Oct 23, 2013 ... (Institute for logistics) of Le Havre University,ISEL. This expert ... Simulation
enables to develop a model and to test different configurations (time ...
Multi-year Expert Meeting on Transport,Trade Logistics and Trade Facilitation:
Transport and logistics innovation towards the review of the Almaty Programme of Action in 2014 22-24 October 2013
USING A STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING TOOL TO DESIGN AND OPTIMIZE SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS (A BEST PRACTICE IN GLASS RECYCLING) by
Mr. Aurélien Levieux Engineer (Institute for logistics) of Le Havre University, ISEL
This expert paper is reproduced by the UNCTAD secretariat in the form and language in which it has been received. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view of the United Nations.
04/11/2013
USING A STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING TOOL TO DESIGN AND OPTIMIZE SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS (A BEST PRACTICE IN GLASS RECYCLING) CNUCED Presentation October, 23rd 2013
[email protected] 04/11/2013
1
ISEL, a school unique in France ISEL, school of logistics is the only public engineering institute in France in the field of logistics Some figures: – – – – – – –
School founded in 1994 465 graduated engineers 212 students (2013/2014) 40% women Around 50 new graduates each year 95% graduates under contract in less than 6 months ISEL 800 program: double the number of students by the coming years
04/11/2013
2
1
04/11/2013
ISEL, a school unique in France ISEL has numerous foreign partner institutions, both European (Socrates/Erasmus programme) and worldwide ISEL has also 2 main partnership agreements with the universities of Hull (UK) and Magdeburg (Ger) A specific entity, Comptoir of Logistics (value-creation entity)
04/11/2013
3
Comptoir of logistics Comptoir of Logistics: – Project engineering – 14 colleagues – 3 main competences: • Modeling/simulation • Supply Chain trade skills diagnosis (Audit) • Major projects and cooperation
Construction of decision making tools We design both strategic (network optimization) and operational (process/flow optimization) models
04/11/2013
4
2
04/11/2013
Modeling and simulation Modeling is a symbolic representation of some aspects of an object or a real phenomenon Simulation enables to develop a model and to test different configurations (time, spatial configuration, …) under different constraints
04/11/2013
5
Modeling and simulation – Logistics issues Sourcing Manufacturing Inventory Infrastructure Outsourcing
Strategic
Inventory modelling / deployment Cost models and budgets Warehouse layout Vehicle routing
Tactical
Opérational
Route Manifests Stock replenishment Shift Patterns Warehouse Resources Picking Lists
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
6 Months
1 year
2 years
5 years
04/11/2013
6
3
04/11/2013
Modeling and simulation – CAST Aurora CAST Aurora: a strategic support tool for Supply Chain planning Interests: – – – – – – – –
Results:
To gain insight To quantify relationships To optimize To generate and evaluate options To test sensitivities To remove emotion and politics To adopt a rigorous process To provide a point of expertise...
– – – – –
Network Optimization Warehouse positioning Transport Mode selection Supply & Demand allocation Carbon optimization
Consider all elements of the Supply Chain in a single, integrated model
04/11/2013
7
Modeling and simulation – Methodology Modifications
Requirements definition
1 Analysis of the situation 2
Data gathering
Data analysis 3
Data
Adequation
Results analysis
5 4
Scénarios Configuration
Modelling 6
9
Implementation 7
8
Software 1: Project definition, objectives
6: Study period, units, rules and constraints
2: Flow diagrams, mappings…
7: Model design
3: Technical data, key variables, constraints 4: Perimeter, functionalities, elements...
8: Model implementation Simulation run
5: Data analysis (folding, deleting, combining…)
9: Assumption tests (analysis and recommendations)
04/11/2013
8
4
04/11/2013
Partners
04/11/2013
9
AUTOMOTIVE GLASS RECYCLING
5
04/11/2013
Context and objective Context European regulation: from 2015, 95% of the total weight of an End of Live Vehicles (ELV) should be re-used / recycled. Concerning this issue, France is not a model in Europe: only 81% of an ELV is be re-used / recycled. Automotive glass is not recycled and is representing 3-4% of the total weight… Objective Establish a profitable network for glass collecting and recycling of the French manufacturer Renault
04/11/2013
11
04/11/2013
12
Partners Industrials
Engineering schools
Association Public partners
6
04/11/2013
ISEL objective
Create a decision making tool to size and define the cost of the collecting, storage and distribution network of reusable glass in France (including carbon footprint)
04/11/2013
13
04/11/2013
14
Actors of the supply chain Glass deposits • Car crushers • Car dealership • Windscreen repairer (Carglass, France Pare brise…)
Collection platforms • Sita platforms • Renault platforms...
Glass reprocessing sites Transportation companies
7
04/11/2013
Model presentation – Main figures
3 615 collection points
2 172 locations
52 571 tons of glass (24 kg/VHU) 142 collection platforms “6 customers” (glass demand) 4 different transportation vehicles
15
04/11/2013
Résults
Maltha
Base case
PATE
Solover 2
SRPVI Solover 1
Brianne
Scénario
Number of tons
Collection
Base Case
51 769 t 98 %
2 068 452 € 40 €/t
Platforms
Transfer
33 614 € 1 276 480 € 0,7 €/tConfidential 24,7data €/t
Total
CO2
3 378 546 € 65,3 €/t
2 137 t 41,3 kg/t
04/11/2013
16
8
04/11/2013
Examples of scenarios Increase of the number of platforms Scenario
Number of tons
Collection
Platforms
Transfer
Augmentation du nombre de plateformes
51 797 t 98,5 %
1 643 544€ 31,7 €/t
37 947 € 1 321 414 € Confidential data 0,7 €/t 25,5 €/t
Total
CO2
3 002 904 € 58 €/t -11%
1 929 t 37,25 kg/t -10%
Total
CO2
2 891 566 € 55,8 €/t -15%
1 769 t 25,8 kg/t -47%
Existing platforms relocation Scenario
Number of tons
Collection
Platforms
Transfer
Relocalisation des plateformes
51 797 t 98 %
1 519 530€ 29,3 €/t
37 940 € 1 334 096 € data 0,7 €/t Confidential 25,8 €/t
Use of new transportation companies (higher capacity vehicles) Scenario
Number of tons
Collection
Nouveaux transporteurs pour le transfert (25 à 27 tonnes)
51 769 t 98 %
1 922 293 € 37,1 €/t
Platforms
Transfer
56 061 € 690 785 € data 1,1 €/t Confidential 13,3 €/t
Total
CO2
2 669 139 € 51,5 €/t -14%
1 740t 33,6 kg/t -19%
17
04/11/2013
Average cost VS. % of collection 70
65
Existing platforms
Confidential data
55
50
Target cost
Average cost (€)
60
45
Relocated platforms
40
35 100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
Number of collected tons (percentage)
04/11/2013
18
9
04/11/2013
Conclusions of the study Conclusions • The number and the location of each actor of the supply chain have a strong impact on the total cost • It is necessary to consider several key variables to reach the objectives of the project • It is important to gather products (minimize number of platforms) to decrease significantly logistics costs
The use of CAST can be adjustable depending on your needs Importance of the size of the network and the granularity of the model 04/11/2013
19
Thank you for your attention Institut Supérieur d’Études Logistiques Quai Frissard – B.P. 1137 76063 LE HAVRE CEDEX Tel.: +332 32 74 49 00 Fax: +332 32 74 49 11 Email:
[email protected]
04/11/2013
20
10