Application of LAIC model approach in space

0 downloads 0 Views 4MB Size Report
IONOSPHERE-MAGNETOSPHERE COUPLING”. Sergey Pulinets. Space Research Institute. Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, Russia pulse@rssi.ru.
VALIDATION OF LAIC MODEL WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF ISSI PROJECT “MULTIINSTRUMENT SPACE-BORNE OBSERVATIONS AND VALIDATION OF THE PHYSICAL MODEL OF THE LITHOSPHERE-ATMOSPHEREIONOSPHERE-MAGNETOSPHERE COUPLING” Sergey Pulinets Space Research Institute Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia [email protected]

ISSI Team: D. Ouzounov, K. Hattory, M.Parrot, Tiger Liu, V. Tramutoli, A. Namgaladze, A.Krankowski

OUTLINE Universal character of LAIC Ionization as a source of the chain Thermal effects validation Ionospheric effects validation and modeling Cconnection with seismology Bipolar character of the ionization effects Integrated parameters Conclusions

Jet-streams

VLF noises trapping, cyclotron interaction Particle precipitation

Air pressure drop

Field-aligned irregularities in magnetosphere

Most recent view of the LAIC conception OLR anomalies

Air temperature growth

Earthquake clouds formation

Latent heat release

Convective ions uplift, charge separation, drift in anomalous EF

Relative humidity drop

Ions hydration– formation of aerosol size particles

Electric field effects within the ionosphere Atmospheric electric field growth

Air conductivity change

Air ionization by α-particles – product of radon decay Pulinets and Ouzounov, 2011 Faults activation – permeability changes Gas discharges including radon emanation

IONIZATION

3

MAIN CONSEQUENCES OF IONIZATION

Thermal anomalies

Ionospheric anomalies

Latent heat release

Boundary layer conductivity modification

Ion induced nucleation

Ionization

THE SOURCES OF AIR IONIZATION  Solar radiation  Natural and anthropogenic radioactivity  Particle precipitation (impact ionization)  Electric discharges of different origin

TESTS CONDUCTED FOR THERMAL EFFECTS  Radon  Nuclear power plant (Three-Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima)  Nuclear explosion(Northern Korea, Semipalatinsk)  Natural fossil nuclear reactor (Gabon, Oklo)  Thunderstorm discharges (Katrina)  Galactic cosmic rays (Katrina)  Laboratory experiments (Japan, Poland)  Artificial coronal discharge in open environment (Mexico)

RADON PRECURSOR ENERGETICS

Chernogor, 2012

In natural conditions the radon ionization rate is qi0 ≈ 107 m-3s-1 Before earthquake it can reach qi ≤ 1010 m-3s-1 The ionized layer is no more than 10 m, but because of the turbulent diffusion the thickness of ionization layer can increase up to 1 km and more The power of such precursors is: Pq= εiqiSeq∆zt where ∆zt = (Dt∆t)1/2 – the thickness of the layer with radon reached by ∆t as a result of the turbulent diffusion, Dt is a coefficient of turbulent diffusion. Under Dt = 102 m2/s, ∆t = 105 s we will have ∆z ≈ 103 m. For L’Aquila earthquake with M=6.3 we will have the area of earthquake preparation zone S = 8⋅1011 m2, qi = 1010 m-3s-1 what gives Pq= 4⋅107 W or Eq = Pq∆t = 4⋅1012 J

IONOSPHERIC ANOMALIES TESTED WITH AIR CONDUCTIVITY CHANGES  Nuclear weapon tests in atmosphere  Nuclear power plant (Three-Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima)  Nuclear explosion(Northern Korea, Semipalatinsk)  Natural fossil nuclear reactor (Gabon, Oklo)  Thunderstorm discharges (Katrina)  Volcano eruptions  Sand storms

WHAT’S NEW?

Dobrovolsky 2009

Irregularity disruption media property changes – coincides with short-term precursory period

GUTENBERG-RICHTER RELATION AND B-VALUE PHYSICAL MEANING Frequency-Magnitude Relation (FMR)

log N(M) = a – b⋅M

N is cumulative number of earthquakes in the given area with the magnitude larger than M, a and b – are constants

Papadopoulos et al., 2010 Drop of b-value is a manifestation of transition from elastic to brittle deformation Rozhnoi et al., 2010

DOBROVOLSKY ET AL. RELATION AND ITS PHYSICAL MEANING R = 100.43M km Dobrovolsky et al., 1979 Earthquake preparation zone

R = 100.44M km Gelfand et al., 1976

Critical (earthquake activation) zo

Toutain and Baubron, 1998

IMPLICATION OF DOBROVOLSKY RELATION  it is a maximum distance of possible precursor registration to the earthquake epicenter of given magnitude  dynamic range of deformation is fixed and does not depend on magnitude: from 10-8 to complete rupture  precursors intensity per area unit does not depend on magnitude  radon emanation area follows Dobrovolsky relation and area of increased emanation depends on magnitude  the thermal and ionospheric anomalies will follow the size of the Dobrovolsky zone

EARTHQUAKE PREPARATION ZONE FOR L’AQUILA M6.3 EARTHQUAKE

EARTHQUAKE PREPARATION ZONE FOR GUJARAT M7.7 EARTHQUAKE

BOTH FOR SCALING

CORRECTION TO THE WATER VAPOR CHEMICAL POTENTIAL –DIRECT INDICATION OF ATMOSPHERIC ANOMALIES CONNECTION WITH THE TECTONICS Registered 2 days before the M7.8 Saravan earthquake happened on 16 April 2013

BIPOLAR CHARACTER OF PRECURSORY EFFECTS

COOK STRAIT ∆U DYNAMICS

5 days before

Epicenter M6.5 21.07.2013

19

Suggest Documents