Fat intake and cardiovascular response - Springer Link

5 downloads 0 Views 227KB Size Report
High dietary fat intake is a major risk factor for the development of obesity, which is frequently associ- ated with diseases such as hypertension and diabetes.
Fat Intake and Cardiovascular Response Marlen Damjanovi, MS, and Matthias Barton, MD

Corresponding author Matthias Barton, MD Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, Departement für Innere Medizin, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] Current Hypertension Reports 2008, 10:25–31 Current Medicine Group LLC ISSN 1522-6417 Copyright © 2008 by Current Medicine Group LLC

High dietary fat intake is a major risk factor for the development of obesity, which is frequently associated with diseases such as hypertension and diabetes and thus accelerated atherosclerosis. Angiotensin II and endothelin-1 are powerful growth factors and vasoconstrictors implicated in regulating vascular tone, vascular structure, and inflammation. Reduced bioactivity of nitric oxide and increased formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been associated with obesity and high dietary fat intake. This article reviews the effects of high-fat diet on vascular functional changes in rodents and humans. Changes include alterations in vasoconstrictor function and receptor expression, and modulators of endothelium-dependent vascular tone (eg, nitric oxide- or endothelium-dependent contracting factor–mediated responses). Novel vasodilator effects of ROS and the anatomic heterogeneity of vascular responses are discussed. The beneficial effects of vasoactive mediators on vascular function could play a role for susceptibility to obesity-dependent hypertension, which is present in many, but not all, obese patients.

Introduction Obesity, one of the most important cardiovascular risk factors, has been implicated in the development of hypertension and atherosclerosis in developed countries, and its prevalence is increasing in developing countries [1–4]. Factors such as a diet rich in fat and sugars, lack of physical activity, genetic predisposition, age, hormonal influences, smoking, and stress facilitate the development of obesity [5]. Obesity-associated diseases (eg, hypertension and diabetes mellitus) are the major causes of stroke, myocardial infarction, disability, and renal disease [6]. This review article summarizes new insights in how fat intake is linked to changes in cardiovascular responses of vasoactive mediators and growth regulators. Definitions

of hypertension, links between obesity and hypertension, and effects of obesity on vascular reactivity are discussed along with the associated molecular changes. Information on vasoactive systems that play an important role in regulating vascular homeostasis (eg, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and endothelin [ET] systems and the L-arginine-nitric oxide [NO] pathway), and the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are presented. Special attention is given to fat-induced effects on vasoreactivity.

Hypertension: A Major Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease In Western countries, arterial hypertension (systolic blood pressure values > 140/90 mm Hg) is a major health and economic problem [7,8]. Hypertension is one of the most important cardiovascular risk factors and frequently is associated with other risk factors such as obesity, insulin resistance, diabetes, high alcohol intake, high salt intake, and psychosocial stress [8,9]. Blood pressure is determined mainly by two factors: cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance (BP = CO × PVR) [9]. Thus, changes in either cardiac output or peripheral vascular resistance will result in blood pressure changes. Defective renal sodium excretion and abnormal vasoconstriction have been identified as key factors for hypertension development [10]. Hypertension can be classified as primary or secondary [8,9]. Primary hypertension is a polygenic disease that is defined as an increase in blood pressure in the absence of any secondary medical cause [8]. In contrast, when a disease such as kidney disease causes high blood pressure, it is termed secondary hypertension [11]. In this context, obesity-associated hypertension can also be viewed as a secondary form of the disease. The adequate control and treatment of blood pressure remains a problem in primary medical care in Germany and Europe, where hypertension is greatly underdiagnosed [7,12]. This situation is important because the severity of hypertension is directly related to the increased risk for many cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases [8,9].

Obesity and Hypertension Obesity contributes to the development of associated diseases such as hypertension, insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia, and thus to atherosclerosis [6,13]. Although the underlying mechanisms have been

26

Pathogenesis of Hypertension: Genetic and Environmental Factors

only partly clarified, current experimental and clinical data indicate an important role for obesity in hypertension development [9]. Obesity-associated hypertension results in an increase of blood pressure partly by raising renal tubular reabsorption of sodium and impairing renal pressure natriuresis and via activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system [14–16]. Studies in obese dogs and humans have demonstrated RAAS activation [17]. Treatment with angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in obese dogs and humans decreases renal tubular sodium reabsorption, indicating an important role of angiotensin and/or aldosterone in obesity-induced hypertension associated with sodium retention [18,19••]. Obesity stimulates the sympathetic nervous system in the kidney, thereby contributing to increased arterial blood pressure; accordingly, pharmacologic blockade of B- and C- adrenergic receptors reduces arterial blood pressure more efficiently in obese dogs compared with nonobese dogs [15,16]. Increased glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow can be observed in obesity’s early stages [14–16]. Also, several reports have linked insulin resistance to sodium retention in the kidney, which affects blood pressure in prediabetic patients [20,21]. Structural and functional changes of insulin receptors are associated with insulin resistance and thereby contribute to sodium retention in obesity-induced hypertension [22]. Experimental studies in rats demonstrate that high dietary salt intake modifies insulin receptor function [23]. Insulin resistance and diabetes are associated with abnormal and increased vasoconstrictor activity [24–26,27•,28,29]. Hypertension as a consequence of obesity also causes vascular hypertrophy, which has long-term deleterious effects on vascular structure [30]. Factors contributing to obesity-induced hypertension include the RAAS, the sympathetic nervous system, structural changes in the kidney, insulin resistance, and altered vascular function.

Effects of Obesity on Vascular Reactivity The RAAS and endothelin system Angiotensin-mediated vascular reactivity The RAAS is crucially involved in regulating blood pressure [31], and convincing evidence exists that obesity is associated with RAAS activation [6,32•]. Ang II, the key vasoconstrictor peptide of the RAAS, is responsible for maintaining blood pressure and water balance [31]. Biosynthesis of Ang II occurs via the conversion of angiotensinogen into the inactive form angiotensin I (Ang I) by the endopeptidase renin, which is then cleaved into the active vasoconstrictor Ang II by ACE [31]. Ang II binds to two receptor subtypes, AT1 and AT 2 [33], with the AT1 receptor being the predominant vasoconstrictor receptor [34,35]. Crowley et al. [19••] recently demonstrated a critical role for the renal AT1 receptor in systemic

Ang II–induced hypertension and its associated cardiac hypertrophy. In the obese Zucker rat (a model of insulin resistance with mild hypertension), sensitivity to Ang II– mediated vasoconstriction after bolus injection of Ang II is increased in the renal artery in obese animals compared with controls [36]. Another study in the same animal model demonstrated that AT1 receptor–mediated contractile responses are increased in endothelium-denuded but not in endothelium-intact aortic rings. These investigators also showed increased AT1 receptor and endothelial NO synthase gene expression in the aorta in the presence of intact endothelium [37]. We previously reported that short-term treatment of mice with a high-fat diet increases Ang II–mediated contractions and vascular protein expression of the AT1 receptor, depending on the dietary fat content (Fig. 1). These findings are compatible with an important role of Ang II and the AT1 receptor in hypertension development upon fat intake [33]. In mice exposed to prolonged intake of a high-fat diet, Ang II–mediated contractions in the aorta were enhanced even further (Fig. 1). This effect was abolished in mice concomitantly treated with darusentan, a selective ETA-receptor antagonist, indicating that endogenous ET-1 regulates obesity-induced activation of Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction [24]. In contrast to the aorta, no changes in the responses were observed in the carotid artery (Fig. 1), indicating that the duration of fat intake affects the degree of vasoconstriction, and that changes display distinct effects only in selected vascular beds [24]. ET-mediated vascular reactivity ET-1 is the predominant isoform of the ET peptide family [38]. ET-1 stimulated Ang II formation in vitro by increasing the conversion of Ang I to Ang II in vascular cells [39,40]. On the other hand, infusion of Ang II into rats increased ET-1 peptide content, which is regulated in an ETA receptor–dependent fashion [41]. Thus, an autocrine regulation exists between angiotensin and endothelin in the vasculature, similar to what has been demonstrated in cardiac fibroblasts [42]. ET-1 is produced by vascular and nonvascular cells and is activated by several different stimuli [43]. ET-1 is generated through conversion of preproET-1 into big ET-1 by the action of a furin-like enzyme. Big ET-1 can be cleaved into ET-1 by several different enzymes, including various isoforms of endothelin-converting enzymes (ECE) [43], chymases [43], non-ECE metalloprotease [43], and matrix metalloproteinase-2 [43]. ET-1 acts through two specific receptors, ETA and ETB [24,38,43]. The ETA receptor is expressed on vascular smooth muscle cells and cardiac myocytes [43]. ETA receptor activation by ET-1 results in vasoconstriction and cell proliferation [43]. In comparison, the ETB receptor is expressed in vascular endothelial cells and contributes to NO and prostacyclin release, leading to vasodilation and inhibition of cell growth [43]. Accordingly, ET-1 may play a role in several cardiovascular diseases, including obesity and hypertension [44–46].

2.5 2.0 1.5



AT1 receptor

ETA receptor

0.5

ERK1/2

0 CTL

40

HF



VHF

CTL HF HF DAR

P  0.05 vs control †P  0.05 vs high-fat diet

30 20 10

B

CTL



HF

0

VHF

CTL Obese

P  0.05 vs control

20 formation, RFU/mg protein

Ang II contraction, % KCL



1.0

A

C

P < 0.05 vs control †P < 0.05 vs high-fat diet

10

•OH

Ang II contraction, % KCL

Fat Intake and Cardiovascular Response Damjanovi and Barton 27





0 Aorta

Carotid artery

D

Basal

ET-1

Figure 1. Angiotensin II (Ang II)–mediated contractions (A) and AT1 and endothelin (ET) A receptor protein expression (B) in aorta of C57BL/6J mice fed with a control (CTL), high-fat (HF), or very high-fat (VHF) diet for 15 weeks. Ang II–mediated contractions increased depending on dietary fat content (A). Analysis of immunoblots of AT1 receptor demonstrates increased expression after VHF diet compared with CTL or HF diet. ETA receptor protein expression was increased with HF and VHF diets (B). Responses to Ang II in aorta and carotid artery of C57BL/6J mice fed a CTL, HF, or HF diet plus darusentan (DAR) for 30 weeks (C). In the aorta, Ang II–induced contractions strongly increased after HF diet compared with control. Chronic darusentan treatment completely prevented the enhanced responses to Ang II (left). In the carotid artery, no effect was observed with any treatment (right). Vascular hydroxyl radical (•OH) formation is shown under basal conditions and the effect of ET-1 on •OH generation in aortic rings of control and obese animals in which the stimulatory effect was more or less abrogated (D). Data are mean plus or minus SEM. RFU—relative fluorescence units. (Adapted from Barton et al. [24], Mundy et al. [27•], and Mundy et al. [28] with permission of the American Heart Association, the European Society of Cardiology, and the American Physiological Society.)

As shown in Figure 2, obesity induced by high dietary fat intake increases ET-1–mediated contractions in the aorta in mice. Increased ETA receptor protein expression was seen after 15 weeks of treatment with a high-fat diet, compared with the control animals (Fig. 1). Therefore, upregulation of the ETA receptor and increases in ET-1–mediated contractility after increased dietary fat intake suggest that ET-1 could contribute to obesity-associated hypertension. Indeed, in obese and hypertensive patients, Cardillo et al. [47] demonstrated that increased body mass index is associated with augmented ETAdependent vasoconstrictor activity. Studies in mice given a high-fat diet reported increased renal but not pulmonary ACE activity. Treatment with the nonpeptide ETA receptor antagonist darusentan for 30 weeks markedly reduced renal but not pulmonary ACE activity [24], independent of ACE mRNA expression, body weight, or blood pressure [24]. Long-term treatment with another ETA-selective receptor antagonist reduced arterial blood pressure in rats fed a high-fat diet, again suggesting an

important role of the ETA receptor in regulating arterial blood pressure in obesity [48].

Effects on NO- and ROS-dependent function NO bioactivity NO is a short-lived vasodilating and growth-inhibitory molecule that is secreted by many vascular cells [49]. NO mediates endothelium-dependent relaxation in conduit arteries [50], inhibits platelet adhesion, and inhibits smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation [49,51•]. NO and citrulline are generated by catalyzation of NADPH and O2-dependent oxidation of L-arginine through the enzyme NO synthase (NOS) [49,51•]. The three NOS isoforms are eNOS, neuronal NOS (nNOS), and inflammatory NOS (iNOS) [49]. Upon activation of eNOS by the acetylcholine receptor, phospholipase C is activated, resulting in formation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) from phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate [49,51•]. IP3 increases intracellular Ca2+ and activates calmodulin, which then binds to eNOS, which generates NO [49]. NO

Pathogenesis of Hypertension: Genetic and Environmental Factors

Relaxation, % precontraction

0

Aorta

0

CTL HF

P  0.05 vs control

20

40



60

80

Relaxation, % precontraction

28

10

50

75

9

8 7 6 5 Acetylcholine, log mol/L

10

4

9 8 7 6 Acetylcholine, log mol/L

5

Carotid artery

Aorta

60

60 CTL HF

P  0.05 vs control

40

20

0

Change in tone, % precontraction

Contraction, % KCL 100 mmol/L

CTL HF VHF

25

100

100

40 20 0

20

40

60

11

A

Carotid artery

10 9 8 Endothelin, log mol/L

CTL

7

HF

VHF

B

Figure 2. Upper panels: Endothelium-dependent responses to acetylcholine in thoracic aorta (A), carotid artery (B), and femoral artery (C). Lower panels: Effects of endothelin-induced contractions in thoracic aorta (A); responses to reactive oxygen species (ROS) in carotid artery (B) and femoral artery (C). High-fat (HF) diet attenuated relaxant responses to acetylcholine at high concentrations compared with control (CTL) diet (A). No effects were observed with the different dietary treatments in the carotid artery (B), whereas very high-fat diet (VHF) enhanced acetylcholine-mediated relaxation in the femoral artery (C). In animals fed a HF diet, contractions to endothelin increased compared to CTL diet (A). In the carotid artery, no effects of diets were observed on ROS or hydroxyl radical (•OH)–induced contractions (B), whereas in the femoral artery, ROS/•OH contraction was reversed into relaxation in mice fed a HF or VHF diet compared with CTL (C). (Adapted from Traupe et al. [25] and Bhattacharya et al. [56].)

diffuses from endothelial cells to vascular smooth muscle cells, where it stimulates the activation of soluble guanylate cyclase, generating cyclic guanosine 3´,5´-monophosphate (cGMP) [49]. This causes a decrease of intracellular Ca2+ by activating protein kinase G (PKG), leading to vascular relaxation [49,52]. NO synthase can also be activated by phosphorylation of Akt [53,54]. Most recently, endothelium-dependent relaxation mediated by hydrogen peroxide (H 2O2)–mediated activation of cGMP-dependent protein kinase GIB (PKGIB) has also been demonstrated [55••]. All cardiovascular risk factors and most cardiovascular diseases (including hypertension) are associated with reduced NO bioactivity. We have studied the effects of

obesity on endothelium-dependent vascular reactivity in the aorta of mice fed a high-fat diet for 30 weeks [25]. Also studied were the effects of short-term treatments with diets of different fat content on carotid and femoral artery function of mice [56]. In obesity, endothelium-dependent relaxation in the aorta is counteracted by the release of prostanoid endothelium-dependent contracting factors at a high concentration of acetylcholine (Fig. 2), thus attenuating NO-dependent endothelium-mediated vasoreactivity [25]. In control mice, endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the femoral artery was lower than in the carotid artery (Fig. 2). Diet with very high-fat content had no effect on vasodilation in the carotid artery, but unexpectedly

Fat Intake and Cardiovascular Response Damjanovi and Barton 29

Femoral artery Relaxation, % precontraction



25

50 CTL HF VHF *P  0.05 vs control †P = 0.05 vs high-fat diet

75



100

Change in tone, % precontraction

10

9 8 7 6 Acetylcholine, log mol/L

5

Femoral artery

60 40 20 0

20

40



60

*P  0.05 vs control

CTL

HF

VHF

C Figure 2. Continued.

enhanced relaxation responses to acetylcholine in the femoral artery (Fig. 2). These data suggest an anatomic heterogeneity of endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity in different vascular beds in obesity, as has already been reported for lean animals [57,58]. Endothelium-mediated vasodilation in conduit arteries (eg, the aorta and carotid artery) is mediated mainly by NO [59], whereas in the femoral artery and the mesenteric artery endothelium-dependent relaxation is mediated largely by an endothelium-derived hyperpolarization factor [60,61]. ROS: novel regulators of obesity-associated vascular dysfunction Vascular endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells produce ROS, such as superoxide anion (O2-), H 2O2 , and hydroxyl radical (•OH) [62]. The formation of these oxidants is mainly catalyzed by NADPH oxidase, which consists of two membrane-associated components, p22phox and p91phox, and two cytosolic subunits, p47phox and

p67phox [62]. Moreover, an important aspect is the socalled uncoupling of eNOS, leading to the generation of O2- and NO, which react and result in the formation of peroxynitrite [51•]. This may also play an important role in the development of vascular dysfunction associated with obesity and other cardiovascular factors [51•]. Under normal conditions ROS are produced at low concentrations and function as signaling molecules regulating endothelial and vascular responsiveness [62,63]. Inhibition of H 2O2 by catalase decreases endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization in murine mesenteric arteries [64]. In contrast, under pathophysiologic conditions, increases of ROS result in functional vascular changes (eg, enhanced contractility, vascular smooth muscle cell growth, monocyte invasion, and inflammation) [62,63,65]. Figure 2 shows the effects of ROS on vascular tone in the carotid and femoral arteries of mice fed diets of different dietary fat content. The results indicated that ROS caused contraction in the carotid artery independent of diet, but caused relaxation in the femoral artery after high-fat feeding [56]. These data suggest ROS has a bifunctional role supporting either a vasoconstrictor or vasodilator function, depending on the vascular bed affected. Other investigators have reported a role of ROS as a regulator of obesity-associated vascular dysfunction and cellular injury [66,67]. Investigators have shown that ET-1, which modulates growth, and formation of ROS such as O2- and H 2O2 also regulates vascular •OH formation in mice (Fig. 1) [68,69]. This stimulating effect of ET-1 on vascular •OH formation was abrogated in obese animals [27•]. Results of recent studies show that activation of cGMP-dependent PKGIB by dimerization in response to H 2O2 is involved in endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization of aortic rings [55••]. These investigators also showed that insulin, which is increased in patients with insulin resistance and obesity, causes PKGIBmediated endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization and relaxation [55••].

Conclusions High dietary fat intake is associated with numerous changes in the cardiovascular system, which can be linked to the premature development of cardiovascular diseases. There is now compelling evidence that obesity causes distinct changes in vascular reactivity and contributes to the risk for developing hypertension. The RAAS, endothelin system, NO, and ROS are all involved in these functional changes. Given the deleterious effects of high dietary fat intake on vascular reactivity and its implications for obesity-related diseases, early measures are recommended to prevent obesity and its associated diseases, including hypertension [2,7,70,71].

Disclosures Original work of the authors is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the University of Zurich.

30

Pathogenesis of Hypertension: Genetic and Environmental Factors

References and Recommended Reading Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance 1.

Seidell JC: Obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes—a worldwide epidemic. Br J Nutr 2000, 83(Suppl 1):S5–S8. 2. Barton M, Furrer J: Cardiovascular consequences of the obesity pandemic: need for action. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2003, 12:1757–1759. 3. Jain A: Treating obesity in individuals and populations. BMJ 2005, 331:1387–1390. 4. O’Dowd A: More than 12 million adults in England will be obese by 2010. BMJ 2006, 333:463. 5. Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW: The role of low energy expenditure and sitting on obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes 2007, 56:2655–2667. 6. Barton M, Carmona R, Ortmann J, et al.: Obesity-associated activation of angiotensin and endothelin in the cardiovascular system. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2003, 35:826–837. 7. Bramlage P, Pittrow D, Wittchen HU, et al.: Hypertension in overweight and obese primary care patients is highly prevalent and poorly controlled. Am J Hypertens 2004, 17:904–910. 8. Messerli FH, Williams B, Ritz E: Essential hypertension. Lancet 2007, 370:591–603. 9. Carretero OA, Oparil S: Essential hypertension. Part I: definition and etiology. Circulation 2000, 101:329–335. 10. Guyton AC: Blood pressure control—special role of the kidneys and body fluids. Science 1991, 252:1813–1816. 11. Campese VM, Park J: The kidney and hypertension: over 70 years of research. J Nephrol 2006, 19:691–698. 12. Macdonald R: European GPs don’t know how to deal with obesity epidemic. BMJ 2005, 330:1348. 13. Barton M, Furrer J: Cardiovascular consequences of the obesity pandemic: need for action. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2003, 12:1757–1759. 14. Hall JE, Hildebrandt DA, Kuo J: Obesity hypertension: role of leptin and sympathetic nervous system. Am J Hypertens 2001, 14(6 Pt 2):103S–115S. 15. Hall JE, Crook ED, Jones DW, et al.: Mechanisms of obesity-associated cardiovascular and renal disease. Am J Med Sci 2002, 324:127–137. 16. Hall JE: The kidney, hypertension, and obesity. Hypertension 2003, 41(3 Pt 2):625–633. 17. Rocchini AP, Moorehead C, DeRemer S, et al.: Hyperinsulinemia and the aldosterone and pressor responses to angiotensin II. Hypertension 1990, 15(6 Pt 2):861–866. 18. Sharma AM: Is there a rationale for angiotensin blockade in the management of obesity hypertension? Hypertension 2004, 44:12–19. 19.•• Crowley SD, Gurley SB, Herrera MJ, et al.: Angiotensin II causes hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy through its receptors in the kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:17985–17990. Seminal paper demonstrating the essential role of the kidney in regulating systemic blood pressure via Ang II. 20. Rocchini AP, Key J, Bondie D, et al.: The effect of weight loss on the sensitivity of blood pressure to sodium in obese adolescents. N Engl J Med 1989, 321:580–585. 21. Rocchini AP, Katch V, Kveselis D, et al.: Insulin and renal sodium retention in obese adolescents. Hypertension 1989, 14:367–374. 22. Hall JE, Brands MW, Hildebrandt DA, Mizelle HL: Obesityassociated hypertension. Hyperinsulinemia and renal mechanisms. Hypertension 1992, 19(1 Suppl):I45–I55.

23.

Sechi LA: Mechanisms of insulin resistance in rat models of hypertension and their relationships with salt sensitivity. J Hypertens 1999, 17:1229–1237. 24. Barton M, Carmona R, Morawietz H, et al.: Obesity is associated with tissue-specific activation of renal angiotensinconverting enzyme in vivo: evidence for a regulatory role of endothelin. Hypertension 2000, 35(1 Pt 2):329–336. 25. Traupe T, Lang M, Goettsch W, et al.: Obesity increases prostanoid-mediated vasoconstriction and vascular thromboxane receptor gene expression. J Hypertens 2002, 20:2239–2245. 26. Traupe T, D’Uscio LV, Muenter K, et al.: Effects of obesity on endothelium-dependent reactivity during acute nitric oxide synthase inhibition: modulatory role of endothelin. Clin Sci (Lond) 2002, 103(Suppl 48):13S–15S. 27.• Mundy AL, Haas E, Bhattacharya I, et al.: Endothelin stimulates vascular hydroxyl radical formation: effect of obesity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007, Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00295.2007. This paper demonstrates dilator effects of the •OH radical in obesity and stimulation of •OH formation by ET-1. 28. Mundy AL, Haas E, Bhattacharya I, et al.: Fat intake modifies vascular responsiveness and receptor expression of vasoconstrictors: implications for diet-induced obesity. Cardiovasc Res 2007, 73:368–375. 29. Lago RM, Singh PP, Nesto RW: Diabetes and hypertension. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2007, 3:667. 30. Kramer H: Obesity and chronic kidney disease. Contrib Nephrol 2006, 151:1–18. 31. Weir MR, Dzau VJ: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: a specific target for hypertension management. Am J Hypertens 1999, 12(12 Pt 3):205S–213S. 32.• Sharma AM, Engeli S: The role of renin-angiotensin system blockade in the management of hypertension associated with the cardiometabolic syndrome. J Cardiometab Syndr 2006, 1:29–35. Excellent summary of the effects of RAAS blockade in obesity. 33. Mehta PK, Griendling KK: Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2007, 292:C82–97. 34. Nickenig G, Ostergren J, Struijker-Boudier H: Clinical evidence for the cardiovascular benefits of angiotensin receptor blockers. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2006, 7(Suppl 1):S1–S7. 35. Oro C, Qian H, Thomas WG: Type 1 angiotensin receptor pharmacology: signaling beyond G proteins. Pharmacol Ther 2007, 113:210–226. 36. Stepp DW, Boesen EI, Sullivan JC, et al.: Obesity augments vasoconstrictor reactivity to angiotensin II in the renal circulation of the Zucker rat. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007, 293:H2537–H2542. 37. Siddiqui AH, Hussain T: Enhanced AT1 receptor-mediated vasocontractile response to ANG II in endothelium-denuded aorta of obese Zucker rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007, 292:H1722–H1727. 38. Kedzierski RM, Yanagisawa M: Endothelin system: the double-edged sword in health and disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2001, 41:851–876. 39. Kawaguchi H, Sawa H, Yasuda H: Endothelin stimulates angiotensin I to angiotensin II conversion in cultured pulmonary artery endothelial cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1990, 22:839–842. 40. Moroi M, Fukazawa M, Ishikawa M, et al.: Effect of endothelin on angiotensin converting enzyme activity in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Gen Pharmacol 1996, 27:463–465. 41. Barton M, Shaw S, d’Uscio LV, et al.: Angiotensin II increases vascular and renal endothelin-1 and functional endothelin converting enzyme activity in vivo: role of ETA receptors for endothelin regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997, 238:861–865.

Fat Intake and Cardiovascular Response Damjanovi and Barton 31 42.

Fujisaki H, Ito H, Hirata Y, et al.: Natriuretic peptides inhibit angiotensin II-induced proliferation of rat cardiac fibroblasts by blocking endothelin-1 gene expression. J Clin Invest 1995, 96:1059–1065. 43. Luscher TF, Barton M: Endothelins and endothelin receptor antagonists: therapeutic considerations for a novel class of cardiovascular drugs. Circulation 2000, 102:2434–2440. 44. Barton M, d’Uscio LV, Shaw S, et al.: ET(A) receptor blockade prevents increased tissue endothelin-1, vascular hypertrophy, and endothelial dysfunction in salt-sensitive hypertension. Hypertension 1998, 31(1 Pt 2):499–504. 45. Mather KJ, Mirzamohammadi B, Lteif A, et al.: Endothelin contributes to basal vascular tone and endothelial dysfunction in human obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2002, 51:3517–3523. 46. Schiffrin EL: Vascular endothelin in hypertension. Vascul Pharmacol 2005, 43:19–29. 47. Cardillo C, Campia U, Iantorno M, Panza JA: Enhanced vascular activity of endogenous endothelin-1 in obese hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2004, 43:36–40. 48. da Silva AA, Kuo JJ, Tallam LS, Hall JE: Role of endothelin-1 in blood pressure regulation in a rat model of visceral obesity and hypertension. Hypertension 2004, 43:383–387. 49. Li H, Forstermann U: Nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of vascular disease. J Pathol 2000, 190:244–254. 50. Ignarro LJ, Buga GM, Wood KS, et al.: Endotheliumderived relaxing factor produced and released from artery and vein is nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987, 84:9265–9269. 51.• Forstermann U, Munzel T: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular disease: from marvel to menace. Circulation 2006, 113:1708–1714. Timely review of bifunctional role of NO synthase in cardiovascular disease. 52. Avogaro A, de Kreutzenberg SV: Mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in obesity. Clin Chim Acta 2005, 360:9–26. 53. Fulton D, Gratton JP, McCabe TJ, et al.: Regulation of endothelium-derived nitric oxide production by the protein kinase Akt. Nature 1999, 399:597–601. 54. Dimmeler S, Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, et al.: Activation of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells by Akt-dependent phosphorylation. Nature 1999, 399:601–605. 55.•• Burgoyne JR, Madhani M, Cuello F, et al.: Cysteine redox sensor in PKGIa enables oxidant-induced activation. Science 2007, 317:1393–1397. Seminal paper demonstrating NO-independent vasodilation via hyperpolarization in conduit arteries in response to insulin. 56. Bhattacharya I, Mundy AL, Widmer CC, et al.: Regional heterogeneity of functional changes in conduit arteries after high-fat diet. Obesity 2007, In press. 57. Barton M, Cosentino F, Brandes RP, et al.: Anatomic heterogeneity of vascular aging: role of nitric oxide and endothelin. Hypertension 1997, 30:817–824.

58.

59.

60.

61.

62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68.

69.

70.

71.

Widmer CC, Mundy AL, Kretz M, Barton M: Marked heterogeneity of endothelin-mediated contractility and contraction dynamics in mouse renal and femoral arteries. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2006, 231:777–781. Nagao T, Illiano S, Vanhoutte PM: Heterogeneous distribution of endothelium-dependent relaxations resistant to NG-nitro-L-arginine in rats. Am J Physiol 1992, 263(4 Pt 2): H1090–H1094. Brandes RP, Schmitz-Winnenthal FH, Feletou M, et al.: An endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor distinct from NO and prostacyclin is a major endothelium-dependent vasodilator in resistance vessels of wild-type and endothelial NO synthase knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:9747–9752. Shi Y, Ku DD, Man RY, Vanhoutte PM: Augmented endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated relaxations attenuate endothelial dysfunction in femoral and mesenteric, but not in carotid arteries from type I diabetic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006, 318:276–281. Taniyama Y, Griendling KK: Reactive oxygen species in the vasculature: molecular and cellular mechanisms. Hypertension 2003, 42:1075–1081. Touyz RM, Tabet F, Schiffrin EL: Redox-dependent signalling by angiotensin II and vascular remodelling in hypertension. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2003, 30:860–866. Matoba T, Shimokawa H, Nakashima M, et al.: Hydrogen peroxide is an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in mice. J Clin Invest 2000, 106:1521–1530. Diep QN, Amiri F, Touyz RM, et al.: PPARalpha activator effects on Ang II-induced vascular oxidative stress and inflammation. Hypertension 2002, 40:866–871. Furukawa S, Fujita T, Shimabukuro M, et al.: Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest 2004, 114:1752–1761. Noronha BT, Li JM, Wheatcroft SB, et al.: Inducible nitric oxide synthase has divergent effects on vascular and metabolic function in obesity. Diabetes 2005, 54:1082–1089. Li L, Fink GD, Watts SW, et al.: Endothelin-1 increases vascular superoxide via endothelin(A)-NADPH oxidase pathway in low-renin hypertension. Circulation 2003, 107:1053–1058. Wedgwood S, Black SM: Endothelin-1 decreases endothelial NOS expression and activity through ETA receptor-mediated generation of hydrogen peroxide. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2005, 288:L480–487. James J, Thomas P, Kerr D: Preventing childhood obesity: two year follow-up results from the Christchurch obesity prevention programme in schools (CHOPPS). BMJ 2007, 335:762. Wister A, Loewen N, Kennedy-Symonds H, et al.: One-year follow-up of a therapeutic lifestyle intervention targeting cardiovascular disease risk. CMAJ 2007, 177:859–865.