Table S.1. Preâinoculation ranking of heifers based
Recommend Documents
Evaluation of substitution saturation based on the DAMBE entropy test. Alignment Alignment .... Grivet, D., S. Jeandroz and J. M. Favre. 1999 Nad1 b/c intron ...
0.07. (0.06). 0.12*. (0.05). Drinking behavior. 0.05â . (0.03). 0.02. (0.06). Number of friends who drank. 0.01. (0.02). 0.00. (0.01). Marijuana use. 0.22***. (0.06).
Supplementary Table S1. Unfavorable immunocellular factors for patients with. DLBCL. Parameters. Unfavorable factor. Uni
Formation of a stable ternary complex between Cas1-Cas2, protospacer P1 and CRISPR- containing plasmid pCOLA-Z0. Samples contained combinations of ...
between D and E); IM as in C, FB indicate floral buds. ... Python script statistical_analysis.py (see Materials and Methods and Supplemental_software). .... To install and run the image analysis scripts, expand the file Supplemental_software.zip ...
Jul 11, 2011 - Details of ORFs identified in SCCmec XIa of ST130 MRSA isolate M10/0061. ORF/DR. Nucleotide coordinatesb. Comparative ORF (GenBank ...
Responses of individual GCaMP6F-expressing FoxP2.A tectal cells (related to ... Morphological parameters used to characterize FoxP2.A tectal cells and the ...
65,613 gain Hapmap28821-BTA-. 159936. Hapmap29845-BTA-152324. 3. 1. Unique. 213 chr5. 60,293,217 60,570,822. 277,606 gain BFGL-NGS-117229.
1) in brackets the corresponding strain carrying the reporter plasmid. 2) the data were ... ET12567 pUZ8002 p2. topA. Îp1 (MSz-4). topA .... mapping. (A) A magnified view of the topA upstream region showing the location of transcriptional start ...
Jul 15, 2018 - Bank Credit Card Limit ... Total Number of Credit Card Transactions ... The table, which is constructed for the 9 month data period (9DFM) ...
the ten points for the configurational isomerization (E)-9a (Z)-9a (B C) determined at 298, 303 and 308K (DMSO-d6). S12. Figure S7. The Arrhenius plot of the ...
1, 2, 3 mvp MOs are included in this order in Tables 1, 2, and S3. mvp MO1 is ... 351. 308. 88. 351. 313. 89. 242. 238. 98 mapk3. 158. 154. 97. 158. 156. 99. 124.
For microRNA, T24 cells in a 24-well plate were transfected with wild-type or mutant KLF4 or HMGA2 3'UTR plasmids with mimic miRNA negative control and.
14 58.7 (16) 36.2 (14) 52.1 (9) 69.0 (9) 48 15 59.3 (12) 36.8 (12) 52.0 (10) 69.2 (7) 41 16 61.1 (3) 39.7 (2) 55.7 (1) 67.1 (15) 21 1 This value denotes the ranking of each heifer for a+b by individual forage. Number 1 indicates largest a+b and 16 denotes smallest a+b for a particular feed. 2 This number is the sum of the a+b ranking values for all forages. A smaller number indicates greater total degradation per forage in all forages combined.
Table S.3. Post‐inoculation ranking of heifers based on in situ degradability values of kd (h‐1) for all feeds. Animal Barley Canola Alfalfa Timothy Total Number 1 0.043 (11) 0.040 (3) 0.066 (6) 0.043 (1) 122 2 0.034 (13) 0.030 (12) 0.116 (1) 0.043 (2) 31 3 0.039 (6) 0.037 (4) 0.080 (2) 0.042 (3) 22 4 0.038 (7) 0.034 (8) 0.062 (8) 0.041 (4) 27 5 0.042 (2) 0.042 (1) 0.066 (5) 0.041 (5) 54 6 0.037 (8) 0.026 (14) 0.070 (4) 0.040 (6) 57 7 0.039 (4) 0.037 (5) 0.055 (11) 0.040 (7) 30 8 0.032 (14) 0.033 (9) 0.071 (3) 0.035 (8) 44 9 0.029 (16) 0.027 (13) 0.049 (12) 0.034 (9) 31 10 0.035 (10) 0.024 (15) 0.045 (13) 0.033 (10) 45 11 0.034 (11) 0.030 (11) 0.043 (14) 0.032 (11) 48 12 0.040 (3) 0.040 (2) 0.060 (10) 0.032 (12) 10 13 0.034 (12) 0.032 (10) 0.064 (7) 0.030 (13) 31 14 0.032 (15) 0.020 (16) 0.032 (16) 0.029 (14) 47 15 0.039 (5) 0.035 (7) 0.061 (9) 0.029 (15) 15 16 0.036 (9) 0.035 (6) 0.040 (15) 0.025 (16) 40 1 This value denotes the rank of heifer for kd of each individual forage. Number 1 indicates largest kd, or fastest digester and 16 denotes smallest kd or slowest digester for a particular feed. 2 This number is the sum of the kd ranking values for all forages. A smaller number indicates faster degradation in all forages combined.
Table S. 4. Post‐inoculation ranking of heifers based on in situ potentially degradable fraction (a+b) for all feeds. Animal Barley Canola Alfalfa Timothy Total Number 1 59.5 (41) 37.0 (6) 56.9 (1) 71.2 (1) 122 2 58.5 (8) 37.1 (5) 55.2 (6) 67.3 (12) 31 3 59.5 (3) 35.5 (10) 56.1 (2) 69.4 (6) 22 4 59.4 (5) 38.8 (3) 53.9 (10) 68.5 (9) 27
5 57.6 (12) 33.3 (16) 52.9 (13) 67.2 (13) 54 6 56.9 (14) 34.9 (12) 52.1 (15) 67.1 (15) 57 7 60.0 (2) 34.5 (13) 53.9 (9) 67.5 (11) 30 8 56.3 (16) 34.3 (14) 53.5 (12) 70.4 (2) 44 9 59.4 (6) 34.9 (11) 54.4 (8) 69.5 (5) 31 10 58.5 (9) 38.0 (4) 51.9 (16) 66.0 (16) 45 11 58.4 (10) 35.5 (9) 52.4 (14) 67.2 (14) 48 12 61.1 (1) 38.9 (2) 55.8 (3) 70.2 (4) 10 13 58.2 (11) 37.0 (7) 55.5 (5) 68.5 (8) 31 14 56.7 (15) 33.7 (15) 54.8 (7) 68.4 (10) 47 15 58.7 (7) 41.4 (1) 55.7 (4) 70.4 (3) 15 16 57.5 (13) 35.5 (8) 53.8 (11) 69.3 (7) 40 1 This value denotes the ranking of each heifer for a+b by individual forage. Number 1 indicates largest a+b and 16 denotes smallest a+b for a particular feed. 2 This number is the sum of the a+b ranking values for all forages. A smaller number indicates greater total degradation per forage in all forages combined.
Table S. 5. Rate of passage (kp), DMI, and body weights of heifers pre and post inoculation. Animal kp pre kp post DMI pre DMI post BW pre BW post Number %/h %/h kg/d kg/d kg kg 1 2.47 2.54 5.38 6.66 473.5 502.8 2 1.69 1.74 4.81 6.34 490.5 516.8 3 2.28 2.07 4.91 5.37 419.0 440.3 4 2.21 2.12 5.92 6.35 480.5 494.0 5 1.69 2.02 5.28 5.90 410.0 442.3 6 3.20 2.71 5.18 6.83 415.0 452.3 7 1.68 2.30 5.19 6.28 448.5 491.0 8 1.83 1.82 5.61 6.15 494.0 512.7 9 2.20 1.92 5.92 5.69 463.0 487.5 10 1.61 1.89 6.09 6.75 458.5 484.5 11 2.30 1.80 5.53 6.42 441.5 465.8 12 2.81 2.25 4.74 6.09 430.5 468.5 13 2.33 1.84 4.83 5.82 421.5 445.3 14 2.89 2.23 5.43 6.29 421.0 455.0 15 1.88 2.28 5.91 6.60 455.0 485.3 16 2.40 2.12 5.29 5.49 431.0 461.0
Table S. 6. Pearson correlations before vs. after inoculation. Variable r P‐value Barley