Evaluation of the virtual learning object “Diagnostic ... - SciELO

2 downloads 0 Views 324KB Size Report
The Macromedia Authorware® is acknowledged for its precision and efficiency(6), able to gather text and multimedia resources in a single application, thus.
Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem

Original Article

2011 July-Aug.;19(4):894-901 www.eerp.usp.br/rlae

Evaluation of the virtual learning object “Diagnostic reasoning in nursing applied to preterm newborns” Fernanda dos Santos Nogueira de Góes1 Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca2 Maria Cândida de Carvalho Furtado2 Adriana Moraes Leite2 Carmen Gracinda Silvan Scochi3

The potential use of computer technology in teaching and continuous education for nursing motivated the development of this study to evaluate the virtual learning object, “Diagnostic Reasoning in Nursing Applied to Preterm Newborns” at an intermediate neonatal care unit. This descriptive study evaluates the appearance and content of the virtual object concerning aspects related to presentation, organization, usability and overall impression. Experts from the fields of computer technology (12) and nursing (31) participated in the evaluation process. Each sub-item of the instrument was assessed on a Likert scale and blank space was provided for comments/ suggestions. All items were positively evaluated by over 80% of the experts, except for the ‘informational density’ criterion in the evaluation performed by computer technology experts. The developed product is considered adequate to be used for teaching for nursing students and in continuous education of diagnostic reasoning in the development of Nursing Diagnoses for preterm newborns, in the problem-posing pedagogical framework. Descriptors: Neonatal Nursing; Infant, Premature; Nursing Diagnosis; Computer-Assisted Instruction.

1

RN, Doctoral Student, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research

2

RN, Ph.D. in Nursing, Professor, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, WHO Collaborating Centre for

Development, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]. Nursing Research Development, SP, Brazil. E-mail: Luciana - [email protected], Maria Cândida - [email protected], Adriana - [email protected]. 3

RN, Ph.D. in Nursing, Full Professor, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected].

Corresponding Author: Carmen Gracinda Silvan Scochi Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto Departamento Materno-Infantil e Saúde Pública Av. dos Bandeirantes, 3900 Bairro: Monte Alegre CEP: 14040-902, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil E-mail: [email protected]

895 Avaliação do objeto virtual de aprendizagem “Raciocínio diagnóstico em enfermagem aplicado ao prematuro” Vislumbrando o potencial de uso da informática, na formação e educação permanente em enfermagem, realizou-se o presente estudo com o objetivo de avaliar objeto virtual de aprendizagem raciocínio diagnóstico em enfermagem aplicado ao prematuro, em unidade de cuidado intermediário neonatal. Trata-se de estudo descritivo sobre a avaliação da aparência e conteúdo do objeto virtual, nos aspectos relacionados à apresentação, organização, usabilidade e impressão geral. Participaram peritos das áreas de informática (12) e enfermagem (31). Cada subitem dos instrumentos continha avaliação em escala Likert e espaço para inclusão de comentários/sugestões. Todos os itens foram avaliados positivamente por mais de 80% dos avaliadores, exceto o critério densidade informacional na avaliação dos profissionais de informática. Considera-se que o produto desenvolvido está adequado para ser disponibilizado para uso no ensino de estudantes e educação permanente de enfermeiros, sobre raciocínio diagnóstico na elaboração de diagnósticos de enfermagem, aplicados ao prematuro, inserido no referencial pedagógico da problematização. Descritores: Enfermagem Neonatal; Prematuro; Diagnóstico de Enfermagem; Instrução por Computador.

Evaluación del objeto virtual de aprendizaje “Raciocinio diagnóstico en enfermería aplicado al prematuro” Vislumbrando el potencial de uso de la informática en la formación y educación permanente en enfermería, se realizó el presente estudio con el objetivo de evaluar el objeto virtual de aprendizaje “Raciocinio Diagnóstico en Enfermería Aplicado al Prematuro” en una unidad de cuidado intermedio neonatal. Se trata de un estudio descriptivo sobre la evaluación de la apariencia y contenido del objeto virtual en los aspectos relacionados a la presentación, organización, usabilidad e impresión general. Participaron peritos de las áreas de informática (12) y enfermería (31). Cada sub-ítem de los instrumentos contenía evaluación en escala tipo Likert y espacio para inclusión de comentarios/sugerencias. Todos los ítems fueron evaluados positivamente por más de 80% de los evaluadores, excepto el criterio densidad de información en la evaluación de los profesionales de informática. Se considera que el producto desarrollado está adecuado para ser colocado a disposición para uso en la enseñanza de estudiantes y en la educación permanente de enfermeros sobre raciocinio diagnóstico en la elaboración de Diagnósticos de Enfermería aplicados al prematuro, dentro del marco pedagógico de la problematización. Descriptores: Enfermería Neonatal; Prematuro; Diagnóstico de Enfermería; Instrucción por Computador.

Introduction Understanding Nursing Diagnoses as a phase

There are many definitions in the health field for

of the nursing process that involves clinical judgment

the process of making a diagnosis, such as judgment,

that corresponds to the intellectual endeavor in which

clinical reasoning and diagnostic reasoning(2), which

collected information is analyzed, judged and gathered

can be defined as the process of clinically reasoning to

to define a diagnosis, is often a difficult task for nursing

recognize relevant diagnoses, that is, a type of clinical

professionals .

reasoning aimed to establish the diagnosis that best

(1)

www.eerp.usp.br/rlae

896

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem 2011 July-Aug.;19(4):894-901.

expresses the health state of individuals, families or community .

The Macromedia Authorware® is acknowledged for its precision and efficiency(6), able to gather text

(3)

A didactic resource used to enable nursing students and nurses to better understand the nursing process

and multimedia resources in a single application, thus favoring interactivity.

and diagnosis reasoning is to treat these from a linear

Up to January 2010, Moodle registered more

point of view, which however, does not allow students

than 40 million users in more than 4 million programs,

to visualize how the stages are interconnected or

demonstrating that VLE is recognized as a pedagogical

interdependent .

resource that helps students to improve cognition,

(2)

From this perspective, the search for scientific improvement to advance teaching and qualification is

construct knowledge, and promote positive attitudes through discussion and cooperation(7).

essential because the job market requires professionals

The virtual object has a modular structure with

to have knowledge to work in the systematization of

theoretical content concerning nursing diagnoses: one

nursing care(4).

module to teach diagnoses based on Risner’s work and

There is a lack of studies addressing Nursing

the NANDA taxonomy and another module containing

Diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning specifically in the field

simulations of procedures, in which seven clinical cases

of neonatal nursing care provided to preterm newborns.

of preterm infants are distributed, totaling 72 nursing

Only six studies published in the last five years focused

diagnoses.

on preterm newborns and their families.

Studies evaluating virtual objects or educational

The teaching of Nursing Diagnoses and diagnostic reasoning

in

neonatal

nursing

can

benefit

from

technology, which can help qualify competent nurses in the nursing process contributing to improved quality of care delivered to preterm newborns and their families. Because it permits the construction of repositories of classes to be accessed by various users and provide

software have not used probabilistic samples because such evaluations require that the population have defined characteristics. In relation to the number of evaluators, only one study used a sample greater than six evaluators from computer science(5) and another used a sample greater than 15 nursing scorers(8).

synchronous and asynchronous interaction tools, the

We invited 15 experts with bachelor degrees in

use of Virtual Learning Environments (VLE) can be a

computer science or related fields to identify operational

teaching strategy used in the education and qualification

errors in the system; 12 agreed to participate in the

of nurses concerning nursing diagnoses in care provided

study and signed free and informed consent forms.

to preterm newborns .

After

(5)

an

initial

evaluation

and

technical

Many authors have reported the use of VLE in

corrections in the virtual object, we proceeded to the

teaching nursing. However, only four studies used

evaluation by nursing experts. A total of 43 Brazilian

computer-based interactive resources to teach neonatal

university hospitals and 43 undergraduate nursing

nursing and none used VLE, denoting the scarcity of

programs were contacted through mail and email.

research in the field.

Of these, 29 nurses and 22 professors expressed

Hence, this study evaluated the content and

interest in participating in the evaluation of the virtual

appearance of a virtual learning object inserted into a

object in Moodle. However, only those who met the

VLE addressing diagnostic reasoning in nursing related

study criteria were included in the study: 17 nurses

to preterm infants and their families in a neonatal

and 14 professors. These criteria, contained in an

intermediate care unit.

adapted instrument, characterize expert nurses(9). The minimum score for such a characterization is 4. All the

Methods

selected raters scored between six and 11 and signed

This descriptive study reports the evaluation of a virtual interactive learning object. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (Process 5229/2008). The the

virtual

object

was

multimedia-authoring 

constructed tool 

using

Macromedia

Authorware®, inserted into a VLE, the Moodle.

free and informed consent forms. Evaluation instruments including both the fields of technology and pedagogy were searched for critical analysis of the application and an instrument(10) was then adapted to be used by both computer and nursing professionals. This instrument has been already used by a study conducted in Brazil(11). An instrument was adapted in the form of a checklist to permit evaluating

www.eerp.usp.br/rlae

897

Góes FSN, Fonseca LMM, Furtado MCC, Leite AM, Scochi CGS. the

ergonomics

of

interface

criteria,

which

were

related to the evaluation process of the VLE. The items

included to encompass those who study technology.

that reached 70% agreement among scorers, through

Such an instrument was developed by professors from

concepts such as “agree” or “strongly agree”, according

the Federal University of Santa Catarina and made

to criterion adopted in other studies, were considered

available on the Internet(12). The instruments presented

validated(13-14).

statements concerning aspects related to the expert’s field of evaluation, a Likert-type summative method, and a blank space for suggestions. The instruments for computer science and nursing

Results Evaluation - Computer Science

were evaluated in a pilot-test by three computer

The evaluation of the interactive virtual learning

professionals and two nurses to identify potential

object “Diagnostic reasoning in nursing applied to

difficulties of understanding the terms used. These

preterm infants,” performed jointly with computer

evaluations helped clarify some of the instrument’s

science professionals, was composed of an instrument

expressions.

addressing

Data were collected between April and June 2010. The virtual learning object and respective instruments of evaluation were made available in Moodle and later sent to the researchers through email.

a

general

impression

concerning

the

presentation and organization of content (Table 1) and another addressing usability. Concerning

the

general

impression

of

the

virtual object, table 1 shows there were no negative

Descriptive statistics were used in analyzing data

evaluations.

Table 1 – Evaluation concerning general impression of the virtual object of learning – Computer field. 2010 General Impression

Criteria Agree

Strongly agree

Do not know

1. The interface of the system/virtual learning object favors learning the theme.

Strongly disagree

6 (50.0%)

5 (41.7%)

1 (8.3%)

2. Presentation of content of the system/virtual learning object favors learning the theme.

5 (41.7%)

5 (41.7%)

2 (16.6%)

3. Computer animations help learning the theme.

7 (58.3%))

5 (41.7%)

4. The system/virtual learning object is indicated to be used as an educational tool.

5 (41.7%)

6 (50.0%)

1 (8.3%)

5. The limitations of the virtual learning object do not exceed its utility in the teaching of nursing.

5 (41.7%)

5 (41.7%)

2 (16.6%)

6. I recommend the system/virtual learning object for the teaching of neonatal nursing.

5 (41.7%)

5 (41.7%)

2 (16.6%)

The following suggestions were added: There are problems with the ‘Exit’ button on some screens of the

Disagree

explicit actions 75.0%; User’s experience is considered: 75.0%, and Informational density: 66.6%.

Nursing Diagnosis module and gallery and problems

Hence, all criteria of usability of the virtual learning

going back to a previous page; Standardize fonts in the

object achieved the expected agreement (above 70%),

Nursing Diagnosis module… and …some changes related

except ‘Informational Density,’ which achieved 66.6%

to navigability are needed. All these suggestions were

due to an excess of texts necessary to construct clinical

included in the virtual object before nurses evaluated it.

cases. Four evaluators made observations concerning

The statements concerning usability were grouped into criteria, which obtained the following agreement (agree and strongly agree): Grouping by format: 100%; Quality of error messages: 100%; Speed: 97.9%;

excess of text in clinical cases, but considered the remaining modules to be adequate.

Evaluation - Nursing Field

Grouping by localization: 97.2%; Concision: 95.8%;

Given the extensive content in the virtual object,

Immediate feedback: 94.4%; Minimal actions: 91.6%;

we divided the evaluation into four groups, whose

Correction of errors: 91.7%; Consistency: 91.7%;

compositions were: Groups 1 and 4: four professors and

Compatibility: 91.7%; Readability: 89.6%; User control:

four nurses; Group 2: four professors and three nurses;

83.4%; Meaning of codes and names: 83.4%; User’s

Group 3: five professors and three nurses. The groups 1,

www.eerp.usp.br/rlae

898

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem 2011 July-Aug.;19(4):894-901.

2 and 3 evaluated a case in the teaching module and one

available to all the other groups for consultation.

simulation. Group 4 evaluated a case in the simulation

After navigating through the virtual object, the

module and the theoretical content module concerning

experts answered the instruments for general impression

nursing diagnosis, though, theoretical content was

(Table 2), content (Table 3) and usability evaluations.

Table 2 – Evaluation of the general impression of virtual learning object – nursing. 2010. Criteria

General impression

Agree

Strongly agree

1. The virtual learning object is important for students learning the theme.

Strongly disagree

10 (32.3%)

21 (67.7%)

2. The interface of the virtual learning object favors learning the theme.

13 (41.9%)

18 (58.0%)

3. The content of the virtual learning object is important for learning the theme.

9 (29.0%)

22 (71.0%)

4. Computer animations help learning the theme.

Disagree

10 (32.3%)

18 (58.0%)

5. The simulation of clinical cases is relevant to learning the theme.

2 (6.4%)

10 (32.3%)

21 (67.7%)

6. The system/virtual learning object is indicated to be used as an educational tool.

9 (29.0%)

22 (71.0%)

7. The limitations of the virtual learning object are not greater than its utility.

15 (48.3%)

16 (51.6%)

Do not know

1 (3.2%)

All the items achieved 100% of agreement with exception of the item 4 (computer animation).

Table 3 – Evaluation of content of virtual learning environment – nursing. 2010 Content

Criteria Strongly disagree

Disagree

1. The objectives of the system/virtual learning object are clearly defined. 2. Content is coherent with the target-public.

1 (3.2%)

3. The virtual learning object simulates reality well.

Agree

Strongly agree

10 (32.3%)

21 (67.7%)

11 (35.5%)

19 (61.3%)

10 (32.3%)

20 (64.5%)

4. Interaction during the simulation of clinical cases is satisfactory.

2 (6.4%)

14 (45.2%)

15 (48.3%)

5. Presentation of figures is relevant to information included in the text.

1 (3.2%)

7 (22.6%)

22 (71.0%)

6. Presentation of videos is relevant to information included in the text.

2 (6.4%)

12 (38.7%)

17 (54.8%)

7. Presentation of sounds is relevant to the information included in the text.

4 (12.9%)

13 (41.9%)

14 (45.2%)

8. Virtual learning object encourages learning.

11 (35.5%)

20 (64.5%)

9. Virtual learning object permits learning based on the user’s previous experience.

16 (51.6%)

15 (48.3%)

11 (35.5%)

18 (58.0%)

10. Virtual learning object facilitates retention of content in the student’s memory.

All the items were positively evaluated with a

1 (3.2%)

Do not know

1 (3.2%)

1 (3.2%)

1 (3.2%)

Discussion

percentage above 93% of agreement. When the statements concerning the usability

We realized over the course of this study that the

criteria were grouped, the following level of agreement

use of computers in teaching nursing, specifically virtual

(agree and strongly agree) was obtained: Speed: 95%;

learning objects, has been intensified in recent years,

Readability: 92.5%; Grouping by location: 96.7%;

especially in teaching and research centers.

Consistency: 90.4%; User control: 85.5%; Immediate

The option to use Moodle facilitated the participation

feedback: 93.3%; Correction of errors: 93.6%; and

of experts from other Brazilian regions and will also

Error messages: 93.5%.

enable the dissemination of this virtual object of learning

www.eerp.usp.br/rlae

899

Góes FSN, Fonseca LMM, Furtado MCC, Leite AM, Scochi CGS. as resource aide in learning for teaching, research and

found in clinical practice and ensure appropriately

care institutions.

structured theoretical content and that reliable clinical

Some evaluators of this virtual learning object

cases are available. Clinical cases are presented in this

reported difficulties accessing Moodle. We verified that the

virtual object, allowing students to problematize real

problems were related to difficulty handling the computer

contexts(20).

and the Internet or even not reading instructions on how to execute Moodle and the interactive object. When

users

were

qualified

to

Structuring the content of virtual learning objects into modules and in a non-linear manner enables users

Moodle,

to navigate through content the way they like with

they reported positive impressions concerning the

use

flexibility, freedom respect for each one’s own rhythm,

environment and considered the platform easy to use.

and user’s can actively participate in the construction

They also manifested their intention to transform the

of their own knowledge. All these are premises of a

content of the their courses in virtual language

problem-posing education(20).

.

(15)

A limitation of this study is the proportion of

In relation to the evaluation of the virtual object’s

individuals from the nursing field who were included

usability, the great advantage in testing it lies in

in the study and did not achieve the minimum of ten

discovering problems that can represent difficulties in

evaluators per group. Nonetheless, small samples

course development(16).

composed of experts in the nursing and/or computer

We believe that the option to evaluate usability

fields have been used in studies evaluating virtual

criteria based on the criteria of the ergonomics of interface

objects or educational software in nursing(5,11,13,16).

enabled the analysis of technical aspects relevant to

analyzing interactive multimedia as a

learning. Such aspects can facilitate or hinder navigation

resource to be used in the teaching of semiology for

A study

and consequently either encourage or compromise

nursing students verified that it is medium easy to

learning. However nursing studies conducting ergonomic

use and a facilitator between theory and practice that

evaluations similar to the evaluation conducted in this

improves understanding of theoretical classes.

study were not found.

(17)

The virtual object also presents limitations that may

Only the criterion of ‘informational density’ was

in part be related to the Authorware authoring software.

considered

The construction of content in this program requires

though it was considered adequate by nurses.

inadequate

by

computer

professionals,

the creation of a structure similar to a flow chart for

Another study evaluated ergonomic criteria of a

events, tasks and decisions(18) and, during the creation

virtual environment of a clinical simulation of nursing

of this virtual object, we observed that the system was

in intensive therapy and the following were reported:

incapable of performing some necessary functions,

the organization criterion scored 4.43 (maximum was

resulting in the perception on the part of evaluators that

5); presentation scored 4.5; technical criterion related

there were deficiencies in the system, especially related

to appropriate functioning of links and download speed

to control (options to go back).

scored 4.79(11).

Another difficulty found is that it was not possible

Evaluation of VLE in another study(21) was similar to

to execute the object directly in Moodle due to the size

that of this study. Three computer experts evaluated time

of the file, even after dividing it into smaller modules.

of response, quality of interface, tools and resources,

For the evaluation to occur, it was necessary to install

educational

one executable file and send detailed instructions to the

didactic resources. Evaluations related to screen format,

experts.

error messages, ease of use, links, logical sequence of

Other

authors(19)

also

reported

limitations

aspects,

quality

of

environments

and

in

menus, icons, and informational density were considered

relation to Authorware that could not be resolved due

satisfactory or even excellent by two experts, while one

to the system’s format, which reduced possibilities of

expert considered the text, ease of use and links to be

interaction. Hence, we suggest new authoring software

regular. The comments were centered on aspects related

be used to create virtual learning objects that withstand

to clarification of navigation and instructions to execute

different levels of complexity in actions.

modules(5).

In relation to this study’s virtual object, its content

In relation to the usability of the online course

received such recommendations because it was assessed

addressing care provided to critical patients, ease of

by a group of experts in neonatology and in Nursing

navigation, quality and understanding of content were

Diagnoses to bring the user into proximity of the context

evaluated before it was distributed to students as adjuvant

www.eerp.usp.br/rlae

900

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem 2011 July-Aug.;19(4):894-901.

learning material. The nurses evaluated whether the

The need to perform the last stages of implementation

course ensured active learning, feedback, interaction

provided in the adopted software is apparent: it should

of students with the course, collaboration, and whether

be evaluated by the final users.

it presented multiple resources to encourage learning.

Therefore, it is necessary to develop further studies

On a scale from 1 to 5, all the items scored from 2.63

focusing on the impact of the virtual learning object on

(collaboration) to 4.2 (resources to encourage learning),

the teaching of the nursing process and the retention

while the general evaluation of satisfaction scored 4.17,

of knowledge by undergraduate students and nurses as

which reflects great satisfaction with the course

they use it.

.

(16)

Activities mediated by computer should ensure

We conclude that the results obtained in this study

flexibility of time organization, site of study, rhythm

can contribute to the adoption of educational practices

of

and

based on the use of new computer technologies toward

object

improving the quality of nursing education and the

learning,

interaction

access .

(22)

We

to

coherent

believe

that

information

our

virtual

plays such a role since its content is available on the Internet, facilitating its access from anywhere there is network connection. The student or nurse can navigate whenever is more convenient and establish his/her own rhythm of learning. Additionally, the fact the object is not constructed in a linear manner allows the user to interact the way s/he deems appropriate with freedom of choice. From

this

perspective,

interactivity

motivates

technology users and multimedia has a prominent role in this scenario(23). Appropriate navigability is what allows users to “move” freely through the program, making the best use of information. The application of different media is frequent in educational software and increases the understanding of content(23).

Conclusion

process of qualifying nurses.

References 1.

Farias

JN.

Diagnósticos

de

enfermagem:

uma

abordagem conceitual e prática. João Pessoa: Santa Marta; 1990. 160 p. 2. Cruz DAL. Diagnósticos de enfermagem. In: Garcia TR, Egry EY, organizadores. Integralidade da atenção no SUS e sistematização da assistência de enfermagem. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2010. 336 p. 3. Oliva APV. Banco de itens para avaliação de raciocínio diagnóstico [tese de doutorado]. São Paulo (SP): Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo; 2008. 84 p. 4. Cerullo JASB, Cruz DALM. Raciocínio clínico e pensamento

crítico.

Rev.

Latino-Am.

Enfermagem.

2010;18(1). [acesso 28 mar 2010]. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v18n1/pt_19.pdf

doi:

10.1590/S0104-11692010000100019.

We constructed this virtual interactive learning

5. Caetano KC. Desenvolvimento e avaliação de um

object because we believe that the Nursing Process

ambiente virtual de aprendizagem em administração

within care, which in this study focused on the stage

de enfermagem [dissertação de mestrado]. São Paulo

of development of Nursing Diagnosis reasoning, coupled

(SP): Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São

with computer technology, has a prominent role in the

Paulo; 2006. 155 p.

qualification of nurses.

6. Kasim VM, Silva OMR. Software de autoria apoiando

Only two out of the 45 items evaluated by the

aprendizagem. 2008 [acesso 28 mar 2010]. Disponível

computer experts, which refer to informational density,

em:

failed to achieve the established 70% of agreement

educere2008/anais/pdf/640_552.pdf>.

(agree and strongly agree). All the 46 items evaluated by

7. Martín-blas T, Serrano-Fernández A. The role of

nursing professionals achieved the validation criteria.

new technologies in the learning process. Moodle as a

Hence, we assert that the developed product is

Suggest Documents