT impacted by change in customers; Specific applications ARE impacted by changes in customers © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

13

Impact of System and Technology Changes • Change impact is structured based on the customer mission • Changes can be addressed by new technology, applications and/or systems • Cost impacts are minimized when the new systems and technology solutions are compatible with existing systems and/or system standards and frameworks • Attributes of organizational support and the deployed environment must be effectively handled to reduce total system life cycle cost • Often lifecycle support and operational costs are much greater than the initial capital system cost

© 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

14

Technology Transition To Target Given the domain of a sensor technology, what is a target? A target is defined as a specific sensor technology developed for a specific customer and deployed in a specific environment. Target customer attributes and characteristics: - Technology acquisition process - Technology support and operation processes

Target environmental attributes and characteristics: - Temperature range of operation - Vibration range of operation - Electromagnetic interference range of operation

All aspects of the target must be considered for a successful technology deployment © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

15

Technology Transition Requirements Given a specific target, how are the requirements determined? The target customer requirements are determined from: - Customer systems engineering process - Customer logistics - Operational support concepts

The target environmental requirements are determined from: - Customer system operational profile - Assigned area of operation - Similar existing system solutions - Operational standards

The system functional requirements are determined from the customer system technology request and/or specification. © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

16

Technology Transition Example Integration, Initialization, and Checkout Given a bio-chemical reactor design that was designed, manufactured and shipped to an installation site • Three reactor sections: batch reactor, power, and control sections • Assembled system (integration); initialized system; system failed… • Started trouble shooting programmable logic controller and system sensors (for oxygen, CO2, and dissolved oxygen) • Sensor reading variability was greatly reduced by placing the sensors in a temperature controlled environment (small refrigerator) • Strip chart variations were traced to proximity and schedule of diesel electric trains. When a diesel electric locomotive passed the installation, the chart needles would literally “go off the chart” • Attention to the relevant environmental factors at the installation site provided the key to creating an effective operational system` © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

17

Technology Transition Example Given a ground vehicle with the requirement to locate, identify and classify specific types of physical objects at a given range with a given probability of success • First the system level (vehicle level) requirement must be evaluated, decomposed and assigned to system segments and then to subsystems and components. • A technical budget must be designed to specifically allocate the controlling technical performance measures to each of the components and subsystems. The technical budget also includes a technical measure reserve or margin amount that is available for allocation as necessary at the system level. • If all of the technical budget (including margin) is allocated to the sensor component then total system cost may be increased because of segment and system level considerations. © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

18

Technology Transition Example Given the selection of a optical sensor that uses mature optics technology, analog electric circuits and propriety software • Mass and weight associated with optical sensors creates the need to suppress and isolate vibrations in the operational environment • Analog circuits create the need for a digital to analog interface • Propriety software drives the need for a new software to interface with the existing software.

A sensor solution that employed less weight, direct digital circuits and open software architecture would reduce the total system design and operation cost. All aspects of the system, process integration, logistical support, and operational effectiveness must be considered in the transition of technology to any given target. © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

19

Rapid Technology Development Need an organizational level plan and process to address technology development and packaging for specific targets: • Understand the customer SE process needs • Understand the customer logistics and operational needs • Establish techniques that create the necessary design and support artifacts • Understand the operational environments • Create an adaptable technology ‘packaging’ capability

Recognize that different organizations need different types of support Recognize that different operational environments need different technology ‘packaging’ techniques © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

20

Summary Systems Engineering and Integration are organizational level activities that, while closely connected, vary in detail and application from organization to organization. Technology Readiness Levels are a useful general metric, but must be tailored for specific application in any given context. Connecting Technology Readiness Levels with a specific Systems Engineering project activity creates operational tension because the two process are focused on different aspects of technology and systems development Development and application of an adaptive technology production process will increase the probability of the development and deployment of successful systems. © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

21

Questions? 1- Good Question 2- Excellent Question 3- Interesting Question

© 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

22

Backup

© 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

23

Systems Engineering - Definition Systems Engineering (SE) is an interdisciplinary approach and means to enable the realization of successful systems. It focuses on defining customer needs and required functionality early in the development cycle, documenting requirements, and then proceeding with design synthesis and system validation while considering the complete problem: operations, cost and scheduling, performance, training and support, test, manufacturing, and disposal. SE considers both the business and technical needs of all customers with the goal of providing a quality product that meets the user needs.

(INCOSE SE Handbook, v. 3.2, January 2010) © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

24

Systems Integration - Definition “Systems Integration – is the art and science of facilitating the marketplace of ideas that connects the many separate solutions into a system solution. Systems integration is a component of the systems engineering process that unifies the product components and the process components into a whole. It ensures that the hardware, software, and human system components will interact to achieve the system purpose or satisfy the customer's need.” (Jeffrey O. Grady, System Integration, 1994)

© 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

25

Technology Readiness Levels - Definition Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) – provide a scale composed of nine measures that indicate a program's risk and potential for success. These nine levels are: TRL1: Basic principles observed and reported TRL2: Technology concept and/or application formulated TRL3: Analytical and experimental critical function proof-of-concept TRL4: Component, breadboard validation in laboratory environment TRL5: Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment TRL6: System model, prototype demonstrated in a relevant environment. TRL7: System prototype demonstration in a relevant environment. TRL8: System completed and qualified through test and demonstration TRL9: System verified through successful mission operations © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

26

Presentation Point of View and Organization These observations provide a point of view based on: •

The type of technology development performed at PNNL



The general tension between technology development and major systems acquisition and engineering activities



The assumption that PNNL will develop a technology product that will be deployed to different customer types



The assumption that the technology product will be deployed in a variety of environments by the same or different customers

© 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

27

Systems Engineering Approach The systems engineering approach is based on the following: 1) A structured and disciplined process that defines problems before seeking solutions 2) A systematic search for solutions that examines tradeoffs between alternative solution sets 3) A traceable and disciplined integration process that verifies that the product system meets the original requirements and performs the needed functions 4) An effective information management system that can provide each team member and the customer with any information concerning the system that has been generated.

(Brian W. Mar, “Back to Basics,” 1992) © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

28

Validation and Verification System validation confirms that the system, as built (or as it will be built), satisfies customer’s needs (i.e., “you built the right thing”). System verification addresses whether the system, its elements, and its interfaces satisfy their requirements (i.e., “you built it right”). Basic verification activities are: Inspection: an examination of the item against applicable documentation to confirm compliance with requirements. Analysis: use of analytical data or simulations under defined conditions to show theoretical compliance. Demonstration: a qualitative exhibition of functional performance, usually accomplished with no or minimal instrumentation. Test: an action by which the operability, supportability, or performance capability of an item is verified when subjected to controlled conditions that are real or simulated. Certification: verification against legal or industrial standards by an outside authority without direction to that authority as to how the requirements are to be verified. © 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

Adapted from INCOSE SE Handbook v. 3

29

Verification Activity Design Design of the verification activity involves choosing the most costeffective mix of simulations and physical testing, and integrating test results to avoid unnecessary redundancy Four basic test categories are: Development Test: Conducted on new items to demonstrate proof of concept or feasibility Qualification Test: Conducted to prove the design on the first article produced, has a predetermined margin above expected operating conditions, for instance by using elevated environmental conditions for hardware Acceptance Test: Conducted prior to transition such that the customer can decide that the system is ready to change ownership status from supplier to acquirer Operational Test: Conducted to verify that the item meets its specification requirements when subjected to the actual operational environment

© 2010 Joseph J Simpson, System Concepts, LLC

Adapted from INCOSE SE Handbook v. 3

30

Suggest Documents