Table S29. Logistic regression on ideology - PLOS

0 downloads 0 Views 62KB Size Report
Discipline. Arts & Humanities. 0.87. (0.60). 0.19. (0.29). -0.47. (0.26). Computer Sciences. 1.13. (1.06). -0.40. (0.47). -0.31. (0.41). Engineering. 1.22. (0.77). -0.01.
Table S29. Logistic regression on ideology –– Online privacy, visibility, and scholarly identity. Maintaining my privacy online is very important to me. (n = 1112)

Having a profile on Mendeley/Zotero makes me more visible in my field. (n = 736) Coef. (S.E.) -0.99** (0.38)

(Intercept)

Coef. 2.49***

(S.E.) (0.66)

Platform Zotero

0.59

(0.35)

-1.48***

Education High School Bachelor Doctorate X2

-0.79 -0.53 -0.52 2.4

(1.09) (0.51) (0.40)

Discipline Arts & Humanities Computer Sciences Engineering Environmental Sciences Life Sciences Mathematical Sciences Physical Sciences Psychology None Others X2

0.87 1.13 1.22 0.49 0.33 -0.34 1.58 0.03 -0.65 -0.24 9.3

(0.60) (1.06) (0.77) (0.79) (0.41) (1.12) (1.05) (0.67) (0.91) (0.51)

Occupation Professor Lecturer Researcher Practitioner None X2

-0.17 15.23 -0.34 0.23 -0.76 2.8

(0.52) (804.66) (0.45) (0.58) (0.62)

Gender Female Other X2

0.52 -0.65 3.6

(0.33) (0.80)

0.01

(0.02)

Age

Note: * p < 0.05

** p < 0.01 ***

Being visible online is critical for my scholarly identity. (n = 874) Coef. 1.27***

S.E. (0.37)

(0.20)

0.20

(0.18)

0.34 0.32 -0.33 4.5

(0.67) (0.30) (0.22)

-0.18 -0.23 0.19 1.9

(0.65) (0.29) (0.20)

0.19 -0.40 -0.01 0.39 0.01 -0.48 -0.08 0.08 -14.84 0.50 6.0

(0.29) (0.47) (0.33) (0.47) (0.25) (0.85) (0.44) (0.42) (474.56) (0.30)

-0.47 -0.31 -0.52 -0.76 -0.40 -1.05 -1.48*** -0.42 -0.01 0.02 20.5*

(0.26) (0.41) (0.32) (0.44) (0.24) (0.62) (0.37) (0.37) (0.64) (0.31)

0.16 1.31*** -0.16 0.47 -0.31 17.4**

(0.29) (0.39) (0.26) (0.29) (0.47)

0.20 0.08 -0.05 -0.10 -0.67 5.6

(0.28) (0.36) (0.24) (0.27) (0.37)

-0.19 -0.33 1.3

(0.18) (0.63)

-0.14 0.86 2.1

(0.17) (0.79)

(0.01)

0.00

(0.01)

0.03**

p < 0.001 (two-tailed tests)