Baldock et al Appendix A

Baldock et al. 2011 Ecology 92: 687-698. Ecological Archives E092-057

1

Katherine C. R. Baldock, Jane Memmott, Juan Carlos Ruiz-Guajardo, Denis Roze, and Graham N. Stone. 2011. Daily temporal structure in African savanna flower visitation networks and consequences for network sampling. Ecology 92:687–698.

Ecological Archives E092-057-A1 Appendix A. Flowering plant species present at the two sites during network sampling in 2004 and for equivalent months in 2005 and 2006. TABLE A1. Flowering plant species present in each sampling month at Turkana Boma (TB) site during network sampling (2004) and during the same month in subsequent years (2005 and/or 2006). Shading of table cells indicates the relative abundance of floral units for each species at each timepoint (key given underneath table). Similarities in species composition between the same month in different years were examined using the Sørensen Similarity Index.

where a is the total number of species present in both years, b is the number of species present only in the first year and c is the number of species present only in the second year. The index is bound between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates that the two months have the same composition (i.e. all species occur at both sites), and 1 that the two months share no species. Indices for compared months are given underneath each table. Figure on next page.


2


3


4

TABLE A2. Flowering plant species present in each sampling month at Junction (JN) site during network sampling (2004) and during the same month in subsequent years (2005 and/or 2006). Shading of table cells indicates the relative abundance of floral units for each species at each timepoint (key given underneath table). Similarities in species composition between the same month in different years were examined using the Sørensen Similarity Index.

where a is the total number of species present in both years, b is the number of species present only in the first year and c is the number of species present only in the second year. The index is bound between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates that the two months have the same composition (i.e. all species occur at both sites), and 1 that the two months share no species. Indices for compared months are given underneath each table. Figure on next page.


5


6


7

Ecological Archives E092-057-A2 Appendix B. Comparisons of numbers of flower-visitor links per time interval between observed networks and null model results for visitor species with no significant differences between observed values and null expectations at both study sites in June 2004.

FIG. B1. Comparisons between the number of flower-visitor links actually observed in each time interval (coloured) and the mean (± 95% confidence intervals) observed in 1000 randomised networks (grey) for visitors identified to species in the Turkana Boma (TB) and Junction (JN) June networks. (a) wasp species at TB, (b) fly species at TB, (c) beetle species at TB, (d) fly species at JN, (e) beetle species at JN and (f) butterfly and moth species at JN. There were no significant differences between observed values and null expectations for these data.

Baldock et al. 2011 Ecology 92: 687-698. Ecological Archives E092-057 Ecological Archives E092-057-A3 Appendix C. Comparisons of numbers of flower-visitor links per time interval between observed networks and null model results for visitor taxa at both study sites in June 2004. FIG. C1. Comparisons between the number of flower-visitor links actually observed in each time interval (coloured) and the mean (± 95% confidence intervals) observed in 1000 randomised networks (grey) for all visitors (species and lumped taxa) in the Turkana Boma (TB) and Junction (JN) June networks. (a) All visitor taxa, (b) bee taxa, (c) wasp taxa, (d) fly taxa, (e) beetle taxa and (f) butterfly and moth taxa. Significant differences between observed values and null expectations are indicated by  = p

Baldock et al Appendix A

Baldock et al Appendix A

Suggest Documents

Grass et al 2014 - Appendix

Wen LM et al Appendix

Appendix Bardet et al - Mesozoic marine reptile

et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. 1973) et al.

Appendix A from DG Kontopoulos et al., âUse and

Appendix A from CR Hutter et al., âRapid ...

Appendix A. Supplementary Data for Ehrlich et al

Smith et al., Appendix for oxytocin shapes mammalian ...

Craven et al 1 Supplementary Information Appendix S1. PRISMA

Supporting Information (SI) Appendix Frank et al. Exploitation ... - PNAS

Appendix for Wiegering et al., âCell type-specific

Bailey et al. GEB paper Appendix XXXXX âModelling

Clark et al. PNAS - SI Appendix Regional Geology and Sample ...

Appendix C from C. VanpÃ© et al., âAntler Size

Appendix-6 Lefranc - Nunzo et al. JNP 2013.pdf

Appendix to Bush, Vasen et al. 2016 - Molecular Systems Biology

Wilson et al. 2015 Appendix B: Supplementary Data

Appendix for Haggarty et al. Evaluating Rockfish ...

1 APPENDIX S1 Hammerschlag et al. (2017 ...

TEESE et al. v. PHELPS et al.

et al.

et al.

et al.

et al.

Baldock et al Appendix A