www.nature.com/scientificreports
OPEN
Received: 31 January 2017 Accepted: 22 May 2017 Published: xx xx xxxx
Genetic variants of TRAF6 modulate peritoneal immunity and the risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: A combined prospective-retrospective study Martina Mai 1,2, Sven Stengel2, Eihab Al-Herwi2, Jack Peter2, Caroline Schmidt3, Ignacio Rubio1,3, Andreas Stallmach1,2 & Tony Bruns 1,2 Alterations of the innate immunity contribute to the development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in liver cirrhosis. Given its role in immune signaling, antimicrobial function, and macrophage differentiation, we hypothesized that genetic polymorphisms of TRAF6 modulate the risk of SBP. Thus, we determined theTRAF6 haplotype in 432 patients with cirrhosis and ascites using the haplotypetagging single nucleotide polymorphisms rs331457 and rs5030419. In addition, peritoneal macrophages were immunomagnetically isolated and characterized. Overall, 122 (28%) patients had an episode of SBP. In the combined prospective-retrospective analysis the frequency of SBP differed between the four haplotypes (P = 0.014) and was the highest in 102 patients carrying the rs331457 but not the rs5030419 variant, when compared to other haplotypes (odds ratio 1.95 [1.22–3.12]) or to the wild-type (odds ratio 1.71 [1.04–2.82]). This association was confirmed in multivariate logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio 2.00 [1.24–3.22]) and in prospective sensitivity analysis (hazard ratio 2.09 [1.08–4.07]; P = 0.03). The risk haplotype was associated with lower concentrations of the immune activation marker soluble CD87 in ascitic fluid and with a decreased expression of IL-6 and CXCL8 in isolated peritoneal macrophages. In conclusion, genetic polymorphisms of TRAF6 are associated with decreased peritoneal immune activation and an increased risk of SBP. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a frequent infectious complication in decompensated cirrhosis, which occurs in approximately 25% of patients and is associated with significant mortality1, 2. Although its pathogenesis is not understood in detail, pathological bacterial translocation from the gut into the circulation accompanied by cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction has been accepted as the major underlying mechanism3, 4. Identified risk factors for SBP either reflect an advanced state of liver disease and portal hypertension or a transient alteration of the gastrointestinal barrier (gastrointestinal hemorrhage)5. The finding, that SBP relapses in up to 70% of patients after a first episode without antibiotic prophylaxis6 suggests an individual genetic predisposition to SBP in advanced cirrhosis in addition to environmental factors. Multiple lines of evidence link alterations of the innate immunity on the gut mucosal, peritoneal, or systemic level with the risk of SBP. In this context, monocytes and macrophages are crucial for pathogen recognition and bacterial clearance as they express a variety of extraand intracellular pattern recognition receptors (PRR) to recognize conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Genetic variants associated with PRR signaling, such as in nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2)7, 8 and Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)9, 10, have been shown to predispose to SBP. In addition, modulators of TLR signaling, e.g. nuclear dot protein 52 kDa (NDP52)11, and immune cell 1
The Integrated Research and Treatment Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany. 2Department of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany. 3 Institute of Molecular Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biomedicine (CMB), Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.B. (email:
[email protected]) Scientific Reports | 7: 4914 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04895-z
1
www.nature.com/scientificreports/ recruitment, e.g. monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1)12, may play a role in developing SBP in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Tumor-necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), a K63-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase, is a central regulator for controlling myeloid differentiation response gene D88 (MyD88)-dependent signal transduction of TLRs to activate nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and to induce proinflammatory cytokine responses13. TRAF6 is also activated by NOD2 and therefore necessary to synergistically augment cytokine release after ligation of NOD2 and TLR414. In addition, its activation promotes bacterial killing15 and a proinflammatory macrophage phenotype16. Owing to its nodal bottleneck position in PRR signaling and its importance in immune activation17 (Fig. 1A), we hypothesized a role of germ line polymorphisms of TRAF6 gene for peritoneal immunity and the development of SBP. We evaluated this hypothesis in a large German cohort of hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ascites.
Results
Study cohort and follow-up. 432 hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites who underwent diagnos-
tic ascitic fluid analysis were included in the combined prospective-retrospective analysis. Patients were predominantly male (71%) and presented with alcoholic liver disease (75%) with a median age of 59 years at inclusion (Table 1). The median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at inclusion was 17 (interquartile range: 12–22) indicating advanced liver disease. Overall, 122 (28%) had at least one documented SBP in the study period including 27 patients with a well-documented history of SBP and 95 patients, who had a first episode of SBP at study entry or developed SBP during the follow-up. Overall, 201 (47%) patients died after a median of 51 days (interquartile 15–175) and 36 (8%) patients received a liver transplant after a median of 120 days (interquartile 19–282). Transplant-free survivors (N = 195) were followed-up for a median of 264 days (interquartile range: 52–823). Twenty-five patients received primary antibiotic prophylaxis with quinolones, cotrimoxazole or rifaximin at inclusion and 46 patients at a later time during follow-up.
TRAF6 haplotypes. The TRAF6 haplotypes were defined using the HapMap release 28 (Phase II + III, CEU population, forward strand, chromosome 11, 36467073–36489113) to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) not being in linkage disequilibrium18. As selection criteria a minimum allele frequency of 0.05 and a Hardy Weinberg p-value cut-off of 0.0010 in HaploView 4.2 for each SNP were applied19, which resulted in the identification of two haplotype tagging, non-coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs331457 and rs5030419, covering 12/12 TRAF6 alleles at a mean max r2 of 0.984 (Fig. 1B). The minor allele frequencies of the haplotype-tagging SNPs were 0.16 (139/864 alleles) for rs331457 and 0.15 (126/864 alleles) for rs5030419 as expected in the general population20. The most common haplotype 1 (wild type alleles at both tagging loci) was detected in 208 (48%) patients, haplotype 2 (defined by rs331457 mutation G > A and rs5030419 wild-type) in 102 (24%) patients, and haplotype 3 (defined by rs331457 wild-type and rs5030419 mutation C > G) in 103 (24%) patients. Both tagging SNPs were detected in 19 (4%) patients (rs331457 mutation G > A, rs5030419 mutation C > G). These were called mixed haplotype, as they may represent a unique haplotype (both SNPs on one chromosome) or a mix of the haplotypes 2 and 3 (each SNP on a different chromosome). To validate the haplotyping, the allele frequency of the SNP rs5030445 being located in a putative enhancer region within intron 2 of TRAF619 was determined. As predicted (Fig. 1B), linkage between rs5030445 and rs331457 was observed in 406/432 (94%) patients. TRAF6 haplotypes and the risk of SBP. Patients’ characteristics did not significantly differ between the four TRAF6 haplotypes with exception of ascitic fluid (AF) protein (Table 1). However, there were no differences in the severity liver failure and of portal hypertension between the groups as indicated by surrogate parameters MELD score, serum ascites albumin gradient, and platelet count. In the combined pro- and retrospective analysis, the frequency of SBP significantly differed between the four haplotypes (Table 1) and was the highest in patients with haplotype 2 (Fig. 2A). Among the 347 patients who did not have a history of SBP and did not present with SBP at inclusion, the actuarial cumulative incidence of a first episode of SBP was 16.3% ± 2.7% (standard error) after 1 year according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. In this prospective sensitivity analysis, patients with the TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 had a significantly higher 1-year cumulative incidence of SBP (24.2% ± 6.0%) as compared to patients without the haplotype 2 (13.8% ± 2.9%; P = 0.026 in log rank test) (Fig. 2B) with a hazard ratio for SBP of 2.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–4.07; P = 0.03) in presence of the risk haplotype 2. The unadjusted odds ratio for an episode of SBP in patients with haplotype 2 was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.04–2.82; P = 0.036) when compared to patients with the wild-type haplotype, and it was 1.95 (95% CI: 1.22–3.12; P = 0.005) when compared to all other patients (Table 2). In univariate analysis higher MELD score and lower albumin at inclusion indicated patients at an increased risk for SBP. After adjustment for MELD and serum albumin, only low serum albumin and the TRAF6 haplotype 2 remained an indicator for a significantly increased risk of SBP in multivariate logistic regression (Table 2). The TRAF6-associated risk for SBP was higher in patients with non-alcoholic cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio 3.04; 95% CI 1.11–8.36; P = 0.031) than in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio 1.81; 95% CI 1.04–3.17; P = 0.037) according the multivariate logistic regression model 2. As the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with higher mortality and shorter follow-up, we also confirmed an association of the TRAF6 haplotype with SBP for the subgroup of patients without HCC (Supplementary Table S1). Of note, the association of the TRAF6 haplotype with SBP was observed in patients without NOD2 risk alleles (P = 0.005), but not in patients carrying any of the three NOD2 risk variants R702W, G908R and L1007fs (P = 0.59) (Fig. 2C). Among patients with SBP, 20 developed a second episode despite secondary antibiotic prophylaxis without differences between the TRAF6 haplotypes (Table 1). Scientific Reports | 7: 4914 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04895-z
2
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
A)
TLR4
TLR1/2
TLR5
TLR11
Endosome IRAK4
NOD2
TLR13 TLR7/8 TLR9
IRAK2
TLR3
IRAK1
TRAF6
RIP2
RIP1
TAB2 TAB3 TAK1
MKK 3/6
MKK 4/7
α
IKK Complex
ß P38 P
JNK
CREB
AP1
P50 P65
NFkB
Nucleus
P50 CREB P
AP1 P
P65
DNA
Block 1 (20 kb)
91
91
Block 2 (1 kb)
91
91
91
91
91
PRR5L (3‘-UTR) rs199615696 rs148365574 rs77226645 rs75767916 rs7127484
rs5030416
rs5030419
rs4755453
rs552140
rs540386
rs5030437
rs331457
rs5030445
rs5030470
rs2303439
rs5030472
TRAF6 gene rs1046864
B)
Proinflammatory Cytokines e.g. IL6, CXCL8
91
91 4
LD r² >80% (Block1)
3 4
4 4
4 5
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
LD r² >80% (Block1)
4 4
4 4
4
89
RAG1
rs5030409 rs5030403 rs77129312 rs112758102 rs11599968 rs112758646
Figure 1. Schematic representation of TRAF6 immune function and TRAF6 haplotypes. (A) Schematic representation showing the role of TRAF6 for Toll-like receptor (TLR) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2) signaling in innate immune cells. (B) Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot with r2 values illustrating the TRAF6 gene haplotype definition derived from HapMap data (HapMap release 28 Phase II + III, CEU population, forward strand, http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a minimum allele frequency of 0.05 and a Hardy Weinberg P value cut-off of 0.0010 are shown. The haplotype-tagging SNPs rs331457 and rs5030419 (red) and the validation SNP rs5030445 (blue) are indicated. Furthermore, SNPs in LD with rs331457 in neighboring genes are indicated as identified using HaploReg v4.1.
Scientific Reports | 7: 4914 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04895-z
3
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
rs331457 rs5030419
All patients (N = 432)
Haplotype 1 WT (G) WT (C) (N = 208)
Haplotype 2 MUT (G>A) WT (C) (N = 102)
Haplotype 3 WT (G) MUT (C>G) (N = 103)
Mixed Haplotype MUT (G>A) MUT (C>G) (N = 19)
P value*
Male sex
308 (71%)
149 (72%)
68 (67%)
78 (76%)
13 (68%)
0.53
Alcoholic cirrhosis
325 (75%)
154 (74%)
79 (77%)
78 (76%)
14 (74%)
0.93
NOD2 risk variants#
84 (19%)
43 (21%)
23 (23%)
17 (17%)
1 (5%)
0.29
Patient characteristics at inclusion Age
59 (52–68)
60 (53–68)
58 (47–68)
59 (52–70)
56 (52–66)
0.43
Hepatocellular carcinoma
65 (15%)
33 (16%)
10 (10%)
18 (17%)
4 (21%)
0.30
Child-Pugh stage C
287 (66%)
140 (67%)
66 (65%)
70 (68%)
11 (58%)
0.80
MELD
17 (12–22)
17 (12–22)
18 (12–22)
17 (12–23)
14 (12–17)
0.30
Ascitic fluid protein (g/l)
13 (8–20)
13 (9–19)
10 (8–18)
11 (8–21)
21 (9–32)
0.029
SAAG (g/l)
17 (13–20)
17 (13–20)
17 (13–20)
17 (12–21)
15 (12–15)
0.56
Bilirubin (µmol/l)
44 (22–97)
42 (21–98)
46 (26–92)
48 (20–114)
40 (24–64)
0.95
International normalized ratio 1.4 (1.2–1.7)
1.4 (1.2–1.7)
1.4 (1.3–1.7)
1.4 (1.2–1.8)
1.4 (1.1–1.6)
0.76
Creatinine (µmol/l)
96 (67–148)
90 (67–147)
108 (63–156)
106 (69–148)
81 (60–114)
0.41
C-reactive protein (mg/l)
32 (17–60)
32 (16–59)
37 (20–62)
33 (19–57)
22 (12–56)
0.68
WBC (×109 cells/l)
7.2 (5.0–10.8)
7.0 (5.2–10.0)
6.9 (4.6–12.0)
8.0 (5.5–11.1)
5.7 (3.9–10.2)
0.46
Platelets (×109 cells/l)
129 (82–185)
137 (87–200)
131 (78–185)
114 (79–181)
90 (69–144)
0.16
Albumin (g/l)
24 (20–28)
24 (20–29)
23 (20–28)
25 (20–28)
24 (20–31)
0.94
Sodium (mmol/l)
135 (132–139)
135 (131–138)
135 (132–138)
135 (133–139)
136 (132–141)
0.53
Use of beta blockers
223 (52%)
100 (48%)
60 (59%)
53 (51%)
10 (53%)
0.36
34 (17%)
18 (19%)
17 (17%)
2 (10%)
0.89
Patient characteristics during follow-up Primary antibiotic prophylaxis 71 (17%) at any time¶
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics stratified by the TRAF6 haplotype. Median/IQR or Frequency/Percentage are shown. *P values from from Kruskal Wallis test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. #Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 risk variants R702W, G908R and L1007fs. ¶Comprising quinolones, cotrimoxazole and rifaximin. Data available from 421 patients (97.5%). Abbreviations: mutation (MUT); wild-type (WT); model for end-stage liver disease (MELD); Serum ascites albumin gradient (SAAG); White blood cell count (WBC); spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).
Characteristics of SBP episodes and outcome according to the TRAF6 haplotype. We went on to
investigate the characteristics of SBP episodes with respect to the TRAF6 haplotype. There were no significant differences in age at presentation, microbiological culture results, severity of inflammation, organ failure and mortality between patients with a first episode of SBP with the TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 compared to patients without (Table 3). Short-term survival after a first episode of SBP (Table 3) as well as long-term survival in the overall population were not negatively affected by the presence of the TRAF6 risk haplotype (Fig. 2D). Independent predictors of overall survival were higher age at inclusion, advanced liver disease as indicated by the MELD score, HCC at inclusion and an episode of SBP at any point according to Cox regression analysis (Table 4).
Functional consequences of TRAF6 haplotypes on peritoneal immunity. To assess whether the
TRAF6 haplotype 2 is associated with altered peritoneal macrophage (PMφ) function, we first determined the macrophage activation marker soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in non-infected ascites21. Patients with the TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 had lower AF suPAR concentrations as compared to other haplotypes (Fig. 3A) indicating a reduced peritoneal immune activation under non-inflammatory conditions in these patients. Although TRAF6 mRNA expression in isolated PMφ did not differ between the haplotypes (Fig. 3B), PMφ from patients carrying the TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 had lower basal expressions of IL-6 (P = 0.05) and CXCL8 (P = 0.01) mRNA compared to PMφ from patients with other haplotypes, confirming a less inflammatory phenotype (Fig. 3C,D). There were no significant differences in nuclear factor (NF)-κB p65 nuclear concentrations (Fig. 3E) and in the concentrations of TRAF6 protein, phosphorylated p38, JNK, and ERK in Western blots in unstimulated patients’ PMφ (data not shown). After stimulation with 10 ng/ml lipopolysaccharide there was a non-significant trend towards a lower secretion of the neutrophil-recruiting chemokine CXCL8 in patients carrying the TRAF6 haplotype 2 as compared to other haplotypes (Fig. 3F) suggesting that the LPS-induced release capacity of CXCL8 was not severely compromised in patients with the risk haplotype. Notably, this less inflammatory macrophage phenotype associated with the risk haplotype 2 was only observed in PMφ but not in circulating monocytes (data not shown).
Discussion
In this large association study on Caucasian patients with decompensated cirrhosis we demonstrate for the first time an association of genetic germ line haplotype of the TRAF6 gene with the inflammatory status in peritoneal macrophages and with the risk of developing SBP. A common genetic variant of TRAF6, which we named TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 was found in one out of four patients and conferred an increased risk for SBP as compared either Scientific Reports | 7: 4914 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04895-z
4
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
A)
B) Cumulative incidence of SBP
P = 0.006
Frequency of SBP
50% 40% 30%
history of SBP SBP at inclusion or during follow-up
27% 20%
20% 10% 0%
12% risk HT2 102
5% non-risk HTs 330
0.30 0.25
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00
TRAF6 haplotype N
C)
D)
P = 0.026
0.20
TRAF6 non risk-haplotypes TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 0 271 76
90 145 40
180 103 32
360 days 74 at risk 18 at risk
270 83 23
1.0
P = 0.005
Frequency of SBP
50%
P = 0.59
42%
40%
30%
30% 25%
25%
20%
0.8 0.7
P = 0.25
0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2
10% 0%
Cumulative survival
0.9
TRAF6 non-risk haplotypes TRAF6 risk haplotype 2
0.1 – – 269
– + 79
+ – 61
+ NOD2 risk GT + TRAF6 risk HT 23 N
0.0
0 330 102
90 169 57
180 125 47
270 102 34
360 days 90 at risk 26 at risk
Figure 2. Association of TRAF6 haplotypes with SBP and survival. (A) Combined prospective and retrospective analysis. Frequency of SBP in patients stratified for the presence of the TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 (HT2) and other haplotypes (non-risk HTs). The frequency of SBP is given for SBP, which were well documented at baseline (history of SBP) and, which were diagnosed at inclusion or during follow-up. P value from Fisher’s exact test. (B) Prospective analysis. The cumulative incidence of a first episode of SBP in patients without a history of SBP and without SBP at inclusion is indicated and stratified for the presence of the TRAF6 risk haplotype 2. Data were right-censored at liver transplantation, death, or loss-to-follow-up. Patients at risk and the P value from log-rank test are indicated. (C) The frequency of SBP in patients stratified for the presence of the TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 (HT2) and other haplotypes (non-risk HTs) is given for patients carrying at least one of the NOD2 risk variants R702W, G908R or L1007fs and for patients with the NOD2 wild-types. P values from Fisher’s exact test. (D) Kaplan-Meier analysis of cumulative survival of the overall cohort is shown and stratified for the presence of the TRAF6 risk haplotype 2. Data were right-censored at liver transplantation or loss-to-follow-up. Patients at risk and the P value from log-rank test are indicated.
to the wild-type haplotype 1 (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.04–2.82; P = 0.016) or to all patients with a non-risk haplotype (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.22–3.12; P = 0.005). This association remained significant in prospective sensitivity analysis and in multivariate logistic regression after adjustment for confounding factors. In the absence of SBP, the identified TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 was accompanied by a less proinflammatory state of peritoneal macrophages as shown by reduced concentrations of suPAR, a soluble marker of peritoneal and systemic immune activation21 and lower expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. The lower expression of the neutrophil-recruiting chemokine CXCL8 by PMφ in patients carrying the TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 suggests an impaired neutrophil recruitment to the peritoneal cavity during viable bacterial translocation resulting in a higher risk for SBP accompanied by a reduced state of peritoneal inflammation. The close association of the degree of systemic inflammation with organ dysfunction and subsequent mortality during bacterial infections in cirrhosis21–23, may explain why an increased prevalence of SBP in patients with the TRAF6 risk haplotype did not translate into increased mortality in our study in presence of adequate treatment. In contrast, there was a non-significant trend towards a less pronounced systemic inflammatory response during SBP and a numerically lower short-term mortality. In the present study, only advanced liver disease as indicated by a higher MELD or lower albumin levels but not total AF protein indicated an increased risk of SBP as described and discussed before24. In our study cohort the minor allele frequencies for the TRAF6 haplotype-tagging SNPs rs331457 and rs5030419 were 0.16 and 0.15, respectively, well in line with observed minor allele frequencies in healthy
Scientific Reports | 7: 4914 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04895-z
5
www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Univariate Model OR (95% CI) TRAF6
Multivariate Model 1#
Multivariate Model 2#
Adjusted OR P value (95% CI)
Adjusted OR P value (95% CI)
P value
0.016
—
0.018
not included
Haplotype 1
1.00 (reference)
1.00 (reference)
Haplotype 2
1.71 (1.04–2.82)
1.77 (1.07–2.95)
Haplotype 3
0.76 (0.44–1.33)
0.78 (0.44–1.38)
Mixed Haplotype
0.38 (0.07–1.39)
0.35 (0.08–1.57)
TRAF6 risk haplotype 2*
1.95 (1.22–3.12)
0.005
NOD2 risk variant
0.88 (0.51–1.51)
2.00 (1.24–3.22)
0.004
not included
—
0.64
—
—
—
—
MELD (per 1-point 1.03 (1.00–1.06) increase)
0.046
1.03 (0.99–1.06)
0.11
1.02 (0.99–1.06)
0.12
Albumin (per 1-g/l increase)
0.95 (0.92–0.99)
0.013
0.96 (0.92–0.99)
0.038
0.96 (0.92–0.99)
0.039
AF protein (per 1-g/l increase)
1.00 (0.98–1.02)
0.84
—
—
—
—
Male Sex
1.00 (0.63–1.59)
1.00
—
—
—
—
Primary antibiotic prophylaxis
0.64 (0.34–1.20)
0.17
—
—
—
—
Beta blocker use at inclusion
1.00 (0.66–1.52)
1.00
—
—
—
—
Table 2. Risk factors for a first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. #Binary logistic regression with alternative models including either haplotype overall or the risk haplotype 2 as categorical variable. *Versus non-risk haplotypes 1, 3, and the mixed haplotype. ¶Comprising quinolones, cotrimoxazole and rifaximin. Data available from 421 patients (97.5%). Abbreviations: odds ratio (OR), confidence interval (CI), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), ascitic fluid (AF). European populations of 0.13 (0.10–0.16) and 0.15 (0.11–0.21)20. Therefore, the risk to develop cirrhosis per se was not significantly influenced by the evaluated TRAF6 haplotype. Interestingly, the two haplotype-tagging SNPs investigated conferred an opposite effect on the prevalence of SBP, resulting in a genotype at low-risk for SBP (haplotype 3 and mixed haplotype) and at high-risk for SBP (haplotype 2), when compared to the wild type haplotype 1. Notably, we observed immune-modulating effects of the TRAF6 haplotype in PMφ but not in circulating monocytes, which could be attributed to (i) different life spans of these cells (long versus short living), (ii) a different compartmentalization (peritoneal cavity versus blood), (iii) the different degree of maturation (differentiated late-stage macrophages versus freshly isolated monocytes), or a combination of these. As we did not observe differences in TRAF6 expression or mechanistic evidence for deregulated NF-κB activation between patients with different TRAF6 haplotypes, we cannot attribute whether the observed effects on peritoneal inflammation and infection are direct consequences of altered macrophage signaling or are indirectly mediated by immune cells in other compartments, e.g. in gut-associated lymphatic tissue. In addition, the haplotype tagging SNP rs331457 is in strong linkage disequilibrium with several SNPs in the 3′ untranslated region of the neighboring proline rich 5 like gene (PRR5L) and in recombination activating gene 1 (RAG1)19 (Fig. 1A). Thus, it is also conceivable that the TRAF6 haplotypes reported herein indicate alterations in PRR5L and/or RAG1 expression affecting immune cell maturation, mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) signaling, and cytokine production25, 26. Indeed, the TRAF6-associated immune cluster has been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematodes27, 28 and rheumatoid arthritis29 and in sepsis-associated organ failure30. Our study has two major implications. First, in the light of increasing antimicrobial resistance, individualized approaches that direct antimicrobial prophylaxis only to patients with the highest risk are warranted. NOD2 genotype-based prophylaxis is currently investigated as a rationale for primary prophylaxis for SBP31 but could not be replicated consistently as it may be stronger associated with culture-positive variants of peritonitis8, 11, 32 . The risk of SBP was the highest in NOD2 wild type patients with the TRAF6 risk haplotype 2, extending the population at risk for genotype-based primary interventions. This may also hint towards a critical role for TRAF6 activation in mediating the susceptibility for SBP, as NOD2-induced ubiquitination of TRAF6 and subsequent inflammatory signaling is altered in the presence of NOD2 variants14. Second, our study provides evidence for a role of TRAF6 in mediating SBP as a severe complication of decompensated cirrhosis. Therefore, compounds targeting TRAF6 interactions with CD40, which have proven beneficial in animal models of experimental peritonitis and sepsis33, may be an attractive target for the prevention of inflammatory and infectious complications in advanced cirrhosis.
Patients and Methods
Study design. Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis who underwent paracentesis at the Jena University Hospital were recruited to study the impact of the TRAF6 haplotype on the prevalence of SBP and survival. Patients were recruited during three different periods: between 12/2007 and 10/2010 for a genetic association study of SBP and NOD2 variants as previously reported8 (N = 105), between 10/2010 and 01/2013 for a genetic association study of bacterial infections with polymorphisms of the innate immunity (N = 240), and Scientific Reports | 7: 4914 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04895-z
6
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
TRAF6 risk haplotype 2 (N = 40)
TRAF6 non-risk haplotypes (N = 82)
P value
Male sex
26 (65%)
61 (74%)
0.29
Age at SBP (years)
61 (48–68)
57 (51–65)
0.46
AF PMN (×109 cells/l)
1.3 (0.5–4.3)
0.9 (0.4–2.3)
0.14
Bilirubin (µmol/l)
53 (28–100)
52 (23–144)
0.78
INR
1.4 (1.2–1.8)
1.5 (1.3–2.0)
0.24
Creatinine (µmol/l)
128 (85–190)
109 (79–189)
0.59
CRP (mg/l)
50 (27–108)
84 (36–128)
WBC (×109 cells/l)
8.9 (4.5–13.6) 9.9 (6.9–16.6)
0.10
Hospital-acquired SBP
21 (58%)
42 (52%)
0.55
Culture-negative
23 (58%)
51 (62%)
Gram-negative
7 (18%)
13 (16%)
Gram-positive
6 (15%)
16 (20%)
Mixed
1 (3%)
1 (1%)
N/A
3 (8%)
1 (1%)
No
25 (63%)
51 (62%)
Yes
10 (25%)
23 (28%)
N/A
13 (11%)
8 (10%)
0.11
Microbial culture result
0.38
Renal failure at diagnosis# 0.84
Outcome 28 days after diagnosis Survived
33 (83%)
48 (59%)
Dead
7 (18%)
28 (34%)
Transplanted
0 (0%)
3 (4%)
Lost to follow up
0 (0%)
3 (4%)
Kaplan-Meier estimate ± Std. error
83 ± 6%
65 ± 5%
0.06
0.06
Table 3. Characteristics of the first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Median/IQR or Frequency/ Percentage are shown; P values from Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher’s exact test or log-rank test as appropriate. # Kidney failure was defined by serum creatinine >2 mg/dl or the need for renal replacement therapy according to acute-on-chronic liver failure criteria. Abbreviations: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), ascitic fluid (AF), polymorphnuclear cells (PMN), international normalized ratio (INR), C-reactive protein (CRP), whiteblood-cell (WBC), N/A: not available. Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P-value
(a) Unadjusted Cox proportional hazard model Age* (per 1-year increase)
1.03 (1.02–1.05)
