of Cincinnati. Cincinnati,. Ohio, November. 13-14, 1991 ..... Model Identifi- cation,". IEEE. Control Systems. Magazine,. Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 59-65, 1990. Duyar, A.
,//v'---//_
-/o!& NASA
Technical
Memorandum
105781
_
2Q
g
......
Implementation of a Model Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis for Actuation Faults of the Space Shuttle Main Engine _=_-
A. Duyar Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida and T.-H.
= Guo,
W. Merrill
Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio
Prepared Third
..................
for the
Annual
sponsored Cincinnati,
and J. Musgrave
Conference
on Health
by the University Ohio, November
Monitoring
for Space
Propulsion
Systems
of Cincinnati 13-14, 1991
-
(NASA-TM-105781) IMPLEMENTATION A MODEL BASED FAULT DETECTION OIA_NOSIS FOR ACTUATION FAULTS THE SPACE SHUTTLE MAIN ENGINE (NASA)
15
N93-1140I
OF AND OF
Unclas
p G3/14
0126266
,.
z
__
_L
-F-Z-
T
IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUE
OF A MODEL
FOR
ACTUATION
BASED
FAULTS
FAULT
DETECTION
OF THE
SPACE
AND
S HLrITLE
DIAGNOSIS MAIN
ENGINE
A. Duyar Mechanical Engineering Department Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida 33431 T.-H.
Guo,
National
W. Merrill
and J. Musgrave
Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland,
Ohio
44135
ABSTRACT In a previous detectionand which
study, Guo, Merrill and Duyar, diagnosis system for actuation
is a continuation
of the
previous
1990, reported a conceptual development faults of the space shuttle main engine.
work,
implements
the
developed
fault
of a fault This study,
detection
diagnosis scheme for the real time actuation fault diagnosis of the space shuttle main scheme will be used as an integral part of an intelligent control system demonstration at NASA
Lewis.
and hypothesis
The diagnosis testing
system
utilizes
for actuation,
sensor
a model
based
method
and performance
and
engine. The experiment
with real time identification
degradation
faults.
INTRODUCTION There
is a growing
increased
demand
reliability,
individual
reliabilities
and Lorenzo, focuses
with fault
on the development
the last two
based
fault
detection
Wunnenberg Beard, 1984,
and
1971, Patton
Jones,
analytical
redundancy. sensors
which
has
fault detection
1989,
1977).
As
opposed
to physical
detection
purposes,
model
of the
obtained give
system from
the difference
being the
between
Ge
These
considered. The
the signals
system
capabilities. (FDD)
attention
and
Caglayan,
and
Fang,
schemes
redundancy analytical
system.
control
methods,
considerable
Speyer,
and Sunman,
and the
(MerriU
This paper system
which
the so called
model
system.
detection
Montgomery
performance
be met by improving
and diagnosis
control
of fault
received 1978,
and
enhanced can
and accommodation
an intelligent
development
Wilbers
Potter
based
Clark,
with
demand
and also by an intelligent
for fault
measurements
quantities
1987,
1973,
redundant actual
of the
systems This
diagnostics
of such
approach
Frank,
et al, 1989,
by a mathematical
part
decades
control
components
detection,
of a model
as an integral
During
improved
and maintainability.
of system
1988)
can be used
for
durability
being
1976,
1988,
which
These
1986,
1974,
Wilsky,
measurements
utilizes
signals using
and the
of
from generated
are then compared
is done
measured
and
rely on the idea
uses
signals
Willsky,
Chow
basically
redundancy comparison
(Massoumrfia,
the signals
with
residual being
generatedby the mathematicalmodel. Hence, be def'med of the
as the determination
system
generation The
with
a priori
of residual
basis
each
and
of a fault
model def'ming the effects the residual vector in such Furthermore,
information
quantities
for the isolation
represented
their
by
the
i.e., a signal
faults
fault
detection
cause
has to be unique
schemes
changes
are either
in parameters
of the
system
through
obtained
fi:om a diagnostic
with a fault. A diagnostic model is obtained by deeming that its direction is associated with known fault signatures. to one fault
in order
A set of parity relations or a set of unknown input observers sensitive to a different fault, can be used for this purpose. All the
model
analysis.
is the fault signature,
associated a manner
signature
the model based fault detection and diagnosis can of a system from the comparison of the measurements
of faults
explicitly
or implicitly
of the system.
to accomplish
(Frank,
1990),
based
In the parameter
fault
each
isolation.
assigned
to be
on the assumption
estimation
approach,
that system
parameters are estimated on-line to monitor these changes for fault detection and diagnostics purposes. Therefore, it is a simpler, and a more direct approach than the others. This approach has been used for fault detection in a d.c. motor and pipe system by Filbert and Metzger, 1982. In this
approach
(Isermarm,
fault
decision
1984, Walker
logic
and B aumgarten,
can effectively
be used
in fault
It is believed
that
success
the
of
information
that
accomplished
by incorporating
in the
of the
model
multivariable assumed that component
faulty
parameter no more
faults
different
hypotheses
analyzed
for diagnostics
of the
of some
actuation
of the fault
In this paper, the
model
estimation
a FDD
scheme
depends
on
the
accurate
implementation
previous
be
used
the notion process.
for
type
same
diagnostics
purposes.
of fault parameters
These
at the
Hence,
The
fault
fault
Merrill of either
parameters
parameters
this
study,
this
and Himmelblau,
are estimated
(Duyar, Hdem, in the categories
time.
In
(Watanabe
fault parameters
of faults.
work,
implements
of the nominal
process
the
of the FDD
linear
is presented.
parameters scheme
detection and diagnosis technique Eldem and Saravanan, 1990, Guo, the results
appropriate
by using
a real
and Guo, actuation their
time
1990). It is or sensor or
are estimated
and
is
1983)
based
patterns
on
are then
developed
FDD
development This study, scheme
of an FDD which is a
for the
real
time
of the SSME.
faulty
fault
and
The model of the faulty process def'mes the effects associated is modelled to distinguish the faults, then the residuals carry can
the development of
etc., which
purposes.
diagnosis
of the
parameters
fuel consumption,
In a previous study, Guo, Merrill and Duyar, 1990, reported a conceptual system for actuation faults of the space shuttle main engine (SSME). continuation
physical
logic.
estimation algorithm than one type of fault
can occur
the estimates
199 l) such as efficiency,
diagnosis
modelling of the faulty process. with faults. If the faulty process meaningful
can also employ
is
model
Then,
of the SSME
the
fault
discussed.
Finally,
the
for actuation
faults
of the
diagnosis results SSME
is first presented. scheme
based
obtained are presented.
Next, on
the
through
the
The
fault
used in this study was previously reported in papers .(Duyar, Merrill and Duyar, 1990, Duyar and Eldem, 1991). However,
of the real time implementation
are new and are presented
in this paper.
MODEL
OF THE
It is assumed described
NORMAL
that
PROCESS
the dynamics
by the following
x(n+l) --A x(n) +B
of the SSME
can be modelled
as a discrete
time
Linear system
state equations
(I)
u(n)
(2)
y(n)--C x(n)
where
x, u and y are the kxl
B, C are the nominal
state,
matrices
system is in a-canonical relations hold:
the pxl
input
of the system
form
(Duyar,
and the qxl
with appropriate
Eldem,
Merrill
output
vectors
dimensions.
and Guo,
respectively
and
It is assumed
1990)
such
that
the
that the following
C = [0 :H -1]
A
(3)
= Ao + K H C
(4)
=o
(5)
(n c3,
(6)
-- o for
(HC)nA_K#=0
Here
K is a deadbeat
the observability by It. (HC),
indices
denotes
of
computer
using
developed
by Eldem
the power
level
preburner and
rotary
the
SSME
from
valve ratio,
(OPFV).
(7)
IX I
H are lower
observability
left triangular
index
which
l_j denotes
of the normal
process
1981).
1989,
70% valve
_,-
of HC while
of the valve
oxidizer
l