1
FINAL AUTHOR COPY CITATION: Maas, M., McDaniel, B. T., Feinberg, M. E., & Jones, D. E. (2015). Division of labor and multiple domains of sexual satisfaction among first-time parents. Journal of Family Issues. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X15604343 Link to Article: http://jfi.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/09/03/0192513X15604343.abstract
Division of Labor and Multiple Domains of Sexual Satisfaction Among First-time Parents
Megan K. Maas Brandon T. McDaniel Mark E. Feinberg Damon E. Jones
The Pennsylvania State University
This research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1 K23 HD042575) and the National Institute of Mental Health (R21 MH06412501), to Mark E. Feinberg, principal investigator, and the National Institute of Drug Abuse (T32 DA017629). We are grateful to Michelle Hostetler for her help with data collection and project management.
Please address all correspondence to Megan Maas (
[email protected]).
2 Division of Labor and Multiple Domains of Sexual Satisfaction Among First-time Parents Although sexual satisfaction is a unique contributor to happiness in romantic relationships (Impett, Muise, & Peragine, 2013), it often goes unmeasured in studies examining first-time parents (Litzinger & Gordon, 2005). The lack of data regarding sexual satisfaction among new parents leaves an incomplete understanding of couple functioning at a time when sexual activity changes in terms of frequency and meaning (Ahlborg, Dahlöf, & Hallberg, 2005; Pacey, 2004) and at a time when relationship satisfaction is important not just for the couple, but also for the child (Feinberg et al., 2009). Generally, greater sexual frequency and satisfaction are associated with relationship stability (Ade-Ridder, 1990; Yeh, Lorenz, Wickrama, Conger & Elder, 2006), regulation of stress, and psychological well-being (Davison, Bell, LaChina, Holden, & Davis, 2009; Ein-Dor & Hirschberger, 2012). Therefore, understanding sexual satisfaction among first-time parents would provide more understanding of functioning after the birth of a child and further inform couple-based prevention efforts. At the transition to parenthood, the focus of the couple relationship shifts as the coparenting aspect of the relationship emerges (McHale et al., 2002). Coparenting encompasses how partners work together in parenting their child but does not include the romantic aspects of the couple relationship (Feinberg, 2003). Although couples often experience great pleasure from their new baby, many also experience a decline in pleasure from their relationship (Pacey, 2004), as the baby takes precedence over couple-level issues (Cowan & Cowan, 1992). Couples may also experience an increase in conflict as they sort out a myriad of new tasks and responsibilities, balance new roles, and function with reduced sleep (Cowan & Cowan, 1992; McDaniel & Teti, 2012). Thus, the transition to parenthood brings a multitude of new stressors as well as a decline in relationship and sexual satisfaction (Ahlborg, Strandmark, & Dahlöf, 2000; Lawrence et al.,
3 2008; Pacey, 2004). Yet, less is known about how specific domains of the new parent role predict specific domains of sexual satisfaction. Sexual satisfaction is shaped by the interplay of factors at three levels: the individual, the relationship, and the broader culture (Bancroft, Loftus, & Long, 2003; Carpenter, Nathanson, & Kim, 2009). Accordingly, the current study aims to identify predictors of sexual satisfaction after the transition to parenthood within the context of the individual’s experience of stress, the relational experience of coparenting and division of labor, and the sociocultural experience of gender. In addition, this study aims to explore non-intercourse aspects of the sexual relationship such as cuddling, romance, and passion as limited work has explored multiple domains of satisfaction with the sexual relationship after the transition to parenthood. Stress and Sexual Satisfaction Over the past 20 years, since Morokoff and Gillilland’s (1993) study of the link between stress and sexual frequency, the majority of research on sexuality within the context of marriage has focused on stress. However, findings have been inconsistent. Some research suggests sexual activity decreases at times of stress, whereas other studies indicate sexual activity increases (Bancroft et al., 2003; Morokoff & Gillilland, 1993). Additionally, daily stress predicts less sexual activity within the relationship for women who are dissatisfied with their marriage and more sexual activity within the relationship for men who are dissatisfied with their marriage (Bodenmann, Ledermann & Bradbury, 2007). These findings highlight the nuanced nature of the relationship between gender, stress, and sexuality. New stressors related to the transition to parenthood include sleep disruption, work and family balance demands, increases in role overload, and changes in identity (Cowan & Cowan, 1992; McDaniel & Teti, 2012). Daily hassles, especially related to parenting a temperamentally
4 reactive or fussy child, can result in elevated parenting stress (e.g., Crnic & Low, 2002), which has been shown to negatively affect couple relationship quality (Lavee, Sharlin, & Katz, 1996). Division of Labor, Satisfaction, and Sexuality First-time parents are faced with determining how to divide responsibilities for paid and household labor. Time-diary-data has shown that there has been a general decline in total time women spend on housework since 1965 as more women have entered the paid-labor force; yet for men, time spent doing housework has doubled (Bianchi, Milkie, Sayer, & Robinson, 2000). Despite these trends, many women feel overburdened as they work outside the home and still do the majority of the housework in what is known as the “second shift” (Hoschild, 1989). The effects of juggling work and home life have typically been focused on mothers. Juggling both paid work and responsibilities at home has been viewed as potentially positive by those citing the ‘enhancement hypothesis’. The enhancement hypothesis (Marks, 1977) suggests that participating in multiple realms of life (e.g. work, family, social, spiritual) creates a feeling of balance and satisfaction. In this view, parents—especially mothers—who both work outside the home and inside the home may be better adjusted and enjoy their romantic relationship. However, more attention is needed to understand the role of hours spent on work outside the home, given the demand of full-time employment on new parents—especially mothers—who may still be breastfeeding or who want to spend more time bonding with their infants while still capitalizing on intellectually or socially stimulating processes at work outside the home. In contrast, the ‘scarcity hypothesis’ (Beilby & Beilby, 1989) suggests that strain from engagement in multiple areas leads to feelings of being overwhelmed. Several studies have investigated the association between the division of household labor and relationship satisfaction (Barstad, 2014). Mothers generally spend more time per week multitasking to complete
5 household chores than fathers, and this time is associated with an increase in overall negative emotion and couple conflict (Barstad, 2014; Offer & Schneider, 2011). However, the relationship between balancing multiple roles and sexual satisfaction is unclear. Some prior research has not shown a significant difference between women who work exclusively inside the home versus women who are employed full-time or part-time outside the home on measures of frequency of intercourse, sexual satisfaction, and decreased sexual desire (Hyde, DeLamater & Hewitt, 1998). However, a study using the National Survey of Households and Families found that couples who have a more traditional division of household and paid labor have sex more frequently (Kornrich, Brines, & Leupp, 2013). Yet another study using the same data, found that dual-earner couples who ‘work hard’ also ‘play hard’, meaning that couples who spent more time overall on household labor also had sex more frequently than couples who spent less time on household labor (Gager, & Yabiku, 2010). Furthermore, qualitative work suggests that husbands and wives feel that sex is important for their marriage, but conflict arises when couples try to fit sex into busy schedules (Elliott & Umberson, 2008). Missing in much of the research on workload and sexual satisfaction is a recognition of the importance of satisfaction with the division of labor, instead of simply the division of hours spent on labor. Satisfaction with the division of labor is also linked to perceptions of fairness in a couple’s division of household labor. For example, in a study of dual-income lawyers, men were more likely to perceive the distribution of tasks as unfair for their spouse when their spouse was doing the majority of the housework, whereas women were more likely to perceive the distribution of tasks as unfair for themselves, regardless of how much time was spent on the tasks relative to their spouse (Young, Wallace, & Polacheck, 2013). In contrast, women are more likely to report fairness in the division of chores if their own or their husbands’ personal
6 commitment is higher (Tang & Curran, 2012), which suggests that the division of labor is as much an emotional arrangement as it is a practical one. Therefore, the decline in marital satisfaction after the transition to motherhood can be partly attributed to perceptions of unfairness in the division of labor (Dew & Wilcox, 2011; Milkie et al., 2002; Wilkee, Ferree, & Radcliff, 1998). Moreover, wives’ perceptions of father involvement in childrearing are associated with both partners’ marital satisfaction (Galovan, Holmes, Schramm, & Lee, 2013). Therefore, the current study extends research in this area by examining how the number of hours spent on paid labor, satisfaction with the division of labor inside the home, and subjective feelings of role overload among first-time parents predict later sexual satisfaction. Gender Differences in Sexual Satisfaction Finally, integrating both biological and sociocultural perspectives on gender, an overarching goal of this study was to expand what is known about gender differences in sexual satisfaction. Changes in sexuality are drastic and variable after the transition to parenthood. For example, some couples resume sexual activity before the six-week post-birth checkup while others remain abstinent for many months (Dixon, Booth, & Powell, 2000). In general, sexual functioning changes in numerous ways after childbirth for mothers and fathers. On a biological level, both mothers’ and fathers’ experiences of sleep deprivation and lack of “adult only” time are obstacles to sexual activity after the birth of a child (Woolett & Parr, 1997). For new mothers, there is a dramatic decrease in estrogen immediately after birth and a gradual decrease in estrogen and progesterone for the next six to twelve months depending on breast-feeding status (Bancroft, 1989). This drop in hormone levels is associated with decreased sexual desire (Bancroft, 1989). There is also a decrease in pleasure and orgasm due to physical complications from vaginal births such as tearing or complications with the incision
7 from cesarean births that can last up to six months (Pacey, 2004). One study of 484 post-birth women found 80% of women experienced at least one sexual problem at three months post-birth and 67% were still experiencing sexual problems at six months post-birth (Barrett et al., 2000). Overall, the most commonly cited reason for a decrease in sexual activity among new mothers during the first six months after birth is a lack of sexual desire (De Judicibus & McCabe, 2002). Although little is known about fathers’ sexuality post-birth, a study of Scandinavian first-time fathers reported much greater sexual desire than mothers (Ahlborg et al., 2000). On a sociocultural level, there is evidence that the context of the sexual relationship is crucial to women’s sexual response more so than men’s (Leiblum, 2002). Women’s sexual desire more often requires a coherent narrative that ties what is occurring sexually with the relational dynamics, while men tend to desire sex regardless of what is occurring in the relationship (Leiblum, 2002). Thus, being more satisfied with the overall relationship functioning is associated with higher sexual satisfaction in women (Witting et al., 2008) but not men. For women, intimacy tends to be a pathway to sexuality, but for most men, sexuality is a pathway to intimacy (Kohler-Riessman, 1990). This is seen in men reporting the reason they feel disconnected from a partner is because they are not having frequent sex, while women more often report that the reason they are not having sex is because they do not feel intimate with their partner (Hatfield & Rapson, 1987). Based on these findings, we expected relational and contextual factors such as satisfaction with the division of labor and satisfaction with coparenting quality to be more salient predictors of sexual satisfaction for mothers than fathers. The Current Study In this study, we conceptualized and measured multiple domains of sexual satisfaction such as satisfaction with the overall sex life, frequency of sex, frequency of cuddling, amount of
8 romance and amount of passion. Given limited literature in sub-domains of sexual satisfaction, we were also interested in determining which non-intercourse behaviors and qualities (e.g., cuddling, romance, passion) would be predicted by relational and contextual factors. Although couples do not substitute non-intercourse behaviors (e.g. cuddling) for intercourse per se, even as intercourse decreases (Ahlborg et al., 2005), cuddling is a means by which couples often continue to validate each other as romantic partners as they cope with a decrease in sexual intercourse after the transition to parenthood (Ahlborg & Strandmark, 2006). Research examining non-intercourse behaviors in adulthood is limited, despite the prevalence of these behaviors throughout adolescence and emerging adulthood (O’Sullivan, Cheng, Harris, & Brooks‐Gunn, 2007). Even less research examines if couples are satisfied with non-intercourse behaviors and qualities of the sexual relationship or what predicts satisfaction with nonintercourse behaviors and qualities of the sexual relationship. The overarching research question for our study was: How do relational and contextual factors of first-time parents such as coparenting, parenting stress, role overload, number of work hours and satisfaction with the division of household labor predict later sexual satisfaction for mothers and fathers? Well-validated measures (perceptions of coparenting, role overload, parenting stress, housework satisfaction and childcare satisfaction) at 6 months post-birth were used to predict overall sexual satisfaction and four sub-domains of sexual satisfaction (satisfaction with the frequency of sex, romance, passion & excitement, and cuddling) at 12 months post-birth with data from a randomized coparenting intervention. For mothers, we hypothesized that (H1) more satisfaction with overall coparenting and the division of household labor would predict more sexual satisfaction and (H2) more parenting stress and role overload would predict less sexual satisfaction. These hypotheses for mothers are
9 based on findings that the overall quality of the couple’s relationship is more highly linked with sexual satisfaction, and stressors are greater impediments for sexual functioning, among women compared to men (Bodenmann et al., 2007; Leiblum, 2002). In line with both the enhancement and scarcity hypotheses, we hypothesized (H3) a curvilinear association between paid work hours and sexual satisfaction for mothers such that a low to moderate amount of hours of paid labor would enhance maternal well-being, but that a high amount of paid labor would create stress for new mothers which affects energy, interest, and enjoyment in sexuality. For fathers, it was hypothesized that (H4) stressors such as higher parenting stress or role overload would predict less sexual satisfaction similarly to mothers. However, as men’s sexual desires and behaviors are less linked to feelings about the relationship and emotional intimacy compared to women (Leiblum, 2002), we hypothesized that (H5) their perceptions of coparenting quality would not predict their sexual satisfaction. As fathers often participate less frequently than mothers in household labor tasks, and perhaps as a result have not been shown to be as sensitive to the division of labor as women (Dew & Wilcox, 2011), we hypothesized that (H6) the satisfaction with the division of labor would not predict sexual satisfaction for fathers. We also hypothesized that (H7) work hours would not be associated with sexual satisfaction for fathers given the limited variability in fathers’ work hours. Finally, differential hypotheses with regards to each specific sub-domain of sexuality were withheld as prior research involving multidomain sexual satisfaction measures is limited. Method Participants Participants (N = 169 heterosexual couples) in the present study were from a longitudinal study designed to test the intervention program Family Foundations, which is a coparenting
10 intervention program for couples during the transition to parenthood (
, 2008). To be
eligible for the study, first-time parents must have been at least 18 years of age, living together and expecting their first child. Couples were mostly (81%) recruited from childbirth education programs at two hospitals located in the Northeast. All other couples were recruited from doctors’ offices (8%), newspapers ads or flyers (7%), by word of mouth (3%), or by unknown means (1%). Participants were not chosen based upon higher risk factors for negative individual or couple functioning. Data on the division of labor, parenting stress, role overload and coparenting were collected when the couple’s infant was approximately 6 months old. Sexual satisfaction data were collected when the couple’s infant was approximately 12 months old. At the 12 month wave, all couples were still living together and 89% were married (M = 4.68, SD = 2.37 years). Ninety-three percent of fathers and 72% of mothers were employed full time. Fathers on average were 30.21 (SD = 5.35) years old, and mothers on average were 28.68 (SD = 4.69) years old. The majority of mothers (93%) and fathers (91%) were non-Hispanic White, with a median household income of $63,968 (SD = $31, 515). Average level of education at the beginning of the study was 14.86 years (SD = 2.01) for fathers, and 15.31 years (SD = 1.71) for mothers. Only those mothers and fathers who had complete data on all study variables were included in our analyses (N = 137 mothers, 132 fathers). We compared our analytic sample with participants who had missing data on the study measures or who dropped out of the study by 12 months on demographic variables utilizing a series of χ2 and t-tests. There were no significant differences on ethnicity/race, income, or intervention group status. However, fathers in our analytic sample were significantly older [t (134) = -2.17, p < .05], more educated [χ2 (8) = 23.50, p < .01] and more likely to be married [χ2 (1) = 16.85, p < .01]. Our analytic sample also had
11 mothers who were significantly more educated [χ2 (7) = 16.67, p < .05] and more likely to be married [χ2 (1) = 18.28, p < .001]. Procedure Informed consent was obtained, and couples were paid for their participation. Pretest data were collected via home interviews when mothers were pregnant (average weeks of gestation = 22.9, SD = 5.3). Mothers and fathers worked separately on questionnaires. Following the pretest, couples were randomly assigned to an intervention (N = 89) or to a no-treatment control condition (N = 80). There were no significant differences between intervention and control group couples on marital status, mental health, education, age, income, or relationship quality at baseline. Further data (see measures below) were collected 6 months after birth via mailed questionnaires and 12 months after birth via home interviews and paper and pencil questionnaires. Sexual satisfaction questions were only asked at 12 months after birth via paper and pencil questionnaires. Measures Sexual satisfaction. Sexual satisfaction was assessed with a measure that was developed for this study and administered at 12 months post-birth. The measure consisted of four items that included satisfaction with the frequency of (1) sex, (2) cuddling and touching, (3) romance, and (4) passion and excitement. Participants responded on a 9-point scale ranging from 1 to 9 with 1 = not enough; 5 = just right; and 9 = too much. We recoded and reverse-scored item responses to be the absolute deviation from the mid-point, with 0 representing the most dissatisfied (with either too little or too much) and 4 representing the most satisfied (just right). All items were analyzed separately in order to examine parents’ satisfaction with various domains of their
12 sexual relationship. These sub-domains were exploratory for this study as multi-domain sexual satisfaction measures are limited. To measure satisfaction with the overall sex life, participants responded on a 9-point scale to the item, “Regarding your sex life with your partner, would you say that you are overall” not at all satisfied (1) to very satisfied (9). Work hours. Work hours were assessed at 6 months post-birth and were calculated as a sum of 2 items: “How many hours per week do you spend at work?” and “How many hours per week do you spend on work-related activities at home?” Parenting stress. Parenting stress was measured at 6 months post-birth and assessed with 27 items from the 3rd Edition of the Parenting Stress Index – Short Form (Abidin, 1995). Six items from the Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction scale and 3 items from the Difficult Child scale because Abidin (1995) found that they had lower factor loadings than the rest of the items. Items measured parental distress (e.g., “I find myself giving up more of my life to meet my children’s needs than I ever expected.”), parent–child dysfunctional interaction (e.g., “My child smiles at me much less than I expected.”), and parents’ reports of a difficult child (e.g., “My child turned out a to be a lot more of a problem than I had expected.”) on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Responses were averaged and the total scale score was used in the analyses. Cronbach’s alphas (α) were .89 for mothers and .85 for fathers. Satisfaction with the division of household labor. We measured satisfaction with the division of housework and childcare at 6 months post-birth with Cowan and Cowan’s (1988) Who Does What Scales. Parents rated, on a 9-point scale ranging from 1 = I do it all to 9 = my partner does it all, how they feel the division is now and also how they would like it to be. They rated 13 items regarding housework (e.g., “Planning and preparing meals”) and 15 items
13 regarding the division of childcare (e.g., “Reading to our child”). A scale for satisfaction with housework (α = .72, fathers; α = .69, mothers) as well as a scale for satisfaction with childcare (α = .81, fathers; α = .88, mothers) were produced by taking the absolute difference of a parent’s ratings between how it is divided now with how he or she would like it to be. Higher scores on each of these scales represent more satisfaction with the division in that area. These scales were correlated for both mothers (r = .62, p < .001) and fathers (r = .50, p < .001); thus to reduce multicollinearity in our final analyses, these two scales were standardized and averaged to produce an overall satisfaction with the division of household labor score for each parent. Coparenting quality. Parents responded to the Coparenting Relationship Scale (Feinberg, Brown, & Kan, 2012) which includes 35 items assessing their parenting relationship with their partner at 6 months post-birth. The measure taps various dimensions of the relationship, such as agreement, endorsement, closeness, support and cooperation, division of labor, competition and undermining, and child exposure to interparental conflict. Items (e.g., “My partner asks my opinion on issues related to parenting”, “My partner does not trust my abilities as a parent”) were rated on a 6-point scale with responses ranging from 0 = Not true of us to 6 = Very true of us. Negative items were reverse scored, and all items were totaled and averaged to produce an overall coparenting score for each parent. Higher scores indicate more positive perceptions of coparenting (α = .93, fathers; α = .94, mothers). Role overload. Role overload was assessed at 6 months post-birth. Parents rated the degree to which they felt strain from their daily roles using the 13-item Role Overload scale (Reilly, 1982). Items (e.g., “I need more hours in the day to do all the things which are expected of me”) were rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree.
14 Items were reverse scored and summed, such that higher scores reflected more role overload. This measure was found to be highly reliable (α = .92, fathers; α = .92, mothers). Plan of Analysis Due to the dearth of literature on gender differences in the associations between the division of household/paid labor and sexual satisfaction, we decided to first examine bivariate correlations between the predictors and outcomes for mothers and fathers. Then, due to the sheer number of gender interactions required to test gender differences in each of our predictors in our models and the resulting multi-collinearity of these many interactions, the stark differences in the bivariate correlations for mothers and fathers (see Table 1), as well as biological differences in postpartum sexual function that can last for up to 12 months (Pacey, 2004), we elected to carry out analyses to evaluate our study hypotheses separated by gender. As the data come from a large scale family intervention, intervention status was also entered as a control variable in our regression models. Other controls (parent education, family income, marital status, and age) were considered, but were not significantly correlated with any of our outcomes and were therefore not included in the final analyses. Results In Table 1, we present results for our bivariate correlations of study variables, which show large differences by gender. For example, parenting stress and coparenting are associated with all variables for sub-domains of sexual satisfaction for mothers, but are not associated with any sub-domains of sexual satisfaction for fathers. In contrast, number of work hours are associated with overall sexual satisfaction for fathers but not mothers. Also, mothers’ and fathers’ overall sexual satisfaction and satisfaction with the frequency of sex, romance and
15 cuddling were correlated with each other, but not satisfaction with the amount of passion. These correlations between mothers and fathers on the sub-domains were small. In Table 2, we present the means, standard deviations and gender differences utilizing matched-pairs t-tests for all study variables. On average, mothers and fathers were generally dissatisfied with their overall sex life and all four sub-domains of sexual satisfaction at 12 months post-birth. Mothers were significantly more dissatisfied than fathers with the amount of romance (t (130) = -4.48, p < .001) and fathers were significantly more dissatisfied with the frequency of sex than mothers (t (130) = 2.70, p < .001). There were also significant differences within parents on satisfaction between the four sub-domains for mothers (F (3, 134) = 17.33, p < .001) and fathers (F (3, 129) = 10.76, p < .001). In general, mothers were more satisfied with the frequency of sex and cuddling than they were with the amount of romance and passion (p < .01). Fathers were less satisfied with the frequency of sex and amount of passion than they were with the frequency of cuddling and amount of romance (p < .01). In Table 3, we present results from our multivariate regression models for mothers. The results represent five separate linear regression models each examining a different sexual domain. All of the study variables (coparenting, role overload, parenting stress, and satisfaction with the division of household labor) were significantly associated with the various sexual satisfaction domains (see Table 1) and thus were all entered in the regression models for mothers. In addition to correlated study variables, we also added a quadratic effect for work hours due to our hypothesis (H3) regarding maternal work hours. H1: Mothers’ Satisfaction with Coparenting and the Division of Household Labor It was hypothesized that being more satisfied with overall coparenting and the division of household labor would predict more sexual satisfaction for mothers (H1). This hypothesis was
16 partially supported for mothers’ satisfaction with their overall sex life, amount of passion, and frequency of cuddling. Greater satisfaction with the division of household labor at 6 months post-birth predicted more satisfaction with sex life, amount of passion, and frequency of cuddling at 12 months post-birth although not frequency of sex or amount of romance (see Table 3). Surprisingly, in the presence of all of the other predictors in the models, mothers’ perceptions of coparenting quality at 6 months post-birth did not significantly predict any sub-domains of sexual satisfaction. H2: Mothers’ Parenting Stress and Role Overload It was hypothesized that greater parenting stress and role overload would predict lower sexual satisfaction for mothers (H2). Hypothesis 2 was partially supported with greater parenting stress at 6 months post-birth predicting lower satisfaction with the frequency of sex and with overall sex life at 12 months; greater role overload at 6 months also predicted less satisfaction with the amount of passion and the frequency of cuddling at 12 months, but surprisingly did not predict satisfaction with overall sex life or with the frequency of sex (see Table 3). H3: Mothers’ Paid Work Hours In line with both the enhancement and scarcity hypotheses, we hypothesized a curvilinear association between paid work hours and sexual satisfaction for mothers (H3). Hypothesis 3 was supported, with the linear and quadratic terms for mothers’ work hours both significantly predicting satisfaction with overall sex life, as well as satisfaction with the frequency of sex and cuddling; this was also the case for satisfaction with the amount of passion at the p = .06 level (see Table 3). Results suggest that more time spent on paid labor predicted more sexual satisfaction to a point, and then after a certain point additional hours of paid labor predicted less sexual satisfaction for mothers (see Figure 1). This inflection point occurred around 25-30 hours
17 for satisfaction with sex life, around 20-25 hours for satisfaction with frequency of sex, around 15-20 hours for satisfaction with frequency of cuddling, and around 25-35 hours for satisfaction with the amount of passion. Predictors of Fathers’ Sexual Satisfaction In Table 3, we present results from our multivariate analyses for fathers. We hypothesized that stressors such as higher parenting stress or role overload would predict lower sexual satisfaction for fathers (H4), but that perceptions of coparenting quality (H5), satisfaction with the division of labor (H6), and number of work hours (H7) would not predict sexual satisfaction for fathers. Only work hours, role overload and satisfaction with the division of labor were significantly predicted some dimensions of sexual satisfaction for fathers (see Table 1); thus, these were the only predictors used in the regression procedures for fathers. Surprisingly, parenting stress did not significantly predict any of the sexual satisfaction outcomes for fathers (H4). Feeling more role overload at 6 months post-birth was linked to less satisfaction with the frequency of sex, amount of passion, and frequency of cuddling at 12 months post-birth, providing partial support for Hypothesis 4 (that stress would impact fathers’ sexual satisfaction). Satisfaction with coparenting quality did not predict any of the sexual satisfaction outcomes for fathers, and in our regression models, the division of labor did not predict sexual satisfaction for the most part either, providing support for Hypotheses 5 and 6. However, satisfaction with the division of household labor at 6 months post-birth predicted more satisfaction with one subdomain at 12 months post-birth, romance. Finally, it was expected that fathers’ paid work hours would not predict sexual satisfaction (H7), and this was supported for the satisfaction with the sub-domains. However, in the regression models, spending more time on paid labor at 6 months
18 post-birth predicted lower satisfaction with overall sex life at 12 months post-birth for fathers, providing only partial support for Hypothesis 7. Discussion In general, our findings support a growing body of evidence that suggests first-time parents are generally dissatisfied with their sexual lives (Ahlborg et al., 2000; Ahlborg et al., 2005; Ahlborg, & Strandmark, 2006; Pacey, 2004). Our findings also suggest that stress in the new role of parent and the division of tasks that go along with that role are differentially predictive of sexual satisfaction for mothers and fathers. More work hours are also predictive of less overall sexual satisfaction for both mothers and fathers, although for mothers little to no work hours also predicts less overall sexual satisfaction. In general, differences in predictors of romance, passion, and cuddling for mothers and fathers were more varied. Satisfaction with the division of labor was important for both mothers’ and fathers’ sexual satisfaction—yet for different sub-domains. In support of our hypothesis, satisfaction with the division of household labor predicted more satisfaction with overall sex life and frequency of cuddling and amount of passion for mothers. These findings are consistent with research highlighting the particular importance of satisfaction with the division of labor for mothers (Dew & Wilcox, 2011; Milkie et al., 2002; Wilkee et al., 1998). However, greater satisfaction with the division of labor predicted fathers’ but not mothers’ satisfaction in the amount of romance. This result was surprising because the majority of research finds women to be more oriented to relationship interactions and romance than men (Leiblum, 2002). These findings for satisfaction with the amount of romance suggest future research should include an examination of what men and women consider as ‘romantic’ or what contributes to experienced romance. Further, these findings suggest the need for future researchers to develop measures for satisfaction with non-
19 intercourse behaviors and constructs (such as romance, cuddling, and passion), as our results suggest that sexual satisfaction is more nuanced and expands beyond satisfaction with sexual intercourse or sexual pleasure for first-time parents. Although the negotiation of the division of labor can be considered a part of the coparenting relationship, we also examined the quality of the broader coparenting relationship in addition to the division of labor. In partial support of our hypothesis, satisfaction with coparenting quality was associated with more sexual satisfaction in all domains for mothers in our bivariate correlations. Yet, coparenting did not predict any of the sexual satisfaction domains for mothers in the multivariate regression models. Fathers' perceptions of coparenting quality were also not associated with fathers’ sexual satisfaction, which was in line with our hypothesis as men’s sexual satisfaction is less linked to other aspects of the couple relationship than it is for women (Leiblum, 2002). For mothers, it may be that overall coparenting quality was not linked to sexual satisfaction in the multivariate regression models because a more proximal and specific aspect of coparenting, the division of labor, was included in the model. In addition, given the influence of coparenting quality on parental stress (Cowan & Cowan, 1992; Crnic & Low, 2002), it may be that parental stress partially mediates the influence of coparenting on sexual satisfaction. A more sophisticated longitudinal design would be able to explore such indirect paths in future research. In contrast to our hypothesis, parenting stress was not associated with any sexual satisfaction measure for fathers. However, in support of our hypothesis for mothers, parenting stress was associated with all sexual satisfaction domains for mothers in the bivariate correlations and in the presence of other predictors in our regression models, parenting stress continued to predict overall sexual satisfaction and satisfaction with the frequency of sex.
20 Parenting stress predicting later sexual satisfaction for mothers may be due to women’s view of child-rearing as an obligatory gender role, in contrast to men’s more optional participation in child-rearing (Coltrane, 2000). In a qualitative study of the sexual experience among mothers, common themes for lack of sexual interest were the feeling that ‘her body belonged to her children’, and ‘not having energy to devote to her partner after giving all day to her children’ (Trice-Black, 2010). Thus, the mothers in our sample who were stressed by the new role of parent may have felt less sexual desire or less sexually attractive, thus reducing sexual satisfaction. For fathers, however, parenting stress may have been unrelated to their sexual satisfaction because parenting may be less tied to the male gender role. Our results corroborate previous findings that suggest stress plays an important role in the sexual function of couples. In general, both mothers and fathers felt overloaded. However, mothers reported greater role overload than fathers. Although mothers worked fewer hours on paid labor on average than fathers, they likely spent more time on household and child-related duties. In our bivariate correlations, both mothers and fathers who reported more role overload reported less sexual satisfaction in all domains. In the multivariate regression models, more role overload predicted less satisfaction with the frequency of cuddling and amount of passion for mothers and fathers, and less satisfaction with the frequency of sex for fathers. Our role overload findings provide support for the scarcity hypothesis (Beilby & Beilby, 1989), indicating that time and energy dedicated across multiple areas of life leaves one feeling overwhelmed and may take time and energy away from the sexual relationship. Although both mothers’ and fathers’ satisfaction with the frequency of cuddling and amount of passion were predicted by role overload and both mothers’ and fathers’ work hours predicted satisfaction with the overall sex life, there are some gender differences that should be
21 noted. Greater role overload for fathers and greater parenting stress for mothers predicted less satisfaction with the frequency of sex. Overall, stress experienced inside and outside the couple was demonstrated more in mothers, with less satisfaction with coparenting quality and more feelings of role overload predicting less sexual satisfaction. Although there has been a shift toward fathers becoming more involved in housework and childcare, there continue to be more demands placed on mothers to balance multiple roles after the transition to parenthood. These greater demands would make mothers more easily distracted by childcare and housework and therefore mothers would need more energy to boost desire for sexual activity (Levine, 1992). These findings for mothers are similar to a recent daily diary study which found that the probability of having sexual intercourse following a relatively stressful day was higher for men than women (Ein-Dor & Hirschberger, 2012). In partial support of the enhancement hypothesis for mothers, work hours had a curvilinear association in four out of the five domains of sexual satisfaction for mothers suggesting that some time spent on paid labor is beneficial to the well-being of new mothers. However, the scarcity hypothesis was supported by the findings that more work hours predicted diminished sexual satisfaction for mothers. In our sample, although paid work hours was not predictive of satisfaction with most of the sexual satisfaction domains, we found one significant linear trend for fathers: higher work hours was associated with decreased satisfaction with their overall sex life, providing some support for the scarcity hypothesis for fathers. Of course, fathers generally were working outside the home for more hours than mothers, and thus it is possible that the scarcity hypothesis only applies across a certain range of work hours for both men and women. Overall, these findings allude to the importance of measuring the number of work hours
22 instead of dichotomizing working inside or outside the home as well as considering non-linear associations when considering gender differences in work and family. Limitations Although this study adds to the literature on sexual satisfaction among first-time parents in a number of ways, there are certain limitations. First, the sample was not ethnically diverse and therefore these findings may not generalize across different ethnicities. Second, a portion of the sample participated in a coparenting intervention, and although intervention status was controlled for in our models, some participants’ experiences may not be normative of all firsttime parents. Third, future research would benefit from exploring actual sexual behavior and frequency in addition to satisfaction. Fourth, our sample did not include same-sex couples or couples with an adopted child, and therefore these findings might not generalize across all firsttime parents. Although the current study examined mothers and fathers separately in the analyses due to power issues, multi-collinearity, and inherent biological differences in sexual function post-birth, the current study provides an initial exploration of the predictors of multiple sexual and romantic domains in first-time parents. We believe the current study will act as a springboard for future work to examine the complex interdependencies that may exist between mothers and fathers within couples in terms of sexual satisfaction. Contributions Despite these limitations, we highlight three key implications of these findings. First, the sexual aspect of the relationship in first-time parents is an integral part of the entire relationship. When sexual intimacy decreases there is a risk that the couple detaches emotionally and physically from each other (Foux, 2008) and the risk of infidelity increases (Cowan & Cowan, 1992). Accordingly, it is important to address sexuality in couple-based interventions. Our
23 findings could be used in coparenting and premarital interventions in order to educate and inform new parents about sexual expectancies and realities of first-time parenthood as well as important gender differences to consider when facing the challenge of maintaining sexual intimacy after the transition to parenthood. For example, it would be beneficial to caution new parents that they may be dissatisfied with their sexual life, yet ensure them this is a normative experience and encourage them to communicate with their partner about their sexual feelings or concerns. Second, our results—although exploratory—suggest that different parenthood factors (e.g., coparenting, parenting stress, role overload, and satisfaction with the division of household labor) predict different sexual satisfaction domains. These results suggest that sex, cuddling, passion and romance are likely distinct aspects of the sexual relationship. Future research should explore whether non-intercourse sexual behaviors play a protective role for couples in maintaining intimacy in the absence of sexual intercourse. Third, stress and sexual satisfaction are associated for first-time parents. However, sources and perceptions of stress vary between genders. It is important to consider the sources of stress for new parents (e.g. work hours, division of labor, parenting stress, and role overload) and how these relate to couple sexual satisfaction. Conclusion It is apparent to us that sexuality is deeply understudied in first-time parents, offering an opportunity for future investigation that uses a more complex analytic approach. Our findings indicate that sexuality is an integral part of other relationship dynamics in first-time parents, and therefore should be considered when examining difficulties faced in first-time parents. Therefore, couple-based prevention programs should address gender differences in sexual functioning and satisfaction among first-time parents by offering possible solutions for
24 communicating and understanding those differences so that both genders in the dyad experience satisfaction with their sex life during the pivotal time for couples after the transition to parenthood.
25 References Abidin, R. R., & Brunner, J. F. (1995). Development of a parenting alliance inventory. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 24, 31–40. Ade-Ridder, L. (1990). Sexuality and marital quality among older married couples. In: Brubaker TH, ed. Family Relationships in Later Life. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 48-67. Ahlborg, T., Dahlöf, L. G., & Hallberg, L. R. M. (2005). Quality of the intimate and sexual relationship in first‐time parents six months after delivery. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 167-174. Ahlborg, T., Strandmark, M., & Dahlöf, L.G. (2000). First-time parents’ sexual relationships. Scandinavian Journal of Sexology, 3, 127-139. Ahlborg, T., & Strandmark, M. (2006). Factors influencing the quality of intimate relationships six months after delivery: First-time parents' own views and coping strategies. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 27, 163-172. Bancroft, J. (1989). Human sexuality and its problems. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. Bancroft J., Loftus J., & Long J.S. (2003). Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 193-208. Barrett, G., Pendry, E., Peacock, J., Victor, C., Thakar, R. & Manyonda, I. (2000). Women’s sexual health after childbirth. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 107, 186-195. Barstad, A. (2014). Equality Is Bliss? Relationship Quality and the Gender Division of Household Labor. Journal of Family Issues, 0192513X14522246. Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347-374.
26 Beilby, W. T., & Bielby, D. D. (1989). Family ties: Balancing commitments to work and family in dual-earner couples. American Sociological Review, 54, 776-789. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191228. Bodenmann, G., Ledermann, T., & Bradbury, T. N. (2007). Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Personal Relationships, 14, 551-569. Carpenter L.M., Nathanson C.A., & Kim Y.J. (2009). Physical women, emotional men: Gender and sexual satisfaction in midlife. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 87-107. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208-1233. Cowan, C.P., & Cowan, P.A. (1988). Who does what when partners become parents: Implications for men, women, and marriage. Marriage and Family Review, 12, 105-131. Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (1992). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Crnic K., & Low, C. (2002). Everyday stresses and parenting. In M. Bornstein (ed.), Handbook of parenting: Practical issues in parenting (2nd edition), vol. 5. (pp. 243-267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Davison S. L., Bell R.J., LaChina M., Holden S. L., & Davis S. R. (2009). The relationship between self-reported sexual satisfaction and general well-being in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 2690-2697. De Judicibus, M. A. & McCabe, M. P. (2002). Psychological factors and the sexuality of pregnant and postpartum women. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 94-103.
27 Dew, J., & Wilcox, W. B. (2011). If Momma ain't happy: Explaining declines in marital satisfaction among new mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 1-12. Dixon, M., Booth, N., & Powell, R. (2000). Sex and relationships following childbirth: A first report from general practice of 131 couples. British Journal of General Practice, 50, 223224. Ein-Dor, T., & Hirschberger, G. (2012). Sexual healing: Daily diary evidence that sex relieves stress for men and women in satisfying relationships. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 29, 126-139. Elliott, S., & Umberson, D. (2008). The performance of desire: Gender and sexual negotiation in long‐term marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 391-406. Feinberg, M. E. (2003). The internal structure and ecological context of coparenting: A framework for research and intervention. Parenting: Science and Practice, 3, 95-131. Feinberg, M. E., Brown, L. D., & Kan, M. L. (2012). A multi-domain self-report measure of coparenting. Parenting, 12, 1-21. Feinberg, M. E., & Kan, M. L. (2008). Establishing family foundations: Intervention effects on coparenting, parent/infant wellbeing, and parent-child relations. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 253–263. Feinberg, M. E., Kan, M. L., & Goslin, M. C. (2009). Enhancing coparenting, parenting, and child self-regulation: Effects of Family Foundations 1 year after birth. Prevention Science, 10, 276-285. Foux, R. (2008). Sex education in pregnancy: Does it exist? A literature review. Sexual Relationship Therapy, 23, 271–7.
28 Gager, C. T., & Yabiku, S. T. (2010). Who has the time? The relationship between household labor time and sexual frequency. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 135-163. Galovan, A. M., Holmes, E. K., Schramm, D. G., & Lee, T. R. (2013). Father involvement, father-child relationship quality, and satisfaction with family work: Actor and partner influences on marital quality. Journal of Family Issues. doi:10.1177/0192513X13479948 Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1987). Gender differences in love and intimacy: The fantasy vs. the reality. Journal of Social Work and Human Sexuality, 5, 12-26. Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York, NY: Viking. Hyde, J. S., DeLamater, J. D., & Hewitt, E. C. (1998). Sexuality and the dual-earner couple: Multiple roles and sexual functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 354. Impett, E. A., Muise, A., & Peragine, D. (2013). Sexuality in the context of relationships. In L. Diamond, & D. Tolman (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 269-316). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Kornrich, S., Brines, J., & Leupp, K. (2013). Egalitarianism, housework, and sexual frequency in marriage. American Sociological Review, 78, 26-50. Lavee, Y., Sharlin, S., & Katz, R. (1996). The effect of parenting stress on marital quality: An integrated mother-father model. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 114-135. Lawrence, E., Rothman, A. D., Cobb, R. J., Rothman, M. T., & Bradbury, T. N. (2008). Marital satisfaction across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 41-50. Leiblum, S.R. (2002). Reconsidering gender differences in sexual desire: An update. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 17, 57 – 68.
29 Levine, S. B. (1992). Sexual life: A clinician's guide, critical issues in psychiatry. New York, NY: Plenum Press. Litzinger, S. & Gordon, K. (2005). Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31, 409-424. doi:10.1080/00926230591006719 Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 39, 567-578. McDaniel, B. T., & Teti, D. M. (2012). Coparenting during the first three months after birth: The role of infant sleep quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 886-895. McHale, J., Khazan, I., Erera, P., Rotman, T., DeCourcey, W., & McConnell, M. (2002). Coparenting in diverse family systems. Handbook of Parenting, 3, 75-107. Milkie, M.A., Bianchi, S.M., Mattingley, M.J., & Robinson, J.P. (2002). Gendered division of childrearing: Ideals, realities and the relationship to parental well-being. Sex Roles, 47, 21–38. Morokoff, P. J., & Gillilland, R. (1993). Stress, sexual functioning, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 43-53. Offer, S., & Schneider, B. (2011). Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns multitasking and well-being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. American Sociological Review, 76, 809-833. O’Sullivan, L. F., Cheng, M. M., Harris, K. M., & Brooks‐Gunn, J. (2007). I wanna hold your hand: The progression of social, romantic and sexual events in adolescent relationships. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 100-107.
30 Pacey, S. (2004). Couples and the first baby: Responding to new parents' sexual and relationship problems. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 19, 223-246. Reilly, M.D. (1982). Working wives and convenience consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 407-418. Tang, C. Y., & Curran, M. A. (2013). Marital commitment and perceptions of fairness in household chores. Journal of Family Issues, 34, 1598-1622. Trice-Black, S. (2010). Perceptions of women’s sexuality within the context of motherhood. The Family Journal, 18, 154-162. Wilkee, J. R., Ferre, M. M., & Strother-Radcliff, K. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 577-594. Witting, K., Santtila, P., Alanko, K., Harlaar, N., Jern, P., Johansson, A., Von Der Pahlen, B. & Sandnabba, N. K. (2008). Female sexual function and its associations with number of children, pregnancy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 34, 89-106. Woolett, A. & Parr, M. (1997). Psychological tasks for women and men in the postpartum. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 15, 159-183. Yeh, H., Lorenz, F. O., Wickrama, K. A. S., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (2006). Relationships among sexual satisfaction, marital quality, and marital instability at midlife. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 339. Young, M., Wallace, J. E., & Polachek, A. J. (2013). Gender Differences in Perceived Domestic Task Equity A Study of Professionals. Journal of Family Issues, 0192513X13508403.
31
Table 1. Correlation of Study Variables Separated by Gender Variables 1. Work hours
1
2
-.05
-.06
3
4
.02
-.03
5 .26**
6
7
8
9
-.15
-.07
-.02
-.10
10 -.26**
2. Division of household labor
.04
.27**
.20*
-.29**
-.06
.03
.14
.18*
.14
.04
3. Coparenting
.06
.48**
.49**
-.61**
-.43**
.12
.08
.09
.14
.15
-.12
-.47**
.29**
.47**
-.03
-.12
-.14
-.11
-.11
-.18*
-.33**
.45**
.24**
-.21*
-.20*
-.12
-.22*
-.22*
4. Parenting stress
-.04
5. Role overload
.28**
6. Sex frequency satisfaction
.00
.11
.27**
-.27**
-.19*
.32**
.65**
.53**
.68**
.59**
7. Cuddling frequency satisfaction
.02
.29**
.34**
-.21*
-.33**
.36**
.18*
.72**
.58**
.42**
8. Romance frequency satisfaction
.09
.21*
.30**
-.18*
-.22*
.33**
.61**
.23**
.61**
.32**
9. Passion frequency satisfaction
-.02
.27**
.34**
-.24**
-.33**
.40**
.62**
.64**
.13
.49**
10. Sex life satisfaction
-.02
.20*
.26**
-.32**
-.21*
.59**
.36**
.32**
.47**
.52**
Note. Fathers’ correlations above the diagonal, mothers’ correlations below the diagonal, correlations between mothers and fathers are bolded and presented along the diagonal. † p < .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01. Mothers (N = 137), Fathers (N = 132).
32
Table 2. Means, standard deviations, and gender differences in study variables. Mothers Fathers Variable M SD M SD Work hours 27.32 19.41 46.92 10.68 Division of labor satisfaction .04 .86 .07 .80 Coparenting quality 4.91 .82 5.08 .67 Parenting stress 1.93 .44 1.90 .45 Role overload 44.22 10.25 41.10 10.02 Sex frequency satisfaction 2.55 1.23 2.23 1.21 Cuddling frequency satisfaction 2.38 1.31 2.58 1.15 Romance frequency satisfaction 1.82 1.27 2.45 1.17 Passion frequency satisfaction 2.12 1.23 2.13 1.24 Sex life satisfaction 6.27 1.99 5.64 2.12 Note. † p < .10, * p < .05. ** p < .01. Mothers (N = 137), Fathers (N = 132).
t -9.90** .45 -2.25* .33 2.88** 2.70** -1.38 -4.48** .01 3.08**
33 Table 3. Standardized regression coefficients summary for models predicting mothers and fathers sexual satisfaction. Satisfaction with frequency
Mothers: Work hours Quadratic work hours Coparenting quality Parenting stress Division of household labor Role overload 2
Total R
F Fathers: Work hours Division of household labor Role overload Total R2 F
Cuddling
Satisfaction with Sex Life
--
.43
.48*
.56*
--
-.41
-.43*
-.51*
.03
.11
.00
.11
-.11
-.22*
-.06
-.10
-.02
.05
.13
.21*
.18*
.20*
-.11
-.15
-.28*
-.31*
.07
Sex
Romance
.57* -.60**
Passion
.09*
.09**
.16***
.21***
3.09*
3.42**
6.40***
7.21***
-.09 .00 -.19* .06 † 2.01 †
.06 .17* -.11 .08* 3.00*
-.03 .11 -.20* .08* 2.75*
-.00 .12 -.18* .06† 2.18†
-.28**
.14*** 5.18***
-.18* .07 -.17† .11** 3.71**
Note. † p < .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, mothers (N = 137), fathers (N = 132), controlled for intervention status.
34
Figure 1. Mothers’ predicted sexual satisfaction values according to how many hours they work (n = 137 mothers). Please note that the relationships between the linear and quadratic effects of work hours and satisfaction with sex life, frequency of sex, and frequency of cuddling were significant (p < .05); however, the linear and quadratic work hours effects were marginally non-significant (p < .06) for satisfaction with frequency of passion. Work hours was not predictive of mothers’ satisfaction with the frequency of romance. The satisfaction with sex life scale ranges from 1 (not at all satisfied) to 9 (very satisfied) and the satisfaction with frequency scales range from 0 (not enough or too much) to 5 (just right).
