Table S13. Logistic regression on rating the importance of ... - PLOS

Recommend Documents

Table S28. Logistic regression on ideology - PLOS

Citations (n = 1057) Mendeley reader/. Zotero library counts reflect value. (n = 773). Coef. (S.E.). Coef. (S.E.). Coef. (S.E.). Coef. (S.E.). (Intercept). -0.09. (0.34).

Table S29. Logistic regression on ideology - PLOS

Discipline. Arts & Humanities. 0.87. (0.60). 0.19. (0.29). -0.47. (0.26). Computer Sciences. 1.13. (1.06). -0.40. (0.47). -0.31. (0.41). Engineering. 1.22. (0.77). -0.01.

Table S26. Logistic regression on ideology - PLOS

0.29. (0.66). Computer Sciences. 0.37. (1.10). 0.57. (0.65). 0.31. (1.09). Engineering. -0.65. (0.59). 0.57. (0.48). -0.20. (0.64). Environmental Sciences 16.02.

Table S21. Logistic regression on the level of engagement - PLOS

Mendeley/Zotero allows me to keep up to date with current research in the field. (n = 884). Coef. (S.E.). Coef. (S.E.). Coef. (S.E.). Coef. (S.E.). (Intercept). -1.73*** ...

S13 Table. - Plos

SUT737/313. SUT798/387. SUT827. SUT830. tA(AGC)G, tA(AGC)J. tA(AGC)K1 ... tQ(UUG)D2. tR(ACG)K. tR(ACG)L. tR(CCU)J (HSX1). tR(UCU)B. tR(UCU)D.

Table S13 - PLOS

Cross-module. N/A. LSB4. 18.29. 20.08. -. 13.25. N/A. N/A. N/A. Cross-module. N/A. TWF1. -. -. -. -. N/A. N/A. N/A. N/A. Summed Interaction Score. Time frame.

S13 Table - PLOS

Ireland. 629. 896. 20075. 21937. 3656. 379. 47572. Denmark. 1106. 762 ... 1815. 62. 24288. Slovenia. 78. 203. 6392. 11179. 3254. 239. 21345. Cyprus. 0. 139.

S13 Table - PLOS

CYP4B1. -4.79. -5.24. 4.11e-06 5.14e-05 4.15 2.17 0.56. -0.80. -0.47. ENSG00000114854. TNNC1. -5.00. -6.17. 1.31e-04 4.38e-04 0.84 3.04 0.51. -0.94. -0.48.

S4 Table. Multinomial logistic regression analysis of the ... - PLOS

Never married. 0.63 (0.37, 1.05) 0.87 (0.57, 1.32) 0.95 (0.41, 2.21). 0.87 (0.26, 2.89) ... Sometime difficult. 1.23 (1.03, 1.45) 1.09 (0.93, 1.28) 1.45 (1.03, 2.06).

Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis: Factors ... - PLOS

Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis: Factors associated with the depressive emotion among the informal caregivers of disabled elders (N=444).

S3 Table: Model A Multivariable logistic regression analysis in ... - PLOS

S3 Table: Model A Multivariable logistic regression analysis in derivation dataset after exclusion of all clinical TB. (N=499). Predictor. Patients with TB.

Table S13. -â -â -â -â Table S13. Table 1 done again, allowing ... - PLOS

q2Îr. q3Îr. q4Îr Ï2 test P value. (Bonferroni correction). A. charge score. 1. 578. 630. 700. 766. 1.3e-â06 (3.8e-â06). 0. 270. 256. 255. 242. 0.67. -â1. 496. 457.

Table S2. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression

Table S2. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis of variables associated with ischaemic heart disease and myocardial infarction in patients with ...

Table S1. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression ...

Patients who have ever smoked and carry the TGFB1+868 TC genotype, compared with all remaining patients. Forward stepwise selection was used to ...

Table S13: Page 1 of 2 Table S13: Putative motility genes more ... - Plos

anthracis Sterne (34F2). Locus Tag #. Gene Name. Fold. Difference in O2. B. cereus G9241. BCE_G9241_0373 methyl-accepting_chemotaxis_protein_putative.

Supplemental Table S13 Description of the genes deleted in ... - PLOS

Supplemental Table S13 Description of the genes deleted in the P. falciparum strains analyzed; Deletions are only reported for genes with â¥ six probes.

Table S13. Summary statistics for the log of polymorphism ... - PLOS

Table S13. Summary statistics for the log of polymorphism/divergence ratio in human- mouse conserved sequences (HMCS) versus unfiltered data. Data. Min.

Logistic Regression

Chapter 12. Logistic Regression. 12.1 Modeling Conditional Probabilities. So far, we either looked at estimating the conditional expectations of continuous.

Logistic Regression

6.2 Logistic Regression and Generalised Linear Models. 6.3 Analysis Using R. 6.3.1 ESR and Plasma Proteins. We can now fit a logistic regression model to the ...

Logistic Regression

This note follow Business Research Methods and Statistics using SPSS by ... http ://www.uk.sagepub.com/burns/website%20material/Chapter%2024%20-.

Logistic Regression

Slide 1. Logistic Regression – 14 Oct 2009. Logistic Regression. Essential Medical Statistics. Applied Logisitic Regression Analysis. Kirkwood and Sterne.

The Logistic Regression Model

The Logistic Regression Model (LRM) – Interpreting Parameters. [This handout steals heavily from Linear probability, logit, and probit models, by John Aldrich.

Leukemia Prediction Using Sparse Logistic Regression - PLOS

Aug 30, 2013 - Kappa-FIT. Lambda-PE CD45-ECD CD19-PC5 CD20-PC7. Tube 3. CD7-FITC. CD4-PE. CD45-ECD CD8-PC5. CD2-PC7. Tube 4. CD15-FITC.

Multilevel logistic regression for SRH - PLOS

Supporting information 1 - Table A: Multilevel logistic regression for SRH (18+ yrs.) Higher Edu. S.E. Rep. Rights S.E. Provider S.E. Elect. Off. S.E. Manage.

Table S13. Logistic regression on rating the importance of ... - PLOS

Download PDF

0 downloads 0 Views 77KB Size Report

Comment

(0.29). (0.17). Education. High School. -1.16. 0.44. -1.51. -0.15. 0.83. (0.68). (0.81). (0.85). (1.08). (0.76). Bachelor. -0.24. 0.55. -0.11. -0.44. 0.29. (0.49). (0.33).

Table S13. Logistic regression on rating the importance of Mendeley/Zotero at various stages of a research project. Starting a new project (n = 1187) (Intercept) Platform Zotero Education High School Bachelor Doctorate X2 Discipline Arts & Humanities Computer Sciences Engineering Environmental Sciences Life Sciences Mathematical Sciences Physical Sciences Psychology None Others X2 Occupation Professor Lecturer Researcher

Performing the project (n = 1044)

Writing (n = 1234)

Preparing the manuscript for submission (n = 1164) 2.76*** (0.53)

Disseminating my manuscript (n = 863)

2.75*** (0.60)

0.48 (0.37)

4.47*** (0.87)

0.18 (0.34)

1.01** (0.33)

0.38* (0.19)

0.83 (0.46)

0.77** (0.29)

-1.09*** (0.17)

-1.16 (0.68) -0.24 (0.49) -0.16 (0.34) 3.0

0.44 (0.81) 0.55 (0.33) -0.84*** (0.22) 20.7***

-1.51 (0.85) -0.11 (0.66) 0.88 (0.55) 6.8

-0.15 (1.08) -0.44 (0.38) 0.26 (0.33) 2.4

0.83 (0.76) 0.29 (0.27) -0.42* (0.20) 8.0*

-0.53 (0.43) 0.4 (0.79) -0.24 (0.47) 0.39 (0.79) 0.22 (0.40) -0.24 (1.10) 0.01 (0.60) -0.61 (0.53) -1.55* (0.79) 1.13 (0.77) 12.2

1.25*** (0.32) 0.46 (0.43) 1.02** (0.36) 0.05 (0.40) 0.26 (0.23) 0.90 (0.82) 0.78 (0.42) -0.71* (0.34) -0.71 (0.61) 0.44 (0.31) 37.0***

-0.07 (0.62) 14.96 (881.09) 0.22 (0.83) 0.01 (1.11) 0.37 (0.61) 14.23 (1,786.45) -0.51 (0.85) -0.69 (0.74) -0.75 (0.99) 0.85 (0.84) 4.7

0.41 (0.41) -0.24 (0.50) 0.70 (0.52) 0.73 (0.78) 0.94* (0.39) -0.19 (1.09) 0.28 (0.58) -0.09 (0.50) -0.93 (0.64) 0.70 (0.47) 14.8

0.04 (0.26) 0.44 (0.37) 1.33*** (0.32) 1.08* (0.44) 0.41 (0.23) 0.55 (0.66) 0.55 (0.35) -0.46 (0.36) -0.19 (0.59) 0.16 (0.28) 29.9***

-0.37 (0.45) 0.57 (0.77) -0.64

0.52 (0.28) 1.83 (0.62) 0.59**

-0.55 (0.68) -0.27 (0.83) -0.27

-0.06 (0.44) -0.13 (0.53) -0.11

0.13 (0.27) 1.09** (0.36) -0.01

Practitioner None X2 Gender Female Other X2 Age

Starting a new project (n = 1187)

Performing the project (n = 1044)

Writing (n = 1234)

Preparing the manuscript for submission (n = 1164) (0.39) -0.56 (0.38) -0.59 (0.55) 2.9

Disseminating my manuscript (n = 863)

(0.39) 0.00 (0.51) 0.05 (0.71) 4.6

(0.25) 0.81* (0.30) 0.06** (0.41) 16.4**

(0.64) -0.88 (0.59) 0.37 (1.27) 3.0

0.39 (0.29) -0.24 (0.79) 2.2

-0.02 (0.18) -0.70 (0.56) 1.6

0.17 (0.43) -2.27*** (0.68) 13.0**

0.23 (0.27) -1.68** (0.56) 11.5**

0.03 (0.16) -1.67* (0.81) 4.4

0.00 (0.01)

0.01 (0.01)

-0.03 (0.02)

-0.02 (0.01)

-0.01 (0.01)

Notes: The numbers in the parentheses are standard errors. * p < 0.05

** p < 0.01

*** p < 0.001 (two-tailed tests)

(0.23) 0.34 (0.25) -0.03 (0.40) 11.7*